EPTalso charles dance is such a good actor, the expressions on his face in the episode lool...
[TV] HBO Game of Thrones - Page 1064
| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
All book discussion in this thread is now allowed. | ||
|
EleanorRIgby
Canada3923 Posts
also charles dance is such a good actor, the expressions on his face in the episode lool... | ||
|
Grettin
42416 Posts
On April 15 2014 03:16 Steveling wrote: Reposting for greater good. + Show Spoiler + Poll: Joffrey died a painful death and I am SCARED FOR TYRION >.< (34) HOPING FOR CERSEI TO FOLLOW (16) HAPPY AS A CLAM (11) DOING THE SLOW CLAP (8) 69 total votes Your vote: Joffrey died a painful death and I am (Vote): HAPPY AS A CLAM Too bad you can't vote more than once. I'd vote all of those | ||
|
JonnyBNoHo
United States6277 Posts
On April 15 2014 02:51 nukem1 wrote: why would Lady Olenna have the poison in the necklace the fool gave Sansa? there's no need for the overcomplicated plan. why can't she just have it on her, it's not like anyone is gonna frisk her. plus she is sitting at a different table. from what i see: left table Tyrells (family of the bride), middle table Joffrey and Margaery (the married couple) and the table on the right the Lannisters. Just thinking about it: a) she wants the poison in her possession for as short a time as possible (takes from Sansa right before using) to limit the odds of someone seeing her with it. b) whenever the poison isn't in her hand it can't be traced back to her house (in Sansa's possession). c) Sansa and the fool are natural decoys (both hate the king). d) the poison could have been sourced from a foreign country, or at least a place foreign to Highgarden (e.g. not derived from a local plant). if so, having a 3rd party contact (fool and Sansa) to receive the poison would have made it harder to trace back to the Tyrells. e) Sansa (Tyrion's wife) is now missing making Tyrion look more guilty (fall guy). f) if Sansa is caught they'll find her necklace missing a stone (fall guy is even more guilty). If the main goal is not getting caught (and I think it was) than it is a pretty good plan! | ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
| ||
|
udgnim
United States8024 Posts
if Cersei still gets married to Loras, does Loras become King? I definitely do not believe poison cake killed Joffrey | ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
| ||
|
MagmaPunch
Bulgaria536 Posts
On April 15 2014 03:38 udgnim wrote: seems Olenna played a significant part in killing Joffrey if Cersei still gets married to Loras, does Loras become King? Officially no, since the previous king, Robert, has direct heir to the throne - Tomen and Myrcella, although they are not really his children. | ||
|
ZasZ.
United States2911 Posts
On April 15 2014 03:34 crms wrote: is this 'bird poisoning' from the dead birds a legit theory or is it some coy book spoiler shit people drop around? I hope that's not the case because that would be really fucking lame. If it is from the books perhaps it works because of more story telling around the birds/scene in question but the way it was presented in the show, it would be pretty silly. I hope it's just everyone being nuts. I can't think of any type of bacteria or infection you could get from eating a dead bird, or in this case cake that has come in contact with dead bird, that would kill you in 45 seconds. That's straight up poison. | ||
|
Kal_rA
United States2925 Posts
| ||
|
JonnyBNoHo
United States6277 Posts
On April 15 2014 03:34 crms wrote: is this 'bird poisoning' from the dead birds a legit theory or is it some coy book spoiler shit people drop around? I hope that's not the case because that would be really fucking lame. If it is from the books perhaps it works because of more story telling around the birds/scene in question but the way it was presented in the show, it would be pretty silly. I hope it's just everyone being nuts. I can't imagine it being bird poisoning... insta-kill from some bird blood? If bird blood was that deadly you wouldn't put them in pie... | ||
|
nukem1
345 Posts
On April 15 2014 03:27 JonnyBNoHo wrote: Just thinking about it: a) she wants the poison in her possession for as short a time as possible (takes from Sansa right before using) to limit the odds of someone seeing her with it. b) whenever the poison isn't in her hand it can't be traced back to her house (in Sansa's possession). c) Sansa and the fool are natural decoys (both hate the king). d) the poison could have been sourced from a foreign country, or at least a place foreign to Highgarden (e.g. not derived from a local plant). if so, having a 3rd party contact (fool and Sansa) to receive the poison would have made it harder to trace back to the Tyrells. e) Sansa (Tyrion's wife) is now missing making Tyrion look more guilty (fall guy). f) if Sansa is caught they'll find her necklace missing a stone (fall guy is even more guilty). If the main goal is not getting caught (and I think it was) than it is a pretty good plan! what if Sansa had just not worn that particular necklace at the party? | ||
|
Mafe
Germany5966 Posts
| ||
|
nukem1
345 Posts
On April 15 2014 03:34 crms wrote: is this 'bird poisoning' from the dead birds a legit theory or is it some coy book spoiler shit people drop around? I hope that's not the case because that would be really fucking lame. If it is from the books perhaps it works because of more story telling around the birds/scene in question but the way it was presented in the show, it would be pretty silly. I hope it's just everyone being nuts. are you refering to what I wrote earlier? I was just saying it would be gross to eat cake that had live or dead birds in it not that the birds were poisoned or something. also I have not read the books | ||
|
-Archangel-
Croatia7457 Posts
On April 15 2014 03:44 nukem1 wrote: what if Sansa had just not worn that particular necklace at the party? What if the boar didn't kill Robert afterall? We will never know, but you can guess smart people playing Game of Thrones don't give up after one failure. | ||
|
Scorch
Austria3371 Posts
I never expected an event of this magnitude so early in the season. If this was only episode 2, i wonder what the season's climax in episode 9 will be. | ||
|
Sejanus
Lithuania550 Posts
is this 'bird poisoning' from the dead birds a legit theory or is it some coy book spoiler shit people drop around? I hope that's not the case because that would be really fucking lame. If it is from the books perhaps it works because of more story telling around the birds/scene in question but the way it was presented in the show, it would be pretty silly. I hope it's just everyone being nuts. If that was not a rhetorical question, PM me for an answer. If you really want to know  | ||
|
MagmaPunch
Bulgaria536 Posts
On April 15 2014 03:49 Mafe wrote: So if Tommen dies now his successor would be Myrcella - or Stannis? (after them, Stannis' daughter and then anarchy?) Either way the Lannisters would be in big trouble. They better watch him day and night and taste have all his food tasted now. Actually, it could be argued whether Myrcella or Tommen have the bigger rights to the throne. Tommen is the son but Myrcella is the older child, so it really depends. After them, it really gets chaotic and basically the party with the biggest stick will take the throne. If the children are not a factor anymore, both Stannis and the Queen-Regent Cersey can make claims to the throne. | ||
|
JonnyBNoHo
United States6277 Posts
On April 15 2014 03:44 nukem1 wrote: what if Sansa had just not worn that particular necklace at the party? True, maybe Sansa's necklace is just there to throw off suspicion. | ||
|
jinorazi
Korea (South)4948 Posts
| ||
|
Raneth
England527 Posts
| ||
| ||
