[TV] Suits - Page 41
Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
NOTE: This thread contains spoilers. Do not read the thread if you are not caught up. If a new episode has already officially aired, you are allowed to discuss what happened without posting in spoilers. | ||
mierin
United States4943 Posts
| ||
Psyclon
Bulgaria2443 Posts
Can't wait for next week! | ||
FXOUnstable
Australia159 Posts
| ||
![]()
Nyovne
Netherlands19135 Posts
![]() | ||
![]()
Kiante
Australia7069 Posts
| ||
mcmartini
Australia1972 Posts
On February 01 2013 21:13 Kiante wrote: its obviously donna. if you dont agree you're a bad person This is the most true comment in this thread. | ||
iDope
Saudi Arabia223 Posts
On February 01 2013 21:13 Kiante wrote: its obviously donna. if you dont agree you're a bad person That beauty, that rack... those brains... Who else can even come close ![]() | ||
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On February 01 2013 21:13 Kiante wrote: its obviously donna. if you dont agree you're a bad person Winner winner chicken dinner. Hardman is like a zombie, keeps coming back alive. | ||
Stallion
New Zealand67 Posts
![]() | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44422 Posts
On February 01 2013 16:16 feanor1 wrote: It was alright, but the acting seemed a little forced to me this episode in particular. Agreed. Like when Jessica and Harvey met in the middle of the hall and had that "below the belt, at the knees" conversation. On February 01 2013 21:13 Kiante wrote: its obviously donna. if you dont agree you're a bad person Oh yes. The way she walked while she was talking to Katrina at the beginning of the episode (the cookie scene). Donna knows how to carry herself. Oh god. | ||
Jochan
Poland1730 Posts
On February 01 2013 21:13 Kiante wrote: its obviously donna. if you dont agree you're a bad person Ok then riddle me this, red hair on new girls head ? :D | ||
Psyclon
Bulgaria2443 Posts
On February 01 2013 21:13 Kiante wrote: its obviously donna. if you dont agree you're a bad person Sustained! ![]() | ||
Acrofales
Spain18021 Posts
| ||
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
| ||
Cel.erity
United States4890 Posts
On February 02 2013 04:52 wei2coolman wrote: Robert Zaine was such a good character, hopefully we get to see more him later on. Was he? Meh, I was underwhelmed, seemed like the classic daddy's-girl-requires-approval plot, and of course they make up in the end. I was much more intrigued with the Louis-Katrina dynamic in this episode, and Mike actually acting like a real man for once. | ||
coverpunch
United States2093 Posts
Rachel is the only one Hardman doesn't have a white-hot boner to destroy. | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44422 Posts
On February 02 2013 05:05 coverpunch wrote: Did Bunk win? With the preview of the next episode, seems like he should have the last laugh. And it's a very cruel laugh compared to the relatively juvenile antics within Pearson Hardman. Bonus: + Show Spoiler + Rachel is the only one Hardman doesn't have a white-hot boner to destroy. Is your spoiler implying that + Show Spoiler + Hardman is + Show Spoiler + gay | ||
Cel.erity
United States4890 Posts
On February 02 2013 05:10 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Is your spoiler implying that + Show Spoiler + Hardman is + Show Spoiler + gay Is your spoiler impying that... + Show Spoiler + Jessica is really a man? | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44422 Posts
On February 02 2013 05:11 Cel.erity wrote: Is your spoiler impying that... + Show Spoiler + Jessica is really a man? Daniel Hardman is a + Show Spoiler + man. What does Jessica Pearson have to do with this? + Show Spoiler + If Hardman doesn't have a white-hot boner to destroy Rachel, then I question his sexual orientation ![]() | ||
Cel.erity
United States4890 Posts
On February 02 2013 05:15 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Daniel Hardman is a + Show Spoiler + man. What does Jessica Pearson have to do with this? + Show Spoiler + If Hardman doesn't have a white-hot boner to destroy Rachel, then I question his sexual orientation ![]() + Show Spoiler + But nobody can deny that he wants to destroy Jessica. Why are we talking in spoiler tags again? | ||
| ||