EPT[LR] The International II - 2012 - Page 525
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments |
|
konadora
Singapore66364 Posts
| ||
|
Diks
Belgium1880 Posts
| ||
|
Burns
United States2300 Posts
| ||
|
Rebs
Pakistan10726 Posts
On September 02 2012 02:57 Shikyo wrote: Pajkatt is their carry player. For some reason they make Misery play the carry even though pajkatt is way way way better as a carry (and my favorite european player) well seems like they want him playing invoker alot of the time if they can. So then the hard carries tend to go to Misery. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On September 02 2012 02:58 BlitzerSC wrote: ... Do you realize that Pajkatt is the only one who can play mid lane in clg ? Misery is their carry player and he sucks. That's irrelevant, Pajkatt is a way better hardcarry than Misery. | ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34504 Posts
On September 02 2012 02:56 dtz wrote: Yup pretty much. Actually he was shit-tier. Then icefrog made it so that you don't have to level up lucent for your eclipse to do damage ( it's always lvl4 lucents) Then he was tweaked a little into more or less what we have now.( His aura has been changed recently to fixed damage though). I don't remember Icefrog doing that first change you mention, but I definitely remember him making it so eclipse damage depended on your nuke's level. | ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
On September 02 2012 02:58 Diks wrote: Wow, since when Bruno is called STATMAN instead of WICKED ? Since after the last game I think | ||
|
Kahzaar
Sweden897 Posts
On September 02 2012 02:58 Itsmedudeman wrote: It's because pajkatt is also their only invoker player. Should have put Pajkatt on Luna and picked Storm for Misery | ||
|
parazice
Thailand5517 Posts
| ||
|
BlitzerSC
Italy8800 Posts
On September 02 2012 02:58 Shikyo wrote: That's irrelevant, Pajkatt is a way better hardcarry than Misery. It's not irrelevant wtf... Even when Misery got storm he went with a babysit in lane. Truth is, pajkatt play solomid because he is the only one who can play that role. Misery is the carry player. Period. | ||
|
marchex
93 Posts
| ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
| ||
|
konadora
Singapore66364 Posts
yeah lol | ||
|
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34504 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Thats not that specific anymore  | ||
|
konadora
Singapore66364 Posts
On September 02 2012 02:59 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Why don't people run AA more against Morph? Doesn't AA's ult stop Morph's HP from increasing when he strength morphs? Combined with someone who can hold Morph in place, wouldn't it make it a lot easier to take him down? nope, in dota 2 morphling's hp increases now so that it remains the same % hp | ||
|
Poorlilrich
Australia262 Posts
| ||
|
Garnet
Vietnam9050 Posts
| ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
Them having no one else who can mid is irrelevant imo. The original statement was "CLG needs another carry player, misery is bad". Pajkatt is that carry player they needed. They don't need another carry player, they need another mid. Get it? | ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
| ||
| ||
