Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion - Page 558
| Forum Index > Dota 2 General |
|
Spicy_Curry
United States10573 Posts
| ||
|
goody153
44283 Posts
On February 21 2015 01:42 BluemoonSC wrote: 4/5 were long term, they kicked sing after ti4. after he played really well. dunno, i don't think fata was better, but again..we do know the synergy there. sing was not being drafted his best heroes (source: sing) as far as we've seen he isn't particularly great outside ember/meepo/mirana/alchemist/qop i remember like 2 pro players saying that sing isn't really amazing(iceiceice and the other guy is probably rtz but i can't be sure) mid and his heropool for the current meta is outdated .. so is he like EGM ? you know a niche player but extremely good at what his doing(4 pos for alliance ) ? | ||
|
BluemoonSC
SoCal8933 Posts
On February 21 2015 01:48 Comeh wrote: Sing's performance at TI4 was pretty overrated tbh. Sing is overrated. I think he is overrated too, however there were several games where I remember saying "what would they do if sing wasn't playing right now" On February 21 2015 02:27 goody153 wrote: as far as we've seen he isn't particularly great outside ember/meepo/mirana/alchemist/qop i remember like 2 pro players saying that sing isn't really amazing(iceiceice and the other guy is probably rtz but i can't be sure) mid and his heropool for the current meta is outdated .. so is he like EGM ? you know a niche player but extremely good at what his doing(4 pos for alliance ) ? yeah his hero pool is really shallow sadly. he played brew quite well at ti4. | ||
|
goody153
44283 Posts
On February 21 2015 02:27 BluemoonSC wrote: yeah his hero pool is really shallow sadly. he played brew quite well at ti4. oh crap i almost forgot about his brew also didn't he play invoker during the invoker meta ? envy was probably the best invoker(TI4 but it could possibly be the other guy who can play invoker and the other cores that time needs to play other heroes) of the team before fata arrived | ||
|
BluemoonSC
SoCal8933 Posts
| ||
|
andyrau
13015 Posts
| ||
|
goody153
44283 Posts
On February 21 2015 01:48 Comeh wrote: Sing's performance at TI4 was pretty overrated tbh. Sing is overrated. TI4 C9 made sing look good .. especially during the ember/meepo games cause he had shit ton of farm that time | ||
|
andyrau
13015 Posts
dude compared his gpm/xpm to players on teams that placed 11-14th lmfao and i guess navi who placed what, 9th? | ||
|
BluemoonSC
SoCal8933 Posts
| ||
|
Shaella
United States14828 Posts
look, that post is basically a well disguised shitpost of 'singsing is underrated', ofc it got responses. | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
On February 21 2015 02:49 andyrau wrote: well i looked at the reddit thread to see what the sing fuss was about dude compared his gpm/xpm to players on teams that placed 11-14th lmfao and i guess navi who placed what, 9th? And C9, EG, DK, etc. Comparing stats is still bullshit analysis, but he mentioned players from all kinds of teams. | ||
|
BluemoonSC
SoCal8933 Posts
besides, statistics never lie according to paralleluniverse so i think that sing probably should have gone on to win ti4. | ||
|
Shaella
United States14828 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Shaella
United States14828 Posts
| ||
|
andyrau
13015 Posts
On February 21 2015 02:58 SKC wrote: And C9, EG, DK, etc. Comparing stats is still bullshit analysis, but he mentioned players from all kinds of teams. he compared sing to ee tho and we all know why that gpm/xpm was skewed he also compared the sing's farming 1/2 mid to the offlaner on nb, wow he played better than xiao8 that's a big chinese name!! the only legit stats were mushi and burning's but dk played an all around different style | ||
|
BluemoonSC
SoCal8933 Posts
![]() i hope this helps. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
E: dammit bluemoon | ||
|
Shaella
United States14828 Posts
| ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
| ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://www.thepoke.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/piechart.jpeg)