EPTOn April 24 2014 01:26 Sn0_Man wrote:
5.5k #thetrench
I wonder how legit SnY split AM is.
5.5k #thetrench
I wonder how legit SnY split AM is.
Is 5.5 really that bad?
General Discussion - Page 5207
| Forum Index > Dota 2 General |
IRC chatter should remain in IRC - http://webchat.quakenet.org/?channels=tl.dota2 Posts that relate to topics with their own thread, such as in News, Tournaments or Strategy should go in those threads. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
Is 5.5 really that bad? | ||
|
Targe
United Kingdom14103 Posts
depends on your aspirations i guess | ||
|
Erasme
Bahamas15899 Posts
people are terrible at every levels | ||
|
teddyoojo
Germany22369 Posts
| ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
| ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
|
Comeh
United States18919 Posts
On April 24 2014 02:34 Torte de Lini wrote: These terrible ambiguous answers are setting a good standard hohohoho Welcome to GD - where the discussion is meaningless and the posts don't matter. | ||
|
teddyoojo
Germany22369 Posts
On April 24 2014 02:34 Torte de Lini wrote: These terrible ambiguous answers are setting a good standard hohohoho ok so everything below atleast 4,5k simply isnt very good at dota then u have really good players below 5,5k then u have goddamn atrocious terrorblade phoenix and ember players at 7k u really cant just say whos good and not based off of mmr | ||
|
Erasme
Bahamas15899 Posts
On April 24 2014 02:29 Torte de Lini wrote: Can't tell if being trolled because #200 in the leaderboard is 5.6 terrible compared to the ideal player ofc | ||
|
pedrlz
Brazil5234 Posts
On April 24 2014 02:51 teddyoojo wrote: ok so everything below atleast 4,5k simply isnt very good at dota then u have really good players below 5,5k then u have goddamn atrocious terrorblade phoenix and ember players at 7k u really cant just say whos good and not based off of mmr agreed 2,5k mmr player here but i'm good | ||
|
teddyoojo
Germany22369 Posts
ur the exception of course | ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
he's from brazil, it checks out. | ||
|
Jaeger
United States1150 Posts
On April 23 2014 23:20 goody153 wrote: don't buy quelling for naga .. it's not that hard to last hit with naga .. she has decent damage and her attack animation is ok you better just use the extra cash to rush bottle or to obtain faster ring of basilius You generally get quelling on naga after bottle and before boots (assuming mid). | ||
|
Jinxed
United States6450 Posts
| ||
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
| ||
|
Comeh
United States18919 Posts
Just curious what you guys think. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
Awful is relative but I'm definitely awful. | ||
|
kollin
United Kingdom8380 Posts
On April 24 2014 03:59 Comeh wrote: When do you guys think going aquila vs bracer vs drum vs naked radiance for naga (mid) is best? On sidelane (not ideal), mana boots instead of bottle? Just curious what you guys think. Meracle usually goes treads drums on the sidelane for just about enough mana regen, so getting those in a timely fashion should work. | ||
|
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On April 24 2014 03:59 Comeh wrote: When do you guys think going aquila vs bracer vs drum vs naked radiance for naga (mid) is best? On sidelane (not ideal), mana boots instead of bottle? Just curious what you guys think. All of these are varying levels of greed, and the decision is entirely based on how greedy/selfish you can be for your team to not lose the game. Mana regen items on sidelane for example depends how much you think it will piss off your mid that you're hogging the courier to bottle-crow when he also wants to bottle-crow. | ||
| ||
