|
|
On July 15 2013 05:11 kollin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2013 05:10 GreenGringo wrote:On July 15 2013 05:03 Grettin wrote: Mature people or not, we've discussed the same topic many times before (Here as well) and we really don't need to discuss it anymore. A lot of condescension, but guess what? I already made a thread before that thread. It generated two pages of posts. I evaluated the answers and felt that most of them were immature and superficial, and many of them failed to grasp the point of my post and distinguish between skill and knowledge. 'I'm too goddamn clever for everyone here.' But that's not what I said.
I think you'll find the condescension has come from other people.
P.S -- I've been warned not to detail. So I'll take that advice. I'm only going to respond if someone has something of interest to say. Any bullshit strawmen and posts twisting my words, etc., and I simply won't respond to them.
User was temp banned for this post.
|
On July 15 2013 05:14 GreenGringo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2013 05:11 kollin wrote:On July 15 2013 05:10 GreenGringo wrote:On July 15 2013 05:03 Grettin wrote: Mature people or not, we've discussed the same topic many times before (Here as well) and we really don't need to discuss it anymore. A lot of condescension, but guess what? I already made a thread before that thread. It generated two pages of posts. I evaluated the answers and felt that most of them were immature and superficial, and many of them failed to grasp the point of my post and distinguish between skill and knowledge. 'I'm too goddamn clever for everyone here.' But that's not what I said. I think you'll find the condescension has come from other people. Take it to website feedback.
|
On July 15 2013 05:14 GreenGringo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2013 05:11 kollin wrote:On July 15 2013 05:10 GreenGringo wrote:On July 15 2013 05:03 Grettin wrote: Mature people or not, we've discussed the same topic many times before (Here as well) and we really don't need to discuss it anymore. A lot of condescension, but guess what? I already made a thread before that thread. It generated two pages of posts. I evaluated the answers and felt that most of them were immature and superficial, and many of them failed to grasp the point of my post and distinguish between skill and knowledge. 'I'm too goddamn clever for everyone here.' But that's not what I said. I think you'll find the condescension has come from other people.
Just the use of the word condescension is quite condescending
|
On July 15 2013 05:11 kollin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2013 05:10 GreenGringo wrote:On July 15 2013 05:03 Grettin wrote: Mature people or not, we've discussed the same topic many times before (Here as well) and we really don't need to discuss it anymore. A lot of condescension, but guess what? I already made a thread before that thread. It generated two pages of posts. I evaluated the answers and felt that most of them were immature and superficial, and many of them failed to grasp the point of my post and distinguish between skill and knowledge. 'I'm too goddamn clever for everyone here.' kollin, come on, you're better than this. He should be ignored and his further posts removed, not allowed to clutter the topic.
|
On July 15 2013 05:01 GreenGringo wrote:No, I'm not some extremist libertarian or anything of the sort .It's simply true that knee-jerk censorship is often a sign of being afraid of the truth. If you don't understand that, then you aren't familiar with the history of religion and many other things, and I suggest you inform yourself. Show nested quote +On July 15 2013 04:55 kollin wrote: Also it's a fucking inflammatory topic that is pointless to discuss, because it's entirely subjective. Oh, it's "fucking" inflammatory, is it? You mean like using the word "fucking" for no reason? It was inflammatory only if you assume that people lack the maturity to disagree without flaming. Maybe in your case that's true, but you shouldn't generalize to other people.
OMG dude your hilarious
<3
see you when u get unbanned
like its not even like you typed your original argument right.
i suppose i should quote but you said lol has less skill because lol has more skill - in so many words.
hah and i look up and you were banned. I <3 the world
|
Yay he is banned. Now we can get back on topic.
...Wait. What's on topic now that treant is good enough for competitive?
|
My Dota2 crashes on load Even after validated Cache integrity
Working now
|
Ever since Alliance moved to their teamhouse kellys twitter has informed me of exactly what they eat every day.I shall now copy the Alliance diet and become awsome at dota!
|
On July 15 2013 05:25 Intact wrote: Ever since Alliance moved to their teamhouse kellys twitter has informed me of exactly what they eat every day.I shall now copy the Alliance diet and become awsome at dota!
solid plan
|
On July 15 2013 05:20 MrTortoise wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2013 05:01 GreenGringo wrote:On July 15 2013 04:54 kollin wrote: I THOUGHT THIS WAS 'MURICA No, I'm not some extremist libertarian or anything of the sort .It's simply true that knee-jerk censorship is often a sign of being afraid of the truth. If you don't understand that, then you aren't familiar with the history of religion and many other things, and I suggest you inform yourself. On July 15 2013 04:55 kollin wrote: Also it's a fucking inflammatory topic that is pointless to discuss, because it's entirely subjective. Oh, it's "fucking" inflammatory, is it? You mean like using the word "fucking" for no reason? It was inflammatory only if you assume that people lack the maturity to disagree without flaming. Maybe in your case that's true, but you shouldn't generalize to other people. OMG dude your hilarious <3 see you when u get unbanned like its not even like you typed your original argument right. i suppose i should quote but you said lol has less skill because lol has more skill - in so many words. hah and i look up and you were banned. I <3 the world
Seriously dude. Credit where credit is due. What we love is TL
|
On July 15 2013 05:25 Intact wrote: Ever since Alliance moved to their teamhouse kellys twitter has informed me of exactly what they eat every day.I shall now copy the Alliance diet and become awsome at dota! link pls
|
On July 15 2013 05:56 cilinder007 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2013 05:25 Intact wrote: Ever since Alliance moved to their teamhouse kellys twitter has informed me of exactly what they eat every day.I shall now copy the Alliance diet and become awsome at dota! link pls
twitter kellymilkies
|
On July 15 2013 05:21 LAN-f34r wrote: Yay he is banned. Now we can get back on topic.
...Wait. What's on topic now that treant is good enough for competitive? How to make treant a viable hero without living armor
|
On July 15 2013 06:32 Nevuk wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2013 05:21 LAN-f34r wrote: Yay he is banned. Now we can get back on topic.
...Wait. What's on topic now that treant is good enough for competitive? How to make treant a viable hero without living armor We need some special responses whenever treant casts living armor on timbersaw, as he seems to be pick sometimes in the last days. Or we could ofc just discuss what the best build for carry treant is.
|
Czech Republic18921 Posts
Random idea: Level 4 Necrobook, increased stats, cannot be dominated/midas'd/infested.
What do you think? I feel like the item is completely countered by the new Helm of the Dominator and this should help it be better. It might be too strong, the stat increase would probably have to be very minor.
|
United States47024 Posts
If Necrobook had another upgrade level, Arc Warden would be too OP for Icefrog to add to DotA 2.
|
wait... i only have 1 thing to say about lol having skill shots and dota 2 not having them...
since when does dota 2 not have skill shots... Pudge, Mirana, lesh, lina, timber, windrunner, and many many more.
Unless i am unclear as to what a skill shot is, his argument is faulty at best...
|
On July 15 2013 06:42 tpmraven wrote: wait... i only have 1 thing to say about lol having skill shots and dota 2 not having them...
since when does dota 2 not have skill shots... Pudge, Mirana, lesh, lina, timber, windrunner, and many many more.
Unless i am unclear as to what a skill shot is, his argument is faulty at best...
+micro
whats up with long queues? 7-8min for me usally never longer than 3-4min
|
Czech Republic18921 Posts
On July 15 2013 06:42 TheYango wrote: If Necrobook had another upgrade level, Arc Warden would be too OP for Icefrog to add to DotA 2. Arc Warden makes every active item OP, afaik. I don't know why you would care about his balance, he will be a completely different hero by the time he enters captains mode.
|
On July 15 2013 06:46 deichkind wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2013 06:42 tpmraven wrote: wait... i only have 1 thing to say about lol having skill shots and dota 2 not having them...
since when does dota 2 not have skill shots... Pudge, Mirana, lesh, lina, timber, windrunner, and many many more.
Unless i am unclear as to what a skill shot is, his argument is faulty at best... +micro whats up with long queues? 7-8min for me usally never longer than 3-4min
wait... you mean in LoL they have shots whose direction you can change mid flight?
|
|
|
|
|
|