• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:32
CEST 00:32
KST 07:32
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202561RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The StarCraft 2 GOAT - An in-depth analysis #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time EWC 2025 details: $700k total prize; GSL, DH Dallas confirmed Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 706 users

POLL: Macro Booster Community Feedback - Page 9

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 Next All
IceBerrY
Profile Joined February 2012
Germany220 Posts
September 16 2015 21:24 GMT
#161
Having a blast since the removal. My friend who is a noob like myself, is loving the change as well.
I have the bad feeling we are ending with Hots 2.0, since there is not much time left and a lot is beeing reverted.
crazedrat
Profile Joined July 2015
272 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-16 22:01:44
September 16 2015 21:35 GMT
#162
On September 17 2015 06:14 WrathSCII wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2015 05:59 crazedrat wrote:
On September 17 2015 05:51 -_- wrote:
On September 17 2015 05:40 LaLuSh wrote:
Fully manual but nerfed/weakened.

Didn't vote.


I agree.

Looking at this poll, it's weird how much teamliquid.net has changed.

If this poll were worded more objectively, with the other options added, the spread in results would change.


Just like your poll? LOL

We are trying to focus on the concept here, if we want to add a specific detail for every concept then sure as hell everyone will vote for different things and the result will be more of a split.


I understand, you're trying to get what you want conveyed to Blizzard: No Macro Boosters. Here is the problem. You diminish and disinclude most other options. The current patch is not represented properly. The diminished HOTS macro is not included. The new mechanics Blizzard has mentioned are not included. You accurately represent two choices: manual HOTS macro and No Macro boosters. The 3rd option is misrepresented; I didn't choose it myself; I did not feel represented by it.

Say what you want about my poll: I took what Blizzard stated they were considering adding in the community update and put it into a poll. The backlash from this community didn't surprise me - most people here are constantly whining at Blizzard like a teen over his absentee father. That reaction is predictable to me, I see it all the time already, and I place no value on it.

This poll is its own poll. This is, from my understanding, intended to give a voice for no macro mechanics. Problem is it's not even a valid test of that due to limiting alternative viewpoints.
tegla
Profile Joined September 2015
Croatia1 Post
September 16 2015 21:46 GMT
#163
Fully automated or removed for me.
The game needs new players, and the way to achieve that isn't balancing for korean pros.

I'm not saying it should be a casual game, as it never was, but removing macro mechanics would ease the skill floor needed to get into the game, and it would be more fun in general as you can focus on other aspects of the game.

Rizlu imam, licnu karu nemam
AgamemnonSC2
Profile Joined October 2012
Canada254 Posts
September 16 2015 22:33 GMT
#164
Getting a lot of requests to post this on Reddit lately. I don't use Reddit much personally, but if we hit 1,000 votes, I will post it on Reddit. So keep the votes up, and I will let you all know when this goes on Reddit. We will need your upvotes there too.
Co-Founder of SC2 Mistakes
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-17 00:16:42
September 16 2015 22:59 GMT
#165
On September 17 2015 05:30 wjat wrote:
Guys if they took out macro boosters from the game, what are the tweak you think Blizzard should do to balance lotv?


mule remove
queen 1 larva auto
chrono remove or 5-10%

terran: lower several structure costs, also probably costs of a few units slightly (e.g. tank less minerals)
protoss: lower hp/weaken some units especially gateway, faster build time for some high tier units
zerg: some adjustments depending on what is getting changed at t/p

continue from there

something like that
crazedrat
Profile Joined July 2015
272 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-16 23:17:49
September 16 2015 23:05 GMT
#166
The no macro boosters was fun but I think there's all kinds of problems with that design that will pop up which people are not anticipating. The game has been so balanced around the mechanics that at this point it's ingrained into the fabric of the game. Let's say you get the the no macro mechanics and play with it for a while; yes it's fun and new at first, but that feeling wears off.
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-16 23:58:01
September 16 2015 23:40 GMT
#167
On September 17 2015 08:05 crazedrat wrote:
The no macro boosters was fun but I think there's all kinds of problems with that design that will pop up which people are not anticipating. The game has been so balanced around the mechanics that at this point it's ingrained into the fabric of the game. Let's say you get the the no macro mechanics and play with it for a while; yes it's fun and new at first, but that feeling wears off.


Gameplay and metagame with macro boosters and limited strategy has worn off after 5 years. The pressure of the ability to rush and macro up to 200/200 that quickly is too high in order to allow versatile strategical choices by players.

Imo this lowers the skill ceiling of the game as in most cases there is not much to choose from and playing passive macro into 3-4 base push is the obvious one, paired with the business as usual harassment options like bio/prism drops, orcacle, helions, reapers, ling runby or muta harrassment. Or you go full commitment all-in.

Without the macro boosters I am sure semi commitment play is getting alot more viable so that in a situation e.g. where one player has 3OC and the other 3 hatch, zerg is not fully all-in when delaying his 4th as the damage he can do to t is noticeable and can even out things, depending on both players performance in the battle. With macro boosters in place this would end up in a do or die situation for zerg as little dmg to eco of terran is getting overshadowed by 3+ OC mules afterwards and he couldn't catch up anymore so that he has to fully commit on all-in and kill the terran or write gg himself. Without the pressure of the macro boosters alot more styles of play get viable (e.g. bly aggressive Z play) that require all players to widen their overall skill ceiling while just the requirement of apm for injects is being lowered by a bit. Especially the TvP meta can only benefit from a slowed down macro pace as well. The lower availability of larva for zerg will also be good for the game as it requires better dealing with harassment and prevent spamming mass drones after an attack or in a general phase of inactivity. Zergs cannot hoard larva while building drones before an opponents attack anymore and build units only in last second, if the attack comes late z has big advantage, if attack comes 10 sec too early z dies and boredom/frustration amongst players and audience is being spread as all games go that way.

How can a better metagame wear off?

YyapSsap
Profile Joined September 2010
New Zealand1511 Posts
September 16 2015 23:42 GMT
#168
On September 16 2015 02:38 hitpoint wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2015 14:10 DooMDash wrote:
On September 15 2015 13:50 hitpoint wrote:
On September 15 2015 13:23 DooMDash wrote:
On September 15 2015 13:09 WrathSCII wrote:
On September 15 2015 12:03 DooMDash wrote:
Can't believe the results I'm seeing.


What did you expect?

I figured TL of all places would enjoy the macro mechanics. This poll scares me.


Macro is awesome. Macro mechanics are the best part of the game. And by that I mean building supply, units, and structures. Macro boosters are cancer and make the game too volatile. That said, anything is better than automation.


I always felt it was consistent. Can you explain why you feel this way? I always felt it was just a quirk of the race, like anything else unique to that race. I like that they are different, the same way I appreciate the other differences.


So many ugly things about this game stem from these macro boosters. Cheeses, allins, and imbalances. Not to mention they only speed up the game, which just makes it harder to scout dangerous things. Pros have been saying since the start of WoL that the game is ridiculously fast compared to BW. More specifically though, here are some things I hate about macro boosters.

Terran losing huge amounts of SCVs and it barely even matters = bad.

Terran sacrificing all their SCVs late game to have a large army is something I hate with a burning passion.

Terran pulling the boys but it's okay because they have orbitals = volatility.

Protoss always being ahead on upgrades = volatility.

Protoss gimmicks become ultra strong with chrono = volatility.

Zerg losing their whole army and then remaxing a different comp = volatility. Yes, it may be fun and entertaining but does it really make the game better? I'm not sure.

Zerg pooling larvae in zvz and suddenly wins the game with 30 speedlings when he sees the other guy hatching drones = volatility.

A defending Zerg losing two queens to harass, and then having their crippled production snowball into 2k banked minerals and a slow painful death = volatility.

Not to mention, mule is not a macro mechanic. Macro is building units, and structures. "Macro mechanic" is a phrase that get's thrown around, but for terran it really is just an economy "booster". Terran get's free income spikes at no cost, not even attention. There is no cooldown on mules, or penalty for missing them as long as your energy doesn't cap. Terran's real "macro mechanic" that can be compared with chrono and inject is having to build addons. So the mule, as a "macro mechanic," only makes the game worse in every regard. If terran is a bad race without mules, then that's something to be addressed through balance patches. Maybe then they can buff the siege tank finally.

Also, I think zerg would actually get much harder to play if inject was removed and we could only build from larvae that hatcheries naturally spawned. Instead of just using 20 larvae at once we would need to hit production cycles, essentially, to keep from being capped. Which is WAY harder than injecting every once in a while, and then building all of our units at once. Except that queens are no longer a source of vulnerability, which also adds stability to the game.


+1. Couldn't have said it better!
AgamemnonSC2
Profile Joined October 2012
Canada254 Posts
September 16 2015 23:53 GMT
#169
On September 17 2015 08:05 crazedrat wrote:
The no macro boosters was fun but I think there's all kinds of problems with that design that will pop up which people are not anticipating. The game has been so balanced around the mechanics that at this point it's ingrained into the fabric of the game. Let's say you get the the no macro mechanics and play with it for a while; yes it's fun and new at first, but that feeling wears off.


Absolutely false.

Macro Boosters didn't even exist until WOL. If you ever played SC1, than you would know that "no macro mechanics" is not new at all.

And try telling the people who still love, stream, and watch BW that the "feeling wears off".

I lol'd
Co-Founder of SC2 Mistakes
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-17 00:25:45
September 17 2015 00:05 GMT
#170
I loled and was scared a bit when I read/watched posts/streams of pros/semi pros/wannabe pros/former pros that all agitate(d) for keeping the macro boosters and gave proof of how few of an idea they in fact have about the generals of SC. They are probably captives of the small world of metagame they train every day and cannot imagine it to be changed and break out of it. Alot of ppl forgot why SC2 was and still is being denied by many and several others mostly argue for their own race's benefit. I highly doubt that pro-gamers on average make better game designers than others. Their strength probably is to care on the very details once everything is settled tho.


The reason why SC:BW was different and in alot of aspects better than SC2 was not only the lack of unit ai, MBS and the limited group selection but as well the slower game pace with alot of options to choose from and be creative with as timings didn't appear and go as fast as they do in SC2. There were ways to come back into the game and players and audience experienced this on a daily basis in BW. Macro boosters are the main reason that prevent this to happen in SC2.


Lets do it Blizzard, now or never!
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-17 00:24:11
September 17 2015 00:23 GMT
#171
I highly doubt that pro-gamers on average make better game designers than others


I'd expect someone who has played the game for 1000 hours in the last year to be able to make better game design choices than someone who has played for 20-50 hours. Probably the majority of the sc2 community is viewers and hypercasuals; i don't even bother to play if i'm playing less than like 20 games a week
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-17 00:40:27
September 17 2015 00:28 GMT
#172
On September 17 2015 09:23 Cyro wrote:
Show nested quote +
I highly doubt that pro-gamers on average make better game designers than others


I'd expect someone who has played the game for 1000 hours in the last year to be able to make better game design choices than someone who has played for 20-50 hours. Probably the majority of the sc2 community is viewers and hypercasuals; i don't even bother to play if i'm playing less than like 20 games a week


Let me ask you one thing: Do you believe that the creators of Starcraft Broodwar were or became progamers of their own game before/after/while they created and tweaked it when it became as successful as it was?

Why do you think a soccer team is being coached and managed by people that are not actively playing the game? Why is not the headplayer of the team making the strategy and deciding about signups but the coach and management? He should know best as he is the best player in your view of things.

etc.


Everything requires different ressources and to put it simple it doesn't require you to hit your injects perfectly in order to design a good game.
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
September 17 2015 00:42 GMT
#173
You don't have to be a progamer to design a game, it's just better to take suggestions from people who played your game for 200 hours on the recent patch, compared to those who played for 2 hours on it
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-17 01:42:24
September 17 2015 00:47 GMT
#174
On September 17 2015 09:42 Cyro wrote:
You don't have to be a progamer to design a game, it's just better to take suggestions from people who played your game for 200 hours on the recent patch, compared to those who played for 2 hours on it


For sure it is good to take suggestions from anyone who has anything worthy to say on whatever basis.

In this very SC2 issue tho, most former BW pros disliked and denied SC2 in the beginning when I remember things right. What is wrong about listening to their advice now after so many got bored/quitted/never started and still the same problems as in the beginning happen to be in the game? Such as too fast game pace, too much unit massing, too quick hitting 200/200.

I could argue that those who do (still) play SC2 now are only those that managed to deal with all their dislikes that they had in the beginning or never had them or managed to create benefits for themselves with e.g. learning the macro booster gameplay no matter if they liked it or not in the beginning. Why should only them have a voice and not the others who turned their back to the game and therefore you can't read them here?


Why do you think the vast majority of people here is against the macro boosters while most pros that voiced their opinion initially argued for them (I assume alot have turned around already)? They put alot of efforts into training the current meta. Changing those fundamental things is a shuffle and noone really knows where he is exactly at after. Ppl want to conserve their status. Is this a good basis of decisionmaking for the sake of creating a better game?

Just like the soccer player on the field who couldn't see what else is wrong when he complains about another player in his team that made a mistake, pros in SC2 here on this issue failed to see and evaluate the big impact of metagame changes which by far outweigh the little less mechanical requirements of zerg due to autoinjects. Why didn't I see stuchio and co. (pros, nn to name them) debate about the pros and cons of a changing metagame due to the removal of macro boosters but only saw them poking on starcraft's need of mechanical requirement (which is not even changed at all) and zerg is boring without manual injects?

Seriously the answer is easy: Because most of them don't know much about things that are outside of the current metagame. They don't train things daily that are out of meta, how should they have anything in advance over others? How would they have time and ressources to care on things that are outside of the current metagame (which is totally not important when being a pro) while training and focussing solely on the current metagame and having to do so in order to get the best of their kind? Other people who don't put as much ressources on the current metagame have had ressources left to to think through alternatives instead. It requires a bit of distance, the same distance that a coach has to the soccer field.

If you deny all that, give me a better reasoning for the case that almost everyone that voiced their opinion solely focused on the mechanical requirements of SC2 instead of seeing and debating the huge potential of a changing metagame, especially in reference to moving closer towards SC:BW.
AgamemnonSC2
Profile Joined October 2012
Canada254 Posts
September 17 2015 01:54 GMT
#175
This poll excludes no one.
Co-Founder of SC2 Mistakes
crazedrat
Profile Joined July 2015
272 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-17 03:41:45
September 17 2015 03:07 GMT
#176
On September 17 2015 08:40 LSN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2015 08:05 crazedrat wrote:
The no macro boosters was fun but I think there's all kinds of problems with that design that will pop up which people are not anticipating. The game has been so balanced around the mechanics that at this point it's ingrained into the fabric of the game. Let's say you get the the no macro mechanics and play with it for a while; yes it's fun and new at first, but that feeling wears off.


Gameplay and metagame with macro boosters and limited strategy has worn off after 5 years. The pressure of the ability to rush and macro up to 200/200 that quickly is too high in order to allow versatile strategical choices by players.

Imo this lowers the skill ceiling of the game as in most cases there is not much to choose from and playing passive macro into 3-4 base push is the obvious one, paired with the business as usual harassment options like bio/prism drops, orcacle, helions, reapers, ling runby or muta harrassment. Or you go full commitment all-in.

Without the macro boosters I am sure semi commitment play is getting alot more viable so that in a situation e.g. where one player has 3OC and the other 3 hatch, zerg is not fully all-in when delaying his 4th as the damage he can do to t is noticeable and can even out things, depending on both players performance in the battle. With macro boosters in place this would end up in a do or die situation for zerg as little dmg to eco of terran is getting overshadowed by 3+ OC mules afterwards and he couldn't catch up anymore so that he has to fully commit on all-in and kill the terran or write gg himself. Without the pressure of the macro boosters alot more styles of play get viable (e.g. bly aggressive Z play) that require all players to widen their overall skill ceiling while just the requirement of apm for injects is being lowered by a bit. Especially the TvP meta can only benefit from a slowed down macro pace as well. The lower availability of larva for zerg will also be good for the game as it requires better dealing with harassment and prevent spamming mass drones after an attack or in a general phase of inactivity. Zergs cannot hoard larva while building drones before an opponents attack anymore and build units only in last second, if the attack comes late z has big advantage, if attack comes 10 sec too early z dies and boredom/frustration amongst players and audience is being spread as all games go that way.

How can a better metagame wear off?


If you want to talk about a better metagame, during the no macro boosters patch every game was a macro opening. triple hatch, 3CC, nexus 1st... Early aggression from Z and P was so weak it wasnt worth doing. Every game same opening. As far as damaging the enemy econ, there are other ways to make harassment stronger. Right now the MULE change has made early aggression against T stronger. If they adjust the pylon change correctly it will strengthen harassment against Protoss. Zerg already has enough larvae either way. It's the difference between building a macro hatch or not. Zerg dominated so hard in that patch. You will never eliminate Zergs ability to quickly replinish drones.
The patch was fun, Zerg dominated alot, alot of Terrans quit the game and Blizzard changed their minds. That's how it went.
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-17 03:48:48
September 17 2015 03:48 GMT
#177
Right now the MULE change has made early aggression against T stronger


I've had a lot more trouble against terran in the early game (well, between ~3 and 6 minutes) post-mule. Losing 5 workers doesn't cripple them any more, they just drop the mules in the main and defend them well, keeping an economy lead
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Wrath
Profile Blog Joined July 2014
3174 Posts
September 17 2015 06:57 GMT
#178
Finally, a 1000 thousand!
crazedrat
Profile Joined July 2015
272 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-17 07:18:46
September 17 2015 07:14 GMT
#179
On September 17 2015 12:48 Cyro wrote:
Show nested quote +
Right now the MULE change has made early aggression against T stronger


I've had a lot more trouble against terran in the early game (well, between ~3 and 6 minutes) post-mule. Losing 5 workers doesn't cripple them any more, they just drop the mules in the main and defend them well, keeping an economy lead

Compared to hots mechanics, and im speaking as zerg, if you force a lift with roach ravager ling aggression or you make it into the main base you are further ahead now since the orbital is not massing energy during the time its lifted. So when 3 orbitals land there is no MULE spamming; and there are also vulnerable MULES during the whole harassment. Also they end up mining out the main very quickly if you end up containing them afterwards. Overall if you have a semi successful bust against Terran you are in much better shape now. Of course that is about to change when they introduce their new mechanics update (if they go through with it).
Mahiriens
Profile Joined September 2015
Finland12 Posts
September 17 2015 08:50 GMT
#180
On September 17 2015 08:53 AgamemnonSC2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2015 08:05 crazedrat wrote:
The no macro boosters was fun but I think there's all kinds of problems with that design that will pop up which people are not anticipating. The game has been so balanced around the mechanics that at this point it's ingrained into the fabric of the game. Let's say you get the the no macro mechanics and play with it for a while; yes it's fun and new at first, but that feeling wears off.


Absolutely false.

Macro Boosters didn't even exist until WOL. If you ever played SC1, than you would know that "no macro mechanics" is not new at all.

And try telling the people who still love, stream, and watch BW that the "feeling wears off".

I lol'd



How is that absolutely false when the whole balance of the game was built on macro boosters for 5 years? Sc2 without MM is still a vastly different game than sc1, so if you're trying to brag about playing broodwar atleast try to be intelligent about it...
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 11h 28m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 192
StarCraft: Brood War
Larva 483
Dota 2
monkeys_forever386
capcasts170
League of Legends
Grubby4575
Counter-Strike
Fnx 2379
Stewie2K659
taco 421
flusha354
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King118
AZ_Axe84
Liquid`Ken31
Other Games
tarik_tv17683
summit1g10224
gofns8107
FrodaN1833
C9.Mang0175
ViBE64
Sick45
PPMD28
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 61
• musti20045 48
• poizon28 47
• davetesta19
• RyuSc2 14
• Adnapsc2 6
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 34
• FirePhoenix5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22488
League of Legends
• Doublelift3914
Other Games
• imaqtpie1141
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
11h 28m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
15h 28m
CSO Cup
17h 28m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
19h 28m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 10h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 15h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 19h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.