|
|
On October 21 2014 04:52 OtherWorld wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:49 Die4Ever wrote:
mostly everyone has a little bit of spam, but it's no big deal How did you define spamposts finally? Did you take less than 200 or 100 characters? Wow Templar with the 223 spamposts record
if( date-lastdate < 65000 && prevuser==user && isoc==false && chars<100 && numpics==0) { n.spam++; return; }
so within the same minute according to TL, the post was the same user as the previous post, it's not OC, less than 100 characters, and no pictures
|
United Kingdom31935 Posts
Is anyone else here hyped for Arkham Knight?
|
On October 21 2014 04:55 Die4Ever wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:52 OtherWorld wrote:On October 21 2014 04:49 Die4Ever wrote:
mostly everyone has a little bit of spam, but it's no big deal How did you define spamposts finally? Did you take less than 200 or 100 characters? Wow Templar with the 223 spamposts record if( date-lastdate < 65000 && prevuser==user && isoc==false && chars<100 && numpics==0) { n.spam++; return; } so within the same minute according to TL, the post was the same user as the previous post, it's not OC, less than 100 characters, and no pictures
I think that my average amount of characters per post is decently below 100. I wonder how the passionboard4ever would look if the spam was gutted.
|
On October 21 2014 04:52 ZigguratOfUr wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:49 Die4Ever wrote:
mostly everyone has a little bit of spam, but it's no big deal You need to fix the regional totals. So did you end up going for 100 characters as the cutoff?
not sure I want to show how much more spam NA has than the Unimportant Parts of the World....
|
your Country52798 Posts
What is defined as a "spam" post here?
Edit: ah didn't refresh
|
On October 21 2014 04:55 Die4Ever wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:52 OtherWorld wrote:On October 21 2014 04:49 Die4Ever wrote:
mostly everyone has a little bit of spam, but it's no big deal How did you define spamposts finally? Did you take less than 200 or 100 characters? Wow Templar with the 223 spamposts record if( date-lastdate < 65000 && prevuser==user && isoc==false && chars<100 && numpics==0) { n.spam++; return; } so within the same minute according to TL, the post was the same user as the previous post, it's not OC, less than 100 characters, and no pictures
That's pretty nice, although surprinsingly doesn't change the rankings much.
|
On October 21 2014 04:52 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:52 Cricketer12 wrote:
temp and i spam more than everyone else combined T_T Sup I think that you've met your maker, number 5. ^_^
not a chance, Im still going up, choo choo son, except now, i will hopefully be a lot less spammy ^_^
|
On October 21 2014 04:56 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:55 Die4Ever wrote:On October 21 2014 04:52 OtherWorld wrote:On October 21 2014 04:49 Die4Ever wrote:
mostly everyone has a little bit of spam, but it's no big deal How did you define spamposts finally? Did you take less than 200 or 100 characters? Wow Templar with the 223 spamposts record if( date-lastdate < 65000 && prevuser==user && isoc==false && chars<100 && numpics==0) { n.spam++; return; } so within the same minute according to TL, the post was the same user as the previous post, it's not OC, less than 100 characters, and no pictures I think that my average amount of characters per post is decently below 100. I wonder how the passionboard4ever would look if the spam was gutted.
yea well that's what all the other rules are for, look at how many spam posts you have, only 36 out of 1155, I think you're fine lol, you don't make successive posts that often apparently, and yea I chose 100 so that it would count an average length post as spam if it was successively the same user and those other rules
|
On October 21 2014 04:57 Die4Ever wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:52 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On October 21 2014 04:49 Die4Ever wrote:
mostly everyone has a little bit of spam, but it's no big deal You need to fix the regional totals. So did you end up going for 100 characters as the cutoff? not sure I want to show how much more spam NA has than the Unimportant Parts of the World....
Please do so, we EU want something to make up for our ridiculous page amount d:
|
On October 21 2014 04:57 OtherWorld wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:55 Die4Ever wrote:On October 21 2014 04:52 OtherWorld wrote:On October 21 2014 04:49 Die4Ever wrote:
mostly everyone has a little bit of spam, but it's no big deal How did you define spamposts finally? Did you take less than 200 or 100 characters? Wow Templar with the 223 spamposts record if( date-lastdate < 65000 && prevuser==user && isoc==false && chars<100 && numpics==0) { n.spam++; return; } so within the same minute according to TL, the post was the same user as the previous post, it's not OC, less than 100 characters, and no pictures That's pretty nice, although surprinsingly doesn't change the rankings much.
Well that is a really lenient definition of spam, so it doesn't surprise me much. Glad to see I'm at zero spam.
|
your Country52798 Posts
On October 21 2014 04:58 Die4Ever wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:56 IntoTheheart wrote:On October 21 2014 04:55 Die4Ever wrote:On October 21 2014 04:52 OtherWorld wrote:On October 21 2014 04:49 Die4Ever wrote:
mostly everyone has a little bit of spam, but it's no big deal How did you define spamposts finally? Did you take less than 200 or 100 characters? Wow Templar with the 223 spamposts record if( date-lastdate < 65000 && prevuser==user && isoc==false && chars<100 && numpics==0) { n.spam++; return; } so within the same minute according to TL, the post was the same user as the previous post, it's not OC, less than 100 characters, and no pictures I think that my average amount of characters per post is decently below 100. I wonder how the passionboard4ever would look if the spam was gutted. yea well that's what all the other rules are for, look at how many spam posts you have, only 36 out of 1155, I think you're fine lol, you don't make successive posts that often apparently, and yea I chose 100 so that it would count an average length post as spam if it was successively the same user and those other rules
I tend to make double posts by responding to two people in quick succession. I don't spam that much ;_;
|
On October 21 2014 04:58 Cricketer12 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:52 IntoTheheart wrote:On October 21 2014 04:52 Cricketer12 wrote:
temp and i spam more than everyone else combined T_T Sup I think that you've met your maker, number 5. ^_^ not a chance, Im still going up, choo choo son, except now, i will hopefully be a lot less spammy ^_^
I'm still reasonably amazed that you're fifth. You basically shot up in the rankings. Or am I just misremembering?
|
On October 21 2014 04:50 Fusilero wrote:
I liked assault on arkham but that was more suicide squad (And really more deadshot) than batman
I didn't like it because deadshot was too much of a gary sue (out crazy joker? srs ?). Also how could you have some B-list villain "kill off" joker? smh.
|
On October 21 2014 04:58 Die4Ever wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:56 IntoTheheart wrote:On October 21 2014 04:55 Die4Ever wrote:On October 21 2014 04:52 OtherWorld wrote:On October 21 2014 04:49 Die4Ever wrote:
mostly everyone has a little bit of spam, but it's no big deal How did you define spamposts finally? Did you take less than 200 or 100 characters? Wow Templar with the 223 spamposts record if( date-lastdate < 65000 && prevuser==user && isoc==false && chars<100 && numpics==0) { n.spam++; return; } so within the same minute according to TL, the post was the same user as the previous post, it's not OC, less than 100 characters, and no pictures I think that my average amount of characters per post is decently below 100. I wonder how the passionboard4ever would look if the spam was gutted. yea well that's what all the other rules are for, look at how many spam posts you have, only 36 out of 1155, I think you're fine lol, you don't make successive posts that often apparently, and yea I chose 100 so that it would count an average length post as spam if it was successively the same user and those other rules
I think that this is fair, but the prob is no one else except temp really posts so im just gonna have to sit here ^_^ but if the first post is less than 100 characters with no picture but there is no sucessive posts, the first is still counted correct?
|
United Kingdom31935 Posts
On October 21 2014 05:00 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:58 Cricketer12 wrote:On October 21 2014 04:52 IntoTheheart wrote:On October 21 2014 04:52 Cricketer12 wrote:
temp and i spam more than everyone else combined T_T Sup I think that you've met your maker, number 5. ^_^ not a chance, Im still going up, choo choo son, except now, i will hopefully be a lot less spammy ^_^ I'm still reasonably amazed that you're fifth. You basically shot up in the rankings. Or am I just misremembering?
Our vigilance wathered and evil rose once more
|
On October 21 2014 05:00 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:58 Cricketer12 wrote:On October 21 2014 04:52 IntoTheheart wrote:On October 21 2014 04:52 Cricketer12 wrote:
temp and i spam more than everyone else combined T_T Sup I think that you've met your maker, number 5. ^_^ not a chance, Im still going up, choo choo son, except now, i will hopefully be a lot less spammy ^_^ I'm still reasonably amazed that you're fifth. You basically shot up in the rankings. Or am I just misremembering?
I was at 58, then I was at 17, this caused a slow decent upwards, I got stuck around 8 because I had to take a couple of days off, causing walker to outpashun me for a bit, but then i came back, then last night i killed yorkie and gumba
|
On October 21 2014 05:00 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:58 Die4Ever wrote:On October 21 2014 04:56 IntoTheheart wrote:On October 21 2014 04:55 Die4Ever wrote:On October 21 2014 04:52 OtherWorld wrote:On October 21 2014 04:49 Die4Ever wrote:
mostly everyone has a little bit of spam, but it's no big deal How did you define spamposts finally? Did you take less than 200 or 100 characters? Wow Templar with the 223 spamposts record if( date-lastdate < 65000 && prevuser==user && isoc==false && chars<100 && numpics==0) { n.spam++; return; } so within the same minute according to TL, the post was the same user as the previous post, it's not OC, less than 100 characters, and no pictures I think that my average amount of characters per post is decently below 100. I wonder how the passionboard4ever would look if the spam was gutted. yea well that's what all the other rules are for, look at how many spam posts you have, only 36 out of 1155, I think you're fine lol, you don't make successive posts that often apparently, and yea I chose 100 so that it would count an average length post as spam if it was successively the same user and those other rules I tend to make double posts by responding to two people in quick succession. I don't spam that much ;_;
the point of spam isn't to punish, it's to not count certain posts as extra passion, totally different, just keep doing what you're doing and let the system do its job
|
On October 21 2014 05:01 GumBa wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 05:00 IntoTheheart wrote:On October 21 2014 04:58 Cricketer12 wrote:On October 21 2014 04:52 IntoTheheart wrote:On October 21 2014 04:52 Cricketer12 wrote:
temp and i spam more than everyone else combined T_T Sup I think that you've met your maker, number 5. ^_^ not a chance, Im still going up, choo choo son, except now, i will hopefully be a lot less spammy ^_^ I'm still reasonably amazed that you're fifth. You basically shot up in the rankings. Or am I just misremembering? Our vigilance wathered and evil rose once more
Mainly just EU passion, or lack thereof. It's not like you guys have been that passionate, but this might be a new low for you.
|
On October 21 2014 05:00 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:58 Die4Ever wrote:On October 21 2014 04:56 IntoTheheart wrote:On October 21 2014 04:55 Die4Ever wrote:On October 21 2014 04:52 OtherWorld wrote:On October 21 2014 04:49 Die4Ever wrote:
mostly everyone has a little bit of spam, but it's no big deal How did you define spamposts finally? Did you take less than 200 or 100 characters? Wow Templar with the 223 spamposts record if( date-lastdate < 65000 && prevuser==user && isoc==false && chars<100 && numpics==0) { n.spam++; return; } so within the same minute according to TL, the post was the same user as the previous post, it's not OC, less than 100 characters, and no pictures I think that my average amount of characters per post is decently below 100. I wonder how the passionboard4ever would look if the spam was gutted. yea well that's what all the other rules are for, look at how many spam posts you have, only 36 out of 1155, I think you're fine lol, you don't make successive posts that often apparently, and yea I chose 100 so that it would count an average length post as spam if it was successively the same user and those other rules I tend to make double posts by responding to two people in quick succession. I don't spam that much ;_;
we just need to respond to each other and chain multiple pages, that way we still pashun it up without spamming according to the rules of die's system :D
|
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On October 21 2014 05:00 royalroadweed wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 04:50 Fusilero wrote:
I liked assault on arkham but that was more suicide squad (And really more deadshot) than batman I didn't like it because deadshot was too much of a gary sue (out crazy joker? srs ?). Also how could you have some B-list villain "kill off" joker? smh.
I liked it up until the ending parts when deadshot basically became a gary sue. The actual character relation between the suicide squad was fun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
