|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On October 04 2016 02:35 Plansix wrote:Your response to an intentional strawman argument is post a series of strawman arguments, none of which invalidate the original point that Trump is a sexist clown? We know that stupid shit exist on the internet.
He's hoping the people he's arguing with waste their time reading the links instead of focusing on the main point. Classic internet tactic.
|
On October 04 2016 03:34 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 03:26 TheDwf wrote:On October 04 2016 02:30 oBlade wrote:On October 04 2016 00:49 KwarK wrote:On October 04 2016 00:43 Plansix wrote:On October 04 2016 00:41 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 04 2016 00:28 Chewbacca. wrote:On October 03 2016 23:57 Doodsmack wrote:In his years as a reality TV boss on "The Apprentice," Donald Trump repeatedly demeaned women with sexist language, according to show insiders who said he rated female contestants by the size of their breasts and talked about which ones he'd like to have sex with.
The Associated Press interviewed more than 20 people — former crew members, editors and contestants — who described crass behavior by Trump behind the scenes of the long-running hit show, in which aspiring capitalists were given tasks to perform as they competed for jobs working for him.
The staffers and contestants agreed to recount their experiences as Trump's behavior toward women has become a core issue in the presidential campaign. Interviewed separately, they gave concurring accounts of inappropriate conduct on the set.
Eight former crew members recalled that he repeatedly made lewd comments about a camerawoman he said had a nice rear, comparing her beauty to that of his daughter, Ivanka. Yahoo Show me one man that doesn't talk about/rate/rank sexual aspects of attractive women with other men. This article is about as useful as one saying, Trump breathes air. At work? Not really. Certainly not in a typical 9-5/office job type setting. It's not like this is a construction or oil field job or something where its 99.999% guys who will talk about dumps and dick jokes. Call me crazy but I don't actually care about anyone's opinion of who they find attractive or what they find attractive about them least of all coworkers. I have seen people of all management levels be fired for far less. Any argument that these comments are acceptable does not line up with what is considered sexual harassment and hostile work environment. "Fucking SJWs expanding the definition of sexism and sexual harassment beyond what it was in the 1950s why can't they just leave it alone and let men tell them when they're being harassed instead of just going off of when they feel they're harassed and anyway if they don't like it they can get a new job". Saved everyone some time with the talking points. It's a good straw argument, but what it needs is examples of the bonkers people to show they really exist and aren't just a rhetorical invention of the right: + Show Spoiler + Yeah, but the right disproportionally focusing on the excesses rather than the main point is a tactic to dodge the debate and demonize the other side. It's obstruction. What you're saying assumes that the the side you like is correct. It's not dodging the debate, it's having the debate. Disagreement is not obstruction. No, it is attempted to derail the discussion by forcing the other side to justify the most extreme version of their argument. It is literally the opposite of discussion or debate, since it ignore the points being given and attempts to force a new position onto the other side.
|
“When you talk about the mental health problems, when people come back from war and combat and they see things that maybe a lot of the folks in the room have seen many times over and you’re strong and you can handle it, but a lot of people can’t handle it,” Trump said.
Here's the full context which makes it not as bad, but no one ever looks at context :
|
On October 04 2016 03:34 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 03:26 TheDwf wrote:On October 04 2016 02:30 oBlade wrote:On October 04 2016 00:49 KwarK wrote:On October 04 2016 00:43 Plansix wrote:On October 04 2016 00:41 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 04 2016 00:28 Chewbacca. wrote:On October 03 2016 23:57 Doodsmack wrote:In his years as a reality TV boss on "The Apprentice," Donald Trump repeatedly demeaned women with sexist language, according to show insiders who said he rated female contestants by the size of their breasts and talked about which ones he'd like to have sex with.
The Associated Press interviewed more than 20 people — former crew members, editors and contestants — who described crass behavior by Trump behind the scenes of the long-running hit show, in which aspiring capitalists were given tasks to perform as they competed for jobs working for him.
The staffers and contestants agreed to recount their experiences as Trump's behavior toward women has become a core issue in the presidential campaign. Interviewed separately, they gave concurring accounts of inappropriate conduct on the set.
Eight former crew members recalled that he repeatedly made lewd comments about a camerawoman he said had a nice rear, comparing her beauty to that of his daughter, Ivanka. Yahoo Show me one man that doesn't talk about/rate/rank sexual aspects of attractive women with other men. This article is about as useful as one saying, Trump breathes air. At work? Not really. Certainly not in a typical 9-5/office job type setting. It's not like this is a construction or oil field job or something where its 99.999% guys who will talk about dumps and dick jokes. Call me crazy but I don't actually care about anyone's opinion of who they find attractive or what they find attractive about them least of all coworkers. I have seen people of all management levels be fired for far less. Any argument that these comments are acceptable does not line up with what is considered sexual harassment and hostile work environment. "Fucking SJWs expanding the definition of sexism and sexual harassment beyond what it was in the 1950s why can't they just leave it alone and let men tell them when they're being harassed instead of just going off of when they feel they're harassed and anyway if they don't like it they can get a new job". Saved everyone some time with the talking points. It's a good straw argument, but what it needs is examples of the bonkers people to show they really exist and aren't just a rhetorical invention of the right: + Show Spoiler + Yeah, but the right disproportionally focusing on the excesses rather than the main point is a tactic to dodge the debate and demonize the other side. It's obstruction. What you're saying assumes that the the side you like is correct. It's not dodging the debate, it's having the debate. Disagreement is not obstruction. Let's try this tactic with something a little more clear cut:
"I didn't murder that man because I found 12 links to completely unrelated murder accusations that were overturned."
You're basically arguing that sexism doesn't exist at all because you found some dumb people on the internet.
|
On October 04 2016 03:47 Nevuk wrote:Show nested quote +“When you talk about the mental health problems, when people come back from war and combat and they see things that maybe a lot of the folks in the room have seen many times over and you’re strong and you can handle it, but a lot of people can’t handle it,” Trump said.
Here's the full context which makes it not as bad, but no one ever looks at context : https://twitter.com/LeoShane/status/782977949012152320
I don't even see anything wrong with what he said, other than his usual style of a 5th grade book report from a kid who didn't read the book.
I'm pretty sure he was trying to say "They've seen some rough shit, and they need help." Not really much to argue there IMO.
|
On October 04 2016 03:54 Dromar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 03:47 Nevuk wrote:“When you talk about the mental health problems, when people come back from war and combat and they see things that maybe a lot of the folks in the room have seen many times over and you’re strong and you can handle it, but a lot of people can’t handle it,” Trump said.
Here's the full context which makes it not as bad, but no one ever looks at context : https://twitter.com/LeoShane/status/782977949012152320 I don't even see anything wrong with what he said, other than his usual style of a 5th grade book report from a kid who didn't read the book. I'm pretty sure he was trying to say "They've seen some rough shit, and they need help." Not really much to argue there IMO. The out of context quote doesn't even seem bad in the first place...who was bringing it up?
|
On October 04 2016 03:54 Dromar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 03:47 Nevuk wrote:“When you talk about the mental health problems, when people come back from war and combat and they see things that maybe a lot of the folks in the room have seen many times over and you’re strong and you can handle it, but a lot of people can’t handle it,” Trump said.
Here's the full context which makes it not as bad, but no one ever looks at context : https://twitter.com/LeoShane/status/782977949012152320 I don't even see anything wrong with what he said, other than his usual style of a 5th grade book report from a kid who didn't read the book. I'm pretty sure he was trying to say "They've seen some rough shit, and they need help." Not really much to argue there IMO. It isn’t a great way to talk about mental health treatment, saying that some people are strong enough not to need it. That isn’t how mental health works, it has nothing to do with mental strength. The goal of treatment of PTSD is to make it feel normal and not like the person is failing at anything. Trumps statement does not reflect that and makes it seem like a flaw to need help.
|
On October 04 2016 03:37 jalstar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 02:35 Plansix wrote:Your response to an intentional strawman argument is post a series of strawman arguments, none of which invalidate the original point that Trump is a sexist clown? We know that stupid shit exist on the internet. He's hoping the people he's arguing with waste their time reading the links instead of focusing on the main point. Classic internet tactic. Kwark made an obnoxious shitpost (or "intentional strawman argument" as P6 put it) which was already abstracted away from Trump and I wanted to respond to what I found interesting. It's not a deflection, bring up Trump again if you want. I just didn't pick up that part of the conversation because it looked wrapped up, and unlike the front pages of Salon and HuffingtonPost I think there's a world of fascinating things besides Agent Orange.
|
Trump's lack of nuance when describing the mental health outlooks of veterans is a non-issue, particularly in relation to the much worse shit he's said and done.
|
On October 04 2016 04:00 oBlade wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2016 03:37 jalstar wrote:On October 04 2016 02:35 Plansix wrote:Your response to an intentional strawman argument is post a series of strawman arguments, none of which invalidate the original point that Trump is a sexist clown? We know that stupid shit exist on the internet. He's hoping the people he's arguing with waste their time reading the links instead of focusing on the main point. Classic internet tactic. Kwark made an obnoxious shitpost (or "intentional strawman argument" as P6 put it) which was already abstracted away from Trump and I wanted to respond to what I found interesting. It's not a deflection, bring up Trump again if you want. I just didn't pick up that part of the conversation because it looked wrapped up, and unlike the front pages of Salon and HuffingtonPost I think there's a world of fascinating things besides Agent Orange. It was a joke. What Trump did on his show is such a clear case of sexual harassment that there is no getting around it. Kwark was joking about how absurd the counter argument would need to be.
|
Its certainly not the most delicate or eloquent way of phrasing things but the last thing the man is is eloquent. I'd say that's about as good as it gets for Trump. Ideally that's not how you go about phrasing it though. Doesn't do any favors to anyone or help with stigmatization of mental illness. Could it have been said better? Yes. Could Donald Trump have said it better? No.
|
Parade float depicting Trump executing Clinton in electric chair raises protests in Indiana![[image loading]](http://media2.wcpo.com/photo/2016/10/03/WCPO_Aurora_parade_1_1475508890201_47263372_ver1.0_640_480.jpg)
Source
|
How dare you bring that up, there are obviously Clinton fans who are doing the same thing.
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
The Second Amendment people weren't up for the task so he had to do the job himself.
|
Is that a Moai in the front of that trailer?
|
On October 04 2016 04:20 ticklishmusic wrote:Show nested quote +Parade float depicting Trump executing Clinton in electric chair raises protests in Indiana![[image loading]](http://media2.wcpo.com/photo/2016/10/03/WCPO_Aurora_parade_1_1475508890201_47263372_ver1.0_640_480.jpg) Source I especially like the "make America great again" quote on the back of that wagon. Bunch of idiot rednecks (or are they hillbillies in Indiana?)
|
On October 04 2016 04:27 Dromar wrote: Is that a Moai in the front of that trailer?
It would appear so, with an Obama nametag.
Who the hell thinks this up, and then is reinforced by other people, and then proceed to actually do it? Yeah guys this seems like a super great idea!
|
On October 04 2016 04:20 ticklishmusic wrote:Show nested quote +Parade float depicting Trump executing Clinton in electric chair raises protests in Indiana![[image loading]](http://media2.wcpo.com/photo/2016/10/03/WCPO_Aurora_parade_1_1475508890201_47263372_ver1.0_640_480.jpg) Source They finally found it. The actual over-the-top Trump supporter creation.
Next up: Ask Trump what he thinks about vigilantes executing Hillary.
|
On October 04 2016 03:37 Danglars wrote: A billionaire playboy (turned politician) commented about a woman's ass and which women he'd like to take home. And that's a valid news story for some people.
This mischaracterization of what Donald did had already been rebutted 5 or so times before your post. You could at least respond to the rebuttal, right?
|

Finally — some good news for the bees of Hawaii.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has given endangered status to seven species of yellow-faced bees native to the islands. These are "the first bees in the country to be protected under the Endangered Species Act," according to the Xerces Society, which advocated for the new designation.
The new rule designating protections for the bees, published Friday in the Federal Register, states that yellow-faced bees are known "for their yellow-to-white facial markings." They look like small wasps, according to the rule, except for their "plumose [branched] hairs on the body that are longest on the sides of the thorax, which readily distinguish them from wasps."
The yellow-faced bee is the only bee native to Hawaii, meaning that it was able to reach the Hawaiian islands on its own, according to a fact sheet provided by the University of Hawai'i's Master Gardner Program. "From that one original colonist they evolved into 63 known endemic species, about 10% of the world's yellow-faced bees and more than are found in this genus in all of North America."
But the populations of these seven species are getting smaller and smaller, according to Fish and Wildlife. For example, the Hylaeus anthracinus was once found in dozens of locations around Hawaii but is now in only 15 — while Hylaeus hilaris and Hylaeus kuakea are each found only in one location.
The seven endangered species are impacted by a wide variety of threats, including habitat destruction because of urbanization or nonnative animals, the introduction of nonnative plant species, wildfires, nonnative predators and natural events such as hurricanes, tsunamis and drought.
The protected status "will allow authorities to implement recovery programs, access funding and limit their harm from outside sources," as Gregory Koob of the Fish and Wildlife Service told The Associated Press. He added that "all federal agencies must consult with the Fish and Wildlife service when interacting with endangered species."
The Xerces Society called the new rule "excellent news" but added that "there is much work that needs to be done to ensure that Hawaii's bees thrive."
"These bees are often found in small patches of habitat hemmed in by agricultural land or developments," the group said. "Unfortunately, the [Fish and Wildlife Service] has not designated any 'critical habitat' areas of land of particular importance for the endangered bees."
As we've reported, pollinators are under threat around the world. A U.N.-sponsored report released in February found that "about 40 percent of invertebrate pollinator species (such as bees and butterflies) are facing extinction." This could have major implications for world food supply, because "about 75 percent of the world's food crops ... depend at least partly on pollination."
Despite the threats, the University of Hawaii says these bees "have managed to persist with amazing tenacity." While this group of species is now endangered, new species of the genus are discovered regularly – "11 new native species have been found in the past 15 years."
The rule, which goes into effect at the end of the month, also gives the endangered designation to 39 plant species found on the islands and to three other animals native to Hawaii – the band-rumped storm-petrel, the orangeblack Hawaiian damselfly, and the anchialine pool shrimp.
The anchialine pool shrimp is known for its unusual longevity — according to the Hawaii Nature Journal, they can live for 10 to 15 years in the wild.
Source
|
|
|
|