|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On March 04 2016 08:59 Introvert wrote: Trump will lose, go back to his business, and we'll all remember years later that wacky 2016 election.
Regardless of whether Trump wins or loses, I think that in 2024 or 2032 we'll be looking back at the 2016 election as being relatively sane.
|
On March 04 2016 11:13 Fprime wrote:Show nested quote + On March 04 2016 08:59 Introvert wrote: Trump will lose, go back to his business, and we'll all remember years later that wacky 2016 election.
Regardless of whether Trump wins or loses, I think that in 2024 or 2032 we'll be looking back at the 2016 election as being relatively sane. 2024 - Kanye West vs Trump Jr BRING IT
Edit: LOL what the fuck are these questions, oh fox
|
These questions about paths to victory are fucking dumb. Move on, Fox.
|
Holy shit, Wallace's "how many jobs have you created?" to Rubio. Is that supposed to be an impartial question?!
|
On March 04 2016 11:16 kwizach wrote: Holy shit, Wallace's "how many jobs have you created?" to Rubio. Is that supposed to be an impartial question?!
savage out of no where
|
On March 04 2016 10:11 oneofthem wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2016 10:01 Nyxisto wrote:On March 04 2016 09:55 oneofthem wrote:On March 04 2016 08:53 Nyxisto wrote: Given the demographic development in the US wouldn't it make a lot more sense, at least long term, to try to appeal to Hispanic and black voters? Hardcore conservatives seem to poll absolutely terrible among these groups compared to democrats. So what is going farther to the right supposed to accomplish? thats why rubio and cruz were boosted stars Cruz is absolutely crazy as well though. What is he going to do to balance his 10% flat tax, abolish the army? I don't understand what the Republican party's strategy at all was from the beginning. There's not a single moderate in the race the party's marching orders are just crazy. it's either social conservative paleo morality or corporatist propaganda on crack
Trump would definitely have the easiest time doing the pivot to the center for the general. I would love to see him hold a press conference after the nomination saying all that hateful rhetoric was just to win the primary and is not his sincerely held beliefs. I think that statement would be easiest to believe from him.
|
On March 04 2016 11:16 kwizach wrote: Holy shit, Wallace's "how many jobs have you created?" to Rubio. Is that supposed to be an impartial question?!
You must have missed the article where it was reported that Roger Ailes was done with Rubio.
|
So much for presidential.
|
Rubio is losing the plot almost unhinged it seems.
|
So much for no personal insults.
|
|
|
On March 04 2016 11:21 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Rubio is losing the plot almost unhinged it seems. He's trying too hard and totally ruining his image in the process.
|
People should attack Trump on his constant repetition in the same way he labels others.
Also, lol Republicans. I imagine many are crying as they watch this.
|
Trump is getting grilled pretty hard here.
|
|
|
On March 04 2016 11:23 Mohdoo wrote: Trump is getting grilled pretty hard here. Yeah, Chris Wallace is good.
|
Wow proud of fox for laying down the fact-hammer.
|
There's a really silly irony to FOX attacking someone with "well that's the facts!"
|
Remember where you are tonight folks when Fox News became the fact checker in hopes of taming the Republican Party.
|
On March 04 2016 11:24 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Remember where you are tonight folks when Fox News became the fact checker in hopes of taming the Republican Party. Only the uninformed thought that. The FoxNews news division (i.e. The people running this debate) is rock solid.
|
|
|
|
|
|