• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:05
CEST 11:05
KST 18:05
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation5$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced4Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
[G] Progamer Settings i aint gon lie to u bruh... ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 642 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3029

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 3027 3028 3029 3030 3031 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13892 Posts
February 25 2016 18:42 GMT
#60561
On February 26 2016 03:31 ticklishmusic wrote:
Your premise that Hillary is only recently progressive is incorrect. We are talking about someone who organized protests when MLK was assassinated, went undercover in the South after graduating from Yale Law to research discrimination violations in Southern schools, then went on the record against poor treatment of women in China and poor treatment of LGBT individuals in Africa. She swung towards the center somewhat, but she has always been very progressive after a brief romance with Goldwater (who is not nearly as bad as people make him out to be).

I've already said if Bernie wins I'll vote for him and more. However, even ignoring the fact I'm Team Hillary, I find it mathematically unlikely he will win the nomination based on all the information we have now.

I find it interesting that you'd be amenable to Hillary and David Brock in the general... if it's in support of Bernie.

I don't see a particular problem with trying to convince people to vote for the candidate I support. That's called campaigning. GH has convinced to vote for Bernie IRL. I've done the same for Hillary IRL and online.

Do you even see a thing hillary did when she was with bill clinton in the white house? When she was first lady she said and I quote

"We need to take these people on. They are often connected to big drug cartels. They are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called 'super-predators,' "No conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why then ended up that way, but first we have to bring them to heel."

If you want to call that progressive go right ahead. Her entire governmental legacy is as a conservative democrat.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
February 25 2016 18:43 GMT
#60562
On February 25 2016 23:45 oneofthem wrote:
i genuinely feel extremely bad about the way the BLM movement has gone. this sort of stuff is precisely the outcome i was concerned about back when the first mass protests were happening. the reception to these movements by the privileged mainstream society is extremely sensitive to any 'bad' behavior because of the implicit or explicit bias and inability to relate to particular ghetto experiences.

And why should they? Frankly you sound like those I know who rationalize Islamic terrorism as a means of defending against foreign imperialism.

In the court of public opinion, the ends do not justify the means, nor should they. You can't run a civil rights movement with violence and expect people to be happy about it.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 25 2016 18:43 GMT
#60563
If you don't vote, nothing happens. The parties are not going to alter anything or change their tactics because of you or the small number of people that protest in this fashion. The majority of Americans don't vote. You are joining the apathy crowd. Being part of the process is how you signal you can be reached and you will vote again. National elections are a binary option, but there are plenty of other races that have more options and ways to make your displeasure with the system known.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42555 Posts
February 25 2016 18:44 GMT
#60564
I liked Mitthew. Would take him as POTUS over Trump any day.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Souma
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
February 25 2016 18:47 GMT
#60565
On February 26 2016 03:43 Plansix wrote:
If you don't vote, nothing happens. The parties are not going to alter anything or change their tactics because of you or the small number of people that protest in this fashion. The majority of Americans don't vote. You are joining the apathy crowd. Being part of the process is how you signal you can be reached and you will vote again. National elections are a binary option, but there are plenty of other races that have more options and ways to make your displeasure with the system known.

Who here isn't voting?

Or is this just some general rant about the American people...

And please don't try to present to me a false dichotomy. In a general presidential election my vote is plenty fine with a third-party candidate if I wish it to be.
Writer
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13892 Posts
February 25 2016 18:47 GMT
#60566
On February 26 2016 03:36 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 03:35 IgnE wrote:
Acquiescing to blackmail is the first step to being an adult. Got it.

Trump would be an average president. How many racist bigoted presidents have we had in our history?

Hillary is in my nightmares, Plansix.

Let's certainly never forget the great paragon of progressives, Woodrow Wilson!

“Segregation is not a humiliation but a benefit, and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen.”

“The domestic slaves, at any rate, and almost all who were much under the master’s eye, were happy and well cared for.”

“[Reconstruction government was detested] not because the Republican Party was dreaded but because the dominance of an ignorant and inferior race was justly dreaded.”

And my personal favorite for what the fuck wilson

“Now came multitudes of men of the lowest class from the south of Italy, and men of the meaner sort out of Hungary and Poland, men out of the ranks, where there was neither skill nor energy nor any initiative of quick intelligence, and they came in numbers which increased from year to year, as if the countries of the south of Europe were disburdening themselves of the more sordid and hapless elements of their population.”

At least its not as bad as the guy who he was running against for the nominee who called for the pre preemptive hanging of half a million ethnic German citizens from the lampposts because of WW1.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-25 18:50:19
February 25 2016 18:48 GMT
#60567
On February 26 2016 03:37 Souma wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 03:33 Mohdoo wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:30 Souma wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:28 Mercy13 wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:12 Souma wrote:
He doesn't have to vote for Hillary in the general, and it's pretty ridiculous of you and others to pressure people into voting for her if she takes the nomination.

I did not vote for Obama in 2012 and I do not plan on voting for Hillary in 2016. Why in the world should anyone vote for someone or some party that does not represent them? The DNC is what it is today because of voters who will settle for the "less worse" instead of challenging the establishment to represent the people who vote for them.

There's currently no way the Democratic candidate, whether it's Hillary or Bernie, will lose in the general from my observations, however even if my vote was the decider and it was Hillary vs. Trump, I'd still vote Green and the DNC would have no one to blame but themselves for becoming the shithole they are now.

And for the Hillary supporters to support her and and the DNC for their actions just because "it always happens," or "Bernie isn't perfect either," or whatever the hell, leave your disgusting apathy at the door because it's further ruining the democratic process that is already a joke.


I'm not going to tell you who to vote for, but you reducing Hillary's supporters to people suffering "disgusting apathy" is very unfair.

The policy stakes are yyyuuugggee right now. Solely with supreme court nominations (let only executive agency appointments and executive orders) the next president is going to be able to implement drastic policy and social changes, for better or worse.

The GOP now controls 2 of the 3 branches of the federal government, as well as most state and local governments. If the next president is not a liberal we are going to have massive set backs in climate policy, racial justice, tax policy, campaign finance, abortion rights, and virtually everything else progressives care about. On climate policy alone, literally millions of lives could be at stake.

I plan to vote for whoever can best prevent that from happening, and I believe that's Hillary. Bernie's left-wing progressive brand is just too far from the mainstream to have a great chance in the general. I could be wrong of course, and if Bernie wins the nomination I'll gladly support him. However, I think the GOP is correct to desperately want to run against him instead of against Hillary.

Read again: I'm accusing people who are approving her and the DNC's underhanded tactics those with "disgusting apathy."


There's a difference between approving the tactics and saying "Those tactics are the price I pay for not having trump as president? Yes, that's fine."

If I thought there was even a shred of chance for Bernie to win a general, it'd be a different story. I do not have the slightest amount of faith that America is ready for him, as Plansix explained.

Or you could call out your candidate and the establishment for being dirty and still support her because of what you mentioned above. Or what, would that be a little too hard on your conscience if you guys were to accept the fact that Hillary and the DNC are a bit shadier than you'd like yet still vote for them?

Instead of saying, "Hey that's the name of the game," have some integrity ffs.


I've come out against the DNC's favoritism with regards to debates and a lot of shit that's been pulled. Still, I've made the calculation you've described and decided it's something I can live with. I agree there are problems, but to me they are a sign of not a fundamentally flawed and unsaveable system, but one that needs a lot of work.

If anything, I think the Bernie side is more guilty of whitewashing, deflecting and dismissing.

On February 26 2016 03:42 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 03:31 ticklishmusic wrote:
Your premise that Hillary is only recently progressive is incorrect. We are talking about someone who organized protests when MLK was assassinated, went undercover in the South after graduating from Yale Law to research discrimination violations in Southern schools, then went on the record against poor treatment of women in China and poor treatment of LGBT individuals in Africa. She swung towards the center somewhat, but she has always been very progressive after a brief romance with Goldwater (who is not nearly as bad as people make him out to be).

I've already said if Bernie wins I'll vote for him and more. However, even ignoring the fact I'm Team Hillary, I find it mathematically unlikely he will win the nomination based on all the information we have now.

I find it interesting that you'd be amenable to Hillary and David Brock in the general... if it's in support of Bernie.

I don't see a particular problem with trying to convince people to vote for the candidate I support. That's called campaigning. GH has convinced to vote for Bernie IRL. I've done the same for Hillary IRL and online.

Do you even see a thing hillary did when she was with bill clinton in the white house? When she was first lady she said and I quote

"We need to take these people on. They are often connected to big drug cartels. They are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called 'super-predators,' "No conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why then ended up that way, but first we have to bring them to heel."

If you want to call that progressive go right ahead. Her entire governmental legacy is as a conservative democrat.


Read the previous pages of the thread. Most of us were too young to remember, but crime was fucking awful and that statement was very true.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
CannonsNCarriers
Profile Joined April 2010
United States638 Posts
February 25 2016 18:49 GMT
#60568
On February 26 2016 03:42 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 03:31 ticklishmusic wrote:
Your premise that Hillary is only recently progressive is incorrect. We are talking about someone who organized protests when MLK was assassinated, went undercover in the South after graduating from Yale Law to research discrimination violations in Southern schools, then went on the record against poor treatment of women in China and poor treatment of LGBT individuals in Africa. She swung towards the center somewhat, but she has always been very progressive after a brief romance with Goldwater (who is not nearly as bad as people make him out to be).

I've already said if Bernie wins I'll vote for him and more. However, even ignoring the fact I'm Team Hillary, I find it mathematically unlikely he will win the nomination based on all the information we have now.

I find it interesting that you'd be amenable to Hillary and David Brock in the general... if it's in support of Bernie.

I don't see a particular problem with trying to convince people to vote for the candidate I support. That's called campaigning. GH has convinced to vote for Bernie IRL. I've done the same for Hillary IRL and online.

Do you even see a thing hillary did when she was with bill clinton in the white house? When she was first lady she said and I quote

"We need to take these people on. They are often connected to big drug cartels. They are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called 'super-predators,' "No conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why then ended up that way, but first we have to bring them to heel."

If you want to call that progressive go right ahead. Her entire governmental legacy is as a conservative democrat.


Is everyone here not getting that being a Democrat in the 90s is different than being a democrat in the 2010s? The party and country has moved. Some of the people are the same (the Clintons), but they were doing Democrat stuff back in the 90s. What is Liberal/Democrat and what is Republican/Conservative moves as the issues the country faces shifts. Democrats were in the wilderness post Reagan and the 3rd way Dems brought the party back into elected office. Modern, Obama Democrats are significantly more liberal than the 90s 3rd way Dems. Hillary has run her race making it clear that she intends to be a modern, Obama Democrat.
Dun tuch my cheezbrgr
Souma
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
February 25 2016 18:49 GMT
#60569
On February 26 2016 03:48 ticklishmusic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 03:37 Souma wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:33 Mohdoo wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:30 Souma wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:28 Mercy13 wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:12 Souma wrote:
He doesn't have to vote for Hillary in the general, and it's pretty ridiculous of you and others to pressure people into voting for her if she takes the nomination.

I did not vote for Obama in 2012 and I do not plan on voting for Hillary in 2016. Why in the world should anyone vote for someone or some party that does not represent them? The DNC is what it is today because of voters who will settle for the "less worse" instead of challenging the establishment to represent the people who vote for them.

There's currently no way the Democratic candidate, whether it's Hillary or Bernie, will lose in the general from my observations, however even if my vote was the decider and it was Hillary vs. Trump, I'd still vote Green and the DNC would have no one to blame but themselves for becoming the shithole they are now.

And for the Hillary supporters to support her and and the DNC for their actions just because "it always happens," or "Bernie isn't perfect either," or whatever the hell, leave your disgusting apathy at the door because it's further ruining the democratic process that is already a joke.


I'm not going to tell you who to vote for, but you reducing Hillary's supporters to people suffering "disgusting apathy" is very unfair.

The policy stakes are yyyuuugggee right now. Solely with supreme court nominations (let only executive agency appointments and executive orders) the next president is going to be able to implement drastic policy and social changes, for better or worse.

The GOP now controls 2 of the 3 branches of the federal government, as well as most state and local governments. If the next president is not a liberal we are going to have massive set backs in climate policy, racial justice, tax policy, campaign finance, abortion rights, and virtually everything else progressives care about. On climate policy alone, literally millions of lives could be at stake.

I plan to vote for whoever can best prevent that from happening, and I believe that's Hillary. Bernie's left-wing progressive brand is just too far from the mainstream to have a great chance in the general. I could be wrong of course, and if Bernie wins the nomination I'll gladly support him. However, I think the GOP is correct to desperately want to run against him instead of against Hillary.

Read again: I'm accusing people who are approving her and the DNC's underhanded tactics those with "disgusting apathy."


There's a difference between approving the tactics and saying "Those tactics are the price I pay for not having trump as president? Yes, that's fine."

If I thought there was even a shred of chance for Bernie to win a general, it'd be a different story. I do not have the slightest amount of faith that America is ready for him, as Plansix explained.

Or you could call out your candidate and the establishment for being dirty and still support her because of what you mentioned above. Or what, would that be a little too hard on your conscience if you guys were to accept the fact that Hillary and the DNC are a bit shadier than you'd like yet still vote for them?

Instead of saying, "Hey that's the name of the game," have some integrity ffs.


I've come out against the DNC's favoritism with regards to debates and a lot of shit that's been pulled. Still, I've made the calculation you've described and decided it's something I can live with. I agree there are problems, but to me they are a sign of not a fundamentally flawed and unsaveable system, but one that needs a lot of work.

If anything, I think the Bernie side is more guilty of whitewashing, deflecting and dismissing.

Considering Bernie has actively fired people in his camp for bs, I respectfully disagree.
Writer
Deathstar
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
9150 Posts
February 25 2016 18:50 GMT
#60570
Oh please Woodrow Wilson has a rich presidency. Taking some quotes from the 1910s with 2010 morality is ridiculous. It was only a decade ago that Obama, Hillary, Bush, Mccain, and Romney were all against gay marriage.
rip passion
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 25 2016 18:50 GMT
#60571
On February 26 2016 03:47 Souma wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 03:43 Plansix wrote:
If you don't vote, nothing happens. The parties are not going to alter anything or change their tactics because of you or the small number of people that protest in this fashion. The majority of Americans don't vote. You are joining the apathy crowd. Being part of the process is how you signal you can be reached and you will vote again. National elections are a binary option, but there are plenty of other races that have more options and ways to make your displeasure with the system known.

Who here isn't voting?

Or is this just some general rant about the American people...

And please don't try to present to me a false dichotomy. In a general presidential election my vote is plenty fine with a third-party candidate if I wish it to be.

That is fine. My state leans so far toward democrats that it will never go the other way and plenty of people are in that situation. If you are in a swing state, I'm sure you are well aware.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-25 18:53:32
February 25 2016 18:52 GMT
#60572
On February 26 2016 03:49 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 03:42 Sermokala wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:31 ticklishmusic wrote:
Your premise that Hillary is only recently progressive is incorrect. We are talking about someone who organized protests when MLK was assassinated, went undercover in the South after graduating from Yale Law to research discrimination violations in Southern schools, then went on the record against poor treatment of women in China and poor treatment of LGBT individuals in Africa. She swung towards the center somewhat, but she has always been very progressive after a brief romance with Goldwater (who is not nearly as bad as people make him out to be).

I've already said if Bernie wins I'll vote for him and more. However, even ignoring the fact I'm Team Hillary, I find it mathematically unlikely he will win the nomination based on all the information we have now.

I find it interesting that you'd be amenable to Hillary and David Brock in the general... if it's in support of Bernie.

I don't see a particular problem with trying to convince people to vote for the candidate I support. That's called campaigning. GH has convinced to vote for Bernie IRL. I've done the same for Hillary IRL and online.

Do you even see a thing hillary did when she was with bill clinton in the white house? When she was first lady she said and I quote

"We need to take these people on. They are often connected to big drug cartels. They are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called 'super-predators,' "No conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why then ended up that way, but first we have to bring them to heel."

If you want to call that progressive go right ahead. Her entire governmental legacy is as a conservative democrat.


Is everyone here not getting that being a Democrat in the 90s is different than being a democrat in the 2010s? The party and country has moved. Some of the people are the same (the Clintons), but they were doing Democrat stuff back in the 90s. What is Liberal/Democrat and what is Republican/Conservative moves as the issues the country faces shifts. Democrats were in the wilderness post Reagan and the 3rd way Dems brought the party back into elected office. Modern, Obama Democrats are significantly more liberal than the 90s 3rd way Dems. Hillary has run her race making it clear that she intends to be a modern, Obama Democrat.

And they tried to put forward a single payer healthcare system. That thing blew up in their face so hard that they are still feeling the aftershocks. I don't think people were pay attention in the 90s or something.

Edit: Also crime was crazy and the 80s were worse. People used to not go to central park at all, let alone at night.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13892 Posts
February 25 2016 18:54 GMT
#60573
On February 26 2016 03:49 CannonsNCarriers wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 03:42 Sermokala wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:31 ticklishmusic wrote:
Your premise that Hillary is only recently progressive is incorrect. We are talking about someone who organized protests when MLK was assassinated, went undercover in the South after graduating from Yale Law to research discrimination violations in Southern schools, then went on the record against poor treatment of women in China and poor treatment of LGBT individuals in Africa. She swung towards the center somewhat, but she has always been very progressive after a brief romance with Goldwater (who is not nearly as bad as people make him out to be).

I've already said if Bernie wins I'll vote for him and more. However, even ignoring the fact I'm Team Hillary, I find it mathematically unlikely he will win the nomination based on all the information we have now.

I find it interesting that you'd be amenable to Hillary and David Brock in the general... if it's in support of Bernie.

I don't see a particular problem with trying to convince people to vote for the candidate I support. That's called campaigning. GH has convinced to vote for Bernie IRL. I've done the same for Hillary IRL and online.

Do you even see a thing hillary did when she was with bill clinton in the white house? When she was first lady she said and I quote

"We need to take these people on. They are often connected to big drug cartels. They are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called 'super-predators,' "No conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why then ended up that way, but first we have to bring them to heel."

If you want to call that progressive go right ahead. Her entire governmental legacy is as a conservative democrat.


Is everyone here not getting that being a Democrat in the 90s is different than being a democrat in the 2010s? The party and country has moved. Some of the people are the same (the Clintons), but they were doing Democrat stuff back in the 90s. What is Liberal/Democrat and what is Republican/Conservative moves as the issues the country faces shifts. Democrats were in the wilderness post Reagan and the 3rd way Dems brought the party back into elected office. Modern, Obama Democrats are significantly more liberal than the 90s 3rd way Dems. Hillary has run her race making it clear that she intends to be a modern, Obama Democrat.

What the hell are you talking about? So we should just ignore everything about a candidates past and just judge them on what policy that they're presenting now? You'd vote for hitler 20 years after the holocaust because he isn't about hateing the jews anymore? Obama hasn't done anything in the white house to even judge on what kind of policy he'd be about. The only things he was able to do in his first years were decided by the conservative elements of his congressional majority.

This is what pisses me off the most about Hillary supporters. Integrity and consistency matter god dammit.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23172 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-25 18:57:30
February 25 2016 18:56 GMT
#60574
The problem was the solution was to shit all over black (and brown) people's constitutional rights, and places like Ferguson and beyond are still enduring those lasting legacies.

Typical American solution to high crime, ignore as much white crime as possible and lock up any POC you can call criminals.

Modern manifestation would be the Heroin epidemic in NE and FergusonPD fighting reform.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Souma
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-25 18:57:17
February 25 2016 18:57 GMT
#60575
On February 26 2016 03:54 Sermokala wrote:
This is what pisses me off the most about Hillary supporters. Integrity and consistency matter god dammit.

Yeah... what happened to the liberals who got on Romney's case for pretty much being Hillary?

#freesamizdat
Writer
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13892 Posts
February 25 2016 18:57 GMT
#60576
On February 26 2016 03:48 ticklishmusic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 03:37 Souma wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:33 Mohdoo wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:30 Souma wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:28 Mercy13 wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:12 Souma wrote:
He doesn't have to vote for Hillary in the general, and it's pretty ridiculous of you and others to pressure people into voting for her if she takes the nomination.

I did not vote for Obama in 2012 and I do not plan on voting for Hillary in 2016. Why in the world should anyone vote for someone or some party that does not represent them? The DNC is what it is today because of voters who will settle for the "less worse" instead of challenging the establishment to represent the people who vote for them.

There's currently no way the Democratic candidate, whether it's Hillary or Bernie, will lose in the general from my observations, however even if my vote was the decider and it was Hillary vs. Trump, I'd still vote Green and the DNC would have no one to blame but themselves for becoming the shithole they are now.

And for the Hillary supporters to support her and and the DNC for their actions just because "it always happens," or "Bernie isn't perfect either," or whatever the hell, leave your disgusting apathy at the door because it's further ruining the democratic process that is already a joke.


I'm not going to tell you who to vote for, but you reducing Hillary's supporters to people suffering "disgusting apathy" is very unfair.

The policy stakes are yyyuuugggee right now. Solely with supreme court nominations (let only executive agency appointments and executive orders) the next president is going to be able to implement drastic policy and social changes, for better or worse.

The GOP now controls 2 of the 3 branches of the federal government, as well as most state and local governments. If the next president is not a liberal we are going to have massive set backs in climate policy, racial justice, tax policy, campaign finance, abortion rights, and virtually everything else progressives care about. On climate policy alone, literally millions of lives could be at stake.

I plan to vote for whoever can best prevent that from happening, and I believe that's Hillary. Bernie's left-wing progressive brand is just too far from the mainstream to have a great chance in the general. I could be wrong of course, and if Bernie wins the nomination I'll gladly support him. However, I think the GOP is correct to desperately want to run against him instead of against Hillary.

Read again: I'm accusing people who are approving her and the DNC's underhanded tactics those with "disgusting apathy."


There's a difference between approving the tactics and saying "Those tactics are the price I pay for not having trump as president? Yes, that's fine."

If I thought there was even a shred of chance for Bernie to win a general, it'd be a different story. I do not have the slightest amount of faith that America is ready for him, as Plansix explained.

Or you could call out your candidate and the establishment for being dirty and still support her because of what you mentioned above. Or what, would that be a little too hard on your conscience if you guys were to accept the fact that Hillary and the DNC are a bit shadier than you'd like yet still vote for them?

Instead of saying, "Hey that's the name of the game," have some integrity ffs.


I've come out against the DNC's favoritism with regards to debates and a lot of shit that's been pulled. Still, I've made the calculation you've described and decided it's something I can live with. I agree there are problems, but to me they are a sign of not a fundamentally flawed and unsaveable system, but one that needs a lot of work.

If anything, I think the Bernie side is more guilty of whitewashing, deflecting and dismissing.

Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 03:42 Sermokala wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:31 ticklishmusic wrote:
Your premise that Hillary is only recently progressive is incorrect. We are talking about someone who organized protests when MLK was assassinated, went undercover in the South after graduating from Yale Law to research discrimination violations in Southern schools, then went on the record against poor treatment of women in China and poor treatment of LGBT individuals in Africa. She swung towards the center somewhat, but she has always been very progressive after a brief romance with Goldwater (who is not nearly as bad as people make him out to be).

I've already said if Bernie wins I'll vote for him and more. However, even ignoring the fact I'm Team Hillary, I find it mathematically unlikely he will win the nomination based on all the information we have now.

I find it interesting that you'd be amenable to Hillary and David Brock in the general... if it's in support of Bernie.

I don't see a particular problem with trying to convince people to vote for the candidate I support. That's called campaigning. GH has convinced to vote for Bernie IRL. I've done the same for Hillary IRL and online.

Do you even see a thing hillary did when she was with bill clinton in the white house? When she was first lady she said and I quote

"We need to take these people on. They are often connected to big drug cartels. They are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called 'super-predators,' "No conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why then ended up that way, but first we have to bring them to heel."

If you want to call that progressive go right ahead. Her entire governmental legacy is as a conservative democrat.


Read the previous pages of the thread. Most of us were too young to remember, but crime was fucking awful and that statement was very true.

You're terrible for saying that. Literally justifying the entire drug war and the mass incarceration of black people because "crime was really bad back then and that statement was true". By that argument the drug war is a smashing success and we should keep going and jail more people for broken window offences.

But by all means if thats what you believe at least just say it.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
February 25 2016 18:57 GMT
#60577
On February 26 2016 03:49 Souma wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 03:48 ticklishmusic wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:37 Souma wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:33 Mohdoo wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:30 Souma wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:28 Mercy13 wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:12 Souma wrote:
He doesn't have to vote for Hillary in the general, and it's pretty ridiculous of you and others to pressure people into voting for her if she takes the nomination.

I did not vote for Obama in 2012 and I do not plan on voting for Hillary in 2016. Why in the world should anyone vote for someone or some party that does not represent them? The DNC is what it is today because of voters who will settle for the "less worse" instead of challenging the establishment to represent the people who vote for them.

There's currently no way the Democratic candidate, whether it's Hillary or Bernie, will lose in the general from my observations, however even if my vote was the decider and it was Hillary vs. Trump, I'd still vote Green and the DNC would have no one to blame but themselves for becoming the shithole they are now.

And for the Hillary supporters to support her and and the DNC for their actions just because "it always happens," or "Bernie isn't perfect either," or whatever the hell, leave your disgusting apathy at the door because it's further ruining the democratic process that is already a joke.


I'm not going to tell you who to vote for, but you reducing Hillary's supporters to people suffering "disgusting apathy" is very unfair.

The policy stakes are yyyuuugggee right now. Solely with supreme court nominations (let only executive agency appointments and executive orders) the next president is going to be able to implement drastic policy and social changes, for better or worse.

The GOP now controls 2 of the 3 branches of the federal government, as well as most state and local governments. If the next president is not a liberal we are going to have massive set backs in climate policy, racial justice, tax policy, campaign finance, abortion rights, and virtually everything else progressives care about. On climate policy alone, literally millions of lives could be at stake.

I plan to vote for whoever can best prevent that from happening, and I believe that's Hillary. Bernie's left-wing progressive brand is just too far from the mainstream to have a great chance in the general. I could be wrong of course, and if Bernie wins the nomination I'll gladly support him. However, I think the GOP is correct to desperately want to run against him instead of against Hillary.

Read again: I'm accusing people who are approving her and the DNC's underhanded tactics those with "disgusting apathy."


There's a difference between approving the tactics and saying "Those tactics are the price I pay for not having trump as president? Yes, that's fine."

If I thought there was even a shred of chance for Bernie to win a general, it'd be a different story. I do not have the slightest amount of faith that America is ready for him, as Plansix explained.

Or you could call out your candidate and the establishment for being dirty and still support her because of what you mentioned above. Or what, would that be a little too hard on your conscience if you guys were to accept the fact that Hillary and the DNC are a bit shadier than you'd like yet still vote for them?

Instead of saying, "Hey that's the name of the game," have some integrity ffs.


I've come out against the DNC's favoritism with regards to debates and a lot of shit that's been pulled. Still, I've made the calculation you've described and decided it's something I can live with. I agree there are problems, but to me they are a sign of not a fundamentally flawed and unsaveable system, but one that needs a lot of work.

If anything, I think the Bernie side is more guilty of whitewashing, deflecting and dismissing.

Considering Bernie has actively fired people in his camp for bs, I respectfully disagree.


Sure, and I can appreciate that and it puts some weight on his side of the scales. Not enough though.

Let's separate for a moment Hillary's campaign (which she controls) and the DNC (which she doesn't though they do coordinate). Within Hillary's campaign is David Brock. Given his history, his statement about Bernie was pretty tame, he is an attack dog on a leash. That is him barking. He'll be let off the leash for the general to, as I said before, tear the Donald a new one. He's a nasty individual, but he's a tool that has his uses and I accept that. Outside is the DNC, which shows favoritism to Hillary-- it's too much, though their long association does provide some basis for their support. However, for her to surrender the advantages seems, well, stupid. It's like turning away money from supporters (which she's actually done oddly enough, donations from the prison lobby went to some women's prison foundation IIRC but I digress). In retrospect, I think the debate issue is a little moot- these town halls are getting pretty boring and maybe there are enough events after all.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23172 Posts
February 25 2016 18:58 GMT
#60578
On February 26 2016 03:57 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 03:48 ticklishmusic wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:37 Souma wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:33 Mohdoo wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:30 Souma wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:28 Mercy13 wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:12 Souma wrote:
He doesn't have to vote for Hillary in the general, and it's pretty ridiculous of you and others to pressure people into voting for her if she takes the nomination.

I did not vote for Obama in 2012 and I do not plan on voting for Hillary in 2016. Why in the world should anyone vote for someone or some party that does not represent them? The DNC is what it is today because of voters who will settle for the "less worse" instead of challenging the establishment to represent the people who vote for them.

There's currently no way the Democratic candidate, whether it's Hillary or Bernie, will lose in the general from my observations, however even if my vote was the decider and it was Hillary vs. Trump, I'd still vote Green and the DNC would have no one to blame but themselves for becoming the shithole they are now.

And for the Hillary supporters to support her and and the DNC for their actions just because "it always happens," or "Bernie isn't perfect either," or whatever the hell, leave your disgusting apathy at the door because it's further ruining the democratic process that is already a joke.


I'm not going to tell you who to vote for, but you reducing Hillary's supporters to people suffering "disgusting apathy" is very unfair.

The policy stakes are yyyuuugggee right now. Solely with supreme court nominations (let only executive agency appointments and executive orders) the next president is going to be able to implement drastic policy and social changes, for better or worse.

The GOP now controls 2 of the 3 branches of the federal government, as well as most state and local governments. If the next president is not a liberal we are going to have massive set backs in climate policy, racial justice, tax policy, campaign finance, abortion rights, and virtually everything else progressives care about. On climate policy alone, literally millions of lives could be at stake.

I plan to vote for whoever can best prevent that from happening, and I believe that's Hillary. Bernie's left-wing progressive brand is just too far from the mainstream to have a great chance in the general. I could be wrong of course, and if Bernie wins the nomination I'll gladly support him. However, I think the GOP is correct to desperately want to run against him instead of against Hillary.

Read again: I'm accusing people who are approving her and the DNC's underhanded tactics those with "disgusting apathy."


There's a difference between approving the tactics and saying "Those tactics are the price I pay for not having trump as president? Yes, that's fine."

If I thought there was even a shred of chance for Bernie to win a general, it'd be a different story. I do not have the slightest amount of faith that America is ready for him, as Plansix explained.

Or you could call out your candidate and the establishment for being dirty and still support her because of what you mentioned above. Or what, would that be a little too hard on your conscience if you guys were to accept the fact that Hillary and the DNC are a bit shadier than you'd like yet still vote for them?

Instead of saying, "Hey that's the name of the game," have some integrity ffs.


I've come out against the DNC's favoritism with regards to debates and a lot of shit that's been pulled. Still, I've made the calculation you've described and decided it's something I can live with. I agree there are problems, but to me they are a sign of not a fundamentally flawed and unsaveable system, but one that needs a lot of work.

If anything, I think the Bernie side is more guilty of whitewashing, deflecting and dismissing.

On February 26 2016 03:42 Sermokala wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:31 ticklishmusic wrote:
Your premise that Hillary is only recently progressive is incorrect. We are talking about someone who organized protests when MLK was assassinated, went undercover in the South after graduating from Yale Law to research discrimination violations in Southern schools, then went on the record against poor treatment of women in China and poor treatment of LGBT individuals in Africa. She swung towards the center somewhat, but she has always been very progressive after a brief romance with Goldwater (who is not nearly as bad as people make him out to be).

I've already said if Bernie wins I'll vote for him and more. However, even ignoring the fact I'm Team Hillary, I find it mathematically unlikely he will win the nomination based on all the information we have now.

I find it interesting that you'd be amenable to Hillary and David Brock in the general... if it's in support of Bernie.

I don't see a particular problem with trying to convince people to vote for the candidate I support. That's called campaigning. GH has convinced to vote for Bernie IRL. I've done the same for Hillary IRL and online.

Do you even see a thing hillary did when she was with bill clinton in the white house? When she was first lady she said and I quote

"We need to take these people on. They are often connected to big drug cartels. They are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called 'super-predators,' "No conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why then ended up that way, but first we have to bring them to heel."

If you want to call that progressive go right ahead. Her entire governmental legacy is as a conservative democrat.


Read the previous pages of the thread. Most of us were too young to remember, but crime was fucking awful and that statement was very true.

You're terrible for saying that. Literally justifying the entire drug war and the mass incarceration of black people because "crime was really bad back then and that statement was true". By that argument the drug war is a smashing success and we should keep going and jail more people for broken window offences.

But by all means if thats what you believe at least just say it.


Best election ever. So much exposing.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-25 18:59:45
February 25 2016 18:59 GMT
#60579
On February 26 2016 03:57 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 03:48 ticklishmusic wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:37 Souma wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:33 Mohdoo wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:30 Souma wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:28 Mercy13 wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:12 Souma wrote:
He doesn't have to vote for Hillary in the general, and it's pretty ridiculous of you and others to pressure people into voting for her if she takes the nomination.

I did not vote for Obama in 2012 and I do not plan on voting for Hillary in 2016. Why in the world should anyone vote for someone or some party that does not represent them? The DNC is what it is today because of voters who will settle for the "less worse" instead of challenging the establishment to represent the people who vote for them.

There's currently no way the Democratic candidate, whether it's Hillary or Bernie, will lose in the general from my observations, however even if my vote was the decider and it was Hillary vs. Trump, I'd still vote Green and the DNC would have no one to blame but themselves for becoming the shithole they are now.

And for the Hillary supporters to support her and and the DNC for their actions just because "it always happens," or "Bernie isn't perfect either," or whatever the hell, leave your disgusting apathy at the door because it's further ruining the democratic process that is already a joke.


I'm not going to tell you who to vote for, but you reducing Hillary's supporters to people suffering "disgusting apathy" is very unfair.

The policy stakes are yyyuuugggee right now. Solely with supreme court nominations (let only executive agency appointments and executive orders) the next president is going to be able to implement drastic policy and social changes, for better or worse.

The GOP now controls 2 of the 3 branches of the federal government, as well as most state and local governments. If the next president is not a liberal we are going to have massive set backs in climate policy, racial justice, tax policy, campaign finance, abortion rights, and virtually everything else progressives care about. On climate policy alone, literally millions of lives could be at stake.

I plan to vote for whoever can best prevent that from happening, and I believe that's Hillary. Bernie's left-wing progressive brand is just too far from the mainstream to have a great chance in the general. I could be wrong of course, and if Bernie wins the nomination I'll gladly support him. However, I think the GOP is correct to desperately want to run against him instead of against Hillary.

Read again: I'm accusing people who are approving her and the DNC's underhanded tactics those with "disgusting apathy."


There's a difference between approving the tactics and saying "Those tactics are the price I pay for not having trump as president? Yes, that's fine."

If I thought there was even a shred of chance for Bernie to win a general, it'd be a different story. I do not have the slightest amount of faith that America is ready for him, as Plansix explained.

Or you could call out your candidate and the establishment for being dirty and still support her because of what you mentioned above. Or what, would that be a little too hard on your conscience if you guys were to accept the fact that Hillary and the DNC are a bit shadier than you'd like yet still vote for them?

Instead of saying, "Hey that's the name of the game," have some integrity ffs.


I've come out against the DNC's favoritism with regards to debates and a lot of shit that's been pulled. Still, I've made the calculation you've described and decided it's something I can live with. I agree there are problems, but to me they are a sign of not a fundamentally flawed and unsaveable system, but one that needs a lot of work.

If anything, I think the Bernie side is more guilty of whitewashing, deflecting and dismissing.

On February 26 2016 03:42 Sermokala wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:31 ticklishmusic wrote:
Your premise that Hillary is only recently progressive is incorrect. We are talking about someone who organized protests when MLK was assassinated, went undercover in the South after graduating from Yale Law to research discrimination violations in Southern schools, then went on the record against poor treatment of women in China and poor treatment of LGBT individuals in Africa. She swung towards the center somewhat, but she has always been very progressive after a brief romance with Goldwater (who is not nearly as bad as people make him out to be).

I've already said if Bernie wins I'll vote for him and more. However, even ignoring the fact I'm Team Hillary, I find it mathematically unlikely he will win the nomination based on all the information we have now.

I find it interesting that you'd be amenable to Hillary and David Brock in the general... if it's in support of Bernie.

I don't see a particular problem with trying to convince people to vote for the candidate I support. That's called campaigning. GH has convinced to vote for Bernie IRL. I've done the same for Hillary IRL and online.

Do you even see a thing hillary did when she was with bill clinton in the white house? When she was first lady she said and I quote

"We need to take these people on. They are often connected to big drug cartels. They are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called 'super-predators,' "No conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why then ended up that way, but first we have to bring them to heel."

If you want to call that progressive go right ahead. Her entire governmental legacy is as a conservative democrat.


Read the previous pages of the thread. Most of us were too young to remember, but crime was fucking awful and that statement was very true.

You're terrible for saying that. Literally justifying the entire drug war and the mass incarceration of black people because "crime was really bad back then and that statement was true". By that argument the drug war is a smashing success and we should keep going and jail more people for broken window offences.

But by all means if thats what you believe at least just say it.


I take it you didn't read. Therefore, I won't bother responding since there s nothing to respond to.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15663 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-02-25 19:00:38
February 25 2016 19:00 GMT
#60580
On February 26 2016 03:37 Souma wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2016 03:33 Mohdoo wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:30 Souma wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:28 Mercy13 wrote:
On February 26 2016 03:12 Souma wrote:
He doesn't have to vote for Hillary in the general, and it's pretty ridiculous of you and others to pressure people into voting for her if she takes the nomination.

I did not vote for Obama in 2012 and I do not plan on voting for Hillary in 2016. Why in the world should anyone vote for someone or some party that does not represent them? The DNC is what it is today because of voters who will settle for the "less worse" instead of challenging the establishment to represent the people who vote for them.

There's currently no way the Democratic candidate, whether it's Hillary or Bernie, will lose in the general from my observations, however even if my vote was the decider and it was Hillary vs. Trump, I'd still vote Green and the DNC would have no one to blame but themselves for becoming the shithole they are now.

And for the Hillary supporters to support her and and the DNC for their actions just because "it always happens," or "Bernie isn't perfect either," or whatever the hell, leave your disgusting apathy at the door because it's further ruining the democratic process that is already a joke.


I'm not going to tell you who to vote for, but you reducing Hillary's supporters to people suffering "disgusting apathy" is very unfair.

The policy stakes are yyyuuugggee right now. Solely with supreme court nominations (let only executive agency appointments and executive orders) the next president is going to be able to implement drastic policy and social changes, for better or worse.

The GOP now controls 2 of the 3 branches of the federal government, as well as most state and local governments. If the next president is not a liberal we are going to have massive set backs in climate policy, racial justice, tax policy, campaign finance, abortion rights, and virtually everything else progressives care about. On climate policy alone, literally millions of lives could be at stake.

I plan to vote for whoever can best prevent that from happening, and I believe that's Hillary. Bernie's left-wing progressive brand is just too far from the mainstream to have a great chance in the general. I could be wrong of course, and if Bernie wins the nomination I'll gladly support him. However, I think the GOP is correct to desperately want to run against him instead of against Hillary.

Read again: I'm accusing people who are approving her and the DNC's underhanded tactics those with "disgusting apathy."


There's a difference between approving the tactics and saying "Those tactics are the price I pay for not having trump as president? Yes, that's fine."

If I thought there was even a shred of chance for Bernie to win a general, it'd be a different story. I do not have the slightest amount of faith that America is ready for him, as Plansix explained.

Or you could call out your candidate and the establishment for being dirty and still support her because of what you mentioned above. Or what, would that be a little too hard on your conscience if you guys were to accept the fact that Hillary and the DNC are a bit shadier than you'd like yet still vote for them?

Instead of saying, "Hey that's the name of the game," have some integrity ffs.


I honestly could not give any shits about the ethics of who is running our country. If the country does well under someone's leadership, I do not care about the personality or ethics of that person. If they are good for our country. Killed 60 people? Improved infrastructure, healthcare, immigration, our tax system and the economy? Sounds good to me.

I think it's so sad that people care so much about the character of a candidate as a stand alone quality. Not just how that personality influences decision making and policy, but who is the person. Would I have a beer with them? Pretty important quality in a president! Just so stupid. In a perfect world, we wouldn't even be able to see the candidates. We would just read a 50 page essay by each candidate explaining the problems with our country and what they would fix. With an attached resume. That would be the perfect election.
Prev 1 3027 3028 3029 3030 3031 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 55m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JimRising 493
trigger 39
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 1233
Stork 370
Larva 306
actioN 280
TY 268
Zeus 202
ToSsGirL 119
Soma 104
PianO 102
Nal_rA 53
[ Show more ]
sSak 47
Sharp 42
Noble 39
sorry 37
Yoon 35
JulyZerg 34
Sacsri 22
EffOrt 20
hero 17
Barracks 14
firebathero 12
Rush 11
IntoTheRainbow 7
ivOry 3
Dota 2
Gorgc961
XcaliburYe510
XaKoH 491
Fuzer 228
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1135
Other Games
tarik_tv8456
shahzam913
ceh9481
Happy366
crisheroes175
monkeys_forever172
Pyrionflax87
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick33798
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH385
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2183
League of Legends
• HappyZerGling115
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
55m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6h 55m
WardiTV European League
6h 55m
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
14h 55m
RSL Revival
1d
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
1d 3h
Replay Cast
1d 14h
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
2 days
OSC
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
FEL
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.