Anyone who is too lazy to flip through 30 pages of nonsense can refer to my handy 1-10 guide, note that the same people may get different ratings on the basis of different photos.

Evilteletubby: 6
venusian-kohai: 1
distant_voice: disqualified for lying
Trident: 2
PetrBlaha: 7
cataclysmic: DISQ
Meta: 3
ffwowsucks: 5
Szelkye: DISQ
Psylo: 4
Mightyatom: 2
Cyuntiyul: 3
3.22.04: 1
Ender_Spain: 2
KissBlade: 2
IcedEarth: 9
Anal_Ripper: 5
racebannon: 0
racebannon2: 5
Unforgiven_ve: 1
Vortexx: 1
ToKoreawithLove: 6 minus 2 for placing ambiguous object in mouth=4
Headbangaa1: 1
Headbangaa2: 1
Unforgiven_ve2: 2, 3, 1, 2, 0
Strafe: DISQ
lolol: 6-1 for bottle=5, 4, 7, 5, 2, 3
Nazarene: 9, 8
Lord)Lw(: 2
1tym: DISQ
Missthemark: 3
Headbangaa3: 5
Headbangaa B/W Photos: Indecent
Headbangaa4: 5
Headbangaa6: N/A
Trident2: 2
Cooperstown: 5
Pika chu: 4, 5, N/A, 5
Manit0u: 3
Brood: 5-2 for resemblence to Julia Roberts=3
Speakingriddles: 8 (tl.net photo)
Eerik: 8-2 for looking retarded=6
Amnesty: 2, 1
zonbi: N/A, 3, 4
incontrol: 3
AngryLlama: N/A, 1, 4

FakeSteve[TPR]

Valhalla18444 Posts

April 27 2006 14:21 GMT

#583

shut the fuck up

MoltkeWarding

5195 Posts

April 27 2006 14:26 GMT

#584

On April 27 2006 23:21 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
shut the fuck up

I did, but now with this post you are drawing me into a flame war. Retard.

FakeSteve[TPR]

Valhalla18444 Posts

April 27 2006 14:30 GMT

#585

i dont expect you to respond i expect you to shut the fuck up

MoltkeWarding

5195 Posts

April 27 2006 14:33 GMT

#586

Whereas I expected you to make a retarded response, and what I got was a retarded response.

Your expectations on the contrary sucked, proving again that you are a retard.

FakeSteve[TPR]

Valhalla18444 Posts

April 27 2006 14:34 GMT

#587

CONGRATULATIONS YOU'RE A DICKHEAD

SHUT THE FUCK UP

Night[Mare

Mexico4793 Posts

April 27 2006 15:00 GMT

#588

dont argue against fakesteve kk?

GTR

51535 Posts

April 27 2006 15:22 GMT

#589

i like to back fakesteve's statement in place of my name.

HowitZer

United States1610 Posts

April 27 2006 15:36 GMT

#590

MoltkeWarding: -999999 (for not even posting a pic and extreme narcissism)

lololol

5198 Posts

April 27 2006 15:44 GMT

#591

OMG, MoltkeWarding, they are all 11 or more on the 1-10 scale, it's the truth!

HeadBangaa

United States6512 Posts

April 27 2006 15:53 GMT

#592

Headbangaa1: 1
Headbangaa2: 1

Laura, my lovely girlfriend:

Pretentious asshole, might wanna run the numbers again. =p

IcedEarth

United States3661 Posts

April 27 2006 15:56 GMT

#593

/blush thanks

muntol

United States279 Posts

April 27 2006 16:16 GMT

#594

SweeTLemonS[TPR]

11739 Posts

April 27 2006 16:20 GMT

#595

On April 27 2006 23:10 MoltkeWarding wrote:
Anyone who is too lazy to flip through 30 pages of nonsense can refer to my handy 1-10 guide, note that the same people may get different ratings on the basis of different photos.

Evilteletubby: 6
venusian-kohai: 1
distant_voice: disqualified for lying
Trident: 2
PetrBlaha: 7
cataclysmic: DISQ
Meta: 3
ffwowsucks: 5
Szelkye: DISQ
Psylo: 4
Mightyatom: 2
Cyuntiyul: 3
3.22.04: 1
Ender_Spain: 2
KissBlade: 2
IcedEarth: 9
Anal_Ripper: 5
racebannon: 0
racebannon2: 5
Unforgiven_ve: 1
Vortexx: 1
ToKoreawithLove: 6 minus 2 for placing ambiguous object in mouth=4
Headbangaa1: 1
Headbangaa2: 1
Unforgiven_ve2: 2, 3, 1, 2, 0
Strafe: DISQ
lolol: 6-1 for bottle=5, 4, 7, 5, 2, 3
Nazarene: 9, 8
Lord)Lw(: 2
1tym: DISQ
Missthemark: 3
Headbangaa3: 5
Headbangaa B/W Photos: Indecent
Headbangaa4: 5
Headbangaa6: N/A
Trident2: 2
Cooperstown: 5
Pika chu: 4, 5, N/A, 5
Manit0u: 3
Brood: 5-2 for resemblence to Julia Roberts=3
Speakingriddles: 8 (tl.net photo)
Eerik: 8-2 for looking retarded=6
Amnesty: 2, 1
zonbi: N/A, 3, 4
incontrol: 3
AngryLlama: N/A, 1, 4

But how can we tell a person's beauty without knowing the following?:

Their religion, and respective piety
-Their family and family history
-Their socio-economic class
-Their artistic and literary talents
-Their sensitivity, romanticism and sentimentalism
-Their patriotism, provincialism, and rootedness in their native culture
-Their cooking, cleaning and other domestic abilities
-Their mental and emotional stability
-Their historical attitude and preferences regarding bourgeois family life
-Their racial origins (if not already clear)
-Their feminine virtues (virginity, modesty, etc)

(It never gets old...)

This thread was a comedic goldmine, too. With all the crazy pictures, the post of some random person's autobiography (which was pretty interesting, actually), and then IntotheWow's story. Awesome thread. Top ten of all time on TL.net.

Manifesto7

Osaka27158 Posts

April 27 2006 16:51 GMT

#596

just read it again.

Also, thanks for the rating system Moltke, but how is it that you rated a picture of our current Liquibition Champion higher than any other picture, women included? (Iced Earth's entry) I would have thought that supericial evaluation of the physical appearance of another man would have been too much for your moral standards.