|
|
http://clgaming.net/news/609-montecristo-steps-down-as-coach
Monte steps down, Zuna on try out (?).
from ongamers:
While Zuna is not here as CLG's new coach he is here to assist and supplement communication, environment and analysis for the team in their preparations for the match vs Curse Academy. Because of his strong relationships and history with Aphromoo, Link and Doublelift we believe he can facilitate more constructive practice going into the relegation matches on September 9th.
Bringing Zuna most likely mean that core (Aphro/Link/Lift) stays together and Seraph/Dexter are leaving after relegation. It's not good for CLG fans, but CLG probably can't afford to lose Doublelift after not making to Worlds/KR trip.
|
I wouldn't be surprised if fnatic got the best soloqueue ranks from the bootcamping, must be hard to get scrims when you have such a bad scrimming partner reputation, so that means lots of soloqueue
|
On September 05 2014 15:45 SagaZ wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if fnatic got the best soloqueue ranks from the bootcamping, must be hard to get scrims when you have such a bad scrimming partner reputation, so that means lots of soloqueue
What do you mean by "such a bad scrimming partner reputation" ?
|
going afk during games, trolling, no caring, ect...
|
On September 05 2014 14:51 orzeu wrote:http://clgaming.net/news/609-montecristo-steps-down-as-coachMonte steps down, Zuna on try out (?). from ongamers: Show nested quote +While Zuna is not here as CLG's new coach he is here to assist and supplement communication, environment and analysis for the team in their preparations for the match vs Curse Academy. Because of his strong relationships and history with Aphromoo, Link and Doublelift we believe he can facilitate more constructive practice going into the relegation matches on September 9th. Bringing Zuna most likely mean that core (Aphro/Link/Lift) stays together and Seraph/Dexter are leaving after relegation. It's not good for CLG fans, but CLG probably can't afford to lose Doublelift after not making to Worlds/KR trip.
I hope it works out for Zuna. Never liked his play, but like Nien ,I feel bad for him given the heavy shitstorm reddit dropped on him. When his goal for the spring split was to be less hated, you knew he was shot.
|
On September 05 2014 17:14 Sakray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2014 15:45 SagaZ wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if fnatic got the best soloqueue ranks from the bootcamping, must be hard to get scrims when you have such a bad scrimming partner reputation, so that means lots of soloqueue What do you mean by "such a bad scrimming partner reputation" ?
Fnatic are notorious for not really caring about scrims. Whenever an EU pro talks about fnatic and scrims it's always in a pretty negative or non-caring light.
|
The land of freedom23126 Posts
I really like Zuna's addition, though.
Not a lot of players can ignore all the hate with such brilliance, summoning even more hate, lol.
Now, we just need to find toplaner/jungle or get toplane/midlane with switching Link into jungle and CLG S5 #believe.
|
On September 05 2014 21:40 Numy wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2014 17:14 Sakray wrote:On September 05 2014 15:45 SagaZ wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if fnatic got the best soloqueue ranks from the bootcamping, must be hard to get scrims when you have such a bad scrimming partner reputation, so that means lots of soloqueue What do you mean by "such a bad scrimming partner reputation" ? Fnatic are notorious for not really caring about scrims. Whenever an EU pro talks about fnatic and scrims it's always in a pretty negative or non-caring light.
And true to form, Fnatic is piling on those soloque games.
|
On September 05 2014 08:09 Fusilero wrote:
Incarnati0n will not even be with SK at the bootcamp, oh boy.
To clarify why I'm posting this the initial announcement was only that he couldn't go backstage, some speculated (on reddit at least) that he may still help them bootcamp or remote coach. He will be doing neither.
I'm pretty sure manager even stated that he will be bringing him to Korea. Kinda bummed out, I wanted to see him in soloq 
|
On September 06 2014 01:22 Gahlo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2014 21:40 Numy wrote:On September 05 2014 17:14 Sakray wrote:On September 05 2014 15:45 SagaZ wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if fnatic got the best soloqueue ranks from the bootcamping, must be hard to get scrims when you have such a bad scrimming partner reputation, so that means lots of soloqueue What do you mean by "such a bad scrimming partner reputation" ? Fnatic are notorious for not really caring about scrims. Whenever an EU pro talks about fnatic and scrims it's always in a pretty negative or non-caring light. And true to form, Fnatic is piling on those soloque games.
Welp, the structure sure wasted a lot of money to send 5 dickheads play soloQ in Korea.
They'll most likely get destroyed in groupstage (as usual when they're in an international competition) and will try to find a good excuse about it (would be happy if soaz were to retire after WC)
|
The land of freedom23126 Posts
On September 06 2014 05:23 Sakray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 01:22 Gahlo wrote:On September 05 2014 21:40 Numy wrote:On September 05 2014 17:14 Sakray wrote:On September 05 2014 15:45 SagaZ wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if fnatic got the best soloqueue ranks from the bootcamping, must be hard to get scrims when you have such a bad scrimming partner reputation, so that means lots of soloqueue What do you mean by "such a bad scrimming partner reputation" ? Fnatic are notorious for not really caring about scrims. Whenever an EU pro talks about fnatic and scrims it's always in a pretty negative or non-caring light. And true to form, Fnatic is piling on those soloque games. Welp, the structure sure wasted a lot of money to send 5 dickheads play soloQ in Korea. They'll most likely get destroyed in groupstage (as usual when they're in an international competition) and will try to find a good excuse about it (would be happy if soaz were to retire after WC)
On less serious note, Fnatic hadn't got eliminated in groupstages since, uhh...IEM Season VI iirc?
|
|
|
On September 06 2014 05:23 Sakray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 01:22 Gahlo wrote:On September 05 2014 21:40 Numy wrote:On September 05 2014 17:14 Sakray wrote:On September 05 2014 15:45 SagaZ wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if fnatic got the best soloqueue ranks from the bootcamping, must be hard to get scrims when you have such a bad scrimming partner reputation, so that means lots of soloqueue What do you mean by "such a bad scrimming partner reputation" ? Fnatic are notorious for not really caring about scrims. Whenever an EU pro talks about fnatic and scrims it's always in a pretty negative or non-caring light. And true to form, Fnatic is piling on those soloque games. Welp, the structure sure wasted a lot of money to send 5 dickheads play soloQ in Korea. They'll most likely get destroyed in groupstage (as usual when they're in an international competition) and will try to find a good excuse about it (would be happy if soaz were to retire after WC)
Well what matters at the end is worlds and Fanatic was the strongest western team at worlds 2013.
|
On September 06 2014 11:00 TitusVI wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 05:23 Sakray wrote:On September 06 2014 01:22 Gahlo wrote:On September 05 2014 21:40 Numy wrote:On September 05 2014 17:14 Sakray wrote:On September 05 2014 15:45 SagaZ wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if fnatic got the best soloqueue ranks from the bootcamping, must be hard to get scrims when you have such a bad scrimming partner reputation, so that means lots of soloqueue What do you mean by "such a bad scrimming partner reputation" ? Fnatic are notorious for not really caring about scrims. Whenever an EU pro talks about fnatic and scrims it's always in a pretty negative or non-caring light. And true to form, Fnatic is piling on those soloque games. Welp, the structure sure wasted a lot of money to send 5 dickheads play soloQ in Korea. They'll most likely get destroyed in groupstage (as usual when they're in an international competition) and will try to find a good excuse about it (would be happy if soaz were to retire after WC) Well what matters at the end is worlds and Fanatic was the strongest western team at worlds 2013.
Yeah, and Gambit was pretty strong too, Ozone dropped the ball because Dade was awful, and SKTK was by far the best team in the world.
Framing things on results from a strict year ago is silly, imo.
|
On September 06 2014 11:01 Gahlo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 11:00 TitusVI wrote:On September 06 2014 05:23 Sakray wrote:On September 06 2014 01:22 Gahlo wrote:On September 05 2014 21:40 Numy wrote:On September 05 2014 17:14 Sakray wrote:On September 05 2014 15:45 SagaZ wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if fnatic got the best soloqueue ranks from the bootcamping, must be hard to get scrims when you have such a bad scrimming partner reputation, so that means lots of soloqueue What do you mean by "such a bad scrimming partner reputation" ? Fnatic are notorious for not really caring about scrims. Whenever an EU pro talks about fnatic and scrims it's always in a pretty negative or non-caring light. And true to form, Fnatic is piling on those soloque games. Welp, the structure sure wasted a lot of money to send 5 dickheads play soloQ in Korea. They'll most likely get destroyed in groupstage (as usual when they're in an international competition) and will try to find a good excuse about it (would be happy if soaz were to retire after WC) Well what matters at the end is worlds and Fanatic was the strongest western team at worlds 2013. Yeah, and Gambit was preety strong too while Ozone dropped the ball. Framing things on results from a strict year ago is silly, imo.
But worlds is the event who all teams take seriously. Why would u judge Fanatic based on recent events that they don't give a shit about?
|
On September 06 2014 11:04 TitusVI wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 11:01 Gahlo wrote:On September 06 2014 11:00 TitusVI wrote:On September 06 2014 05:23 Sakray wrote:On September 06 2014 01:22 Gahlo wrote:On September 05 2014 21:40 Numy wrote:On September 05 2014 17:14 Sakray wrote:On September 05 2014 15:45 SagaZ wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if fnatic got the best soloqueue ranks from the bootcamping, must be hard to get scrims when you have such a bad scrimming partner reputation, so that means lots of soloqueue What do you mean by "such a bad scrimming partner reputation" ? Fnatic are notorious for not really caring about scrims. Whenever an EU pro talks about fnatic and scrims it's always in a pretty negative or non-caring light. And true to form, Fnatic is piling on those soloque games. Welp, the structure sure wasted a lot of money to send 5 dickheads play soloQ in Korea. They'll most likely get destroyed in groupstage (as usual when they're in an international competition) and will try to find a good excuse about it (would be happy if soaz were to retire after WC) Well what matters at the end is worlds and Fanatic was the strongest western team at worlds 2013. Yeah, and Gambit was preety strong too while Ozone dropped the ball. Framing things on results from a strict year ago is silly, imo. But worlds is the event who all teams take seriously. Why would u judge Fanatic based on recent events that they don't give a shit about?
Because if all Fnatic cares about is worlds, then it's clear their mindset is off.
|
To be fair, Monte said on SI that Korean teams generally will try any scrim partner for two games. If the are satisfied, then they will continue playing. If they aren't, then they will never scrim that team again. So I assume that Koreans will just try Fnatic for themselves rather than base the decision on hearsay. With that said...
Also Leviathan also said on his ask.fm that Bubbadub is the best support and that Forgiven+Bubbadub would be the best botlane, confirmed?
Oh and for people who don't read GD thread: http://na.lolesports.com/articles/interregional-movement-and-expansion-tournament
|
On September 06 2014 05:23 Sakray wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 01:22 Gahlo wrote:On September 05 2014 21:40 Numy wrote:On September 05 2014 17:14 Sakray wrote:On September 05 2014 15:45 SagaZ wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if fnatic got the best soloqueue ranks from the bootcamping, must be hard to get scrims when you have such a bad scrimming partner reputation, so that means lots of soloqueue What do you mean by "such a bad scrimming partner reputation" ? Fnatic are notorious for not really caring about scrims. Whenever an EU pro talks about fnatic and scrims it's always in a pretty negative or non-caring light. And true to form, Fnatic is piling on those soloque games. Welp, the structure sure wasted a lot of money to send 5 dickheads play soloQ in Korea. They'll most likely get destroyed in groupstage (as usual when they're in an international competition) and will try to find a good excuse about it (would be happy if soaz were to retire after WC)
Fnatic has more soloQ games because they arrived first. This is just random hating.
|
|
|
Not sure riot would have allowed that with Blue/White in Korea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
