EPTyou stated your opinion on an issue that wasn't being discussed. if you meant something else then you phrased it badly
GomTV protecting Boxer? - Page 22
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
mOnion
United States5651 Posts
you stated your opinion on an issue that wasn't being discussed. if you meant something else then you phrased it badly | ||
|
Fa1nT
United States3423 Posts
| ||
|
Shirolol
England504 Posts
On December 01 2010 22:34 mOnion wrote: no i didnt. your post touched on the fact that the match wasn't rigged and that nothing in this thread had any merit and then you went on some tangent about conspiracies. you stated your opinion on an issue that wasn't being discussed. if you meant something else then you phrased it badly Pseudo-intellectual much? Calm down. I think I am aware of what I said in my own post, thanks. Just because you can't understand basic English doesn't mean you are correct. I'll explain it in baby-terms for you, so you can understand. On December 01 2010 22:20 mOnion wrote: I think you're ignorantly disregarding a lot of the good arguments in this thread just because he played badly doesn't mean the rest of what was discussed here doesn't have merit This is what I quoted from you, and is what I am writing a response to. I then go on to say that I agree that what you said about him playing badly doesn't mean that the conspiracies you think exist, don't exist, it just means he played badly - even if he was spoon fed tvt's etc. I also talk about how ridiculous 99% of this thread is and the fact is is quite clearly not rigged in any way. Then I explain to you why you are getting so defensive when shown facts that disprove your conspiracy theory for example the post made by junkka. I hope you understand now. | ||
|
drekk
91 Posts
| ||
Aesop
Hungary11233 Posts
| ||
| ||
