EPTDeal, OP will train you at $2.25/hr hour for 4 hours, see you tomorrow at 8pm EST
SC coaching inspired by inc/gretorp - Page 3
| Forum Index > Closed |
Hot_Bid
Braavos36402 Posts
Deal, OP will train you at $2.25/hr hour for 4 hours, see you tomorrow at 8pm EST | ||
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:27 Hot_Bid wrote: Deal, OP will train you at $2.25/hr hour for 4 hours, see you tomorrow at 8pm EST What's the group rate if I get in on this? | ||
Chill
Calgary26003 Posts
My credentials are I moderate a starcraft forum and I play SNES games on a stream while the koreans are out of school because they are too good for me. Also I 3-1 Combat-Ex and dodged him yesterday when he asked me for a re while I was at work. | ||
RaGe
Belgium9950 Posts
2.25/hr? | ||
|
ProoM
Lithuania1741 Posts
40 ![[image loading]](http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/images/b/b6/Vespine.gif) | ||
|
Itachii
Poland12466 Posts
| ||
|
ProoM
Lithuania1741 Posts
| ||
|
itzme_petey
United States1400 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:21 GreEny K wrote: Says who? You need 0 qualification to teach, just need an audiance... Says a logical person who isnt an idiot. But I guess idiots are going to be the only people who consider this. + Show Spoiler + A logical person would assume that teaching requires a person to know a subject thoroughly and have achievements/certifications/experience to prove that knowledge. Let me break that down even more for you buddy. Person --> knowledge --> certification/achievements/experience --> teach Teaching DOES require qualification (in either of those forms). The term "teaching" itself implies experience/knowledge/certification. However, BULLSHITTING requires 0 qualifications, just an audience. | ||
|
leMaj24
United States262 Posts
| ||
|
404.Delirium
United States1190 Posts
| ||
|
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:33 itzme_petey wrote: Says a logical person who isnt an idiot. But I guess idiots are going to be the only people who consider this. + Show Spoiler + A logical person would assume that teaching requires a person to know a subject thoroughly and have achievements/certifications/experience to prove that knowledge. Let me break that down even more for you buddy. Person --> knowledge --> certification/achievements/experience --> teach Teaching DOES require qualification (in either of those forms). The term "teaching" itself implies experience/knowledge/certification. However, BULLSHITTING requires 0 qualifications, just an audience. Ok, you play him 100 times and IF you beat him once I will agree to yuor statement, however he knows more about the game than yuo ever will -_- which gives him knowledge, and he has been playing this game for a while so he has experience, and his qualificationsa re that he has been in WCG multiple times... You sir, have no argument | ||
|
littlechava
United States7221 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:44 GreEny K wrote: calm down broOk, you play him 100 times and IF you beat him once I will agree to yuor statement, however he knows more about the game than yuo ever will -_- which gives him knowledge, and he has been playing this game for a while so he has experience, and his qualificationsa re that he has been in WCG multiple times... You sir, have no argument | ||
|
Cedstick
Canada3336 Posts
You'd be best to hold your patience, Machine, and just do some free training with a couple people to get some testimonials IMO. | ||
|
machinehead..
412 Posts
I just want to have fun with it. If you know gretorp... when both active I think we are around the same skill level, so maybe you can use that as a gauge... A lot of top players just play incredibly standard and win games through better macro/micro. A lot of the lesser players don't have the macro and micro to get the results of others, even if they follow them step by step. I feel like I could help those players win more off strategy than mechanics. If people want to get better, that's their prerogative. If not, just the same, but I see no point in trolling. I deleted a lot of my replays a month ago, but this is uploaded on a site do to it being taken off wgt: one of my wins versus mondragon http://reps.ru/replays.php?replay=comment&id=6859# I'm not proclaiming to be a gosu... but unless you are B+/A- I could prob help you, and especially if you are a lot lower than that. I realize it's a standard replay, but my play style has changed greatly: a lot more friendly to the lesser skilled I think. | ||
|
LuckyFool
United States9015 Posts
| ||
|
Empyrean
17070 Posts
| ||
|
itzme_petey
United States1400 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:44 GreEny K wrote: Ok, you play him 100 times and IF you beat him once I will agree to yuor statement, however he knows more about the game than yuo ever will -_- which gives him knowledge, and he has been playing this game for a while so he has experience, and his qualificationsa re that he has been in WCG multiple times... You sir, have no argument Must I keep having to point out things that are implied? Do you consider quality of experience/knowledge/achievements a factor? Typically people consider that.. How is playing in WCG an achievement, was there a consistent placement in top 5 or so? Or is this a HovZ self-valuation thing? There is no one good that is vouching for him. EDIT: But no more shitting on this thread. | ||
|
ZhenMiChan
Netherlands1181 Posts
| ||
|
littlechava
United States7221 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:52 machinehead.. wrote: You can joke about it if you want, it's not something I'm desperate to do, but simply something I'm capable of doing that would also help me in poker... All foreign players are "bad" compared to Koreans; the point is if someone is better than you, then they can help you get better -- even if you are still "not good enough." If any are truly interested just PM me, and I could help you next week. I just want to have fun with it. If you know gretorp... when both active I think we are around the same skill level, so maybe you can use that as a gauge... A lot of top players just play incredibly standard and win games through better macro/micro. A lot of the lesser players don't have the macro and micro to get the results of others, even if they follow them step by step. I feel like I could help those players win more off strategy than mechanics. If people want to get better, that's their prerogative. If not, just the same, but I see no point in trolling. I deleted a lot of my replays a month ago, but this is uploaded on a site do to it being taken off wgt: one of my wins versus mondragon http://reps.ru/replays.php?replay=comment&id=6859# I'm not proclaiming to be a gosu... but unless you are B+/A- I could prob help you, and especially if you are a lot lower than that. I realize it's a standard replay, but my play style has changed greatly: a lot more friendly to the lesser skilled I think. Hmm... 2+ year old replay vs Mondragon I see you're playing hardball I'll raise | ||
|
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
On January 06 2010 02:56 itzme_petey wrote: Must I keep having to point out things that are implied? Do you consider quality of experience/knowledge/achievements a factor? There is no one good that is vouching for him. EDIT: But no more shitting on this thread. Give it some time, people will vouch for him, also how is beating mondragon in a WCG match not quality? For foreigners WCG is as good as it gets... | ||
| ||
