EPT[ASL6] Ro16 Group A - Page 5
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
Match-fixing accusations are taken very seriously on TL. Do NOT make any kind of match-fixing accusation unless you have proof. The "shady" things that a player did in-game does not count as proof. | ||
TaardadAiel
Bulgaria750 Posts
| ||
|
M2
Bulgaria4168 Posts
| ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51291 Posts
| ||
|
Motivate
2860 Posts
| ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51291 Posts
On September 18 2018 20:25 M2 wrote: This phase should bo3 imo, whats the point to exactly repeat the previous phase format and not even utilizing all 4 maps actually I agree, theres really no difference between Ro24 and Ro16 right now, would like it if Ro16 was Bo3 groups or Round robin groups | ||
|
Timebon3s
Norway772 Posts
| ||
|
nojok
France15846 Posts
On September 18 2018 20:25 TaardadAiel wrote: Sharp had MUCH better positional sense, that sickle-cut maneuver in the bottom 1/3 of the center was so gratifying. He must've read Guderian's books. The moment he had a semi-solid position so as to close access to the third main and was not facing a dropship fleet, he had the game in his favor. Great job, he's an amazing TvT player. Imo it was mostly because of the map lay out. Sharp's third was easy to defend as the tanks on highground still provided some coverage of the centre of the map, then the 4th was further away in a rather hard spot ro acess for a group of vultures. Meanwhile sea's 3rd would have required dead units to defend it and his 4th and 5th bases were much harder to defend. | ||
|
oEkY
Germany649 Posts
| ||
|
oEkY
Germany649 Posts
On September 18 2018 20:28 nojok wrote: Imo it was mostly because of the map lay out. Sharp's third was easy to defend as the tanks on highground still provided some coverage of the centre of the map, then the 4th was further away in a rather hard spot ro acess for a group of vultures. Meanwhile sea's 3rd would have required dead units to defend it and his 4th and 5th bases were much harder to defend. Are those 3rd bases really on highground? i thought that i read somewhere in another thread that it is some kind of fake-highground with no advantage?! | ||
|
nojok
France15846 Posts
On September 18 2018 20:34 oEkY wrote: Are those 3rd bases really on highground? i thought that i read somewhere in another thread that it is some kind of fake-highground with no advantage?! I don't know so you're probably right but the tanks at sharp's 3rd still defended the base while having a presence on the centre. | ||
GTR
51688 Posts
| ||
|
prosatan
Romania9194 Posts
| ||
|
oEkY
Germany649 Posts
On September 18 2018 20:36 nojok wrote: I don't know so you're probably right but the tanks at sharp's 3rd still defended the base while having a presence on the centre. yeah, u are totally right, i was just wondering and would have liked a confirmation from someone who knows it exactly  | ||
|
TaardadAiel
Bulgaria750 Posts
| ||
|
nojok
France15846 Posts
| ||
|
Timebon3s
Norway772 Posts
| ||
|
oEkY
Germany649 Posts
| ||
|
Timebon3s
Norway772 Posts
| ||
|
nojok
France15846 Posts
| ||
|
TaardadAiel
Bulgaria750 Posts
| ||
| ||
