Finals are Bo3 Clan Wars (not individual sets) x Bo7 (standard Clan War format), this thread is for Game 1 only.
If a player commits a punishable offense, one of his teammates will be penalized at random (will be a player which has yet to play) - This ensures that players don't BM when the lose knowing that a suspension will do nothing.
gogo SAS!! i hope sziky, ace, draw, dsaqwe, Zaraki and Dinot show up, and for GT Semih, TrutaCz, SneazeL, Michael, and Jumper. if that happens it will super mega freaking awesome
and would be good too to see hacklebeast and Elegant casting, dual casting are more entertaining
How did eywa get a hold of our line up? we have to shuffle it up, party rock! Also, I think Zaraki's best m.u is ZvP why do you think he will die to sneazel, he's like jaedong in his prime.
On April 17 2012 10:09 dRaW wrote: How did eywa get a hold of our line up? we have to shuffle it up, party rock! Also, I think Zaraki's best m.u is ZvP why do you think he will die to sneazel, he's like jaedong in his prime.
SneazeL's is PvZ, and he is a superior player to ZaRaki in that matchup.
On April 17 2012 10:09 dRaW wrote: How did eywa get a hold of our line up? we have to shuffle it up, party rock! Also, I think Zaraki's best m.u is ZvP why do you think he will die to sneazel, he's like jaedong in his prime.
JW why is the ruling that another player @ random gets punished when this is Bo3 and the BM player can just not play in the other series? (mentioned they can't get penalized...)
On April 17 2012 11:43 dRaW wrote: JW why is the ruling that another player @ random gets punished when this is Bo3 and the BM player can just not play in the other series? (mentioned they can't get penalized...)
1) It's been that way for the previous 2 rounds of playoffs. 2) What you say doesn't apply to all given situations.
On April 17 2012 11:43 dRaW wrote: JW why is the ruling that another player @ random gets punished when this is Bo3 and the BM player can just not play in the other series? (mentioned they can't get penalized...)
1) It's been that way for the previous 2 rounds of playoffs. 2) What you say doesn't apply to all given situations.
okay thnx I am pretty sure there won't be any BM but both team will probably want to win vs the whole roster of the other team (I don't think Gt could even spare 1 person out if there was BM early)
On April 17 2012 11:43 dRaW wrote: JW why is the ruling that another player @ random gets punished when this is Bo3 and the BM player can just not play in the other series? (mentioned they can't get penalized...)
1) It's been that way for the previous 2 rounds of playoffs. 2) What you say doesn't apply to all given situations.
okay thnx I am pretty sure there won't be any BM but both team will probably want to win vs the whole roster of the other team (I don't think Gt could even spare 1 person out if there was BM early)
On April 17 2012 09:37 hacklebeast wrote: Fun fact of the day #1 sneazel only has a winning record over 2 sas players (1-1 zaraki, 2-10 sziky, 2-4 kashu, 4-1 ace, 4-0 vorti, 1-2 locdog)
On April 17 2012 09:37 hacklebeast wrote: Fun fact of the day #1 sneazel only has a winning record over 2 sas players (1-1 zaraki, 2-10 sziky, 2-4 kashu, 4-1 ace, 4-0 vorti, 1-2 locdog)
stats from? isl2 only?
isl1-3, gc1-2, gc all star, gosu cup, defiler tours 6-36 (i may have missed some of your smurffs, you had a lot), 4 different koth events, nation war, ribbon tour, rd tour.
On April 17 2012 10:09 dRaW wrote: How did eywa get a hold of our line up? we have to shuffle it up, party rock! Also, I think Zaraki's best m.u is ZvP why do you think he will die to sneazel, he's like jaedong in his prime.
SneazeL's is PvZ, and he is a superior player to ZaRaki in that matchup.
I love you Draw I'm still laughing :D and yes, I am without doubt one of the weaker players in this final i have much respect for each and every one of gt players, they are really good but I will try to give the best I have ( if i got to play ) gogo sas!! lets hope for good games and also gl and hf to gt !
On April 17 2012 10:09 dRaW wrote: How did eywa get a hold of our line up? we have to shuffle it up, party rock! Also, I think Zaraki's best m.u is ZvP why do you think he will die to sneazel, he's like jaedong in his prime.
SneazeL's is PvZ, and he is a superior player to ZaRaki in that matchup.
I love you Draw I'm still laughing :D and yes, I am without doubt one of the weaker players in this final i have much respect for each and every one of gt players, they are really good but I will try to give the best I have ( if i got to play ) gogo sas!! lets hope for good games and also gl and hf to gt !
Nah, you just need to accept that you could be the best if you wanted to win
Anyway, where's the hype? Already Wednesday night...
On April 17 2012 10:09 dRaW wrote: How did eywa get a hold of our line up? we have to shuffle it up, party rock! Also, I think Zaraki's best m.u is ZvP why do you think he will die to sneazel, he's like jaedong in his prime.
SneazeL's is PvZ, and he is a superior player to ZaRaki in that matchup.
I love you Draw I'm still laughing :D and yes, I am without doubt one of the weaker players in this final i have much respect for each and every one of gt players, they are really good but I will try to give the best I have ( if i got to play ) gogo sas!! lets hope for good games and also gl and hf to gt !
Nah, you just need to accept that you could be the best if you wanted to win
Anyway, where's the hype? Already Wednesday night...
excluding sziky, southpark has never lost a series to a sas member(3-1 kashu, 3-1 zaraki, 2-1 locdog, 2-0 pez, 1-0 kashu, 1-0 zaraki 1-0 vorti, 0-1 sziky, 1-2 sziky, 0-1 sziky)
On April 19 2012 07:26 hacklebeast wrote: Fun fact of the day #3
excluding sziky, southpark has never lost a series to a sas member(3-1 kashu, 3-1 zaraki, 2-1 locdog, 2-0 pez, 1-0 kashu, 1-0 zaraki 1-0 vorti, 0-1 sziky, 1-2 sziky, 0-1 sziky)
On April 19 2012 07:26 hacklebeast wrote: Fun fact of the day #3
excluding sziky, southpark has never lost a series to a sas member(3-1 kashu, 3-1 zaraki, 2-1 locdog, 2-0 pez, 1-0 kashu, 1-0 zaraki 1-0 vorti, 0-1 sziky, 1-2 sziky, 0-1 sziky)
On April 19 2012 07:26 hacklebeast wrote: Fun fact of the day #3
excluding sziky, southpark has never lost a series to a sas member(3-1 kashu, 3-1 zaraki, 2-1 locdog, 2-0 pez, 1-0 kashu, 1-0 zaraki 1-0 vorti, 0-1 sziky, 1-2 sziky, 0-1 sziky)
I think Jumper is also undefeated on Aztec : ))))
But only vs sas or in general ?
in general, also I would like to make a formal complaint that Michael was watching my stream while I was practicing PvZ BOs on Aztec, very un-manner.
On April 19 2012 07:26 hacklebeast wrote: Fun fact of the day #3
excluding sziky, southpark has never lost a series to a sas member(3-1 kashu, 3-1 zaraki, 2-1 locdog, 2-0 pez, 1-0 kashu, 1-0 zaraki 1-0 vorti, 0-1 sziky, 1-2 sziky, 0-1 sziky)
I think Jumper is also undefeated on Aztec : ))))
But only vs sas or in general ?
in general, also I would like to make a formal complaint that Michael was watching my stream while I was practicing PvZ BOs on Aztec, very un-manner.
Then... don't stream while practicing map specific BOs?
On April 19 2012 07:26 hacklebeast wrote: Fun fact of the day #3
excluding sziky, southpark has never lost a series to a sas member(3-1 kashu, 3-1 zaraki, 2-1 locdog, 2-0 pez, 1-0 kashu, 1-0 zaraki 1-0 vorti, 0-1 sziky, 1-2 sziky, 0-1 sziky)
I think Jumper is also undefeated on Aztec : ))))
But only vs sas or in general ?
in general, also I would like to make a formal complaint that Michael was watching my stream while I was practicing PvZ BOs on Aztec, very un-manner.
On April 19 2012 07:26 hacklebeast wrote: Fun fact of the day #3
excluding sziky, southpark has never lost a series to a sas member(3-1 kashu, 3-1 zaraki, 2-1 locdog, 2-0 pez, 1-0 kashu, 1-0 zaraki 1-0 vorti, 0-1 sziky, 1-2 sziky, 0-1 sziky)
I think Jumper is also undefeated on Aztec : ))))
But only vs sas or in general ?
in general, also I would like to make a formal complaint that Michael was watching my stream while I was practicing PvZ BOs on Aztec, very un-manner.
LOL i wasn't even there when you were practicing Aztec, nor do I think you will play on it aka itszergimbamapbysasdraw
On April 19 2012 07:26 hacklebeast wrote: Fun fact of the day #3
excluding sziky, southpark has never lost a series to a sas member(3-1 kashu, 3-1 zaraki, 2-1 locdog, 2-0 pez, 1-0 kashu, 1-0 zaraki 1-0 vorti, 0-1 sziky, 1-2 sziky, 0-1 sziky)
On April 19 2012 07:26 hacklebeast wrote: Fun fact of the day #3
excluding sziky, southpark has never lost a series to a sas member(3-1 kashu, 3-1 zaraki, 2-1 locdog, 2-0 pez, 1-0 kashu, 1-0 zaraki 1-0 vorti, 0-1 sziky, 1-2 sziky, 0-1 sziky)
I think Jumper is also undefeated on Aztec : ))))
But only vs sas or in general ?
in general, also I would like to make a formal complaint that Michael was watching my stream while I was practicing PvZ BOs on Aztec, very un-manner.
LOL i wasn't even there when you were practicing Aztec, nor do I think you will play on it aka itszergimbamapbysasdraw
doesnt matter if you know my map or not,you can not stop me;)
Ah, I recall other people mentioning that the updates/hype keeps the scene really intrigued in upcoming matches... I forgot though that since LRM is not in the finals there is no hype write-up. So perharps I should just do a mini version instead;
(All stats solely from this season of Gambit Cup ONLY for the maps that will be played) The Teams: Gt Gt.Sneazel: 0-1vZ Aztec, 1-1vZ La Mancha, 0-1vT/1-0vZ Gladiator, 0-1vP Jade Gt.Trutacz: 1-1vZ/1-0vP Match Point, 1-0vT La Mancha, 1-1vZ Gladiator, 1-0vP Jade Gt.Michael: 1-0vT Aztec, 0-1vZ La Mancha, 1-0vZ Gladiator, 1-0vP Jade, 1-0vZ Circuit Breaker Gt.SouthPark: 1-0vZ/0-1vT Match Point, 1-0vP La Mancha, 1-0vZ/0-1vP Gladiator Gt.Jumper: 1-0vZ/2-0vP/2-0vT Aztec, 1-0vT Gladiator Gt.eeic09: N/A Gt.Semih: 2-0vP Jade
Sas sas.Locdog: 2-1vP La Mancha Zaraki: 1-0vZ Match Point, 0-1vZ La Mancha, 0-1vP Gladiator Kashu: 2-0vP Aztec Skzlime: 0-1vZ Match Point Vorti: 0-1vZ Match Point 0-1vT La Mancha Draw: 0-1vP Match Point, 2-0vP/0-1vZ Jade Ace: 1-0vP Aztec, 0-1vZ Match Point, 1-1vP La Mancha, 0-2vZ Gladiator Sziky: 1-0vP Match Point, 1-0vP Gladiator, 1-0vP Jade DinOt: 1-0vZ Gladiator, 0-1vZ Jade non: NA
Head-to-Head: Gt > Sas 8-1 (Minus walk over sets) Sneazel> Zaraki/Ace Southpark> Vorti Trutacz> Pez Michael> Draw/Sziky/Ace/Zaraki Jumper < Non
Hmmm, this is an interesting development, I didn't think that was up for public discussion just yet.
Also, @DraW, I already wrote everything there is to write about the players as far as what's relevant to this league, I can just c/p that, but ofc, that would be redundant. I know hype is important, but I don't have an unlimited supply of time and given that you weren't able to formulate your hype in any way that is pertinent to read (hype about your own team), well... You can pretty well see where I'm going with this, no need to write it out.
On April 20 2012 05:35 dRaW wrote: Ah, I recall other people mentioning that the updates/hype keeps the scene really intrigued in upcoming matches... I forgot though that since LRM is not in the finals there is no hype write-up. So perharps I should just do a mini version instead;
(All stats solely from this season of Gambit Cup ONLY for the maps that will be played) The Teams: Gt Gt.Sneazel: 0-1vZ Aztec, 1-1vZ La Mancha, 0-1vT/1-0vZ Gladiator, 0-1vP Jade Gt.Trutacz: 1-1vZ/1-0vP Match Point, 1-0vT La Mancha, 1-1vZ Gladiator, 1-0vP Jade Gt.Michael: 1-0vT Aztec, 0-1vZ La Mancha, 1-0vZ Gladiator, 1-0vP Jade, 1-0vZ Circuit Breaker Gt.SouthPark: 1-0vZ/0-1vT Match Point, 1-0vP La Mancha, 1-0vZ/0-1vP Gladiator Gt.Jumper: 1-0vZ/2-0vP/2-0vT Aztec, 1-0vT Gladiator Gt.eeic09: N/A Gt.Semih: 2-0vP Jade
Sas sas.Locdog: 2-1vP La Mancha Zaraki: 1-0vZ Match Point, 0-1vZ La Mancha, 0-1vP Gladiator Kashu: 2-0vP Aztec Skzlime: 0-1vZ Match Point Vorti: 0-1vZ Match Point 0-1vT La Mancha Draw: 0-1vP Match Point, 2-0vP/0-1vZ Jade Ace: 1-0vP Aztec, 0-1vZ Match Point, 1-1vP La Mancha, 0-2vZ Gladiator Sziky: 1-0vP Match Point, 1-0vP Gladiator, 1-0vP Jade DinOt: 1-0vZ Gladiator, 0-1vZ Jade non: NA
Head-to-Head: Gt > Sas 8-1 (Minus walk over sets) Sneazel> Zaraki/Ace Southpark> Vorti Trutacz> Pez Michael> Draw/Sziky/Ace/Zaraki Jumper < Non
On April 20 2012 05:54 Eywa- wrote: Hmmm, this is an interesting development, I didn't think that was up for public discussion just yet.
Also, @DraW, I already wrote everything there is to write about the players as far as what's relevant to this league, I can just c/p that, but ofc, that would be redundant. I know hype is important, but I don't have an unlimited supply of time and given that you weren't able to formulate your hype in any way that is pertinent to read (hype about your own team), well... You can pretty well see where I'm going with this, no need to write it out.
I said it was mini, mostly just stats and it took me 10minutes, but you know I understand how some people can never take criticism so I don't mind.