EPTOn February 25 2012 11:41 Hinanawi wrote:
What a tangled web we weave, an SKT fan wanting KT to win.
What a tangled web we weave, an SKT fan wanting KT to win.
For the benefit of SKT of course.
[SPL] Woongjin Stars vs KT Rolster - Page 3
| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
Jindo
United States1305 Posts
For the benefit of SKT of course. | ||
|
Jackal03
Brazil7469 Posts
go flash! | ||
|
0kz
Italy1118 Posts
| ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES48176 Posts
| ||
|
X10A
Canada9837 Posts
Probably won't be on for another 10-20 because of setup but lets hope for some more good games! | ||
|
alypse
Vietnam2762 Posts
Go Flash, grab your 14th! | ||
|
SgtPepper
United States568 Posts
Thanks nana! | ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
I want Flash to lose meh. | ||
|
Winechu
Singapore1186 Posts
| ||
|
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
| ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES48176 Posts
On February 25 2012 14:06 Winechu wrote: I actually don't mind KT losing this if it means SKT has a lesser chance of being in the play-offs. I'd rather Stars and CJ be in the POs because Woongjin is KT's bitch while CJ just chokes. SKT is actually more of a threat in the POs. meh, KT can beat anyone that stands in their way. | ||
|
Dental Floss
United States1015 Posts
| ||
|
sinistral
Singapore859 Posts
LETS GO WOONGJIN! | ||
|
X10A
Canada9837 Posts
| ||
|
babysuperga
Vietnam49 Posts
| ||
|
Winechu
Singapore1186 Posts
On February 25 2012 14:07 BLinD-RawR wrote: meh, KT can beat anyone that stands in their way. I agree, but I'm all for KT having more favourable match-ups. Still wanting KT to win this match though, just saying I wouldn't mind a Woongjin win...especially since Zero + SK qtpies | ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES48176 Posts
On February 25 2012 14:11 X10A wrote: Reach kills Soulkey, using 2001 builds, you heard it here <3 I agree! | ||
|
Juliette
United States6003 Posts
GO KT | ||
|
reincremate
China2192 Posts
| ||
|
ShadeR
Australia7535 Posts
On February 25 2012 14:07 BLinD-RawR wrote: meh, KT can beat anyone that stands in their way. Nothing wrong with a little pragmatism =] | ||
| ||
