• Log InLog In
• Register

[MSL] Round of 32 Group F - Page 11

Post a Reply Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next All

Lann555 Netherlands5173 Posts July 03 2010 10:35 GMT #201 On July 03 2010 19:34 538 wrote: base trading gogo Historically in favor of Terran Go Kal!

29 fps United States5724 Posts July 03 2010 10:35 GMT #202 matrixed arbiter!!!!!!

Nesto Switzerland1318 Posts July 03 2010 10:35 GMT #203 lol d matrix arbiter

sixfour England11061 Posts July 03 2010 10:35 GMT #204 wtf was up with that arbiter?

bearbuddy 3442 Posts July 03 2010 10:35 GMT #205 How embarrassing there, MVP.

Realpenguin 8253 Posts July 03 2010 10:35 GMT #206 MVP showing off his new "d-matrix the enemy arbiter" strategy that's right, it was intended

Lann555 Netherlands5173 Posts July 03 2010 10:36 GMT #207 Lol, Kal doing well here now. If he can retake bottom right now the game should be in the bag

Lann555 Netherlands5173 Posts July 03 2010 10:36 GMT #208 REcall incoming. Please work

29 fps United States5724 Posts July 03 2010 10:37 GMT #209 kal has +1 air weapons. why? carrier switch?

Lann555 Netherlands5173 Posts July 03 2010 10:37 GMT #210 Kal seems a little light on troops though. Better get those gates rolling!

snowdrift France2061 Posts July 03 2010 10:38 GMT #211 LOL Kal remembered his game against Flash, where he got greedy and skipped the evacuated base with his arbiter to try and hit the other base, only to get EMPed. He almost did the same thing there, but turned back and recalled. Gj

Lann555 Netherlands5173 Posts July 03 2010 10:38 GMT #212 Kal not able to retake bottom right, but clears a mining base for MVP. MVP mining off 2 bases and setting up another one. Kal at 4 I think

29 fps United States5724 Posts July 03 2010 10:39 GMT #213 lots of stasis, not enough units

Lann555 Netherlands5173 Posts July 03 2010 10:39 GMT #214 Kal has all the time in the world and decides to stasis the front tanks anyway. Might not matter as he has enough to just walk over the new base

538 Hungary3932 Posts July 03 2010 10:39 GMT #215 On July 03 2010 19:37 29 fps wrote: kal has +1 air weapons. why? carrier switch? You can get 1/1 for like the cost of a dragoon and a ht, i think in such a macro game its easily worth it just to create the possibility of a transition, if need be.

Nesto Switzerland1318 Posts July 03 2010 10:39 GMT #216 On July 03 2010 19:37 29 fps wrote: kal has +1 air weapons. why? carrier switch? he wants his arbiters to do more damage

sixfour England11061 Posts July 03 2010 10:40 GMT #217 Carrier switch incoming

bearbuddy 3442 Posts July 03 2010 10:40 GMT #218 dooom push. NAO.

Sadistx Zimbabwe5568 Posts July 03 2010 10:41 GMT #219 On July 03 2010 19:39 Nesto wrote: Show nested quote + On July 03 2010 19:37 29 fps wrote: kal has +1 air weapons. why? carrier switch? he wants his arbiters to do more damage Ah yes, the dreaded transition into pure arbiter. Every T's worst nightmare

naneri Kyrgyzstan165 Posts July 03 2010 10:41 GMT #220 he wants his arbiters to do more damage Why this irony is so nice? ))

Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next All

Please log in or register to reply.