|
is awesome32274 Posts
On January 18 2009 05:10 538 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2009 04:58 Dealer wrote: (...)he's got next to no points to hope for (I expect Guemchi to lose to Yarnc) to sum it up.(...)
Wrong. You forgot that -since he's intrigue's pick- Guemchi will very probably all-kill OGN.
hahaha
He also has Strork who might all kill ace, or maybe 3-1.
|
OMFG WOW I CHOSE HERO ON ACCIDENT INSTEAD OF BY.HERO
|
Braavos36374 Posts
On January 18 2009 01:29 onepost wrote: Miracle is listed twice in Player and Team Prices. thanks, its fixed now
yeah, intrigue being in #1 again is pretty effing amazing lol
|
Germany2896 Posts
I had anytime and oov in my team and then replaced them -_-
|
oov was only used because SKT was playing ACE. It's fairly likely that he'll never be in the lineup again, although he may have paid for himself yesterday (plus a bunch of team wins down the road).
If other teams follow SKT's lead and send out weaker players against ACE, Anytime could definitely rack up points. On the other hand, if they follow Samsung and send out players like Stork, Anytime isn't going to be worth much.
|
Braavos36374 Posts
On January 18 2009 07:06 ShadowDrgn wrote: oov was only used because SKT was playing ACE. It's fairly likely that he'll never be in the lineup again, although he may have paid for himself yesterday (plus a bunch of team wins down the road).
If other teams follow SKT's lead and send out weaker players against ACE, Anytime could definitely rack up points. On the other hand, if they follow Samsung and send out players like Stork, Anytime isn't going to be worth much. i don't think teams are going to fuck around more than 1 or 2 players against ACE, i mean the oov game was pretty close (i didn't watch it but i heard about it). the boxer pick really was kind of like a freewin, but some other teams might be more conservative, and i'd wager the rookies from other teams are better than anytime, especially if they know they will be put in against him and practice super hard since they don't get many opportunities.
|
Huh? where is my team =(
Team name: Isuk (5) (P)free (1) (T)BoxeR (2) (Z)sAviOr (2) (P)Much (6) (Z)July (9) (P)Bisu (Captain)
(5) Samsung KHAN
|
Braavos36374 Posts
On January 18 2009 07:25 CompX wrote: Huh? where is my team =( You really should actually look for your team (by your username) on the rankings before posting "where is my team" OR before sending me a PM about how your team is not there. Make sure it's not there before doing these things. You are ranked #548.
|
Dealer
Sweden1368 Posts
Yep, but from the logic i followed the other cheap players cant really be expected to gather more points then oov anyway, plus i dont think it'll take oov too long to be a regular in the t1 lineup considering their terrans atm.
|
|
haha i have 7 of the top 9 most popular picks
|
|
I picked my team not knowing what I was doing. At least I'm below 150 :D.
|
|
Uh about the people who are talking about ranks right now, aren't they completely meaningless at the moment? :/ I mean obviously the people with KTF/Khan/Ace/SKT players in their teams are looking strong now but the other teams haven't played yet so isn't it kind of silly to talk about ranks yet.
|
Braavos36374 Posts
On January 18 2009 09:03 Frits wrote: Uh about the people who are talking about ranks right now, aren't they completely meaningless at the moment? :/ I mean obviously the people with KTF/Khan/Ace/SKT players in their teams are looking strong now but the other teams haven't played yet so isn't it kind of silly to talk about ranks yet. its still important having both oov and luxury, as they only cost 2 and 3 points respectively and have effectively paid for their costs after only 1 playday
|
United States2096 Posts
On January 18 2009 07:09 Hot_Bid wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2009 07:06 ShadowDrgn wrote: oov was only used because SKT was playing ACE. It's fairly likely that he'll never be in the lineup again, although he may have paid for himself yesterday (plus a bunch of team wins down the road).
If other teams follow SKT's lead and send out weaker players against ACE, Anytime could definitely rack up points. On the other hand, if they follow Samsung and send out players like Stork, Anytime isn't going to be worth much. i don't think teams are going to fuck around more than 1 or 2 players against ACE, i mean the oov game was pretty close (i didn't watch it but i heard about it). the boxer pick really was kind of like a freewin, but some other teams might be more conservative, and i'd wager the rookies from other teams are better than anytime, especially if they know they will be put in against him and practice super hard since they don't get many opportunities. I think there will actually be more messing around vs ACE with playing lesser players. Especially with a team like SKT or Khan, where they have 2-3 players each that could realistically All-kill ACE at any time, so dropping 1-2 sets early on won't kill them.
|
Braavos36374 Posts
On January 18 2009 09:18 lgdDante wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2009 07:09 Hot_Bid wrote:On January 18 2009 07:06 ShadowDrgn wrote: oov was only used because SKT was playing ACE. It's fairly likely that he'll never be in the lineup again, although he may have paid for himself yesterday (plus a bunch of team wins down the road).
If other teams follow SKT's lead and send out weaker players against ACE, Anytime could definitely rack up points. On the other hand, if they follow Samsung and send out players like Stork, Anytime isn't going to be worth much. i don't think teams are going to fuck around more than 1 or 2 players against ACE, i mean the oov game was pretty close (i didn't watch it but i heard about it). the boxer pick really was kind of like a freewin, but some other teams might be more conservative, and i'd wager the rookies from other teams are better than anytime, especially if they know they will be put in against him and practice super hard since they don't get many opportunities. I think there will actually be more messing around vs ACE with playing lesser players. Especially with a team like SKT or Khan, where they have 2-3 players each that could realistically All-kill ACE at any time, so dropping 1-2 sets early on won't kill them. yes, but "messing around" for teams other than T1 is sending very promising rookies looking to crack the A team roster, not old school vets trying to make a comeback. would you take a gosu rookie from KTF (like Hoejja) or STX (like by.hero) over ACE players? I would.
|
On January 18 2009 09:18 lgdDante wrote: I think there will actually be more messing around vs ACE with playing lesser players. Especially with a team like SKT or Khan, where they have 2-3 players each that could realistically All-kill ACE at any time, so dropping 1-2 sets early on won't kill them.
That is until they realize they need those points in F-PL
|
|
|
|
|