Many progamers have had a period of complete dominance, most recently Bisu and Savior before him. I'm curious though if you had to pick one of these eras of domiace who's was the best? Define "best" however you want to interpret.
As a side question, who would you want to come back to dominance? (or maintain in the case of Bisu)
I'm not really qualified to answer my first question as I started watching the pro scene on the tail end of Savior's reign while Nada was still doing well. So I've seen the end of one and the beginning of another. For my second question, I'd like to see Boxer. He's always been my favorite in any match.
On July 28 2007 00:04 Phyre wrote: Many progamers have had a period of complete dominance, most recently Bisu and Savior before him. I'm curious though if you had to pick one of these eras of domiace who's was the best? Define "best" however you want to interpret.
As a side question, who would you want to come back to dominance? (or maintain in the case of Bisu)
I'm not really qualified to answer my first question as I started watching the pro scene on the tail end of Savior's reign while Nada was still doing well. So I've seen the end of one and the beginning of another. For my second question, I'd like to see Boxer. He's always been my favorite in any match.
i'd like to see someone answer something other than boxer.
Boxer won 2 consecutive osl, oov won 3 consecutive msl on top of bisu's 2 msl (so far), nada 3 msl, and savior 2 msl (but 5 straight finals appearances.)
edit: sorry forgot to post my candidate, I would have to agree and I was going to put that picture of oov up lol. I'm pretty sure he had the highest winning rates in his period of dominance than any other player, but not 100% on that.
oov is one of the scarriest 15 month long streaks you have ever seen. comon a winning percentage of like 78%? even savior never reached that but meh, gaming scene is diff than it was back than. julyzerg also had like a 12 month reigning era but yeah.... how could you forget those people?
On July 28 2007 01:02 oshibori_probe wrote: How many starleagues did Giyom win?
OSL/MSL wasnt realy around in that time. He did win the first OSL ever if you dont count the Korean open as OSL. But that was around the end of his reign.
To answer the original question I dont realy want any of the old people making comebacks. However I would like to see Much, Iris or Free dominating
OK, to be honest, you can't really say anyone, ANYONE has dominated or "reigned" BW. To "reign" Korean e-Sports, you have to a) Productively do extremely good all the time in both OSL's and MSL's and b) Good in proleagues
I believe no one ever at all has done that before, except maybe NaDa, but that was ages ago, and for an extremely short period.
oh and i forgot to mention, if one would define 'best' as how beneficial that reign was in terms of improving the game's publicity, improving the level of gameplay, creation of rivalries (good rivalries generate interest, as there is a human/personal aspect in the game), etc etc, this debate becomes even less clear cut.
boxer's reign was definitely beneficial as his entertaining, creative, and innovative play drew many fans to the e-sports scene. his amazing plays demonstrated to everyone how entertaining watching a mere computer game could be. it was also during this period that his rivalry with yellow was the most intense, so this spiced up e-sports. games were definitely exciting to watch, kinda like an 'el classico' (real madrid vs barca, huge rivalry in spanish football in case non-soccer fans are reading this) of progaming if you will.
i didn't watch progaming around the time when nada emerged, but i can imagine it must've been amazing when a wunderkind appeared on the scene and started consistently beating boxer, and other established pros (he beat chrh in a televised game as an amateur too). the combination of giant killing, and the rise of a talented, young star definitely drew even more interest to the game. i also feel nada's strength in macro also paved the way for oov's later success, as the game slowly moved away from micro intensive play. of course, we all know he grew up, endured and overcame a few slumps to become arguably the most successful bw progamer of all time.
the iloveoov, july, ipxzerg streaks were spectacular, because of how they came out of nowhere and more or less smashed everyone (oov's disgusting 27-0 tvz debut run, and how savior went to 4 more msl finals after winning uzoo certainly come to mind).
i still go with iloveoov though, because the stats during his reign were disgusting. progamers were getting overwhelmed by sheer macro, and i think it's safe to say iloveoov's run had a huge part to play in how the modern game has leaned towards macro. i also can't imagine someone suddenly appearing on the scene and raping it up the way he did again, although savior was pretty close to that. also note, he won 3 msls and 1 osl in 2003-2004, the period of his dominance. this run had human drama (overcoming his master in the ever osl final), and was a demonstration of brute force (3 consecutive msl wins), too. as such, i feel oov's run was the 'best' one, if you were to go by statistics, and intangibles.
Even if the numbers dont show a iloveoovesque dominance, It was humilliation in most games. He just played with Goliath drops TvP. Valkiries TvZ. He dominated with everything. He could be losing a TvZ and came back by using dropships alone. Even if he didnt won as much as others like iloveoov, savior or nada, his wins and comeback totally made his opponents look like newbies at the game.
On July 28 2007 04:03 IntoTheWow wrote: Are you kidding me? Boxer.
Even if the numbers dont show a iloveoovesque dominance, It was humilliation in most games. He just played with Goliath drops TvP. Valkiries TvZ. He dominated with everything. He could be losing a TvZ and came back by using dropships alone. Even if he didnt won as much as others like iloveoov, savior or nada, his wins and comeback totally made his opponents look like newbies at the game.
This type of question can be misleading in that it is asking for the most dominant reign of a player. The game has evolved quite a bit from its beginnings, so each time period closer to the present in which a player played is more and more difficult. Nowadays, there are so many good pros that it is a tossup to see who will be in the finals of a league. Everyone is much more evenly matched than boxer's or giyom's day.
Now this brings in the arguement, is someone who is pretty dominant in the current age, such as savior (a few months ago really), more worthy of the title of strongest than Nada or Boxer, who's styles were parts of the major evolutions of the game. Would you have to go to a middle ground, such as iloveoov, who dominated not all that long ago when competition was getting very strong, yet still showed amazing results.
I think the best answer can be done by statistics showing best winning percentage of any of these players over the course of their reign. People will try to dispute the statistics and prove somehow that their favorite is was the strongest, yet pretty much any other way of looking at it becomes more opinion and conjecture than fact and truth.
I know that some players had awesome stats and were dominating on pro scene, but for me while dominating you have to be spectacular. I've never found oov, sAviOr or Bisu spectacular. Ofc they have awesome skill but it wasnt something that driven audience crazy like July's muta micro and agressiveness, Boxer m&m micro and tactical comebacks or even NaDa tornado style in his prime, complete terran destroyer annihilating everyone on his way, with awesome micro, 350 APM macro and multitasking. It was really like tornado (game starts, NaDa moves, opponent GGs) ;>
On July 28 2007 04:03 IntoTheWow wrote: Are you kidding me? Boxer.
Even if the numbers dont show a iloveoovesque dominance, It was humilliation in most games. He just played with Goliath drops TvP. Valkiries TvZ. He dominated with everything. He could be losing a TvZ and came back by using dropships alone. Even if he didnt won as much as others like iloveoov, savior or nada, his wins and comeback totally made his opponents look like newbies at the game.
This type of question can be misleading in that it is asking for the most dominant reign of a player. The game has evolved quite a bit from its beginnings, so each time period closer to the present in which a player played is more and more difficult. Nowadays, there are so many good pros that it is a tossup to see who will be in the finals of a league. Everyone is much more evenly matched than boxer's or giyom's day.
Now this brings in the arguement, is someone who is pretty dominant in the current age, such as savior (a few months ago really), more worthy of the title of strongest than Nada or Boxer, who's styles were parts of the major evolutions of the game. Would you have to go to a middle ground, such as iloveoov, who dominated not all that long ago when competition was getting very strong, yet still showed amazing results.
I think the best answer can be done by statistics showing best winning percentage of any of these players over the course of their reign. People will try to dispute the statistics and prove somehow that their favorite is was the strongest, yet pretty much any other way of looking at it becomes more opinion and conjecture than fact and truth.
That's a very good post, points which I'd like to add to myself.
Also take into consideration of this so-called group of reigning champs - Boxer, Nada, OOv, July, Savior, and notice just how many are terran. I'd like to suggest that those who champion the rise of one particular race and/or reverse the terrible fortune of that race should be given special notice. For example, Boxer's play really put terran on the map, July's ascension reversed the abysmal zvt precedence, and Savior's reign solidified it post-JulyZerg. Those who simply follow in the footsteps of their figurehead and those who spearhead new ways to tackle the problem are on totally different levels.
As for Bisu though, his PvZ and PvT phenomenal, and he has shown in the past for having a pulse for exceptional PvP (although he lost all of his recent proleague matches, among them vP Anytime and vZ intercalm). It really is still wait and see for Bisu. At his current situation he's on fire, but across-the-board dominating he is not.
On July 28 2007 05:32 Musli wrote: I know that some players had awesome stats and were dominating on pro scene, but for me while dominating you have to be spectacular. I've never found oov, sAviOr or Bisu spectacular. Ofc they have awesome skill but it wasnt something that driven audience crazy like July's muta micro and agressiveness, Boxer m&m micro and tactical comebacks or even NaDa tornado style in his prime, complete terran destroyer annihilating everyone on his way, with awesome micro, 350 APM macro and multitasking. It was really like tornado (game starts, NaDa moves, opponent GGs) ;>
You gotta be kidding, what about Savior's watershed defense? OOv's army appearing out of thin air? Bisu's vZ in dominating fashion, a never-before-seen sight?
I still say its a tie between NaDa, Oov and Giyom. Saviors dominance was breathtaking but way too short. Giyom back then was the single force to reckon with. Bisu might be the next one..
1: Blatant fanboyism 2: The incredibly funny, original and stylish ways he could crush even the mightiest opponents. And, something that hasn't been mentioned yet, the way he totally clowned foreigners like Blackman and Elky in the WCG's. Sure the WCG doesn't mean much, compared to the Korean leagues, but I'm sure nobody here can show me a game as funny as boxer vs blackman, with [pG]Korn giving the most biased commentary ever and in the end just going '....wow'.
No progamer has spawned things like that =) Pure entertainment. Boxer's games could make your jaw drop because they'd show you things you'd never even considered possible. I remember watching his game vs terranteacher, and literally shouting WHAT THE FUCK when he suddenly, out of thin air, pulled the lockdown on all of his BC's.
iloveoov was easily the most dominant player ever, despite not having as flashy a playing style or as complete a game as some other dominants players. At some point his MSL record was around 23-7 TvT(more than half of those losses came from having to play against Nada every time) 14-2 TvZ 12-1 TvP
A somewhat large portion of this forum thought he was a TvT specialist since he pretty much made Nada disappear, but a screenshot showed that it was his only matchup below 80% in MSL. His OGN TvZ record was also somewhere around 21-1 at that time, leading many people to act like his match vs JulyZerg was a foregone conclusion until it happened. iloveoov also dominated the MBC Team League by himself, beating the entire other team 4-0 every other match. Often you would see someone like Nada taking out two of the boxer team's top players by himself and putting it into a losing position, only to have oov come out and win the next 4 games in a row. Does anyone know his MTL record back in the day?
Savior, Oov, &Nada for me. Savior for displaying unparalleled dominance with zerg. Oov for crushing the scene with the most disgusting progaming stats ever. Nada for his grand slam & more.
ok this is an attempt at trying to quantify how dominant these players were during their reigns using the brand new tlpd. pop and the rest of the staff can never be commended enough for creating such an amazing addition to the site.
note that i assumed that these players were 'dominant' during the period where they had consecutive finals appearances.
1st iloveoov (09/04/03 to 08/29/04), 3 msl finals appearances in a row. 84 wins - 30 losses (73.68%) overall career: 213 wins - 128 losses (62.46%)
2nd boxer (03/01/01 to 04/14/02), 3 osl finals appearances in a row, 1 msl finals appearance. 42 wins - 19 losses (68.85%) overall career: 233 wins - 179 losses (56.55%)
3rd savior (04/21/05 to 03/03/07), 5 msl finals appearances in a row. 90 wins - 44 losses (67.16%) overall career: 134 wins - 78 losses (63.21%)
4th nada (04/18/02 to 07/19/03), 4 msl finals appearances in a row. 97 wins - 52 losses (65.10%) overall career: 324 wins - 202 losses (61.60%)
edit: of course, itw has a point when he mentions that whether or not the wins during these periods were spectacular tourism bus rides should be a factor in considering how 'great' these players were at their peak, but if we consider intangibles such as this, we'll never agree on an answer. going by statistics alone, it would seem iloveoov was the beastliest of them all.
also, since i used different time norms for each player's dominance, this could very well be terribly inaccurate. it'd be nice if someone more knowledgeable than me in progaming history drew up these stats, but for a set time norm, like say 6 months or 12 months.
the fact that a player who wins an OSL almost always gets thrown out of the tournament early in the next season (i.e. in group phase) has been titled OSL curse
On July 28 2007 02:17 GTR-2-Go wrote: OK, to be honest, you can't really say anyone, ANYONE has dominated or "reigned" BW. To "reign" Korean e-Sports, you have to a) Productively do extremely good all the time in both OSL's and MSL's and b) Good in proleagues
I believe no one ever at all has done that before, except maybe NaDa, but that was ages ago, and for an extremely short period.
Savior fits this bill perfectly
He won 3 MSLs before reaching the finals for the fourth, won the OSL, owned Superfights, and was a complete monster in the Proleague. Imo, although Oov's dominance was pretty scary, no one was more ferocious than the Maestro himself
On July 28 2007 02:17 GTR-2-Go wrote: OK, to be honest, you can't really say anyone, ANYONE has dominated or "reigned" BW. To "reign" Korean e-Sports, you have to a) Productively do extremely good all the time in both OSL's and MSL's and b) Good in proleagues
I believe no one ever at all has done that before, except maybe NaDa, but that was ages ago, and for an extremely short period.
Unless you count reign as the number one ranked Kespa player.
You might not be on top of both leagues, but if you are the number one ranked player for more than a month you more or less have a reign.
To dominate you don't have to be undefeated, you just have to be the winningest player at the time.
Although I do understand the point you are making.
On July 28 2007 05:32 Musli wrote: I know that some players had awesome stats and were dominating on pro scene, but for me while dominating you have to be spectacular. I've never found oov, sAviOr or Bisu spectacular. Ofc they have awesome skill but it wasnt something that driven audience crazy like July's muta micro and agressiveness, Boxer m&m micro and tactical comebacks or even NaDa tornado style in his prime, complete terran destroyer annihilating everyone on his way, with awesome micro, 350 APM macro and multitasking. It was really like tornado (game starts, NaDa moves, opponent GGs) ;>
You gotta be kidding, what about Savior's watershed defense? OOv's army appearing out of thin air? Bisu's vZ in dominating fashion, a never-before-seen sight?
Kinda surprised nobody has mentioned Boxer really (at least I didnt see it). As a "devil's advocate" I would like to throw that name out. He may not have had consecutive big titles but he certainly held the KESPA #1 rank for nearly a record time I believe? His TvZ was considered fairly dominant and his TvT was near the tops. Is it because his TvP was so weak nobody considers him?
It's because they don't respect his competition as much as they do of say, Savior's or Oov's days in the sun. That's my guess atleast. That, or they don't remember it as clearly. While it's certainly admirable and he's forever remembered as a legend, and is still an amazing player today obviously, if people saw Savior / Nada / Boxer attending WCG, they'd see Boxer as the most likely to lose a game, or games out of those three.
He did / does a lot for the game, and he's certainly an honorable mention.
In my opinion Oov's 1# Kespa Rank time was the best. You watched a VOD of Oov playing and he loses EVERY UNIT and then suddenly the camera goes to the main base of Oov and there was a even bigger army. It was just unbelievable at that time.
Oov still is my favorite Player because he always was kind of sympathic to me. I like his play style and I hope he will be at the Top again soon.
On July 28 2007 19:09 {88}iNcontroL wrote: Kinda surprised nobody has mentioned Boxer really (at least I didnt see it). As a "devil's advocate" I would like to throw that name out. He may not have had consecutive big titles but he certainly held the KESPA #1 rank for nearly a record time I believe? His TvZ was considered fairly dominant and his TvT was near the tops. Is it because his TvP was so weak nobody considers him?
BoxeR held kespa #1 rank for 17 consecutive months, IIRC. Longest reign.
Personally I liked oov's reign best, remember thinking "what the hell" when I saw him steamrolling yellow in an important match some time ago iirc. He was the absolute best for awhile and enjoyed many awesome televised games because of him (reach vs oov match anyone ?).
Anyways I'm pretty biased because I really love terran, after that I'd say savior.
I never really followed progaming in boxer's reign, my interest started around the time his reign ended sadly, so I can't really have an opinion on that.
As soon as I saw the thread title, I didn't even have to think. Oov then Savior. Boxer is very debatable too, but then so is Giyom. If you guys thought Savior antis were bad, I remember how much hate Oov got for raping everyone early on. LOL People hated him cuz he won too much.
On July 28 2007 00:27 koryano321 wrote: oov is one of the scarriest 15 month long streaks you have ever seen. comon a winning percentage of like 78%? even savior never reached that but meh, gaming scene is diff than it was back than. julyzerg also had like a 12 month reigning era but yeah.... how could you forget those people?
I loved July's era. I would like to see him reign again. I entered this seen during his time and didn't really get to see oov but wow! Ovv was crazy... I think I have to see some of his videos from the beginning of his career.
If this thread is about who had the best run, then the answer is Grrr and the thread is over.
But if we want to talk about who we think was the best in our eyes at the time, this is totally different.
For me, it's July, hands down. I found him more terrifying during his post Oov smashing days than any other player before or after. He broke ZvP. Stats be damned, no one ever ran in ZvP like he did. No one!
Saviors wsa the best 2 reasons hes my fav and also his reign was the most media hyped making for exciting seasons and videos haha
too bad yellow never had a reign well he did have one as the best and most powerful zerg player but constaly got shoved into 2nd in the leagues next to boxer or some random terran back in the day
On July 28 2007 19:09 {88}iNcontroL wrote: Kinda surprised nobody has mentioned Boxer really (at least I didnt see it). As a "devil's advocate" I would like to throw that name out. He may not have had consecutive big titles but he certainly held the KESPA #1 rank for nearly a record time I believe? His TvZ was considered fairly dominant and his TvT was near the tops. Is it because his TvP was so weak nobody considers him?
BoxeR held kespa #1 rank for 17 consecutive months, IIRC. Longest reign.
haha dam savior ruined his but right now savior has been ranked 1 in kespa for 7 months in a row this hole year haha always by like 500 points to
Having witnessed all of them, I'd have to say Nada's was the most impressive It was said at the time during his reign(even by the commentators) that if you allowed nada to get any base past his natural then there was no way to win...thats just wtf good It was mainly on LT that they were referring to.
When I watched boxer lose to Shinwha after boxering him on game 1, lost his best chance at the golden mouse, then entered the military and went on to only do worse and worse there was no doubt in my mind that boxer had been left behind. True he made 3 more finals appearences or w/e but it seems to me like he has slowley been regressing.
Boxer, oov, stork, and bisu have all had their respective reigns (I now am better informed thanks to you guys), bisu's reign is stil continuing. However im going to do my usual radical thought proceses and predict a bisu slump.
I guess there have been some periods of domination, but they usually end pretty sadly.
I have been a witness to starcraft progaming scene since 1998 when Ssamjang was dominating.. However it wasn't until 1999 when I've watched the progamer's open final between Freemura's and [B&G]TheBoy that I became really interested in it.
I've witnessed emergence of every top gamers in Starcraft pro-gaming scene,
Ssamjang, Freemura, [GG99]slayer, Skelton (although he never dominated), BBoGul (Now a commentator at OSL,[z-zone]Byun, [B_Blade]LeadeR (Commentator at OSL), Grrrr, IntotheRain, Boxer, Garimto, Nada, July, Oov, Savior, Bisu etc...
Now going by statistics alone, it's safe to say that Oov's was the most impressive one, but as someone who experienced and seen every every top gamers reign I have to say that Boxer's domination period was the most glorious one.
No one had impressed the fans like Boxer did, No other gamer had the popularity he had and no other gamer excited the audiences like he did. Starcraft owes a lot to Boxer as he really contributed to the scene more than anyone else did, as he attracted countless audiences, he has shown that same sort of excitement that can be felt at watching sport can be experienced watching StarCraft match... well the list goes on and on
On July 29 2007 02:27 TheFoReveRwaR wrote: Having witnessed all of them, I'd have to say Nada's was the most impressive It was said at the time during his reign(even by the commentators) that if you allowed nada to get any base past his natural then there was no way to win...thats just wtf good It was mainly on LT that they were referring to.
Yea, I have watched so many reps of Nadas on LT and when his macro kicks in he was just unbeatable. Against protoss he went tornado terran at their ass, owning everything up in a matter of minutes after moving out.
I think NaDa and Oov are close in terms of dominance. Surely Oov has a stellar record (especially TvZ) but NaDa has definately been more consistant in the long run.
I would say Nada is the most accomplished and "best" SC player of all times, all in all.
Wow, really nice to see the replies to this. It's like a little history lesson on the world of SC that I missed before I started following the pro scene. Almost makes me feel nostalgic for things I didn't witness.
One comment on Bisu though. While he's certainly on a hot streak I just don't see him in the same light as Savior during his era. I remember comments like "Birds fly, dogs die, people fuck, and Savior wins" and "You can't cheese Savior, Savior will eat your soul." It just didn't seem to occur to people that Savior could lose and he was always the safe bet. Bisu doesn't seem quite as unstoppable and untouchable as Savior or like many of the other greats you guys are mentioning like Oov, Nada, Boxer, etc.
On July 29 2007 08:09 Phyre wrote: Wow, really nice to see the replies to this. It's like a little history lesson on the world of SC that I missed before I started following the pro scene. Almost makes me feel nostalgic for things I didn't witness.
One comment on Bisu though. While he's certainly on a hot streak I just don't see him in the same light as Savior during his era. I remember comments like "Birds fly, dogs die, people fuck, and Savior wins" and "You can't cheese Savior, Savior will eat your soul." It just didn't seem to occur to people that Savior could lose and he was always the safe bet. Bisu doesn't seem quite as unstoppable and untouchable as Savior or like many of the other greats you guys are mentioning like Oov, Nada, Boxer, etc.
yeah, bisu does not nearly have the "unstoppable" aura that savior and oov had... in fact, no protoss has ever had something like that
True, the dominant races has always been Terran and Zerg. I guess the PvZ matchup is a great struggle for most tosses to be honest and this is a big reason why a toss hasn't been more dominant.
On July 29 2007 08:09 Phyre wrote: Wow, really nice to see the replies to this. It's like a little history lesson on the world of SC that I missed before I started following the pro scene. Almost makes me feel nostalgic for things I didn't witness.
One comment on Bisu though. While he's certainly on a hot streak I just don't see him in the same light as Savior during his era. I remember comments like "Birds fly, dogs die, people fuck, and Savior wins" and "You can't cheese Savior, Savior will eat your soul." It just didn't seem to occur to people that Savior could lose and he was always the safe bet. Bisu doesn't seem quite as unstoppable and untouchable as Savior or like many of the other greats you guys are mentioning like Oov, Nada, Boxer, etc.
yeah, bisu does not nearly have the "unstoppable" aura that savior and oov had... in fact, no protoss has ever had something like that
On July 29 2007 08:38 JensOfSweden wrote: True, the dominant races has always been Terran and Zerg. I guess the PvZ matchup is a great struggle for most tosses to be honest and this is a big reason why a toss hasn't been more dominant.
I welcome anyone to prove me wrong.
actually it's really mostly just terran (boxer, nada, oov).... and then savior
although you could count giyom for protoss but that was mostly before the progaming scene developed
zergs have had just as much trouble zvt as tosses have had pvz in championship matches really
On July 29 2007 08:09 Phyre wrote: Wow, really nice to see the replies to this. It's like a little history lesson on the world of SC that I missed before I started following the pro scene. Almost makes me feel nostalgic for things I didn't witness.
One comment on Bisu though. While he's certainly on a hot streak I just don't see him in the same light as Savior during his era. I remember comments like "Birds fly, dogs die, people fuck, and Savior wins" and "You can't cheese Savior, Savior will eat your soul." It just didn't seem to occur to people that Savior could lose and he was always the safe bet. Bisu doesn't seem quite as unstoppable and untouchable as Savior or like many of the other greats you guys are mentioning like Oov, Nada, Boxer, etc.
yeah, bisu does not nearly have the "unstoppable" aura that savior and oov had... in fact, no protoss has ever had something like that
I'd say Grrr was as close as an unstoppable protoss as you can get
On July 29 2007 06:10 1tym wrote: I have been a witness to starcraft progaming scene since 1998 when Ssamjang was dominating.. However it wasn't until 1999 when I've watched the progamer's open final between Freemura's and [B&G]TheBoy that I became really interested in it.
I've witnessed emergence of every top gamers in Starcraft pro-gaming scene,
Ssamjang, Freemura, [GG99]slayer, Skelton (although he never dominated), BBoGul (Now a commentator at OSL,[z-zone]Byun, [B_Blade]LeadeR (Commentator at OSL), Grrrr, IntotheRain, Boxer, Garimto, Nada, July, Oov, Savior, Bisu etc...
Now going by statistics alone, it's safe to say that Oov's was the most impressive one, but as someone who experienced and seen every every top gamers reign I have to say that Boxer's domination period was the most glorious one.
No one had impressed the fans like Boxer did, No other gamer had the popularity he had and no other gamer excited the audiences like he did. Starcraft owes a lot to Boxer as he really contributed to the scene more than anyone else did, as he attracted countless audiences, he has shown that same sort of excitement that can be felt at watching sport can be experienced watching StarCraft match... well the list goes on and on
So yeah.. I am going with Boxer.
Then I have a question for you. As we know, the Norwegian player Slayer won 2-1 vs I_Love_Star in 2000 KBK (basicly the biggest Tournament that year), but I have also seen I_Love_star was in the finals in 1999. What happened to this player?
On July 29 2007 08:38 JensOfSweden wrote: True, the dominant races has always been Terran and Zerg. I guess the PvZ matchup is a great struggle for most tosses to be honest and this is a big reason why a toss hasn't been more dominant.
I welcome anyone to prove me wrong.
actually it's really mostly just terran (boxer, nada, oov).... and then savior
although you could count giyom for protoss but that was mostly before the progaming scene developed
zergs have had just as much trouble zvt as tosses have had pvz in championship matches really
Well, actually I count July as a dominant force as well, maybe I'm wrong though. And I think clearly ZvT is "easier" than PvZ, because otherwise there is no reason why a toss wouldn't have been more dominant. But yea I agree that many zergs struggle in ZvT as well, especially in important games where even a really good zerg user can be demolished by a mediocre terran.
Just look at many of the great tosses; great PvT (this is common), great PvP (often), so-and-so PvZ. PvZ is definately holding them back.
On July 28 2007 10:27 Carnac wrote: the fact that a player who wins an OSL almost always gets thrown out of the tournament early in the next season (i.e. in group phase) has been titled OSL curse
thats not like throwing them as in if they are winning all their matches the OSL jsut kicks them out?!?! or is it just a common coincidence that people have named.
On July 28 2007 10:27 Carnac wrote: the fact that a player who wins an OSL almost always gets thrown out of the tournament early in the next season (i.e. in group phase) has been titled OSL curse
thats not like throwing them as in if they are winning all their matches the OSL jsut kicks them out?!?! or is it just a common coincidence that people have named.
OSL is an established, professional competition, they don't arbitrarily decide to remove players from the tournament
but yeah its been a pretty constant thing throughout OSL history
I walk in the streets, I say starcraft. Many people know boxer. Not so many knows even rA, not to mention bisu or w/e oov... What boxer did to BW is like Jordan did to Basketball, there really is no comparison.
On July 29 2007 16:13 evanthebouncy! wrote: Boxer by a long shot.
I walk in the streets, I say starcraft. Many people know boxer. Not so many knows even rA, not to mention bisu or w/e oov... What boxer did to BW is like Jordan did to Basketball, there really is no comparison.
If by streets you mean U.S. East, then yes.
But, if you say Bisu, thousands of protoss players will answer back.
On July 29 2007 16:13 evanthebouncy! wrote: Boxer by a long shot.
I walk in the streets, I say starcraft. Many people know boxer. Not so many knows even rA, not to mention bisu or w/e oov... What boxer did to BW is like Jordan did to Basketball, there really is no comparison.
Too bad that wasn't the freakin question. Just because boxer is the most famous doesn't mean he was the most dominate.
On July 29 2007 16:13 evanthebouncy! wrote: Boxer by a long shot.
I walk in the streets, I say starcraft. Many people know boxer. Not so many knows even rA, not to mention bisu or w/e oov... What boxer did to BW is like Jordan did to Basketball, there really is no comparison.
Too bad that wasn't the freakin question. Just because boxer is the most famous doesn't mean he was the most dominate.
It wasn't the question? Thread's name is ' who reign was most dominate ' Boxer's reign made starcraft. Nobody else's reign can say ' Hey I molded the future of starcraft not only through my gameplay, but through my actions outside the game '
Nobody.
If we focus on in-game domination it's between Oov and Nada. Nada has just conquered more [3osl] so we can give him the title of ' most dominant ' overall but Oov probably gets the title of ' most dominating ' for his reign.
This is a very simple question I don't know why it has taken so many pages. The only real interesting thing is the old history that oldschool sc watchers have said.
On July 29 2007 08:38 JensOfSweden wrote: True, the dominant races has always been Terran and Zerg. I guess the PvZ matchup is a great struggle for most tosses to be honest and this is a big reason why a toss hasn't been more dominant.
I welcome anyone to prove me wrong.
actually it's really mostly just terran (boxer, nada, oov).... and then savior
although you could count giyom for protoss but that was mostly before the progaming scene developed
zergs have had just as much trouble zvt as tosses have had pvz in championship matches really
Well, actually I count July as a dominant force as well, maybe I'm wrong though. And I think clearly ZvT is "easier" than PvZ, because otherwise there is no reason why a toss wouldn't have been more dominant. But yea I agree that many zergs struggle in ZvT as well, especially in important games where even a really good zerg user can be demolished by a mediocre terran.
Just look at many of the great tosses; great PvT (this is common), great PvP (often), so-and-so PvZ. PvZ is definately holding them back.
Statistics say otherwise. People are so used to terrans owning the crap out of zergs that it almost seems unnatural when zergs take the win. I know most people's gut feelings' tell them otherwise, but statistically speaking, zergs have a harder time against terrans than tosses do against zergs. Stats say so for the year 2005, 2006 and whaddya know? 2007.
Why do you think no zerg managed to win a major tournament until 2005? Take a looks at the results of all ZvT, PvZ, TvP BO5 and you will see how horribly lopsided ZvT has been during all these years. Or try looking up the stats of what you thought were a "zerg-friendly map" like Arcadia only to find out that terrans actually are ahead. Protoss killing maps like Mercury are notorious but are actually pretty decent balance-wise when compared to zerg killing maps like Ragnarok.
Then why did no protoss dominated like Boxer, Nada, Oov and Savior did? Don't include July here because Nal_Ra has been just as good. July kept his Kespa number 1 ranking because the nobody dominated the starcraft scene in 2005, Nal_Ra had way stiffer competition. The answer is that Savior is actually the first non-terran to dominate the progaming scene and that's why people were in awe. He is a freak of nature in the terran-dominant starcraft scene. Watch Xellos vs Yellow OSL finals 4 years ago. Terrans haven't changed all the much since then, but zergs have evolved by leaps and bounds. Maybe Bisu will follow his steps, who knows? Wait for the protoss monster that'll kill all competition, but please for god's sake stop crying PvZ imba!!! because it's getting old.
I'd say Boxer's reign. I can honestly say he isn't my favourite player, but he does have distinct qualities that make him a model candidate. If the word "reign" is defined by: "to be larger in number, quantity, power, status or importance"
Its gotta be Boxer. His winning ratio may not be the highest, the number of OSLs and MSLs won may not be highest either, but his authority and importance to pro-gaming is undeniably remarkable.
You guys already know his accomplishments, how he handpicked oov, .. etc, etc whatever so no need to restate the obvious, but for myself, authority/importance/status matters most, and Boxer is unsurpassed in that area as of yet.
from farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr it's grrr's one (gyiom). He was just unbeatable for 2 years, no pro gamers performed that.
When you're talking about eras, for me it's like comparing pele and ronaldhino. The level is not the same, technicaly ronaldhino > pele eaf, but pele is still the king, cuz he was soooooooooo good compared to the players of his time.
As a side question, who would you want to come back to dominance?
Not dominance, but another starleague title for boxer would be awesome from start to finish. Just imagine a bo5 final, 5th game and boxer pulls out a legendary micro stunt and wins the set. Pow! Everyone screams, cries, faints, the emperor pushs his fist up in the air and somehow all girls in the first row get pregnant.
As a side question, who would you want to come back to dominance?
Not dominance, but another starleague title for boxer would be awesome from start to finish. Just imagine a bo5 final, 5th game and boxer pulls out a legendary micro stunt and wins the set. Pow! Everyone screams, cries, faints, the emperor pushs his fist up in the air and somehow all girls in the first row get pregnant.
As a side question, who would you want to come back to dominance?
Not dominance, but another starleague title for boxer would be awesome from start to finish. Just imagine a bo5 final, 5th game and boxer pulls out a legendary micro stunt and wins the set. Pow! Everyone screams, cries, faints, the emperor pushs his fist up in the air and somehow all girls in the first row get pregnant.
Lol that cracked me up :p
I'm pretty sure that is also what happens with all present women when Mantoss enters the room.
No one had impressed the fans like Boxer did, No other gamer had the popularity he had and no other gamer excited the audiences like he did. Starcraft owes a lot to Boxer as he really contributed to the scene more than anyone else did, as he attracted countless audiences, he has shown that same sort of excitement that can be felt at watching sport can be experienced watching StarCraft match... well the list goes on and on
boxer redefined starcraft, his era meant GLORY, but oov was just brute force, pure ownage. so boxer is the pick for the coolest reign and oov gets the best reign from the stats point of view.