EPTBGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.com/ - Page 153
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Minus_zero
17 Posts
| ||
|
Minus_zero
17 Posts
| ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland23339 Posts
On December 27 2024 20:33 Minus_zero wrote: @D3AD-R3TARD If you think banning someone for leaving a game like that deserves a ban, then he's a fucking idiot. Praxo ruins every other game he plays, but he doesn't have a problem because he leaves the game when the 5th minute is up and fuck it, you're doomed to fail then. You lose points and time, but that's not important. The most important thing is that he's not breaking the rules that some idiot came up with. If 9 out of 10 people tell you you're wrong, then you're wrong and stop defending yourself. Change the rules because soon no one will want to play this game. What do you propose? Retard has a finite amount of time, in a perfect world he’d be able to judge ban criteria on a case-by-case basis, but as he does not, the rules are set accordingly. They’re black and white and easy to administer. Now perhaps if there are players that consistently go against the spirit of the rules, fuck games up and deliberately do just enough to not actually break the rules, and a lot of players have issues with their conduct, yeah there’s a case to just ban them. | ||
|
Jealous
10084 Posts
No proposal, just impotent, entitled, childish whining about a free service someone provides to the community for no material benefit. It's like they don't understand that he could easily say "okay this is too much trouble because of all the people constantly bitching at me, I'm just going to shut it down," which has happened countless times in this community. On September 03 2019 05:29 intrigue wrote: this always happens. it goes like this: step 1: someone puts in a lot of time to give us really good content step 2: someone comes along and make a horrifically stupid comment step 3: everyone gets moderated and we stop getting content my suspicion is that this cycle can be broken if we can just eliminate step 2. it'd be nice if we collectively tried to do this. A.Alm i understand you are only working with what god gave you but please try your best thank you everybody for your cooperation | ||
|
D3AD-R3TARD
Poland277 Posts
On December 27 2024 20:33 Minus_zero wrote: @D3AD-R3TARD If you think banning someone for leaving a game like that deserves a ban, then he's a fucking idiot. Praxo ruins every other game he plays, but he doesn't have a problem because he leaves the game when the 5th minute is up and fuck it, you're doomed to fail then. You lose points and time, but that's not important. The most important thing is that he's not breaking the rules that some idiot came up with. If 9 out of 10 people tell you you're wrong, then you're wrong and stop defending yourself. Change the rules because soon no one will want to play this game. This rule is in play for 7 months. There are two messages that tell player when it is ok and not ok to leave. This rule made ruining lobby way less frequent. Majority of more than 1000 players who played in last month seems to understand it. So yeah I am a fucking idiot for thinking this... Also I've added a pool to see what people think about this rule. If there is indeed only 10% approval then I'll remove it. Poll: Should leaving lobby after "don't leave" message be banned? Yes (19) No (8) 27 total votes Your vote: Should leaving lobby after "don't leave" message be banned? | ||
2Pacalypse-
Croatia9462 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28528 Posts
| ||
|
ameba..
10 Posts
@D3AD-R3TARD https://bghmmr.eu/ seems to be down for several days. | ||
|
D3AD-R3TARD
Poland277 Posts
On December 28 2024 18:41 ameba.. wrote: Agree with only temp ban proposed by 2Pacalypse. @D3AD-R3TARD https://bghmmr.eu/ seems to be down for several days. Thats strange. Google analytics shows site running last week no problem. | ||
|
kAra
Germany1318 Posts
| ||
|
jedongpoker
7 Posts
anyway perm ban for leaving after msg and temp ban after leaving in game is a sad joke | ||
|
Atokus
10 Posts
On December 26 2024 08:02 Haxby wrote: NEVER! The ban is FOREVER can you understand that? And it should stay that! If you break the rules you get banned FOREVER Merry Christmas Haxby, I came with a new fact about the situation when I was banned. Maybe not everybody knows. Observer's replay does not have recorded in-game-conversation! So when D3AD-R3TARD was considering banning me, he couldn't see the game objectively. This is precise in-game-chat after our teammate left: 00:17:10 Cannon_in_D :gg 00:19:19 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :cancel 00:19:20 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :6 00:19:21 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :idiot 00:19:26 Atokus  ?? 00:19:31 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :cancel 00:19:40 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :if you dont cancel 00:19:41 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :i leave 00:19:45 (My tanks start shooting, no ally, vision change - I expected him to leave, the game was over) 00:19:57 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl 00:20:03 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :why you attack me? 00:20:04 Atokus :you can leave idiot 00:20:10 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :you see forum 00:20:13 Atokus :yeah 00:20:14 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :i banned 2 guys recently 00:20:16 Atokus :waiting for it 00:20:19 Atokus :faggit 00:20:19 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :and you will be banned 00:20:24 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :i report you 00:20:27 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :you get ban 00:20:33 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :keep attack me 00:20:37 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :so that i can ban you 00:20:44 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :very good 00:20:48 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :attack me all 00:21:00 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :last week i reported piramidata and get banned 00:21:04 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :and this week you get ban 00:21:14 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :see forum 00:21:19 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :today i report you 00:21:21 Atokus :cry more 00:21:23 Atokus :you ididot 00:21:28 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :very very good 00:21:30 Atokus :whats ryour name faggot 00:21:31 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :10 mins later 00:21:32 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :see forum 00:21:32 Atokus :;DDD 00:21:32 Cannon_in_D :gg 00:21:35 Atokus :gg 00:21:37 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :i write 00:21:40 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :i report you From here it's visible that I wasn't some troll ally-killer, but attack happened after my teammate betrayed the team declaring that he is leaving. And he didn't leave the game for the only reason to report me. The rule was this: "Attacking teammates will result in a ban". I had no teammates at the time of attack, so I couldn't break the rules. We need better judicial system. | ||
|
Che cazzo
121 Posts
On December 29 2024 03:55 Atokus wrote: Haxby, I came with a new fact about the situation when I was banned. Maybe not everybody knows. Observer's replay does not have recorded in-game-conversation! So when D3AD-R3TARD was considering banning me, he couldn't see the game objectively. This is precise in-game-chat after our teammate left: 00:17:10 Cannon_in_D :gg 00:19:19 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :cancel 00:19:20 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :6 00:19:21 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :idiot 00:19:26 Atokus ?? 00:19:31 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :cancel 00:19:40 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :if you dont cancel 00:19:41 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :i leave 00:19:45 (My tanks start shooting, no ally, vision change - I expected him to leave, the game was over) 00:19:57 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl 00:20:03 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :why you attack me? 00:20:04 Atokus :you can leave idiot 00:20:10 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :you see forum 00:20:13 Atokus :yeah 00:20:14 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :i banned 2 guys recently 00:20:16 Atokus :waiting for it 00:20:19 Atokus :faggit 00:20:19 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :and you will be banned 00:20:24 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :i report you 00:20:27 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :you get ban 00:20:33 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :keep attack me 00:20:37 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :so that i can ban you 00:20:44 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :very good 00:20:48 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :attack me all 00:21:00 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :last week i reported piramidata and get banned 00:21:04 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :and this week you get ban 00:21:14 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :see forum 00:21:19 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :today i report you 00:21:21 Atokus :cry more 00:21:23 Atokus :you ididot 00:21:28 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :very very good 00:21:30 Atokus :whats ryour name faggot 00:21:31 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :10 mins later 00:21:32 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :see forum 00:21:32 Atokus :;DDD 00:21:32 Cannon_in_D :gg 00:21:35 Atokus :gg 00:21:37 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :i write 00:21:40 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIl :i report you From here it's visible that I wasn't some troll ally-killer, but attack happened after my teammate betrayed the team declaring that he is leaving. And he didn't leave the game for the only reason to report me. The rule was this: "Attacking teammates will result in a ban". I had no teammates at the time of attack, so I couldn't break the rules. We need better judicial system. You are very mean. You always appear like a hyena when forum is noisy. You bring this topic every time when there is harsh debate about ban. You got permanent ban by attacking teammate.There is no debate, no support about your action. Admin clearly saw replay and replied to your objection(Link: #2101 ), but you are keep writing same shit continuously. In past few days, we lost 3 decent & historical zerg players by leaving lobby after game start. It is very sad and pity, and I agree this should be changed to temp. ban. But your case is different. You attacked teammate and got permanent ban. Don't treat your ban same to leaving ban. Last thing, I want to point out is, you are lying and twisting the fact. You said: 1)"From here it's visible that I wasn't some troll ally-killer, but attack happened after my teammate betrayed the team declaring that he is leaving." → Don't try fool people here. Nobody betrayed the team, but only you betrayed the team, and only you got permanent ban as result. 2) "Observer's replay does not have recorded in-game-conversation! So when D3AD-R3TARD was considering banning me, he couldn't see the game objectively." → No, admin can see chat history. In the early stage of bot game, admin used to ban players from chats.(Link: #95) You deserve it. End of story. (But I am sure you will come back again like hyena, when forum is noisy.) | ||
|
Esp1noza
Russian Federation477 Posts
| ||
|
kAra
Germany1318 Posts
On December 29 2024 17:07 Esp1noza wrote: Why BghBotmmr_EU2 have setting "unit limits: original", and BghBotmmr_EU4 have "unit limits: extended"? Does extended mean you can have more than 200 limit? had a few games with valks stopped shooting rather early into the game, would be great if this would be fixable also the homepage working for anybody right now? timeout for me last few days | ||
|
CruiseR
Poland4011 Posts
On December 29 2024 17:07 Esp1noza wrote: Why BghBotmmr_EU2 have setting "unit limits: original", and BghBotmmr_EU4 have "unit limits: extended"? Does extended mean you can have more than 200 limit? no it's not about 200 limit, but about total unit limit on the map (of all players, including interceptors, scarabs and probably valk shoots, which aren't units but projectiles, like kAra said. The limit of all those small "units" is 2000 or something or maybe 4000. In extended, it is just bigger. On December 29 2024 17:14 kAra wrote: also the homepage working for anybody right now? timeout for me last few days working fine | ||
|
Esp1noza
Russian Federation477 Posts
On December 29 2024 17:14 kAra wrote: also the homepage working for anybody right now? timeout for me last few days It's working all the last days, but for some people in the thread is not working. | ||
|
tfeign
United States2980 Posts
But it does not load at all when I try to access it using my computer on a wifi connection. I recorded my experience below: Seems like a bunch of others are reporting to have the same problem loading the site if admin is able to look into it. | ||
|
CruiseR
Poland4011 Posts
no but seriously, I appreciate your effort It means that the website is up, its something related to your device or network, like DNS maybe. Have you tried accessing on mobile, but not using 5g, but home wi-fi network? Have you tried other browsers? As i said, for me it works on every device, however when I enter the website and too quickly click Games tab or i refresh once or twice, it sometimes goes out too. Website is working (black layout) but instead of contents, I get the following error. The error reads: "Warning: SQLite3::query(): Unable to prepare statement: database disk image is malformed in /home/platne/serwer316669/public_html/bghmmr.eu/games.php on line 36 Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to a member function fetchArray() on false in /home/platne/serwer316669/public_html/bghmmr.eu/games.php:37 Stack trace: #0 {main} thrown in /home/platne/serwer316669/public_html/bghmmr.eu/games.php on line 37" | ||
|
rich-
United States117 Posts
There is a clear indication that the users would appreciate a SABC bot 24/7. I think the demand is there. Also the removal of DEF bots replaced with an SAB or SABC given the lack of usage here. Also this: On December 29 2024 17:07 Esp1noza wrote: Why BghBotmmr_EU2 have setting "unit limits: original", and BghBotmmr_EU4 have "unit limits: extended"? Does extended mean you can have more than 200 limit? Do you have plans to incorporate any of these ideas/ fixes? | ||
| ||
