EPTOn June 21 2007 06:15 lastshadow wrote:
does this mean tfeign is Top player that ever existed?
does this mean tfeign is Top player that ever existed?
means tfeign was lucky
ahk-gosu is by far the best player in the world
^^v
Could you beat a pro-gamer? - Page 2
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Kacas
Brazil3143 Posts
means tfeign was lucky ahk-gosu is by far the best player in the world ^^v | ||
|
wXs.Havok
Argentina529 Posts
haha n1 I could only beat a lower-class progammer that no one actually knows but figured in one of the proteams. august something. It was a pvt and im zerg, so it was kinda "wtf ?". I cant be sure about him beign progamer or not. That day i played some of em and they introduced me to him, i dunno, i cant be sure if it was real. i suck a lot tho. | ||
|
boghat
United States2109 Posts
| ||
|
Eatme
Switzerland3919 Posts
EDIT:Oh and I've played a pro in late 2004 and did not lose THAT bad since it was zvz. Still I would be lucky to survive over 10minutes if they remotely tried. | ||
|
lastprobeALIVE
United States973 Posts
Poll: Could you beat a progamer from 2002 ~ 2003 (Vote): yes (Vote): no with what you know now | ||
|
GodsDevil[5thF]
Romania622 Posts
| ||
|
grobo
Japan6199 Posts
| ||
|
yokohama
United States1116 Posts
On June 21 2007 05:01 dementus wrote: this thread is ahk-gosu bait. ![[image loading]](http://teamliquid.net/staff/Hot_Bid/TLCardGame/ahkgosu.jpg ) as for myself, no, never in a million years. Hahahaha that is great~ | ||
|
{ToT}Strafe
Thailand7026 Posts
 So probably if I played Nada I could win every now and then. Not that I want to, because to achieve that one win Nada would assrape me so silly | ||
|
merz
Sweden2760 Posts
| ||
|
ilovezil
United States4143 Posts
Put it this way: Can you say it's absolutely impossible to beat a progamer as in 0% chance? Statistically, your chances might be close to 0, but not at in my opinion. | ||
|
Resonate
United Kingdom8402 Posts
progamers from 2000 would be easy to beat with new strats and knowledge of timing, but 2002/3... i'm convinced they still had sick ability back then. | ||
|
Raithed
China7078 Posts
| ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
| ||
|
FirstBorn
Romania3955 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + maybe a pvt vs casy | ||
|
WhatisProtoss
Korea (South)2324 Posts
On June 21 2007 06:23 HappyFeetO_O wrote: I think that I could probably beat Savior + Nada at the same time You overreacted, gosu doesn't even mean the best these days, it simply means good. People say someone is gosu and they just mean the person is good. Exactly. When NaDa goes on bnet, he doesn't go under an anonymous ID. In an interview, he said that he could only get games with the "gosus" if he was signed in with his proper ID, Sea.s2 or NaDa. | ||
|
RebelHeart
New Zealand722 Posts
On June 21 2007 07:42 ilovezil wrote: I believe it's possible for anyone to win a game vs a pro gamer. Remember, progamers are human as well, so they have their weaknesses. The problem is that pro gamers have much more experience and practice, so chances of beating them are reduced drastically. Still, there's ALWAYS a possibility to beat one. It could be anything from exposing Yellow's low-eco style of play to savior falling off his chair and breaking his wrist. Put it this way: Can you say it's absolutely impossible to beat a progamer as in 0% chance? Statistically, your chances might be close to 0, but not at in my opinion. lol... but the question is whether or not Savior is your bitch... in which case by picking yes you have just blamed the history of American crime and violence on men at a black slave freedom rally - (see Family Guy, season one - the one where Peter becomes a feminist) | ||
|
abandonallhope
Sweden563 Posts
| ||
|
grobo
Japan6199 Posts
On June 21 2007 08:01 Jyvblamo wrote: Well, I'd say Uhjoo could beat many of the progamers. Look how he totally schooled Sea and TT in the MSL wildcard (Too bad he ran into the Big Bird in the end). But isn't he a pro himself though? | ||
|
xM(Z
Romania5275 Posts
| ||
| ||
