EPTStarcraft Patch 1.17.0 (unannounced/discovered) - Page 6
| Forum Index > BW General |
Mod note: It is likely that this is an internal testing version not intended to be public yet. Battle.net reportedly does not work after patching, which indicates that it's not yet "released". | ||
|
mca64Launcher_
Poland629 Posts
| ||
|
brian763
22 Posts
On July 26 2016 08:55 shin ken wrote: what's up with all the new accounts in this thread Oo Because I am Chinese.I often focus teamliquid.But I seldom reply on it. Sorry.I often reply on Chinese forum[Baidu tieba] | ||
|
Wrath
3174 Posts
| ||
|
yewbow
7 Posts
Tibet before 1949 was under slavery. It's right Tibet is not free, so Tibet should have the right to choose slavery again. It's also right America is not free. People should have the right to buy slaves. Americans are forced to abandon slavery! Free America! Free Saudi Arabia! Free Syria! User was warned for this post | ||
|
Probemicro
3708 Posts
On July 26 2016 13:17 brian763 wrote: Because I am Chinese.I often focus teamliquid.But I seldom reply on it. Sorry.I often reply on Chinese forum[Baidu tieba] 别喂那群傻逼 谢谢您为TL提供消息 On July 26 2016 13:39 Wrath wrote: So what is faster turn rates is? i've tested online. seems like they remove some of the inbuilt ingame latency. but not all of it for people who played on fish server, its like having default #l2 | ||
|
LordOfDabu
United States394 Posts
 Lots of skeptics then, too! | ||
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21245 Posts
On July 26 2016 14:11 LordOfDabu wrote: 1.08 was also leaked early in a similar way. Lots of skeptics then, too!hi man long time no see n_n | ||
|
tn5421
United States9 Posts
| ||
writer22816
United States5775 Posts
| ||
|
bduddy
United States1326 Posts
| ||
|
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
On July 26 2016 15:49 bduddy wrote: If you people somehow think http://ftp.blizzard.com is a scam, then please, learn about how the Internet actually works before you spew any more of your "wisdom" here. The patch is 100% legit, although possibly not intended to be released yet. Enjoy your new palettes. That's exactly why I'm skeptical because I know how the internet works. On the other hand, you don't. Go learn a little bit about spoof URLs, spoof e-mails, etc before you talk about internet security. | ||
|
typhoonius
United States4 Posts
Also, the domain (blizzard.com) is completely separate from the protocol used. blizzard.com is blizzard.com no matter what protocol is used. Only the registrant for blizzard.com (Blizzard) can create a subdomain for blizzard.com (which is what ftp.blizzard.com is). This is how DNS works. It's a hierarchy. Finally, Blizzard has distributed patches over this URL for forever. I remember downloading Warcraft II patches over it. It was the only way to get them since Battle.net didn't exist yet. | ||
|
brian763
22 Posts
On July 26 2016 16:27 typhoonius wrote: The reason the scheme (http) is different from the subdomain (ftp) is because it's an HTTP gateway for their FTP server. In other words, the files are stored on an FTP server, but it's served to you through HTTP for compatibility reasons, and the entire process is transparent to you. This has traditionally been done because FTP is a weird protocol that opens a lot of ports and doesn't play well with firewalls. Furthermore, most web browsers don't have built-in FTP support anymore (Chrome and Firefox don't, for instance, unless you download an extension). The fact that ftp://ftp.blizzard.com/ doesn't work is irrelevant, since they can easily set up a server that is directly accessible only to other servers on their network (this is essentially how a load balancer works, after all). Also, the domain (blizzard.com) is completely separate from the protocol used. blizzard.com is blizzard.com no matter what protocol is used. Only the registrant for blizzard.com (Blizzard) can create a subdomain for blizzard.com (which is what ftp.blizzard.com is). This is how DNS works. It's a hierarchy. Finally, Blizzard has distributed patches over this URL for forever. I remember downloading Warcraft II patches over it. It was the only way to get them since Battle.net didn't exist yet. Greatly appreciate for your trust! I want to say that,But I am Chiness,my English is so bad. | ||
|
xboi209
United States1173 Posts
On July 26 2016 16:05 Shield wrote: That's exactly why I'm skeptical because I know how the internet works. On the other hand, you don't. Go learn a little bit about spoof URLs, spoof e-mails, etc before you talk about internet security. So how do you spoof a digital signature? ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/iCKvPEQ.png) | ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4427 Posts
Can we stop with that argument now please | ||
|
bduddy
United States1326 Posts
On July 26 2016 16:05 Shield wrote: Because messing with email headers or adding a bunch of garbage to a URL is the same this as somehow hijacking an entire domain on blizzard.com. Right. Please stop talking before you really hurt someone. Having a single domain deal in multiple protocols is incredibly common and normal.That's exactly why I'm skeptical because I know how the internet works. On the other hand, you don't. Go learn a little bit about spoof URLs, spoof e-mails, etc before you talk about internet security. EDIT: typhoonius is completely correct, except I know that Firefox does support FTP, and Chrome probably does too although I never use it so I'm not sure. | ||
|
brian763
22 Posts
On July 26 2016 06:11 iFU.pauline wrote: Blizzard never released a patch that is not downloadable via battle.net. "no joke" http://ftp.blizzard.com/ It is. "no joke" | ||
|
KameZerg
Sweden1772 Posts
| ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
| ||
|
Cheesefome
314 Posts
When blizzard is ready they'll release it within the game. | ||
| ||
