WCSKorhal.info.pl back
| Forum Index > BW General |
IT'S ALIVEEEEEEEE!!!!! | ||
|
[tyu38]
Poland114 Posts
| ||
|
B-royal
Belgium1327 Posts
| ||
|
f10eqq
United States320 Posts
| ||
|
Saggymidgetbooty6969
104 Posts
imo this looks better http://i.imgur.com/w2sRXfy.jpg (from bisu twitch restream) @edit, nevermind, the issue was in my video player | ||
|
[tyu38]
Poland114 Posts
Saggymidgetbooty6969 , what file is broken ? I checked 09_17_23-09-2015_bisu.avi and is ok. | ||
|
Saggymidgetbooty6969
104 Posts
thanks for the uploads | ||
|
toriak
Slovakia470 Posts
Unfortunaly it seems that the quality of video is lower than before, isnt it ? I would better stick with better quality and less archived players. | ||
|
nbaker
United States1323 Posts
| ||
|
JieXian
Malaysia4213 Posts
I wonder how much money it's costing you to host a large amount of video files :O | ||
739
Bearded Elder14781 Posts
| ||
|
Malkiyah
Russian Federation88 Posts
For example someday I want to watch the stream which recorded a month ago | ||
|
[tyu38]
Poland114 Posts
Hmm. Recording streams for one month should take approximately 250-300 GB of hdd space. Storing those files cost too much for VPS - 50$ per month. JieXian, at the moment my expenses for keeping server, domain, etc cost me about 50$ per year. | ||
|
[tyu38]
Poland114 Posts
| ||
|
Jealous
Niger7159 Posts
| ||
prech
United States2947 Posts
On October 30 2015 00:05 [tyu38] wrote: Hi, I've changed server at www.korhal.info.pl. It's faster, but limited to 22 GB for streams. Despite of that, Best & Effort recording works finally and I've added their streams to korhal. There is a question now to persons, who download streams, what is better for you: more players on korhal with shorter storage time or conversly? Thanks for setting things back up, definitely easier than perusing Afreeca archives every day. I personally would rather see more players with shorter storage time -- more variety this way. This benefits those fans who are most interested/passionate, as we can easily bookmark and check the site often, rather than the fair-weather viewers who may log on every few months out of boredom  | ||
|
vOdToasT
Sweden2678 Posts
On October 30 2015 10:00 prech wrote: Thanks for setting things back up, definitely easier than perusing Afreeca archives every day. I personally would rather see more players with shorter storage time -- more variety this way. This benefits those fans who are most interested/passionate, as we can easily bookmark and check the site often, rather than the fair-weather viewers who may log on every few months out of boredom As a fair-weather viewer, I yield to to and agree with you | ||
|
[tyu38]
Poland114 Posts
From now recorded streams will be uploaded on youtube, instead of downloading files from server. Links to youtube will be available a few minutes after recorded stream (Breaking connection with Afrecca can cause creating very short videos). Link's unavailability means verification by YouTube Policy and takes to 30 minutes. You can watch streams on Korhal from last 10 days. I recommend you watch videos at Korhal because of chronology and clarity. | ||
|
prech
United States2947 Posts
On November 08 2015 07:06 [tyu38] wrote: Big changes at Korhal. From now recorded streams will be uploaded on youtube, instead of downloading files from server. Links to youtube will be available a few minutes after recorded stream (Breaking connection with Afrecca can cause creating very short videos). Link's unavailability means verification by YouTube Policy and takes to 30 minutes. You can watch streams on Korhal from last 10 days. I recommend you watch videos at Korhal because of chronology and clarity. Terrific news, Youtube archiving will be great for long term storage -- alas, there might be issues with music as most of the players play western/Korean pop music while playing, so often I get copyright blocking in one or more regions :/ | ||
|
Probemicro
3708 Posts
| ||
|
[tyu38]
Poland114 Posts
check: http://korhal.info.pl | ||
| ||
|
| ||
