EPTOn January 08 2013 09:02 vOdToasT wrote:
I saw G5 online just now.
:O
I saw G5 online just now.
:O
Yeah, I saw him lurking in ladder D as well.
TeamLiquid Legacy Starleague - Page 35
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
ninazerg
United States7291 Posts
Yeah, I saw him lurking in ladder D as well. | ||
|
SAfinA
Canada15 Posts
| ||
|
thezanursic
5478 Posts
On January 08 2013 09:02 vOdToasT wrote: I saw G5 online just now. :O No joke? That's amazing! | ||
|
skYTosS
United States188 Posts
| ||
|
Sinedd
Poland7052 Posts
 go go go | ||
|
soccerguy10
6 Posts
| ||
|
Zera
Lithuania716 Posts
On January 10 2013 08:52 soccerguy10 wrote: Question for every BWer that uses battlenet. I am contemplating on buying the battlechest to get back on battle net, is it worth it? I am not sure if it is because on iccup, the population seems pretty dead. Anyone that gives information on # of users usually online/active on battlenet would be greatly appreciated. Thanks to everyone on this site!! well, battle.net is full of maphackers, so dunno if there is use of it and iccup has lan latency, which is essential in today's gaming  | ||
|
vOdToasT
Sweden2870 Posts
On January 10 2013 08:52 soccerguy10 wrote: Question for every BWer that uses battlenet. I am contemplating on buying the battlechest to get back on battle net, is it worth it? I am not sure if it is because on iccup, the population seems pretty dead. Anyone that gives information on # of users usually online/active on battlenet would be greatly appreciated. Thanks to everyone on this site!! If you host a game on ICCup, someone will join and you'll be playing in seconds. And there's anti hack, and lan latency. If you host a game on battle net, you probably get a game as fast, but it will be unplayable laggy, and he will hack. | ||
|
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
On January 10 2013 08:52 soccerguy10 wrote: Question for every BWer that uses battlenet. I am contemplating on buying the battlechest to get back on battle net, is it worth it? I am not sure if it is because on iccup, the population seems pretty dead. Anyone that gives information on # of users usually online/active on battlenet would be greatly appreciated. Thanks to everyone on this site!! I don't think it's worth it. ICCUP has more activity than bnet servers. | ||
|
S2Glow
Singapore1042 Posts
On January 08 2013 02:23 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: u werent so good in ur primer anyway :p F*************** U~~~ i win u some before =P | ||
|
pebble444
Italy2495 Posts
On January 10 2013 08:52 soccerguy10 wrote: Question for every BWer that uses battlenet. I am contemplating on buying the battlechest to get back on battle net, is it worth it? I am not sure if it is because on iccup, the population seems pretty dead. Anyone that gives information on # of users usually online/active on battlenet would be greatly appreciated. Thanks to everyone on this site!! Iccup Daily peak is 690 PLayers. Type /motd or any time you re-enter server to see. | ||
|
thezanursic
5478 Posts
On January 10 2013 08:52 soccerguy10 wrote: Question for every BWer that uses battlenet. I am contemplating on buying the battlechest to get back on battle net, is it worth it? I am not sure if it is because on iccup, the population seems pretty dead. Anyone that gives information on # of users usually online/active on battlenet would be greatly appreciated. Thanks to everyone on this site!! Fish is really active like 20,000 concurrents that is of course if you don't mind being raped by Koreans. | ||
|
HaFnium
United Kingdom1071 Posts
On January 10 2013 14:48 pebble444 wrote: Iccup Daily peak is 690 PLayers. Type /motd or any time you re-enter server to see. Battle.net is only good if you like UMS games as there tend to be more gosus ums-er on them. Iccup should be fine as long as you can host, its a BIG IF though haha. | ||
|
Glioburd
France1911 Posts
No joke I played him yesterday ! This tournament bring back some gosu this is great ! | ||
|
Birdie
New Zealand4438 Posts
 | ||
|
thezanursic
5478 Posts
On January 08 2013 09:02 vOdToasT wrote: I saw G5 online just now. :O Hahaha. After I got totally hyped up he got WO'd because he had lag issues xD Well maybe he can still participate in the other qualifiers. | ||
|
WandS
Canada86 Posts
| ||
|
Mewka
Poland1458 Posts
| ||
|
thezanursic
5478 Posts
On January 13 2013 07:34 WandS wrote: I am very pleased how the 1st qualifier went. When me and my opponent had an IP conflict and could not play each other, the Team Liquid staff quickly resolved the issue. I now look forward playing in the next qualifier. Good luck!!! | ||
|
Sum41
Chile345 Posts
| ||
| ||
