It's not that bad guys, it's two seasons per year with two 'grand finals'. The no ace match is a bit disappointing but it'll be good to watch some interesting pseudo ace matches between whichever players are sent out last.

Reuental

United States457 Posts

November 17 2011 07:37 GMT

#104

God Kespa is so stupid. Why would you remove the ace match? And no winners League? Doesn't every sports institution that less super star coverage is a really bad thing? This will really hurt KeSPAs amount of viewers I guarantee it.

Fenrax

United States5018 Posts

November 17 2011 07:38 GMT

#105

I can see the reasoning behind no Ace match though I am not sure yet if they are convincing. And I suspect that Winner's League had bad ratings so they got rid of it.

But two Winners and no Grand finals. I dont know what the fuck is going on. Have they lost their fucking mind?
Maybe in Wimbledon next year there won't be Nadal vs. Federer. Both win! Because fuck you Fans. Also no Manchester vs. Barca. Because who would want to see that?

XsebT

Denmark2980 Posts

November 17 2011 07:41 GMT

#106

What in the name of hell... These are some weird changes.
One thing I'm a huge fan of is less matches per week though! Think it's gonna make each match more tense and make it easier to follow aswell (plus, I believe this is also in the players' best interest).

Btw, is this format final or can changes still be made?

blabber

United States4448 Posts

November 17 2011 07:41 GMT

#107

bring back 2v2 instead of removing ace match to allow that extra player to play

Kal_rA

United States2925 Posts

November 17 2011 07:44 GMT

#108

No ace or Grand Finals?!!! WTF kespa. If you wernt sponsoring Team 8 I would flame you so hard right now.

w/e Team 8 only needs to field JD Sea and Baby to win every bo5 and take both titles undefeated hehe.

sixfour

England11061 Posts

November 17 2011 07:47 GMT

#109

no ace match is unbelievably good for stars

zenMaster

Canada761 Posts

November 17 2011 07:50 GMT

#110

Major nerf to KT, I approve. BW lives!

Kenpachi

United States9908 Posts

November 17 2011 07:51 GMT

#111

seems appropriate if you think about it.

konadora

Singapore66158 Posts

November 17 2011 07:52 GMT

#112

I honestly think that KT is going to suffer the most from the no ace system, followed by SKT :<

HighTemper

Canada3867 Posts

November 17 2011 07:53 GMT

#113

On November 17 2011 14:33 Doraemon wrote:
no ace and bo5 makes me sad =[

On November 17 2011 16:09 Ryo wrote:
Bo5 and no Ace set, disappointing.

On November 17 2011 16:34 konadora wrote:
no ace match and bo5 is just wtf.

-________-

Subversive

Australia2229 Posts

November 17 2011 07:58 GMT

#114

On November 17 2011 16:47 sixfour wrote:
no ace match is unbelievably good for stars

Yeah good for Stars. But even though they have top players, good for all the deep teams like CJ as well. Completely turns pl on its head. Top player teams nowhere near as scary. Solid deep teams a lot more so.

Sawamura

Malaysia7602 Posts

November 17 2011 07:59 GMT

#115

Flash can't play the final role of final boss ??? T_T my kt fan boy heart is already crying inside already . So freaking depress.......................

konadora

Singapore66158 Posts

November 17 2011 08:08 GMT

#116

ok please tell me at least among the 3 rounds per half-season, the middle round is winner's league

or we have a separate winner's league

omfg

i'm fine with bo5 BUT ACE MATCH PLEAPSELASPELASasdfasdcv....