KeSPA Ranking December 2010 - Page 3
Forum Index > BW General |
sCriv
United Kingdom90 Posts
| ||
opsayo
591 Posts
GOD DAMNIT BEST U CAN OUTMACRO A SMALL COUNTRYS WORTH OF SWEATSHOPS User was warned for this post | ||
moopie
12605 Posts
On December 05 2010 10:32 ConSenT wrote: Can't understand how Light managed to drop a place. BeSt should be ranked alot higher than 23rd and ZerO should have gone up more than one rank, as should Bisu. Action should have lost more than just 2 places aswell. I know its all based on maths, but, like the FIFA football world rankings, it is a bit of a joke. The only ranks I 100% agree with are the top 3, everyone else is debatable. So the ranking follows a specific formula based on player wins (weighed heavier on individual league progress than team leagues), and you disagree with it? KeSPA ranks aren't there to tell you that #8 is a worse player than #7, just that in recent history he hasn't performed as well (or hasn't played as much). As for why Bisu passed Light, it was because he was on a roll last round going 10-0, where as Light went 3-7. The two are still very closely tied in points (Bisu with 1,339.5, Light with 1,326.8) so Light can overtake him very easily if he performs well. BeSt dropped 4 places, but if you look closely, the difference between BeSt (828.4) at #23, and Hyuk (830.6) at #21 is almost nothing. You should take a look at the ranking with the correct point alocations to see how close certain positions are on the ranking. | ||
RezChi
Canada2368 Posts
| ||
| ||