On April 19 2010 02:46 lone_hydra wrote: I hope Effort gets raped in ro8. That guy pulled some bullshit. He played like 2 whole games then suddenly he complained the moment he was about to lose.
I cannot believe it was the computer's fault. How many games were played on that computer prior to Effort's game that worked just fine? I mean, what could possibly go wrong in a computer to justify Effort's own mouse breaking down?
I bet that fucking crushed Shine's spirit and his play got sloppy. Effort sucks vs. zerg, sucks vs. terran. and is only decent vs. P. Did you see how close the game was even though Effort went 9 pool speed vs. 12 hatch? Fuck, I hope he gets raped by Zero and fails in SPL.
On April 19 2010 03:46 Fenrax wrote: Yeah, thats right. The mouse broke, just when he got destroyed. But it was not the fault of the mouse. It was the fault of the PC: How convenient. What a cheater... Regaming this is the worst decsion ever.
Yeah, that's right. They inspected the mouse and found there was no evidence whatsoever of it being messed up and decided to give him a regame anyway.
On April 19 2010 04:19 Firien wrote: and what if effort was lossing his game vs shine cause his mouse was failing him (maybe you saw the game ? his micro was really really bad, and at his speed its kind of impossible to do that many mistakes unless he switched himself with a D/C player), and called pause when he saw clearly whats the case ? we cant say shit without FPVOD . No need for everyone to hate effort
If it was his mouse, then it's his fault. Imagine if in some racing competition someone asked for a re-race becase his car broke lol. In each sport, each sportsman is fully resposible for his own equipment.
Well, that said, in racing car competitions, the driver is not the one who is fixing the car and keeping it working well. And with a computer mouse, I assume it's much harder to figure out whether or not it's not working perfectly, or when it's going to break.
Of course, I'm probably not too annoyed because I love EffOrt, but here's to hoping he can prove everyone wrong by demolishing ZerO.
Which game was the most difficult? The first game was the most difficult. I prepared a very sharp (T/N: timing I think) build, but because the build was such a gamble there was enormous pressure. I played a little easier after that first game.
Hmm i dont know what other translators use for 날카로운 but instead of sharp i think abusive would work better. A build that can really take advantage of what another player is doing. '
It's just a good thing this thing doesn't happen in professional sports. Imagine them re-running the 100m at the Olympics because someone's shoe was untied, or replaying the 18th hole at the masters because Tiger Woods complained about a bad club.
Pretty ridiculous decision in my opinion, equipment failure happens, and it sucks, but you can't just hand out rematches - especially when it's solely on the players word.
On April 20 2010 15:22 LunarDestiny wrote: But those who didn't watch the endless tiebreaker. Nukethestar will tell you all about in about 5 minutes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-xaTLUppAc
On April 20 2010 15:22 LunarDestiny wrote: But those who didn't watch the endless tiebreaker. Nukethestar will tell you all about in about 5 minutes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-xaTLUppAc
Props to nukethestars for summarizing the entire ~7 hour event.
EPT![[image loading]](http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/5145/brokenmouse431x276.jpg)
