well, personally, i don't really care which format is used, fair or not. i'm just unhappy because you guys are trying to change it now, and not 3-4 weeks earlier (kinda like how i'd be pissed if a professor mentions a specific final exam format in the syllabus and decides to change it right before the day of the exam). so... if this arguing goes on for another day or so, how about we have like a vote from all CPL participants (and i mean EVERYONE, not just members in the finals)?

Xenocide_Knight

Korea (South)2625 Posts

April 02 2010 06:29 GMT

#2682

On April 02 2010 14:18 numLoCK wrote:
Fairness to the less played players is so meh as a reason to me.
Our less played players are less played because the vanished and never earned a position in the lineup again. Honestly I don't think anything is more fair than "earn your own spot on the lineup".
And I mean, maybe its just me, but if we play Bo5 all season then I think the finals should also be Bo5. Strength in a Bo5 is what was emphasized all season, and changing the format for the final seems to go against that.

well it's hard coming in as D- and getting a lineup spot vs a D+. Although you're right, its not a good reason. thats why, I just want to point out again

On April 02 2010 14:02 Xenocide_Knight wrote:

Show nested quote +

Another alternative that came up was a Bo21 but we use a random generator to pick players for each match. I have a lot of UMS maps that are basically random generators (like russian roulette) and it would be really fun(ny). Maps could just rotate between the 5 CPL maps in an order l10f would decide.

think about it guys! It could be fun!

numLoCK

Canada1416 Posts

April 02 2010 06:46 GMT

#2683

It does sound like it could be fun, but I don't think its a suitable way to hold the finals lol.

I dunno, I'll try to talk to the rest of my team and see if we can come up with any kind of compromise idea.

Shotcoder

United States2316 Posts

April 02 2010 07:05 GMT

#2684

Altair, Numlock, what race are you guys missing? I mean since other teams got to replace their inactive players you should be able to do the same. If it's Terran I wouldn't mind participating xD

sixduck

United States301 Posts

April 02 2010 07:36 GMT

#2685

RECRUITING FREE AGENTS FOR VICTORIOUS SECRET

LCC

Canada348 Posts

April 02 2010 13:11 GMT

#2686

I'MA FREE AGENT K.

FaCE_1

Canada6158 Posts

April 02 2010 16:56 GMT

#2687

lets play 5bo 4v4 team melee

Ruken

United States858 Posts

April 02 2010 18:10 GMT

#2688

I like xenocide BO21 thing. Lotsa games for lotsa people.

numLoCK

Canada1416 Posts

April 03 2010 00:03 GMT

#2689

Our team has a Terran who played in the early season and then disappeared. We see him periodically now but I don't think he's actually played a game with us in months.
And we have a Zerg who also played in the early season but has now peaced out for SC2.
However, I don't think recruiting ace players from top teams is in the spirit of the league exactly, lol.

Shotcoder

United States2316 Posts

April 03 2010 01:53 GMT

#2690

On April 03 2010 09:03 numLoCK wrote:
Our team has a Terran who played in the early season and then disappeared. We see him periodically now but I don't think he's actually played a game with us in months.
And we have a Zerg who also played in the early season but has now peaced out for SC2.
However, I don't think recruiting ace players from top teams is in the spirit of the league exactly, lol.

I think it's perfectly legal, they want a BO7 and you only have 4 players. Ketomai and I would be 100% down for filling out your roster. And what does spirit have anything to do with it when they're going to be anal about doing a BO5 instead?

coolcrimefighter

United States378 Posts

April 03 2010 02:46 GMT

#2691

i think the better way to do it would be for VS to pick me up as a zerg/terran player since I play protoss :D so its kind of fair

genericname92

United States148 Posts

April 03 2010 03:09 GMT

#2692

don't do it, ccf sux at zerg

AltaiR_

Korea (South)922 Posts

April 03 2010 07:21 GMT

#2693

On April 03 2010 10:53 Shotcoder wrote:

Show nested quote +

it's perfectly legal as long as MIK can be lenient on if we can get someone to play in our stead (not HAVING to be shotcoder/ketomai of course)

Chaos

United States772 Posts

April 03 2010 07:22 GMT

#2694

i'll play ^_^

AltaiR_

Korea (South)922 Posts

April 03 2010 07:22 GMT

#2695

On April 03 2010 16:22 Chaos- wrote:
i'll play ^_^

hah preferably a player instead of a coach please.

AltaiR_

Korea (South)922 Posts

April 03 2010 07:27 GMT

#2696

i am going to PM aaron, he said he was willing to play for finals, but he also said he was willing to play for when we faced ninja explosion, which ended up as W.O. so....yeah lets assume we are down two.

Xenocide_Knight

Korea (South)2625 Posts

April 03 2010 08:01 GMT

#2697

is it really that horrendous to have someone just play twice?

AltaiR_

Korea (South)922 Posts

April 03 2010 08:22 GMT

#2698

On April 03 2010 17:01 Xenocide_Knight wrote:
is it really that horrendous to have someone just play twice?

i'd rather not finally give in and make all my comments go to waste, but it looks like we have to, because it seems you won't accept any negotiations and rather stick to what you had originally planned and make us deal with it. only reason i argued this now is because right after we won vs WIO, l10f was considering on if we should change the format for finals.