|
Made in Korea vs Midnight (Z) XenocideKnight < Fighting Spirit > (P) coolcrimefighter (T) Ruken < Destination > (T) Mekhami (T) Jadoreoov < Matchpoint > (P) Pyrodog (P) Face_1 < Outsider > (Z) Genericname92 (Z) XenocideKnight < Heartbreak Ridge > Mekhami
|
|
Made In Korea vs. Midnight XenocideKnight < Fighting Spirit > ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/Picon_small.png) coolcrimefighter ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/Ticon_small.png) Ruken < Destination > Mekhami![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/Ticon_small.png) Jadoreoov < Matchpoint > Pyrodog Face_1 < Outsider > ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/Zicon_small.png) Genericname92 XenocideKnight < Heartbreak Ridge > ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/Ticon_small.png) Mekhami
|
Korea (South)922 Posts
can we voteban aeroh from predicting shit please. =]
oh and will there be a 3/4 match? that way we can kinda have a break before finals like any other finals in a league/midnight vs wio would be cool to watch?
|
how come Midnight didn't send Pyrodog ?
Well.. GJ Xeno !!
BO7 Final, This will be interesting. !!! All player for the team will play (if needed). Can't wait !!
|
Korea (South)922 Posts
so whats the format gonna be for finals, l10f
|
On March 31 2010 15:09 AltaiR_ wrote: so whats the format gonna be for finals, l10f how about you read first page ?
|
gogog mik!
|
Korea (South)922 Posts
On March 31 2010 18:45 FaCE_1 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2010 15:09 AltaiR_ wrote: so whats the format gonna be for finals, l10f how about you read first page ? how about it might be changed
|
On March 31 2010 18:45 FaCE_1 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2010 15:09 AltaiR_ wrote: so whats the format gonna be for finals, l10f how about you read first page ? You know that a Bo7 requires more maps than we have in the map pool, and that the actual format has not even been finalized yet, right? And we don't know when we are playing and we can't submit lineups until we get a map order.
|
|
im pumped for this!!!!!!!
Victorious Secret FTWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW ALL THE WAY im no lifeing my spring break for this.
|
|
Korea (South)922 Posts
On April 01 2010 13:01 Xenocide_Knight wrote: sumbit yo lineups! little issue about lineups at the moment.
|
Altair, if you get PvT and want to practice just give me a ring.
|
Korea (South)922 Posts
MIK, we have an issue. I know that this is supposed to be a team victory, but simply put, not all teams have had the fortune of all 6 of their members being 100% active throughout the whole thing, and the finals WILL be depressing if it stays as bo7. In fact, after talking with other teams, every team BUT you guys had some random leaver on their team leaving the average count of players that show up being 4, and had to deal with it throughout the whole thing. Doing a Bo7 with us repeating a player is not only warping the lineups (i wouldn't want to face a top player twice either..), but it really isn't fair for the rest of us. I know it's lame if some players can't join the finals and participate with the team, but that's how most team leagues are (A team, B team, practice partners etc). The easiest suggestion to this is stick to Bo5, so neither team is follied from any other format besides bo5. We aren't telling you to deal with our standards, just most of us simply don't have the same luxury to keep up with yours. What do you say?
|
Maybe something on the lines of some modified version of 3x bo3 or bo5 or something?
Or 4 players, stay until eliminated.
|
On April 01 2010 23:35 AltaiR_ wrote: MIK, we have an issue. I know that this is supposed to be a team victory, but simply put, not all teams have had the fortune of all 6 of their members being 100% active throughout the whole thing, and the finals WILL be depressing if it stays as bo7. In fact, after talking with other teams, every team BUT you guys had some random leaver on their team leaving the average count of players that show up being 4, and had to deal with it throughout the whole thing. Doing a Bo7 with us repeating a player is not only warping the lineups (i wouldn't want to face a top player twice either..), but it really isn't fair for the rest of us. I know it's lame if some players can't join the finals and participate with the team, but that's how most team leagues are (A team, B team, practice partners etc). The easiest suggestion to this is stick to Bo5, so neither team is follied from any other format besides bo5. We aren't telling you to deal with our standards, just most of us simply don't have the same luxury to keep up with yours. What do you say?
the format, i'll have to ask my team 1st, so can't answer that right now... but as for having an inactive member, i'll need to correct ya: we did have that experience. that was the whole reason we had to replace our protoss player before the playoffs.
|
Korea (South)922 Posts
On April 02 2010 03:00 dschoe wrote:Show nested quote +On April 01 2010 23:35 AltaiR_ wrote: MIK, we have an issue. I know that this is supposed to be a team victory, but simply put, not all teams have had the fortune of all 6 of their members being 100% active throughout the whole thing, and the finals WILL be depressing if it stays as bo7. In fact, after talking with other teams, every team BUT you guys had some random leaver on their team leaving the average count of players that show up being 4, and had to deal with it throughout the whole thing. Doing a Bo7 with us repeating a player is not only warping the lineups (i wouldn't want to face a top player twice either..), but it really isn't fair for the rest of us. I know it's lame if some players can't join the finals and participate with the team, but that's how most team leagues are (A team, B team, practice partners etc). The easiest suggestion to this is stick to Bo5, so neither team is follied from any other format besides bo5. We aren't telling you to deal with our standards, just most of us simply don't have the same luxury to keep up with yours. What do you say? the format, i'll have to ask my team 1st, so can't answer that right now... but as for having an inactive member, i'll need to correct ya: we did have that experience. that was the whole reason we had to replace our protoss player before the playoffs. ya well our coach thinks one of our players will still come to the task and play if we need to, so he kept him, but i doubt that.
|
On April 01 2010 23:35 AltaiR_ wrote: MIK, we have an issue. I know that this is supposed to be a team victory, but simply put, not all teams have had the fortune of all 6 of their members being 100% active throughout the whole thing, and the finals WILL be depressing if it stays as bo7. In fact, after talking with other teams, every team BUT you guys had some random leaver on their team leaving the average count of players that show up being 4, and had to deal with it throughout the whole thing. Doing a Bo7 with us repeating a player is not only warping the lineups (i wouldn't want to face a top player twice either..), but it really isn't fair for the rest of us. I know it's lame if some players can't join the finals and participate with the team, but that's how most team leagues are (A team, B team, practice partners etc). The easiest suggestion to this is stick to Bo5, so neither team is follied from any other format besides bo5. We aren't telling you to deal with our standards, just most of us simply don't have the same luxury to keep up with yours. What do you say? ok thats why we decided to let you guys play someone twice.. I don't see what the problem is, this arrangement only favors you guys
|
|
|
|