• Log InLog In
• Register

[Update] 09-10 Proleague Season News by Fomos - Page 2

158 CommentsPost a Reply Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All

TwoToneTerran United States8841 Posts September 15 2009 02:52 GMT #21 On September 15 2009 11:48 benjammin wrote: why are they wearing life jackets in a waist-deep pool? The pool could be on a boat.

Arrian United States889 Posts September 15 2009 02:53 GMT #22 Perhaps they finally realized that they were flooding the market. This is mostly good news.

Ideas United States8182 Posts September 15 2009 02:55 GMT #23 just about all these changes sound awesome :D

Heyoka Katowice25012 Posts September 15 2009 02:59 GMT #24 I liked last year's format a ton, but it seems weirder to me that the season is <1month from starting and they haven't decided on a format yet?? Do we know when this is all going to get rolling yet?

roronoe Canada1527 Posts September 15 2009 03:10 GMT #25 This is the biggest news in quite a while. Most changes are pretty good, my favourite being more winner's league. Not too sure about the bo7 though.....sometimes for me the matches seem too dragged out. Even watching four games in a row seem to take too much time/gets boring for me sometimes...especially if they're long games. edit: on second thought, bo7 would benefit the players though. it'll definitely give more chances for different players to come out and really allow the players that aren't the top 4 of team depth to have a chance. this seems a lot better for many teams. I still think from a viewer's perspective bo7 might be too long

doubleupgradeobbies! Australia1361 Posts September 15 2009 03:12 GMT #26 Hmm I liked last year's format fine too. But if the progamers are really overworked then I guess I understand. I'd have thought GOM going down would have fixed the overworking thing though. Also less seasons means less FPL seasons

ryuu_ United States1266 Posts September 15 2009 03:16 GMT #27 These are some great changes can't wait till next season!

IntoTheWow is awesome32282 Posts September 15 2009 03:20 GMT #28 CJ take the winners league no contest.

FragKrag United States11567 Posts September 15 2009 03:27 GMT #29 CJ CJ CJ I want up to 3/race. It seems right, and I don't like the race limitations.

alffla Hong Kong20321 Posts September 15 2009 03:28 GMT #30 cool cahngeslol. moar bo7s and winners leagues plz thx. lol so now they're going to have 전기리그 and 후기리그 champions like before?? :D

l10f United States3241 Posts September 15 2009 03:28 GMT #31 On September 15 2009 11:52 TwoToneTerran wrote: Show nested quote + On September 15 2009 11:48 benjammin wrote: why are they wearing life jackets in a waist-deep pool? The pool could be on a boat. Life jackets reduce the chances of catching H1N1.

Nitan United States3401 Posts September 15 2009 03:42 GMT #32 Bo7 makes me happy.

ndralcasid United States524 Posts September 15 2009 03:48 GMT #33 With the best 3o5 format, I favored the requiring using one of each race. With best 4o7, I'd rather just have no race limitations, since it wouldn't make a terribly huge difference.

Sigh Canada2433 Posts September 15 2009 03:58 GMT #34 On September 15 2009 12:28 l10f wrote: Show nested quote + On September 15 2009 11:52 TwoToneTerran wrote: On September 15 2009 11:48 benjammin wrote: why are they wearing life jackets in a waist-deep pool? The pool could be on a boat. Life jackets reduce the chances of catching H1N1. Are you serious? lol

Xiphos Canada7507 Posts September 15 2009 04:02 GMT #35 Well by doing race balance, it will bring out the full team player's potential out. I hate seeing players that retires because they don't get any play time.

cablesc United States1540 Posts September 15 2009 04:03 GMT #36 Sounds good for the most part but I'd make a few changes. For race requirements, I'd go for 1 of each race AND no more than 3 of a single race. The two of each race is crazy some teams don't even have 1 quality "insert race" let alone 2. As for the winners league, I wonder if it'll be too much of an advantage/workload for one-man-teams like Flash and Jaedong. What if the winners could only win a max of two games. Could be a bit more strategic for coaches to figure out the right two map matchups.

alffla Hong Kong20321 Posts September 15 2009 04:08 GMT #37 On September 15 2009 12:58 Sigh wrote: Show nested quote + On September 15 2009 12:28 l10f wrote: On September 15 2009 11:52 TwoToneTerran wrote: On September 15 2009 11:48 benjammin wrote: why are they wearing life jackets in a waist-deep pool? The pool could be on a boat. Life jackets reduce the chances of catching H1N1. Are you serious? lol romanian much

Mystlord United States10264 Posts September 15 2009 04:16 GMT #38 l10f, awesome job. Thanks for keeping us up to date on this ^_^. In respect to the changes, I approve all of them. The race requirements one is a bit tricky though... I'm not sure where I stand on that to make it fair. One of each is fine, but I'm not sure if I want anymore regulations than that.

FirstBorn Romania3955 Posts September 15 2009 04:24 GMT #39 I really like these changes, especially the change in the PL format. Hopefully games will be more interesting this way. Also, l10f , you've been a hero these last few weeks, translating all of these articles. Thanks!

zeppelin United States565 Posts September 15 2009 04:24 GMT #40 I think it would be neat if they kept the minimum one of each race requirement. Let a team send out 4/1/1 if they want to. This would have the effect of letting teams become race-specialist teams. I think it's neat how in football you can have teams that are known specifically for running or passing or defense. Why not have a format that allows a team to become known for their zerg play (for example) instead of having every lineup be extremely similar. All they really need is a system to make sure mirrors aren't played so much. If they can fix the mirror problem, I will be happy with everything else.

Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All

Please log in or register to reply.