|
What WeSt described constantly happened to my friend when we played. Don't know why, might have been because he was trying to use chaos launcher, but he doesn't hack. Yet now he is banned.
|
The internetz is serieus business it seems.
|
- CaM says:
did you hack vs me
in our games?
121 says:
yea
why do you think
i won like 4 games?
- CaM says:
yay my zvt is good vs maphackers
He just says he is sorry and deserves his time banned.
|
On August 31 2009 18:29 zergnewb wrote:
What WeSt described constantly happened to my friend when we played. Don't know why, might have been because he was trying to use chaos launcher, but he doesn't hack. Yet now he is banned.
Thats not reason they got banned !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They hacked. I have got that "ur connection lost" xx times, I dont hack, I am not on that list. Same with my friends who dont hack.
|
I reckon I could take you with hacks, Cam >: D
Actually no, because I had the BO win and you still beat me in that ZvZ :o
|
Oh phew, they didn't catch me.
|
On August 31 2009 18:38 iCCup.deL wrote:
I reckon I could take you with hacks, Cam >: D
Actually no, because I had the BO win and you still beat me in that ZvZ :o
Around 4 ZvZ's actually :O.
|
On August 31 2009 18:39 Camlito wrote:Show nested quote +On August 31 2009 18:38 iCCup.deL wrote:
I reckon I could take you with hacks, Cam >: D
Actually no, because I had the BO win and you still beat me in that ZvZ :o Around 4 ZvZ's actually :O.
Yeah but only one was a BO win for me (which I then proceeded to lose  ). I will get you one day... When I get my desktop and lag-free internet back I am coming for you 
|
When will the new season start? I'm eager to play. Better to ask here then to make another thread.
|
|
|
Come on guys this topic isn't all about clazz.. How about these other hackers found :
MGMT, iG.Voltron = Fassw Fassw-x17 still can't give up hacking eh? What's this the one billionth time you got caught?
imjiraya - Funny i accused you in our 2v2 games and u spaz me in channel playing mr.innocent and getting your butt buddies to spaz me. Eat it kid.
S.pg)nico Rofl again? When will u ever stop hacking?
I knew this day would come. I even made a list of hackers who dl'ed the maphack on GG.net some other names included was Ret and Idra (Funny how he started winning all these tournies eh?) Lastshadow, G5. There will be more names to come. Then GG.net closed forum and ban me cause they thought i was throwing out names w/o proof. But i did. I couldn't just release people's ip over the internet. Suckers.
|
Wow Universalmedia's post is hilarious.
|
On August 31 2009 19:06 Universalmedia wrote:
I knew this day would come. I even made a list of hackers who dl'ed the maphack on GG.net some other names included was Ret and Idra (Funny how he started winning all these tournies eh?)
uh, SC-maven? I thought Idra started winning because of Korea?
|
In no way am i saying they're constantly hacking. Only source i have is they dl'ed the hack ok?
And just because some people may do well offline or prove they can play offline and in live tournies doesn't mean they'll never hack online. Use your brain. Actually i should just respond to people who has a brain. Perfect example: remember Trek?
|
It's so funny i cant stand this. Some horrible wannabe korean losing a game to HolyZerg crying that he hacks in iccup site and some other newbie losing to him too. If that is your solid proof for hacking then you guys are the best. Some admin decides to fuck up somebody 'reputation' putting him in hackers list without even giving one replay where he hacked ( they dont have anything obviously)
|
Ret obviously hacks, how could he else play on A-/A level on iCCup when streaming to over 400 viewers almost everyday? We all saw it! Seriously to say Idra and Ret cheats is just supid. Idra could have been be able to cheat with that cape from Harry Potter to turn invisible and sit besides Skyhigh unnoticed and hack. Idra if you manage to do that you are my new hero! Also give that cape to research I want one!
|
On August 31 2009 13:12 Masamune wrote:Show nested quote +On August 31 2009 12:49 YPang wrote:On August 31 2009 12:46 Masamune wrote:On August 31 2009 12:43 YPang wrote:On August 31 2009 12:35 Masamune wrote:On August 31 2009 12:12 YPang wrote:On August 31 2009 11:59 Masamune wrote:On August 31 2009 11:47 YPang wrote:On August 31 2009 11:42 sixghost wrote:On August 31 2009 11:26 YPang wrote:
[quote]
So what you expect hackers to do? Come out on a random day and create a thread and apologize for hacking randomly? of course no one is gonna do that. Have you EVER seen anyone do something like that, confessing before they were caught? I haven't.
It's sorta like cheating on a test, you did it once cuz you were tempted, and then felt guilty about it. But MOST LIKELY you're not going to go up to the class and confess that you cheated, you'll just have the guilt inside. And when someone catches you cheating, you'll have to apologize and thats the best you can do. That's the point. If he was really sorry about it he would have admitted it before he was outed. He's just sorry he got caught, not that he hacked. Clazz Yes, this is only the case if someone did something that he KNEW he 100% shouldn't of, most of the time only do people confess themselves is when they've commited a murder, or hurt an entire family. Hacking on a game, i believe is similar to cheating on a test, or lying to a friend, these are the things that you probably won't randomly confess until you are highly suspected ( even in this case iccup's list is not an official list of hackers, ONLY highly suspicious, and thats when clazziquai admitted that he was hacking). The guilt would NEVER be big enough for someone to go up and confess like that. EDIT: if you hacked like a mofo in a money tournament and WON it, its different. God this post is so dumb. Hacking is 100% wrong, so is murder and everything else bad. Some are worse than others, but in a perfect would they wouldn't exist. If you can convince yourself that hacking is only 90% wrong (I don't know why I'm using these dumb percentages, I think I'm just trying to respond to your post..) you deserve to face the consequences. Its not dumb, if you would read my entire posts prior to this you'd know that i was responding to kwark's comment of people confessing before they're caught hacking. And when have i said its only 90% wrong, or not totally wrong? If you were to confess for everyone of your sins/wrong doings, you'd be doing it for 5 hours a day. A lot of mistakes people make are just not big enough for them to have enough guilt to confess like that, and permanent ban punishment i believe is too harsh, especially to a community they've spent COUNTLESSS HOURS ON. I do believe clazz should be punished, but not Permanetly banned. Plus as a said earlier, iccup's hack list is NOT official, but only suspects. CLazziqual had the balls to admit at that time (unlike Much) which i give him mad props for. If you're going to respond to this post, i suggest you read this thread more thoroughly before you make a fool out of yourself. Again. On August 31 2009 12:15 YPang wrote:On August 31 2009 12:13 IdrA wrote:On August 31 2009 12:12 YPang wrote:On August 31 2009 11:59 Masamune wrote:On August 31 2009 11:47 YPang wrote:
[quote]
Yes, this is only the case if someone did something that he KNEW he 100% shouldn't of, most of the time only do people confess themselves is when they've commited a murder, or hurt an entire family.
Hacking on a game, i believe is similar to cheating on a test, or lying to a friend, these are the things that you probably won't randomly confess until you are highly suspected ( even in this case iccup's list is not an official list of hackers, ONLY highly suspicious, and thats when clazziquai admitted that he was hacking). The guilt would NEVER be big enough for someone to go up and confess like that.
EDIT: if you hacked like a mofo in a money tournament and WON it, its different. God this post is so dumb. Hacking is 100% wrong, so is murder and everything else bad. Some are worse than others, but in a perfect would they wouldn't exist. If you can convince yourself that hacking is only 90% wrong (I don't know why I'm using these dumb percentages, I think I'm just trying to respond to your post..) you deserve to face the consequences. Its not dumb, if you would read my entire posts prior to this you'd know that i was responding to kwark's comment of people confessing before they're caught hacking. And when have i said its only 90% wrong, or not totally wrong? If you were to confess for everyone of your sins/wrong doings, you'd be doing it for 5 hours a day. A lot of mistakes people make are just not big enough for them to have enough guilt to confess like that, especially to a community they've spent COUNTLESSS HOURS ON. I do believe clazz should be punished, but not Permanetly banned. Plus as a said earlier, iccup's hack list is NOT official, but only suspects. CLazziqual had the balls to admit at that time (unlike Much) which i give him mad props for. If you're going to respond to this post, i suggest you read this thread more thoroughly before you make a fool out of yourself. Again. how does it take balls to admit to something after getting caught he's not technically caught, just suspected. If it was spades, or much he'd still be denying no? no no, your posts are dumb. I suggest you read the thread over again. Clazz already admitted that he hacked, it's not just a suspicion. Did you really not get what i meant? I MEAN he ADMITTED that he hacked WHEN the LIST IS NOT AN OFFICIAL LIST OF HACKERS BUT A LIST OF SUSPICIOUS HACKERS... there i typed i t in caps, hopefully you understand now. iccup's hack list is NOT official, but only suspects There i bolded the part where i said iccup's hack list is not official hopefully that helps you. Thanks good day sir. Next time you call my posts dumb please double read my comments before makign yourself look like a Fool AGAIN!... your post is still dumb. Big deal if it's not official. Nothing is official; there is always a sliver of a chance someone is innocent when they are accused of a crime. He still hacked, bottom line. I really don't know what you're getting at. I would go on with this, but i feel like you're not using reasoning but trying to compete with my ego. So i'll let it go, good day sir. Your lucky your English is that bad because no one can really tell what the hell you were originally trying to say. In your earlier posts, you were going on about how some people have less regard for some things than others and that if it's serious enough or they feel really guilty about it, they will admit it--and that Clazz probably didn't see it as something as bad so he didn't admit to it right away...I have no clue, it was totally off topic and some jumbled bullshit from your head. Anyway....forget that. Onto what you're saying now. Clazz admitting he hacked after a list of suspected hackers came out as opposed to a confirmed list. There is a difference, yes, but to me, there's not much of a significant one. We KNOW that he did use hacks because he already admitted it and someone else said he even told him about it. Either he could have denied it now, and looked worse later when they somehow finalized it (because he did do it, it's only a matter of time before he would be caught), or he could just admit it now. He chose to admit it now. Simple as that. People have different personalities. Some people are scared of what can potentially happen when they do something wrong and run, others give up because they see there is no escaping. It's really based on the person, and I don't think admitting something after your either 99% caught or 100% caught makes a difference. This is just some trivial bs you're rambling on about because you want Clazz to stay. For the record, I didn't know Clazz before this happened so I'm not completely affected by this and not that emotionally attached. If he comes back, fine, if not whatever. But if I were in that tl tourny he hacked in and if it affected my outcome, I wouldn't be pleased.
you're*
|
On August 31 2009 18:37 kroko wrote:Show nested quote +On August 31 2009 18:29 zergnewb wrote:
What WeSt described constantly happened to my friend when we played. Don't know why, might have been because he was trying to use chaos launcher, but he doesn't hack. Yet now he is banned. Thats not reason they got banned !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They hacked. I have got that "ur connection lost" xx times, I dont hack, I am not on that list. Same with my friends who dont hack.
I agree. I get that massege in at least 20% of my games, because my internet sucks and I am not on the list.
edit
But I've played only 2 games this weekend, so if it was done just in that time I can't guarantee.
|
Bearded Elder29905 Posts
On August 31 2009 19:17 iMp.will. wrote:
It's so funny i cant stand this. Some horrible wannabe korean losing a game to HolyZerg crying that he hacks in iccup site and some other newbie losing to him too. If that is your solid proof for hacking then you guys are the best. Some admin decides to fuck up somebody 'reputation' putting him in hackers list without even giving one replay where he hacked ( they dont have anything obviously)
You dumb? Did You even read the method of how iccup admins caught all of the hackers or not really?
|
On August 31 2009 19:22 Toxiferous wrote:Show nested quote +On August 31 2009 13:12 Masamune wrote:On August 31 2009 12:49 YPang wrote:On August 31 2009 12:46 Masamune wrote:On August 31 2009 12:43 YPang wrote:On August 31 2009 12:35 Masamune wrote:On August 31 2009 12:12 YPang wrote:On August 31 2009 11:59 Masamune wrote:On August 31 2009 11:47 YPang wrote:On August 31 2009 11:42 sixghost wrote:[quote] That's the point. If he was really sorry about it he would have admitted it before he was outed. He's just sorry he got caught, not that he hacked. Clazz Yes, this is only the case if someone did something that he KNEW he 100% shouldn't of, most of the time only do people confess themselves is when they've commited a murder, or hurt an entire family. Hacking on a game, i believe is similar to cheating on a test, or lying to a friend, these are the things that you probably won't randomly confess until you are highly suspected ( even in this case iccup's list is not an official list of hackers, ONLY highly suspicious, and thats when clazziquai admitted that he was hacking). The guilt would NEVER be big enough for someone to go up and confess like that. EDIT: if you hacked like a mofo in a money tournament and WON it, its different. God this post is so dumb. Hacking is 100% wrong, so is murder and everything else bad. Some are worse than others, but in a perfect would they wouldn't exist. If you can convince yourself that hacking is only 90% wrong (I don't know why I'm using these dumb percentages, I think I'm just trying to respond to your post..) you deserve to face the consequences. Its not dumb, if you would read my entire posts prior to this you'd know that i was responding to kwark's comment of people confessing before they're caught hacking. And when have i said its only 90% wrong, or not totally wrong? If you were to confess for everyone of your sins/wrong doings, you'd be doing it for 5 hours a day. A lot of mistakes people make are just not big enough for them to have enough guilt to confess like that, and permanent ban punishment i believe is too harsh, especially to a community they've spent COUNTLESSS HOURS ON. I do believe clazz should be punished, but not Permanetly banned. Plus as a said earlier, iccup's hack list is NOT official, but only suspects. CLazziqual had the balls to admit at that time (unlike Much) which i give him mad props for. If you're going to respond to this post, i suggest you read this thread more thoroughly before you make a fool out of yourself. Again. On August 31 2009 12:15 YPang wrote:On August 31 2009 12:13 IdrA wrote:On August 31 2009 12:12 YPang wrote:On August 31 2009 11:59 Masamune wrote:
[quote]
God this post is so dumb. Hacking is 100% wrong, so is murder and everything else bad. Some are worse than others, but in a perfect would they wouldn't exist. If you can convince yourself that hacking is only 90% wrong (I don't know why I'm using these dumb percentages, I think I'm just trying to respond to your post..) you deserve to face the consequences.
Its not dumb, if you would read my entire posts prior to this you'd know that i was responding to kwark's comment of people confessing before they're caught hacking. And when have i said its only 90% wrong, or not totally wrong? If you were to confess for everyone of your sins/wrong doings, you'd be doing it for 5 hours a day. A lot of mistakes people make are just not big enough for them to have enough guilt to confess like that, especially to a community they've spent COUNTLESSS HOURS ON. I do believe clazz should be punished, but not Permanetly banned. Plus as a said earlier, iccup's hack list is NOT official, but only suspects. CLazziqual had the balls to admit at that time (unlike Much) which i give him mad props for. If you're going to respond to this post, i suggest you read this thread more thoroughly before you make a fool out of yourself. Again. how does it take balls to admit to something after getting caught he's not technically caught, just suspected. If it was spades, or much he'd still be denying no? no no, your posts are dumb. I suggest you read the thread over again. Clazz already admitted that he hacked, it's not just a suspicion. Did you really not get what i meant? I MEAN he ADMITTED that he hacked WHEN the LIST IS NOT AN OFFICIAL LIST OF HACKERS BUT A LIST OF SUSPICIOUS HACKERS... there i typed i t in caps, hopefully you understand now. iccup's hack list is NOT official, but only suspects There i bolded the part where i said iccup's hack list is not official hopefully that helps you. Thanks good day sir. Next time you call my posts dumb please double read my comments before makign yourself look like a Fool AGAIN!... your post is still dumb. Big deal if it's not official. Nothing is official; there is always a sliver of a chance someone is innocent when they are accused of a crime. He still hacked, bottom line. I really don't know what you're getting at. I would go on with this, but i feel like you're not using reasoning but trying to compete with my ego. So i'll let it go, good day sir. Your lucky your English is that bad because no one can really tell what the hell you were originally trying to say. In your earlier posts, you were going on about how some people have less regard for some things than others and that if it's serious enough or they feel really guilty about it, they will admit it--and that Clazz probably didn't see it as something as bad so he didn't admit to it right away...I have no clue, it was totally off topic and some jumbled bullshit from your head. Anyway....forget that. Onto what you're saying now. Clazz admitting he hacked after a list of suspected hackers came out as opposed to a confirmed list. There is a difference, yes, but to me, there's not much of a significant one. We KNOW that he did use hacks because he already admitted it and someone else said he even told him about it. Either he could have denied it now, and looked worse later when they somehow finalized it (because he did do it, it's only a matter of time before he would be caught), or he could just admit it now. He chose to admit it now. Simple as that. People have different personalities. Some people are scared of what can potentially happen when they do something wrong and run, others give up because they see there is no escaping. It's really based on the person, and I don't think admitting something after your either 99% caught or 100% caught makes a difference. This is just some trivial bs you're rambling on about because you want Clazz to stay. For the record, I didn't know Clazz before this happened so I'm not completely affected by this and not that emotionally attached. If he comes back, fine, if not whatever. But if I were in that tl tourny he hacked in and if it affected my outcome, I wouldn't be pleased. you're*
LOOOOOOOOOOL! HAHA :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
