EPT
ICCUP Hacker
| Blogs > 1t2t3t4t5taw |
|
1t2t3t4t5taw
Andorra173 Posts
| ||
|
Ryan307 :)
United States1289 Posts
| ||
|
1t2t3t4t5taw
Andorra173 Posts
| ||
|
jimminy_kriket
Canada5533 Posts
| ||
MasterOfChaos
Germany2896 Posts
| ||
NonY
8751 Posts
On February 28 2008 06:40 1t2t3t4t5taw wrote: Why? It's a blog. If I want to write that I found someone using oblivion on ICCUP with the AH on, then I can. cuz you dont provide proof. upload the replay, show us how you confirmed the guy was using hack, and show us the game on the match list on iccup web site. | ||
|
1t2t3t4t5taw
Andorra173 Posts
If you look at his matchlist half his games are X's even though the points still get assigned, don't know how that works. Looks like his account got caught and reset. Like I said, I just thought it was interesting. I still have faith in and appreciate the antihack and the efforts of the people at iccup. And yea, he has a ton of non-ah games but I refuse to play anyone without AH so I'm sure he had it on when I played him http://www.iccup.com/details.php?match_id=1140117 http://rapidshare.com/files/95484444/0981_IntoTheSaSP_LittleBigT.rep.html If it's not obvious from the 555555555 actions, here's the BWHF analysis of it FOUND 8 HACKS IN THE REPLAY: IntoTheSaSin used autogather/autotrain hack at 5 IntoTheSaSin used multicommand hack at 17770 IntoTheSaSin used multicommand hack at 17775 IntoTheSaSin used multicommand hack at 17785 IntoTheSaSin used multicommand hack at 18970 IntoTheSaSin used multicommand hack at 18980 IntoTheSaSin used multicommand hack at 19635 IntoTheSaSin used multicommand hack at 19645 Replay analysis ended in 3 sec 875 ms. | ||
|
DamageControL
United States4222 Posts
On February 28 2008 07:50 NonY[rC] wrote: cuz you dont provide proof. upload the replay, show us how you confirmed the guy was using hack, and show us the game on the match list on iccup web site. In a blog? You can be pissed or rant in a blog, I thought. He is not going like THISGUYRIGHTHERE HACKS KILL HIM. | ||
|
Krohm
Canada1857 Posts
On February 28 2008 09:06 DamageControL wrote: In a blog? You can be pissed or rant in a blog, I thought. He is not going like THISGUYRIGHTHERE HACKS KILL HIM. Yeah no shit, thats what I was thinking. BUT* I still think the OP needed more content. But since he's posted more information, it's all good. | ||
|
NonY
8751 Posts
On February 28 2008 09:06 DamageControL wrote: In a blog? You can be pissed or rant in a blog, I thought. He is not going like THISGUYRIGHTHERE HACKS KILL HIM. sure that'd make sense if everyone knew iccup AH didnt work. but when the general concensus is that the AH on iccup is working, and during a "rant" a blogger says that it isnt, the focus shifts and i think the blogger has more responsibility. a lot of bad consequences can come out of a bullshit claim or a mistaken claim so people want to know all the facts. anyway, i appreciate 1t2t3t4t5taw posting that extra info. that really sucks  | ||
|
ilbh
Brazil1606 Posts
| ||
| ||
