Wow, I was just messing around with the hacker checkers and stuff and I noticed that a guy I played on ICCUP who had the antihack on used oblivion. I still think the Antihack is a good thing and that it prevents a large amount of hacking but it's obviously not foolproof

Ryan307 :)

United States1289 Posts

February 27 2008 21:38 GMT

i would close this if i could close things; even if it is a blog

1t2t3t4t5taw

Andorra173 Posts

February 27 2008 21:40 GMT

Why? It's a blog. If I want to write that I found someone using oblivion on ICCUP with the AH on, then I can.

jimminy_kriket

Canada5489 Posts

February 27 2008 21:41 GMT

yeah its pretty well known that were were hacks, and there will be more hacks if anyone gets around to making them. But I dont think there are any hacks that work since the launcher's been updated. What was the date of the game?

MasterOfChaos

Germany2896 Posts

February 27 2008 22:07 GMT

There are several reports of hacks with AH, but I don't find an anti-antihack myself. That's frustrating.

NonY

8748 Posts

February 27 2008 22:50 GMT

On February 28 2008 06:40 1t2t3t4t5taw wrote:
Why? It's a blog. If I want to write that I found someone using oblivion on ICCUP with the AH on, then I can.

cuz you dont provide proof. upload the replay, show us how you confirmed the guy was using hack, and show us the game on the match list on iccup web site.

1t2t3t4t5taw

Andorra173 Posts

February 27 2008 23:35 GMT

ok
If you look at his matchlist half his games are X's even though the points still get assigned, don't know how that works.

Looks like his account got caught and reset. Like I said, I just thought it was interesting. I still have faith in and appreciate the antihack and the efforts of the people at iccup.

And yea, he has a ton of non-ah games but I refuse to play anyone without AH so I'm sure he had it on when I played him

http://www.iccup.com/details.php?match_id=1140117

http://rapidshare.com/files/95484444/0981_IntoTheSaSP_LittleBigT.rep.html

If it's not obvious from the 555555555 actions, here's the BWHF analysis of it

FOUND 8 HACKS IN THE REPLAY:
IntoTheSaSin used autogather/autotrain hack at 5
IntoTheSaSin used multicommand hack at 17770
IntoTheSaSin used multicommand hack at 17775
IntoTheSaSin used multicommand hack at 17785
IntoTheSaSin used multicommand hack at 18970
IntoTheSaSin used multicommand hack at 18980
IntoTheSaSin used multicommand hack at 19635
IntoTheSaSin used multicommand hack at 19645

Replay analysis ended in 3 sec 875 ms.

DamageControL

United States4222 Posts

February 28 2008 00:06 GMT

On February 28 2008 07:50 NonY[rC] wrote:

Show nested quote +

cuz you dont provide proof. upload the replay, show us how you confirmed the guy was using hack, and show us the game on the match list on iccup web site.

In a blog? You can be pissed or rant in a blog, I thought. He is not going like THISGUYRIGHTHERE HACKS KILL HIM.

Krohm

Canada1857 Posts

February 28 2008 00:13 GMT

On February 28 2008 09:06 DamageControL wrote:

Show nested quote +

In a blog? You can be pissed or rant in a blog, I thought. He is not going like THISGUYRIGHTHERE HACKS KILL HIM.

Yeah no shit, thats what I was thinking.

BUT* I still think the OP needed more content. But since he's posted more information, it's all good.

NonY

8748 Posts

February 28 2008 00:33 GMT

#10

On February 28 2008 09:06 DamageControL wrote:

Show nested quote +

In a blog? You can be pissed or rant in a blog, I thought. He is not going like THISGUYRIGHTHERE HACKS KILL HIM.

sure that'd make sense if everyone knew iccup AH didnt work. but when the general concensus is that the AH on iccup is working, and during a "rant" a blogger says that it isnt, the focus shifts and i think the blogger has more responsibility. a lot of bad consequences can come out of a bullshit claim or a mistaken claim so people want to know all the facts. anyway, i appreciate 1t2t3t4t5taw posting that extra info. that really sucks