Was SW7 worse than the prequels? - Page 3

Blogs > mustaju

Post a Reply

Prev 1 2 3 All

Deathstar

9150 Posts

December 27 2015 23:45 GMT

#41

They're both forgettable and unwatchable for me. It'll depend on which produces the better plinkett review.

parkufarku

882 Posts

December 28 2015 18:10 GMT

#42

one thing i really hated, was the fact that the super larger death star destruction scene felt non-existant....the other movies there was a lot of build-up and scenes for it. The new movie's death star destruction felt cheap - and this is made worse because the new death star is so much bigger too.

Lebesgue

4542 Posts

January 05 2016 03:12 GMT

#43

Yeap, pretty much agree with all the comments here. I also don't buy the argument that we will see more in the next episodes. Episodes IV and I where fine as a stand alone movies in terms of plot. Sure, we knew that there is more to come but there was no need to scratch your head and think: "Maybe they will explain it in the next episode".

SW7 is forgettable movie, with really weak plot, poorly paced, decent acting, and nice cinematography. Unfortunately, we cannot enjoy the cinematography because everything is happening so damn quick. Wth? Can't JJ Abrams slow the action for even a second? How did it get 8.5/10 on imbd is beyond my comprehension.

Prev 1 2 3 All

Please or register to reply.

Was SW7 worse than the prequels? - Page 3

Completed

Ongoing

Upcoming