• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:48
CEST 19:48
KST 02:48
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202529RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Corsair Pursuit Micro? Pro gamer house photos
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 886 users

Why Romney? - Page 2

Blogs > rogzardo
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
rogzardo
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
610 Posts
September 17 2012 03:48 GMT
#21
On September 17 2012 12:41 Blazinghand wrote:
I've had good dialogue in it. If you don't try to put something in you'll never get any thing out.


Yeah....no.
Ryalnos
Profile Joined July 2010
United States1946 Posts
September 17 2012 03:50 GMT
#22
We have such an echo chamber going on here I wonder why anyone bothers.
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3188 Posts
September 17 2012 03:50 GMT
#23
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/07/sept-6-a-referendum-or-a-choice/

This is an essential question in many elections, but this one especially: are people voting based on "Which candidate better?" Or are they voting purely based on "How happy am I with the incumbent's performance?" The first option is a direct comparison between the two candidates, while the second is purely an evaluation of the incumbent's performance, and his opponent only needs to be vaguely competent.

Most people are of the opinion that if voters choose based on the "which candidate is better?" option, Obama is quite likely to win. If people are purely voting based on "How do I think Obama's been doing?" the election will be much closer. Because it's not just you that thinks people aren't supporting Romney, they're opposing Obama; that's pretty much the common opinion this cycle, and both candidates know it. Note that Romney's and Ryan's speeches don't tout Romney's record nearly as much as they emphasize criticizing Obama's; they want people thinking in terms of the latter question. Obama, for his part, is trying to bring up Romney's record as much as possible to shift people back in to the former camp.

So to answer the question: Romney, because he was the only even slightly viable Repubican candidate, and a lot of people hate Obama's presidency enough that they're willing to vote for just about anyone else.

I support Obama, by the way, if that's relevant.
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
September 17 2012 03:57 GMT
#24
Keep in mind that budget cuts and taxation business is in the (not so capable hands) of Congress. The president doesn't technically have any legislative powers. When they make those promises, they don't tell you that it's not actually up to them.and the most they can do is ask Congress to cooperate, and those guys will do whatever the fuck they want, won't they?

Anyway Romney is such a strange specimen and shows how far lobbyism has gotten. Rich people have used their huge influence to convince commoners to vote neo-con even though it's against their interests. There are a few reasons to vote for Romney, the first is you're rich and immoral with no social conscience, the second is you dislike Obama, but given how you think Romney would be better, your reasons are probably not too convincing.

The man has an extensive history of acquiring his fortune through morally questionable ways, sometimes ruining the lives and careers of others. Don't be suckers just because of your ridiculous "Free Market" ideals.
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
Aerisky
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States12129 Posts
September 17 2012 04:31 GMT
#25
On September 17 2012 12:48 rogzardo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2012 12:41 Blazinghand wrote:
I've had good dialogue in it. If you don't try to put something in you'll never get any thing out.


Yeah....no.

Blazinghand has a point. There are posters who know what they're talking about. Not to mention you post in it anyway.

If you really think it's a complete and utter waste of your time to post in that thread, then just stay out. It would be conducive to your continued privilege to post on TL, in any event.
Jim while Johnny had had had had had had had; had had had had the better effect on the teacher.
Carson
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada820 Posts
September 17 2012 05:56 GMT
#26
On September 17 2012 13:31 Aerisky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2012 12:48 rogzardo wrote:
On September 17 2012 12:41 Blazinghand wrote:
I've had good dialogue in it. If you don't try to put something in you'll never get any thing out.


Yeah....no.

Blazinghand has a point. There are posters who know what they're talking about. Not to mention you post in it anyway.

If you really think it's a complete and utter waste of your time to post in that thread, then just stay out. It would be conducive to your continued privilege to post on TL, in any event.


LOL I like the wording of your post ^^

It's funny being Canadian, because it would seem we care more about your politics than our own.

My question is: can a person ever be 100% satisfied with the government?

+ Show Spoiler +
I don't think so.
"You have to remember something: Everybody pities the weak; jealousy you have to earn." Arnold Schwarzenegger
Entirety
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
1423 Posts
September 17 2012 06:07 GMT
#27
On September 17 2012 14:56 Carson wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2012 13:31 Aerisky wrote:
On September 17 2012 12:48 rogzardo wrote:
On September 17 2012 12:41 Blazinghand wrote:
I've had good dialogue in it. If you don't try to put something in you'll never get any thing out.


Yeah....no.

Blazinghand has a point. There are posters who know what they're talking about. Not to mention you post in it anyway.

If you really think it's a complete and utter waste of your time to post in that thread, then just stay out. It would be conducive to your continued privilege to post on TL, in any event.


LOL I like the wording of your post ^^

It's funny being Canadian, because it would seem we care more about your politics than our own.

My question is: can a person ever be 100% satisfied with the government?

+ Show Spoiler +
I don't think so.


Why yes, a person can be 100% satisfied with the government.
+ Show Spoiler +
Only if he's the one ruling it
IMMvp (정종현) | Fan Club: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=211431
Silidons
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States2813 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-17 07:57:28
September 17 2012 07:56 GMT
#28
Why would I vote for rich Harvard Lawyer Obama or rich Harvard Lawyer Romney? American politics are nothing more than a money-making machine.

Don't even think your vote truly matters either. Tell Al Gore that the people choose the President, he'd love to hear that.
"God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon Bonaparte
Newbistic
Profile Blog Joined August 2006
China2912 Posts
September 17 2012 10:15 GMT
#29
This thread's a pretty good snapshot of youth today. Someone asks for serious discussion on a serious issue, everyone pitches in but no one answers the question. Everyone wants their say but nobody has anything worth saying. First amendment rights in the hands of people who love to exercise it but do not understand its true value.

I wish I can pitch in, but I'm in the Obama camp... at the very least his rhetoric appeals to me more than Romney's and I want to see what he can do in the next four years.
Logic is Overrated
KurtistheTurtle
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States1966 Posts
September 17 2012 10:53 GMT
#30
On September 17 2012 11:15 docvoc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2012 10:35 rogzardo wrote:
To end with, here is a small list of things off the top of my head that Obama has done in the last four years that has made me proud to have voted for him.

-Obamacare
-Bin Laden
-Publicly supporting same sex marriage and repealed 'don't ask don't tell'
-Publicly supported womens equality and signed Lilly Ledbetter fair pay act
-Supports clean energy and raises fuel efficiency standards
-Effectively ended the war in Iraq
.


I'm not necessarily voting, but,
[list]
[*]Bin Laden was going to happen had it been anyone else, he had nothing to do with that, that would be like giving Kennedy full responsibility for the bay of pigs, which was created in the Eisenhower presidency. Bin Laden had been a 12 year long affair.

When you're president, it's your fault. Sometimes that's a good thing.
“Reject your sense of injury and the injury itself disappears."
KurtistheTurtle
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States1966 Posts
September 17 2012 11:27 GMT
#31
On September 17 2012 19:15 Newbistic wrote:
This thread's a pretty good snapshot of youth today. Someone asks for serious discussion on a serious issue, everyone pitches in but no one answers the question. Everyone wants their say but nobody has anything worth saying. First amendment rights in the hands of people who love to exercise it but do not understand its true value.

Today's youth is raised in an era of considerably less journalism than ever. It wouldn't seem like it, there's information everywhere, but 80-90% of it is generated by a small number of news sources then flung and reflected around the net (twitter, anyone?). The old pillars of the industry have eroded and left news stations at the mercy of their advertisers who wield this corporate interest extremely effectively. Furthermore, we've been raised during the emergence of the attack ad and simplified campaign messages. Why did this happen? Because, for the older generation, it worked. The politicians who used these tactics got elected. So we grow up media savvy, see through it, and become cynical about the whole system. In a typical 30 minute newscast, 10 is devoted to commercials. 6~7 each to sports and the god damn weather & traffic (seriously? the weather ISN'T THAT IMPORTANT), then 4 minutes for civic issues.

So politicians have to dumb down their messages even more, refine their talking points harder and pander to the media -- it's the only way they can be seen by their constituencies. C-span removes the right of congress to secrecy and disallows the intrinsic deliberation, debate and friction around issues which needs to take place for the result to be worth anything. Furthermore it can't do any justice to the complex voting and discussion system which takes place in Congress.

So we see more and more attack ads, more and more of the same messages and themes used by all politicians -- because that's what works. Media only focuses on conflict, winners and losers, and follows the narrative frame "look at the game these people are playing. It's dramatic, but you're helpless and this doesn't involve your interests. We'll just highlight different points of view from powerful people and set those as the full spectrum of inevitable outcomes." Not mentioned is how, to feed their families, these networks have to feed off this system. Because, you know, it's all that gets paid for. People aren't willing to pay for actual journalism since the internet (*fingers crossed* -- yet!) And everybody thinks journalists are jackasses even though they're the ones who keep the gov't clean.

Don't ever think there aren't smart people in the government who want to make our country better. There are, and a lot of them. But they have to represent their constituencies and remain loosely true to the vows they ran on. If they suck, it's our fault. There's much more I can expand on but, in short, it's everybody's fault but nobody in particular.

The reality we're at now is that democracy is completely malnourished and sick from lack of participation. But because it's sick and not working the way we don't want to feed it. Or, in my generation's case, if we're part of the silent majority who want to participate despite the rampant cynicism ripping hope from people, we don't know how to participate effectively because they don't teach you that shit in school or anywhere unless you're born into it.

Just remember this, cynicism is cancer. Every time you devalue your importance to the democratic process it becomes sicker. So when that first romney supporter posts, before you type a response you have to try and identify with and understand his, and really think about the merits. which group of people share his pov? why? do you actually? why or why not? what group of people share your interests? Wish I could get more specific.

So, it's your choice, but stop not participating. I've had a policy where I don't post things I wouldn't/haven't said to people irl for a while now. So I can say with full authority that if you're not happy with something and you're not trying to change it or talk about it, I don't respect your point of view and you're a useless person.

I can also tell you we still have enough time from terminal condition. I hope we cure the cancer.
“Reject your sense of injury and the injury itself disappears."
KurtistheTurtle
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States1966 Posts
September 17 2012 11:32 GMT
#32
On September 17 2012 12:57 Djzapz wrote:
Anyway Romney is such a strange specimen and shows how far lobbyism has gotten. Rich people have used their huge influence to convince commoners to vote neo-con even though it's against their interests. There are a few reasons to vote for Romney, the first is you're rich and immoral with no social conscience, the second is you dislike Obama, but given how you think Romney would be better, your reasons are probably not too convincing.

The man has an extensive history of acquiring his fortune through morally questionable ways, sometimes ruining the lives and careers of others. Don't be suckers just because of your ridiculous "Free Market" ideals.

The media. They were hamstrung to the ground by the corporations, and now they're getting hit over the head by everyone else!
“Reject your sense of injury and the injury itself disappears."
B.I.G.
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
3251 Posts
September 17 2012 12:14 GMT
#33
As an outsider, I'm still amazed you guys have only two parties to choose from..
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States886 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-17 14:15:02
September 17 2012 14:11 GMT
#34
On September 17 2012 21:14 B.I.G. wrote:
As an outsider, I'm still amazed you guys have only two parties to choose from..


That is an unfortunate side effect of the way our election system is designed. Any given election is winner-takes-all, which is a massive reason to not vote for anyone who you don't think has a reasonable chance at winning. It's not that we don't have more than two parties, because we do - green, libertarian, workers', etc., but they often share candidates with the Democrats or Republicans on the big tickets, because third party candidates don't work. In fact, voting for a third-party candidate in the US usually means that it's more likely your least preferred candidate will win.
For example, say you vote for the Green Party this election, and Obama loses your state by one vote, and therefore the election. I can reasonable say that someone who votes Green probably would prefer Obama to Romney, but Romney won, because people who would have voted Obama in a true 2-party election voted for someone else. Take the 2000 Presidential elections, where Bush won Florida (and thus the election) by 537 votes. That year, a staggering 2,882,000 (out of around 100,000,000 votes cast, that is, about 2% of the vote) people voted Green party. If even 600 of those people were in Florida and had voted for Gore, Gore would have won.
QuanticHawk
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
United States32051 Posts
September 17 2012 14:23 GMT
#35
he was worth considering early on because he seemed to be a moderate and because i thought obama's first term was average enough that you'd have to at least see what your other option is.

however, he has proven himself to be a huge vote whore depending whichever way the wind blows any given day. he has steadily gone further towards the neo con religious right, and paul ryan is a fucking nutcase, which is what really sealed the deal for me
PROFESSIONAL GAMER - SEND ME OFFERS TO JOIN YOUR TEAM - USA USA USA
mizU
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States12125 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-17 14:25:59
September 17 2012 14:25 GMT
#36
You guys do realize it's the electoral college votes that matter, not popular vote right?
(In most states)

What's your opinion on the bailout that he did?
if happy ever afters did exist <3 @watamizu_
jacosajh
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
2919 Posts
September 17 2012 14:55 GMT
#37
I'm probably going to vote Romney because of one simple concept. He is a businessman.

No matter how you slice the pie, a country is basically a business. I'm hoping he can do whatever business-stuff he needs too in order to fix our economy. Because if our economy isn't fixed, it's not going to be much longer that any of this shit even matters.
brolaf
Profile Joined May 2012
291 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-17 15:33:45
September 17 2012 15:25 GMT
#38
Okay, but there are also bad things in 4 years that could make one dissatisfied with Obama.

5T more debt(+ the infamous off sheets liabilities US is known for)
Household incomes smaller than 4 years ago
Economy stagnant or in slight real recession the entire time(given how low the official inflation numbers are compared to real increase expenses)
Joblessness RISING - the unemployment number is down but participation rate is ALSO DOWN, people are giving up and leaving the labor force
Reckless monetary policy(huge monetization) putting govt in a difficult position when they are pressurised into stopping inflation
rogzardo
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
610 Posts
September 17 2012 15:27 GMT
#39
On September 18 2012 00:25 brolaf wrote:
Okay, but there are also bad things in 4 years that could make one dissatisfied with Obama.

5T more debt
Household incomes smaller than 4 years ago
Economy stagnant or in slight real recession the entire time(given how low the official inflation numbers are compared to real expenses)
Joblessness RISING - the unemployment number is down but participation rate is ALSO DOWN, people are giving up and leaving the labor force


These are good points. What will Romney do to improve them?
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-17 15:56:11
September 17 2012 15:52 GMT
#40
On September 18 2012 00:25 brolaf wrote:
Okay, but there are also bad things in 4 years that could make one dissatisfied with Obama.

5T more debt(+ the infamous off sheets liabilities US is known for)
Household incomes smaller than 4 years ago
Economy stagnant or in slight real recession the entire time(given how low the official inflation numbers are compared to real increase expenses)
Joblessness RISING - the unemployment number is down but participation rate is ALSO DOWN, people are giving up and leaving the labor force
Reckless monetary policy(huge monetization) putting govt in a difficult position when they are pressurised into stopping inflation

You do realize that Obama's powers are executive, not legislative. As such, Congress is responsible for most of those perceived shortcomings, as Obama's role in those matters is largely advisory, although he can pull some strings and hope for the best.

That's not to say he did a great job, but if we give it an honest look rather than partisan bullshit, we have to think about the fact that we can't compare the path that Obama's administration took with "the path not taken" for which we have no data (as it didn't happen, obviously). So, Obama was given very limited control of the US's economic policies at the beginning of a major economic crisis, and just like in every recession, unemployment goes up and in keynesian economies the debt goes up too.

Now you can look at that and say, look the debt is up and unemployment is up therefore its bad. Or, you can put on your critical thinker hat and say "well we don't know shit". Times are tough because it's a recession, so we can reasonably expect to get worse (and thus people will complain regardless). The question is, how much worse? So who's to say that things aren't better now than they would otherwise have been?

The rotten economy was left by the previous administration (Again, not Bush specifically - the decisions taken in Congress had a huge impact). To expect unemployment to be back after 4 years is probably quite crazy. And to put the blame on the executive branch of the government is just odd.
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
10:00
2025 - Day 1
Cure vs ShoWTimELIVE!
EWC_Arena6890
ComeBackTV 2136
EWC_Arena_21616
TaKeTV 715
Hui .426
3DClanTV 357
CranKy Ducklings209
Berry_CruncH208
mcanning193
EnkiAlexander 193
Rex180
UpATreeSC156
Reynor149
davetesta15
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena6890
EWC_Arena_21616
Hui .426
mcanning 193
Rex 180
UpATreeSC 156
Reynor 149
StarCraft: Brood War
Barracks 1020
Mini 645
Larva 629
EffOrt 548
Stork 229
Aegong 63
PianO 27
soO 25
scan(afreeca) 16
Sharp 15
[ Show more ]
Movie 12
ivOry 5
JulyZerg 3
League of Legends
Dendi1086
Counter-Strike
fl0m2122
byalli233
oskar203
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor325
XaKoH 132
Other Games
ceh92119
singsing1909
syndereN206
Trikslyr62
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 1
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 7
• FirePhoenix7
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2817
• masondota21178
• WagamamaTV390
League of Legends
• Nemesis4868
• TFBlade917
Other Games
• imaqtpie784
• Shiphtur388
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
16h 12m
ByuN vs Zoun
SHIN vs TriGGeR
Cyan vs TBD
Rogue vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Solar
Reynor vs Maru
herO vs TBD
Serral vs Classic
Esports World Cup
1d 16h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.