|
On December 15 2011 11:55 Kiante wrote:
I would kindly ask you not to compare sc2 progamers to S class BW progamers
OK, how is this not missing the point entirely? The OP was obviously not saying that Naniwa has S-class skill but that he has shown that he has overcome certain mental obstacles that would stop him from approaching that level (from a very long distance away, if you like).
I don't know. Maybe I'm missing something. But this seems like random SC2 vs BW injected somewhere it really doesn't belong.
|
|
|
On December 15 2011 12:52 Redmark wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 11:55 Kiante wrote:
I would kindly ask you not to compare sc2 progamers to S class BW progamers OK, how is this not missing the point entirely? The OP was obviously not saying that Naniwa has S-class skill but that he has shown that he has overcome certain mental obstacles that would stop him from approaching that level (from a very long distance away, if you like). I don't know. Maybe I'm missing something. But this seems like random SC2 vs BW injected somewhere it really doesn't belong.
You do not speak lightly of Gods in the ears of their devout followers.
|
Meh. Naniwa has what it takes to be at that level of play, certainly, but he isn't anywhere near it yet. Maybe in a year or three.
|
|
|
On December 15 2011 11:55 Kiante wrote:
I would kindly ask you not to compare sc2 progamers to S class BW progamers
I agree.
I hope naniwa makes it!
|
intrigue
Washington, D.C9935 Posts
i... i.. don't even... omg. the difference between "s-class" bw players and "code s" sc2 players is so unbelievab- nevermind. have a great day
|
On December 15 2011 11:55 Kiante wrote:
I would kindly ask you not to compare sc2 progamers to S class BW progamers
Keep your bw elitism to your self. You don't need to turn every thread instantly confrontational with that shit. I love bw too, but I don't bleed all over my garters whenever someone calls a sc2 pro s-class.
Edit: you too intrigue
|
On December 15 2011 11:55 Kiante wrote:
I would kindly ask you not to compare sc2 progamers to S class BW progamers
I would kindly ask you not to subject the sc2 community to your BW elitism
He didn't call Naniwa S-Class, simply that he has that potential if he continues to learn from his mistakes like he currently is. Stop getting so worked up over it.
|
On December 15 2011 11:55 Kiante wrote:
I would kindly ask you not to compare sc2 progamers to S class BW progamers
No fun allowed.
|
On December 15 2011 13:19 Tektos wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 11:55 Kiante wrote:
I would kindly ask you not to compare sc2 progamers to S class BW progamers I would kindly ask you not to subject the sc2 community to your BW elitism He didn't call Naniwa S-Class, simply that he has that potential if he continues to learn from his mistakes like he currently is. Stop getting so worked up over it.
Posting a picture of boxer/flash/bisu/jaedong and then talking about Naniwa is borderline sacrilege tbh.
|
United States10328 Posts
first picture: ...
second picture: lolol
|
|
|
LOL bonus pic.
And from what I gather, BW Sclass are lightyears ahead of SC2 Sclass in their own games
|
lol. take a shit on the community and fans by refusing to play a game; wait a long ass time; issue an apology after quantic probably reamed you; and after appearing apologetic, you have joined the s-class. freaking joke.
bonus pic was cool tho. lol
|
United States7639 Posts
I would kindly ask you not to compare a not-very-cute guy like Naniwa to very cute guys like Bisu, Stork, and Jaedong.
|
On December 15 2011 11:55 Kiante wrote:
I would kindly ask you not to compare sc2 progamers to S class BW progamers
No offence but seriously Kiante just give it up man. Why do you even look at sc2 blogs 
|
I think there is a big difference between apologizing and actually learning/changing the action that prompted the apology in the first place. I've had people apologize for doing stuff and then keep doing said stuff anyway. It will take some time to see if this apology of his actually means anything. This isn't coming from a standpoint biased against Naniwa. I actually support his decision and I think GOM over reacted.
|
On December 15 2011 13:07 intrigue wrote:
i... i.. don't even... omg. the difference between "s-class" bw players and "code s" sc2 players is so unbelievab- nevermind. have a great day
.... nevermind but you said what you wanted to say anyways?
|
10387 Posts
On December 15 2011 13:07 m3rciless wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 11:55 Kiante wrote:
I would kindly ask you not to compare sc2 progamers to S class BW progamers Keep your bw elitism to your self. You don't need to turn every thread instantly confrontational with that shit. I love bw too, but I don't bleed all over my garters whenever someone calls a sc2 pro s-class. Edit: you too intrigue
you know the OP posted a BW related term/image, so it invited such "bw elitism"
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
