EPTTLO vs Boxer - Game Analysis Graphic - Page 5
| Blogs > alteredclone |
|
hXcBassman
Canada38 Posts
| ||
|
Simple
United States801 Posts
| ||
|
DarkGo
29 Posts
| ||
|
honkeybeef
United States143 Posts
| ||
|
Honga
Australia64 Posts
| ||
|
alks
Canada24 Posts
| ||
|
AutomatonOmega
United States706 Posts
| ||
Kryptonite333
42 Posts
As was already stated before in this thread: I would recommend a hd resolution version, that way the whole picture fits a regular computer screen. You could skim a bit on the headers and footers (300pixel gg looks cool but might be a bit overkill) | ||
|
Brutaxilos
United States2630 Posts
| ||
|
sylverfyre
United States8298 Posts
I think a lot of unnecessary space is devoted to upgrades, which could be spent on other things, such as a more detailed view of what's going on in the game. It's basically a big dead zone which is both poor aesthetics and doesn't tell much of the story either (other than that they apparently both went for air units.) How about count of CC's (actively mining, so you can see when bases get mined out too!), count of Rax, of Factories, and of Starports? That tells a more interesting story AND has a lot less dead space than upgrade info. It gives an at-a-glance idea of build order also Something like this, but with your cool chart graphics TLO | Boxer Note: numbers of bases/buildings totally made up. You could then remove the "tacked on" bases coming online graphic on the left, and instead "tack on" upgrades in a more compact fashion (perhaps a single column after CC/Rax/Fact/Starport count.) Later, in my mind: Hm, I wonder how that same idea i threw out would look for protoss and zerg. Zerg: Hatches Tech bldgs Tech lvl Hm. Might also want to differentiate between count of hatches and # of mining bases (one is production t he other is income) | ||
|
Conquerer67
United States605 Posts
 . | ||
|
Deezl
United States355 Posts
| ||
|
RoM.Inverse
Canada51 Posts
| ||
|
Mindful
Sweden21 Posts
The only thing I can say at the moment is that the min/gas graph is somewhat "cluttered", perhaps you could make it a bit more understandable? Perhaps separating them a bit? | ||
|
SHOOG
United States1639 Posts
| ||
| ||
