EPTSexist Jobs - Page 3
| Blogs > SpoR |
|
Perseverance
Japan2800 Posts
| ||
|
thepeonwhocould
Australia334 Posts
Furthermore your email shows your own ignorance and pregidous. You are a complete hypocrit. I have included some quotes from your email to show how pregidous you are: "There are guys with these traits, some might call them friendly, some might call them gay." "Out of the 1000s of females I know, only 2 of them have ever showed this trait." "obvious, considering most of the world is built by men." "What facebook and text messaging? Sounds like a female problem." TLDR: OP is a butthurt sexist who is angry because he can't get a job working in a bra store. Yeh, you might want to watch what you say when you are calling someone else sexist. | ||
|
Seide
United States831 Posts
This is usually because that is what will appeal to the customers who shop there. Business is business, companies will look to hire those who will maximize their sales. It's not really a matter of sexism as it is a matter of maximizing business. Try to use logic from a business perspective, in the future it can save you from making a fool of yourself by showing complete ignorance. | ||
|
DroneAllDay
United States140 Posts
| ||
|
CellGel
Australia27 Posts
And I agree with micronesia, WTFBBQ facebook? O.o | ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
| ||
|
Perseverance
Japan2800 Posts
On August 29 2011 07:50 Seide wrote: I don't see the problem. There are plenty of places who hire only women or only men for customer service/retail. This is usually because that is what will appeal to the customers who shop there. Business is business, companies will look to hire those who will maximize their sales. It's not really a matter of sexism as it is a matter of maximizing business. Try to use logic from a business perspective, in the future it can save you from making a fool of yourself by showing complete ignorance. This is a pretty good perspective to look at it from | ||
|
Lemonwalrus
United States5465 Posts
Edit: Also, charlie, on the off chance that this was some elaborate rape ruse, well then their sexism helped you dodge a bullet now, didn't it? Silver lining. | ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22258 Posts
 | ||
|
Ganfei2
473 Posts
User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
Happy Juvia
15 Posts
I was expecting a blog about the pay discrepancies between male and female pornstars. | ||
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
| ||
|
OpticalShot
Canada6330 Posts
I can almost assure you that if this job had exact same description and asked for "men over 21 years old", the feminists / woman's rights people would be enraged and go the distance to enforce this employer to "fix" it. Although I somewhat sympathize with the OP, I'm sick of hearing equal employer / employment crap - it's so blatantly obvious some jobs are suited for one sex over another. | ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
| ||
|
XXGeneration
United States625 Posts
| ||
|
jacosajh
2919 Posts
| ||
|
dudeman001
United States2412 Posts
On August 29 2011 05:35 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Mhmmmm, I'd be interested in hearing what the actual position is. Maybe it was reading the OP's wittiness that got me into some pure guy/girl mindset, but this made me laugh. On August 29 2011 13:23 jacosajh wrote: Some people took this thread too seriously... No kidding holy fuck. The OP KNOWS that it's a girl only job. Hell, in America you could probably sue for these hiring requirements and immediately lose because you're taking shit too seriously. The problem is that if you're looking to hire young females, you're obviously not selecting your staff because they have the strongest work ethic you're looking for, or an intense drive to lead your business forward, you're hiring them because they're young attractive women. Don't bullshit around that. | ||
|
Cambium
United States16368 Posts
I think this is pretty much common practice these days, except that they don't state it explicitly. Mine is very private (un)fortunately  | ||
|
FractalsOnFire
Australia1756 Posts
On August 29 2011 07:47 thepeonwhocould wrote: Furthermore your email shows your own ignorance and pregidous. You are a complete hypocrite. I have included some quotes from your email to show how pregidous you are: Pregidous? Prejudiced????? ????? ?????? On August 29 2011 07:47 thepeonwhocould wrote: "There are guys with these traits, some might call them friendly, some might call them gay." How is this prejudiced? He doesn't explicitly say all guys who are bubbly and fun are gay. He may be insinuating bubbly and fun are purely gay traits but i think that's a bit of a stretch. On August 29 2011 07:47 thepeonwhocould wrote: "Out of the 1000s of females I know, only 2 of them have ever showed this trait." Again he's saying the majority of women he's met are not willing to clean. Prejudiced? Not really. Presumptuous? Probably. On August 29 2011 07:47 thepeonwhocould wrote: "obvious, considering most of the world is built by men." A cold hard fact. Its actually true. That isn't prejudiced. On August 29 2011 07:47 thepeonwhocould wrote: "What facebook and text messaging? Sounds like a female problem." Probably the only line that seems to be prejudiced. | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On August 29 2011 07:24 TerraTron wrote: What if you don't use facebook... I can see them thinking you're BSing and not hire you which would be kinda retarded. If you were bubbly and fun you would have facebook they don't want no antisocial nerds obviously | ||
| ||
