| Blogs > platorepublic |
|
TheAntZ
Israel6248 Posts
On May 22 2011 23:52 gogogadgetflow wrote: man the real world is gonna hit you hard Edit: high-five Torte! wow i didnt notice this part of the post. As an ugly person i find this extremely offensive  | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On May 22 2011 23:57 Thrill wrote: You can be as gay as you like, i don't give a shit - that statement is still retarded and i won't hesitate to call it so. The ugly side of science is when it nears religion in these questions and is used as an excuse for adopting a fatalistic view of the world. "Our faith is in God's hands and was determined long before we were born, it's all in His plan" "Our genes decide our faith, upon conception we're given traits such as personality, intelligence, looks and artistic talent. The potential of all of us is written in our genetic code." Spot the similarity? No? Oh, it's just that neither of these statements have been proven in any scientific study and only serve as giant leaps to conclusions that help plebeians make sense of the world. Vast difference between fantasizing good associative personality traits and having faith or belief in justifications outside of the scientific method. Don't be a Debbie Downer and make the statement above larger than it is intended. What he is saying, as silly as it is, is completely normal and intended by the photos. To infer beyond that is just bothering for trouble. | ||
|
MiniRoman
Canada3953 Posts
lol @ your list of traits. why not just write "good qualities" | ||
Nyovne
Netherlands19141 Posts
| ||
|
Demand2k
Norway875 Posts
On May 22 2011 23:59 Torte de Lini wrote: Vast difference between fantasizing good associative personality traits and having faith or belief in justifications outside of the scientific method. Don't be a Debbie Downer and make the statement above larger than it is intended. What he is saying, as silly as it is, is completely normal and intended by the photos. To infer beyond that is just bothering for trouble. Did you even read the OP's post? He clearly believes there's a correlation between looks and brains. I was about to write that there's no way to misinterpret it, but you did. | ||
|
StorkHwaiting
United States3465 Posts
On May 22 2011 23:54 Torte de Lini wrote: brooooooooo We're smart cookies ;D! Yeah! /high-five! You kind of just disproved yourself with this circle-jerk comment. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
kyarisan
United States347 Posts
| ||
|
gogogadgetflow
United States2583 Posts
On May 23 2011 00:06 StorkHwaiting wrote: You kind of just disproved yourself with this circle-jerk comment. Bad day? | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On May 23 2011 00:06 StorkHwaiting wrote: You kind of just disproved yourself with this circle-jerk comment. No? Not really o_o How does what I am doing make the halo-effect of his statements any less true? Additionally, I also said it was very normal, so normal that even I do it (even though the statement you are quoting that disproves me doesn't entirely fall exactly in the realm of the halo-effect) This only further proves my point... Good try though. In other news, those guys are actually fairly handsome. I'm no homosexual, but I can appreciate good facial features :3 On May 23 2011 00:04 Demand2k wrote: Did you even read the OP's post? He clearly believes there's a correlation between looks and brains. I was about to write that there's no way to misinterpret it, but you did. I don't think I did, but I won't derail to clarify, just read what I originally wrote in my first reply/post lolol | ||
|
DorF
Sweden961 Posts
 | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
JWD opens up his series of blog with a fine young dame :3 | ||
|
Nyovne
Netherlands19141 Posts
On May 22 2011 23:37 Demand2k wrote: This sucks in a male-dominated environment, so I'm unsure if you're doing this just as a minor provocation. It's like me sitting in a vorspiel with 90% average girls and preaching that I prefer supermodels. Also your picks are boring and attractive in the most generic sense... all of them are similar. It's like me picking Jessica Alba or similar boring women that every single male in the whole world finds attractive. The biggest thumbs down ever, both in terms of lack of originality and content. Flame shield off, since I expect alot of people to become sulky over this post no matter what. But I don't care, since it's well deserved. What a post, for 80% it has no place in this blog as it's main aims are to troll/provoke as it claims this blog to do. The irony is not lost on me. On top of that it is faintly disturbing to me that you regard someone of an alternate sexual preference, which happens to be a minority, to be provoking the majority when opening a blog topic which contains content which is considered to be normal or even highly entertainable/appreciated when it is of a heterosexual nature. Martyring to boot is just icing on the cake. If you have nothing to contribute except content aimed to provoke or derail please refrain from going for that reply button in the future. Which is sad since I found the part about your post above generic and boring choices to be spot on and interesting and adding to the topic. The rest of your post this thread could sorely do without. | ||
|
Nyovne
Netherlands19141 Posts
| ||
|
Demand2k
Norway875 Posts
On May 23 2011 00:15 Nyovne wrote: What a post, for 80% it has no place in this blog as it's main aims are to troll/provoke as it claims this blog to do. The irony is not lost on me. On top of that it is faintly disturbing to me that you regard someone of an alternate sexual preference, which happens to be a minority, to be provoking the majority when opening a blog topic which contains content which is considered to be normal or even highly entertainable/appreciated when it is of a heterosexual nature. Martyring to boot is just icing on the cake. If you have nothing to contribute except content aimed to provoke or derail please refrain from going for that reply button in the future. Which is sad since I found the part about your post above generic and boring choices to be spot on and interesting and adding to the topic. The rest of your post this thread could sorely do without. I was applying a reaction, as it's correctional in it's effect, just like your critisizm of me is correctional behavour. I did so quite harshly in this case as I feel it was warranted. The fact that you think is too harsh is something I'll have to take into consideration for the future, as it hurts my post to be too direct, which it did as shown by your reaction. But calling me martyr or disrespective towards certain groups of people is just plain wrong as it has nothing to do with being harsh or direct. I've made no implications of the former in my first post, as the content would fit if he was a girl, which I thought he was in the first place. Read my post again and you'll se that it's so. | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
gogogadgetflow
United States2583 Posts
On May 23 2011 00:28 Demand2k wrote: I was applying a reaction, as it's correctional in it's effect, just like your critisizm of me is correctional behavour. I did so quite harshly in this case as I feel it was warranted. The fact that you think is too harsh is something I'll have to take into consideration for the future, as it hurts my post to be too direct, which it did as shown by your reaction. But calling me martyr or disrespective towards certain groups of people is just plain wrong as it has nothing to do with being harsh or direct. I've made no implications of the former in my first post, as the content would fit if he was a girl, which I thought he was in the first place. Read my post again and you'll se that it's so. You don't understand what he meant by 'martyring.' What you did here: Flame shield off, since I expect alot of people to become sulky over this post no matter what. That's known as martyring and usually results in moderation no matter what, so consider yourself lucky.A but more on topic, I agree with your first post but I wouldn't have bothered posting it. | ||
|
taran
Finland49 Posts
| ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
Edit: oops, I can't count, I was thinking of #6. If me and #5 ended up in the same room, my wife would kill him. Or me. Or both. Or maybe she'd get really hot and bothered, that would be lucky. | ||
|
Demand2k
Norway875 Posts
On May 23 2011 00:34 gogogadgetflow wrote: You don't understand what he meant by 'martyring.' What you did here: That's known as martyring and usually results in moderation no matter what, so consider yourself lucky. A but more on topic, I agree with your first post but I wouldn't have bothered posting it. I just freshed up on the forum rules, and saw that assuming critisizm beforehand is defined as martyring. In that case, I feel obliged to respectfully apologize for what what you quoted me on. | ||
|
TheAwesomeAll
Netherlands1609 Posts
On May 22 2011 22:28 BLinD-RawR wrote: uhhh,platorepublic is gay,everyone should know that by now...hes just sharing his fantasies. still,it does creep me out on a personal level. sharing your gay fantasies, thats how the internet begun + Show Spoiler + or something similar edit : platorepublic, personal question : nada s body thread or gay starcraft players thread? | ||
| ||
|
|
Afreeca Starleague
Shine vs Rush
WardiTV Weekly
Monday Night Weeklies
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Light vs EffOrt
OSC
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
