• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 07:22
CET 13:22
KST 21:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced10[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge2
StarCraft 2
General
BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle [Alpha Pro Series] Nice vs Cure $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Which season is the best in ASL? A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? Current Meta PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread The Perfect Game Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Big Programming Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Esports Earnings: Bigger Pri…
TrAiDoS
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2600 users

modern control engineering and starcraft

Blogs > exeexe
Post a Reply
exeexe
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Denmark937 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-02 00:03:15
October 01 2010 23:51 GMT
#1
Rofl i just came to think about something that could be a funny correlance.
Im gonna talk about modern control engineering (MCE) and after that im gonna talk about the funny correlance between MCE and starcraft.

MCE:
+ Show Spoiler +

In MCE you make like a bode diagram like this:
[image loading]
For the untrained eye its very confusing but its very effective for the guy who knows what its about. Basically we are gonna use the upper part so just ignore the phase thingy.

The bode diagram works in that way that you have a system, then you give that system an input and out of the system you get an output. Then you compare the output with the input.

And then you get a closed loop, because you start with input and you end up by the input again like this:
[image loading]

So the comparing between the input and the output will give the gain which is the vertical axis on the bode diagram and on horisontal axis there is the frequency. So basically what you do is you put an input and test it at different frequencies. The result will show up as a dot in the bode diagram and with enough dots you can draw a line.

The frequency is often depicted on a logaritmic scale, so the numbers goes like this 1 10 100 1000 etc..
This means the frequency can be very small when it crosses the vertical axis.

The area of interest in a bode diagram is when the gain changes value. So for a certain frequency band you get interesting stuff while the gain outside of this intersting band is just trivial, so thats why you dont have to draw the bode diagram with a frequency of infinity.

So this is a very short introduction and there a tons of more stuff to say about this but i have no time, and i proberbly forgot to mention a lot of stuff too xD so sry if it didnt make sense.


MCE and starcraft:
So i thought hey maybe you can combine the principles from MCE and make sort of a bode diagram of starcraft xD

So you have a system, like the protoss race or the zerg race etc. then you have the input. That would be the mineral spent and the output would be the damage inflicted o.0
The frequency would be the apm. Do you follow me?
Then the Bode diagram of starcraft would be like this:

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
Red = zerg
green = terran
blue = protoss


The brown areas are the band of interest. As you can see there is the band of iccup and the very narrow band of pro. My theory is that if it was possible to go beyond the band of pro then starcraft would no longer be balanced, and the reason why we would like to think that starcraft is balanced is because at pro level all 3 gains for each race crosses each other.
The protoss has units that cant inflict damage unless you micro them (HT to mention one). Thats why i decided to put protoss in the negative at very low apm. But protoss quickly catch up because its easier to macro as protoss.
The gain of the terran race will continue to grow beyond the pro-band because their units are so strong but in order to utilise that power you need to micro them, and you need to micro them more than the units of the 2 other races, but also the advantage are bigger. Luckely for the bw scene that state of imbaness lies out of human reach, but it is there, in my beleive.

Also the bode diagram for starcraft may have been distorted at some parts but its so hard to draw in paint and with logaritmic scale lol. I still think though that the bode diagram that i managed to create displays my thoughts to an acceptable level.

Also dont take it litteraly because there still are a lot of things that needs to be taking into consideration like decission making and scouting, so you should only take this very generally.

So what do you think, do i have a point? o.0

Also i have like no experience in zvt...

****
And never forget, its always easier to throw a bomb downstairs than up. - George Orwell
Seide
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States831 Posts
October 02 2010 00:04 GMT
#2
haha pretty interesting . I actually like it, and you make some good points about the bands.
One fish, two fish, red fish, blue fish.
Impervious
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada4211 Posts
October 02 2010 00:52 GMT
#3
Personally, I think Z would be the most imbalanced race..... Thanks to the larvae mechanic. If you can't see why, well, yea.....
~ \(ˌ)im-ˈpər-vē-əs\ : not capable of being damaged or harmed.
Myrmidon
Profile Blog Joined December 2004
United States9452 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-03 02:45:13
October 03 2010 02:44 GMT
#4
I thought modern control theory was based on state space representations, while classical control theory is based on frequency-domain analysis, using Bode plots, etc.

The main issue is that nobody has APM (skills) beyond the "pro band," so we can't extrapolate the gain function accurately. Any type of guess of ability given whatever APM level in that region is just like anybody else guessing, with or without diagrams.

edit: but of course I'm taking the analogy too seriously, I know.
exeexe
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Denmark937 Posts
October 03 2010 03:03 GMT
#5
On October 03 2010 11:44 Myrmidon wrote:
I thought modern control theory was based on state space representations, while classical control theory is based on frequency-domain analysis, using Bode plots, etc.


ISBN 0-13-043245-8
And never forget, its always easier to throw a bomb downstairs than up. - George Orwell
Myrmidon
Profile Blog Joined December 2004
United States9452 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-03 03:16:53
October 03 2010 03:12 GMT
#6
Hm, all I know is that my professor made the distinction between classical and modern control theory in the way I did. In my one-semester class, we had classical control theory for 90% of the class and then a brief intro to state space representations in the last 10%. It also seems to match with what wikipedia says. But I wouldn't be surprised at all if many control theory books began with classical control theory, since that's the order in which it's usually taught, at least in the USA.

edit: on a side note, my professor was from the UK, though granted I don't think he would be using terminology that isn't common in the States.

It's an interesting subject though.

Originally I thought you were going to explain game flow as a control problem, though. Scouting gives you feedback, so you have closed-loop control. Just another thought.
NevilleS
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada266 Posts
October 03 2010 06:44 GMT
#7
Modern control theory is definitely inclined towards state space. No offense OP but an apm vs race effectiveness graph is hardly a way to model starcraft using control theory... After all, the presence of variations in gain is hardly something specific to controls, it is something all scientists are concerned with (finding ways to model natural behavior with mathematical relationships). The key of the bode plot is that it can be used to infer control parameters such as system stability, gain margins, etc.
Cambium
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States16368 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-03 07:27:03
October 03 2010 07:21 GMT
#8
I did my undergrad in Systems Engineering and what you said in the OP doesn't make much sense.

First of all, as most people have pointed out, the frequency-domains analysis falls under classical control theory (modern control theory uses time-domain state-space representation).

Going along with frequency analysis, this part doesn't make sense at all....

So you have a system, like the protoss race or the zerg race etc. then you have the input. That would be the mineral spent and the output would be the damage inflicted o.0


At least I can't think of a good way to connect Starcraft and control theories.

This is how I would picture a closed-loop system if I had to:
- the game itself is the system rather than the race
- the inputs would be your commands
- the outputs would be the various game states
- you would simultaneously supply the input, be the controller and the sensor

edit:
You can make anything "work" by making a plethora of arbitrary assumptions; at the end of the day, you have to realize that applications for control theories are not limitless, and they aren't applicable to everything in our daily lives.
When you want something, all the universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Korean Royale
12:00
Playoffs
ByuN vs Cure
TBD vs NightMare
TBD vs Classic
TBD vs Solar
Zoun vs Creator
WardiTV415
TKL 158
IndyStarCraft 71
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SortOf 223
TKL 158
Lowko111
Rex 76
IndyStarCraft 71
trigger 5
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 49342
Rain 2560
Horang2 1436
Hyuk 575
Stork 534
actioN 499
Larva 486
BeSt 425
Mini 411
firebathero 338
[ Show more ]
Rush 274
ZerO 234
Last 232
Soulkey 194
Hyun 160
Pusan 135
hero 124
Barracks 71
Sharp 57
sorry 49
Mong 45
Backho 39
Shine 28
scan(afreeca) 21
Aegong 17
Noble 15
IntoTheRainbow 10
Icarus 6
Dota 2
qojqva3043
XcaliburYe548
420jenkins6
Counter-Strike
byalli7918
zeus2157
fl0m1663
edward39
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor185
Other Games
B2W.Neo1237
Fuzer 249
Mew2King173
Pyrionflax144
ArmadaUGS67
nookyyy 57
ZerO(Twitch)13
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream360
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 11
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 11
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 5952
• WagamamaTV376
• lizZardDota2145
League of Legends
• Jankos2762
Upcoming Events
OSC
4h 38m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
21h 38m
WardiTV Korean Royale
23h 38m
TBD vs SHIN
TBD vs Reynor
TBD vs herO
Replay Cast
1d 11h
Wardi Open
1d 23h
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
StarCraft2.fi
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
StarCraft2.fi
3 days
[ Show More ]
PiGosaur Monday
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
StarCraft2.fi
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

SOOP Univ League 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
Slon Tour Season 2
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.