• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:54
CEST 04:54
KST 11:54
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy9[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple2BSL Season 237Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon101Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser
Tourneys
Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Announcement RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 544 Double Trouble The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses Mutation # 542 The Ascended
Brood War
General
Bot on ladder PLAYzone Challenge - open offline tour in Prague BSL Season 23 BW General Discussion NaDa's Body
Tourneys
PLAYzone Challenge - open offline tour in Prague [ASL22] Ro8 Day 2 [ASL22] Ro16 Group D [ASL22] Ro8 Day 1
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Diablo IV Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine All you football fans (soccer)!
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Gaming Intensity, Problemati…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7706 users

modern control engineering and starcraft

Blogs > exeexe
Post a Reply
exeexe
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Denmark937 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-02 00:03:15
October 01 2010 23:51 GMT
#1
Rofl i just came to think about something that could be a funny correlance.
Im gonna talk about modern control engineering (MCE) and after that im gonna talk about the funny correlance between MCE and starcraft.

MCE:
+ Show Spoiler +

In MCE you make like a bode diagram like this:
[image loading]
For the untrained eye its very confusing but its very effective for the guy who knows what its about. Basically we are gonna use the upper part so just ignore the phase thingy.

The bode diagram works in that way that you have a system, then you give that system an input and out of the system you get an output. Then you compare the output with the input.

And then you get a closed loop, because you start with input and you end up by the input again like this:
[image loading]

So the comparing between the input and the output will give the gain which is the vertical axis on the bode diagram and on horisontal axis there is the frequency. So basically what you do is you put an input and test it at different frequencies. The result will show up as a dot in the bode diagram and with enough dots you can draw a line.

The frequency is often depicted on a logaritmic scale, so the numbers goes like this 1 10 100 1000 etc..
This means the frequency can be very small when it crosses the vertical axis.

The area of interest in a bode diagram is when the gain changes value. So for a certain frequency band you get interesting stuff while the gain outside of this intersting band is just trivial, so thats why you dont have to draw the bode diagram with a frequency of infinity.

So this is a very short introduction and there a tons of more stuff to say about this but i have no time, and i proberbly forgot to mention a lot of stuff too xD so sry if it didnt make sense.


MCE and starcraft:
So i thought hey maybe you can combine the principles from MCE and make sort of a bode diagram of starcraft xD

So you have a system, like the protoss race or the zerg race etc. then you have the input. That would be the mineral spent and the output would be the damage inflicted o.0
The frequency would be the apm. Do you follow me?
Then the Bode diagram of starcraft would be like this:

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
Red = zerg
green = terran
blue = protoss


The brown areas are the band of interest. As you can see there is the band of iccup and the very narrow band of pro. My theory is that if it was possible to go beyond the band of pro then starcraft would no longer be balanced, and the reason why we would like to think that starcraft is balanced is because at pro level all 3 gains for each race crosses each other.
The protoss has units that cant inflict damage unless you micro them (HT to mention one). Thats why i decided to put protoss in the negative at very low apm. But protoss quickly catch up because its easier to macro as protoss.
The gain of the terran race will continue to grow beyond the pro-band because their units are so strong but in order to utilise that power you need to micro them, and you need to micro them more than the units of the 2 other races, but also the advantage are bigger. Luckely for the bw scene that state of imbaness lies out of human reach, but it is there, in my beleive.

Also the bode diagram for starcraft may have been distorted at some parts but its so hard to draw in paint and with logaritmic scale lol. I still think though that the bode diagram that i managed to create displays my thoughts to an acceptable level.

Also dont take it litteraly because there still are a lot of things that needs to be taking into consideration like decission making and scouting, so you should only take this very generally.

So what do you think, do i have a point? o.0

Also i have like no experience in zvt...

****
And never forget, its always easier to throw a bomb downstairs than up. - George Orwell
Seide
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States831 Posts
October 02 2010 00:04 GMT
#2
haha pretty interesting . I actually like it, and you make some good points about the bands.
One fish, two fish, red fish, blue fish.
Impervious
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada4222 Posts
October 02 2010 00:52 GMT
#3
Personally, I think Z would be the most imbalanced race..... Thanks to the larvae mechanic. If you can't see why, well, yea.....
~ \(ˌ)im-ˈpər-vē-əs\ : not capable of being damaged or harmed.
Myrmidon
Profile Blog Joined December 2004
United States9452 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-03 02:45:13
October 03 2010 02:44 GMT
#4
I thought modern control theory was based on state space representations, while classical control theory is based on frequency-domain analysis, using Bode plots, etc.

The main issue is that nobody has APM (skills) beyond the "pro band," so we can't extrapolate the gain function accurately. Any type of guess of ability given whatever APM level in that region is just like anybody else guessing, with or without diagrams.

edit: but of course I'm taking the analogy too seriously, I know.
exeexe
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Denmark937 Posts
October 03 2010 03:03 GMT
#5
On October 03 2010 11:44 Myrmidon wrote:
I thought modern control theory was based on state space representations, while classical control theory is based on frequency-domain analysis, using Bode plots, etc.


ISBN 0-13-043245-8
And never forget, its always easier to throw a bomb downstairs than up. - George Orwell
Myrmidon
Profile Blog Joined December 2004
United States9452 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-03 03:16:53
October 03 2010 03:12 GMT
#6
Hm, all I know is that my professor made the distinction between classical and modern control theory in the way I did. In my one-semester class, we had classical control theory for 90% of the class and then a brief intro to state space representations in the last 10%. It also seems to match with what wikipedia says. But I wouldn't be surprised at all if many control theory books began with classical control theory, since that's the order in which it's usually taught, at least in the USA.

edit: on a side note, my professor was from the UK, though granted I don't think he would be using terminology that isn't common in the States.

It's an interesting subject though.

Originally I thought you were going to explain game flow as a control problem, though. Scouting gives you feedback, so you have closed-loop control. Just another thought.
NevilleS
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada266 Posts
October 03 2010 06:44 GMT
#7
Modern control theory is definitely inclined towards state space. No offense OP but an apm vs race effectiveness graph is hardly a way to model starcraft using control theory... After all, the presence of variations in gain is hardly something specific to controls, it is something all scientists are concerned with (finding ways to model natural behavior with mathematical relationships). The key of the bode plot is that it can be used to infer control parameters such as system stability, gain margins, etc.
Cambium
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States16368 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-03 07:27:03
October 03 2010 07:21 GMT
#8
I did my undergrad in Systems Engineering and what you said in the OP doesn't make much sense.

First of all, as most people have pointed out, the frequency-domains analysis falls under classical control theory (modern control theory uses time-domain state-space representation).

Going along with frequency analysis, this part doesn't make sense at all....

So you have a system, like the protoss race or the zerg race etc. then you have the input. That would be the mineral spent and the output would be the damage inflicted o.0


At least I can't think of a good way to connect Starcraft and control theories.

This is how I would picture a closed-loop system if I had to:
- the game itself is the system rather than the race
- the inputs would be your commands
- the outputs would be the various game states
- you would simultaneously supply the input, be the controller and the sensor

edit:
You can make anything "work" by making a plethora of arbitrary assumptions; at the end of the day, you have to realize that applications for control theories are not limitless, and they aren't applicable to everything in our daily lives.
When you want something, all the universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 6m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 217
Nina 2
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 17134
Shuttle 756
Terrorterran 3
Dota 2
monkeys_forever948
NeuroSwarm190
febbydoto44
League of Legends
JimRising 618
Counter-Strike
taco 647
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox394
Other Games
summit1g10777
Artosis529
WinterStarcraft352
C9.Mang0247
PiGStarcraft232
Maynarde188
ViBE141
UpATreeSC62
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1231
StarCraft: Brood War
Afreeca ASL 402
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 92
• mYiSmile19
• davetesta5
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo577
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
7h 6m
Replay Cast
21h 6m
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
GSL
3 days
Yamato Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Soma vs Jaedong
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Leta vs Soulkey
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Custodian Cup
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.