|
Hey you High Schoolers on TL. I bet you're wondering how to get all the way up to the top of Diamond in no time at all! Well, good news!
It's time to put aside SC2 and trying to get that Solo Zen Master achievement, (at least for a few weeks) and turn your attention to something just as entertaining, but oh so much more rewarding....
I present to you.....
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +I'll not talk about my other qualifications and just say, regarding the SAT, that I got a 2400 and that I've tutored people for the SAT for over 2 years. I've also used this fact to get laid precisely 0 times. So you might be wondering.... OMFG WTF THAT'S AWESOME! LAIK HOW DO I GET STARTED!?!?!?!?!?1?Well, you're in luck, because I present to you the definitive approach to getting the perfect score: ![[image loading]](http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/4287/54867861.png) 1.) Buy the College Board SAT blue book, if you haven't already. It looks like this: + Show Spoiler +It's like porn. In that it has words. 2.) Read the book. Specifically page 101 for writing. Critical reading and Math are more intuitive, so feel free to skim if it gets tedious. Heck, feel free to skip most of the critical reading... if you can understand what I'm saying in this guide, your basic reading skills are probably up to par. First 2-3 weeks. Familiarity, 40 minutes - 1 hour per day.3.) Pick a section a day: Math, Writing, Crit. I'd say do it randomly, but at least be systematic about it. Leave yourself some entire tests untouched. if it makes it less painful, you can pretend Math = Protoss, Writing = Terran, and Crit = Zerg, and that you're just practicing for 3 matchups. *wink* Do the section. See how many you get wrong. 4.) After you're done getting roflstomped, go over the answers and make sure you know how to do every problem on the section you just took. This is like watching your replay, and figuring out what you did wrong. Only a thousand times more fun. 5.) Retake the same section again and again until you get a perfect score on that section. This is like when Nony practices against a computer to get a build order right in preparation for perfect execution against a human opponent. Only there is no human opponent... EXCEPT YOU! Next 2-3 weeks. Accuracy and Speed 30-40 minutes a day.6.) You should now be able to do any given section and get at most 2-3 questions wrong per section. While still focusing on accuracy, try to finish these sections in as little time as possible. Pretend this is like when you're 50 and 3 in bronze and waiting to get promoted. Make it your new goal to facestomp these noobs in as quick and hilarious a fashion as possible. Have fun with it. + Show Spoiler +![[image loading]](http://www.i-worth.com/gallery/normal/sharp-end-cat-pencil-sharpener[1].jpg) Ur doin it wrong. 7.) Go over the test again, but instead of trying to look for mistakes, look for places you could have done something better, faster. You've found out how to make the computer gg in 4 minutes. Could you have made that probe start building sooner? Could you have gotten a better split? Can you make it 3:55? 8.) Now do the entire test again in EVEN less time, while still reading the questions and answer choices as you normally would have. Think cmethodfeedback. Final 2-3 weeks. Endurance 1-2 times per week. ~ 4 hours.9.) Take a full practice test from the book, noting time as necessary. You've been promoted to diamond, show those 1a2a3a noobs what you've got. 10.) Go over your results and write down your score range for each section *remember we haven't talked about the essay yet, so just assume you got a perfect score on it* It's like bragging about your rating, only in this case, if you say you're over 800, people know you're full of shit. 24.) Go back and look at your mistakes and make sure you don't make the same mistake again. (Good scouting will prevent you for falling for the same cheese twice.) You should be in the "OMG I'm owning" score range by this point.
Now I bet you're thinking, WHAT ABOUT THE ESSAY!?!?!?! Well you're in luck... The essay:"Just add water" ~2 hours?This almost doesn't need practice if you know how to write. It just needs a formula. You can pick a formula of your own, but here's one I like to use: 1.) Identify the prompt: i.e. "Progress comes at a price." 2.) Do a dichotomy... split the topic into two facets/perspectives that are mutually exclusive but collectively exhaustive. That means, more simply, you want the two resulting branches to be sufficiently different so that you're not spending the whole paper repeating yourself, but that you're not leaving any part of the prompt unaddressed. + Show Spoiler +
Acceptable dichotomies: a.) Progress does indeed come at a price. You talk about the price of progress here. b.) That price in many cases is worth paying.... You talk about how that progress justifies the price in your given examples.
a.) In some cases, progress was worth its price. Give some examples b.) In other cases, progress was not worth its price. Give some examples.
a.) Progress has direct monetary costs. b.) Progress has indirect or unexpected costs.
Unacceptable dichotomies: a.) Progress is never worth the price. b.) Sometimes progress kills people. (this is not sufficiently different from a, and in fact falls squarely under the umbrella of a)
a.) Progress is pursued by many people. b.) Progress is pursued by robots. (This is unacceptable because what about animals and progress? It merely gives two examples, and does not work toward creating a generalized statement in response to the prompt).
3.) Write a topic sentence you think sounds clever and is somewhat relevant to the prompt. 4.) What is your position on the prompt? This requires a clear definition of potentially controversial phrases. 5.) How will you go about proving your position? (Explain your dichotomy here.) paragraph break. 6.) Argue the first point in your dichotomy. 7.) Give an example. 8.) give another example. (one big example works, two smaller ones also works. three is too many; you don't have time to come up with 3 solid examples.) 9.) Transition into second part of dichotomy. 10.) Argue second point. 11-12) Moar examples 14.) Transition to conclusion. 15.) Bring together your two points in the dichotomy to rehash your initial position. 16.) What are the implications of this position? Why does it matter? 24.) Call to action. "We should all pursue progress, but always be mindful of its price." Here's a half-assed and purely fictitious example essay with some commentary. I recommend you use facts, but hey, facts are overrated. + Show Spoiler + Prompt: Progress comes at a price. Dichotomy: a.) Progress has fully expected costs. Ex: microwave oven. b.) Progress also has many unexpected costs. Ex: Global warming from kittens.
Economists often say that there is no such thing as a free lunch. Never is this notion more true than when dealing with scientific progress. (I'm defining progress here as scientific progress) With the advent of any great technology that seeks to push mankind forward, comes a cost that may threaten to bring mankind back to its knees. Whether the costs are expected, as was the case for weapons of war, or unexpected, as in the case of global warming, progress is never free. i don't care if you think it's a hoax, it's a good example! Examples don't need to be correct to be good.
Many of today's quintessential (throw in a vocab word or two) modern marvels were created by minds who knew full well of their inventions' destructive capability. For example, the microwave oven was first introduced by Soviet spies to the United states as a means to fracture American society by removing the need to socialize in restaurant settings. While today we may enjoy the convenience such a contraption offers, back during the Cold War, the Soviet scientists behind the microwave, in order to wage psychological warfare against its democratic rival, were fine with the cost to be born by America's countless lonely housewives. Even today, the negative effects of this devious invention can be seen in the desperation of housewives in suburban neighborhoods all across the country as detailed by a recent documentary series on ABC. But the greatest costs of progress are those that were completely unforeseen.
The eighteenth century, for instance, could not foresee (this word connects with the word unforeseen in the previous sentence, achieving a sense of cohesion) the effects that the genetic modification of cats might have on the climate many hundred years down the road. In fact, all our feline-modifying forebears had intended to do was to solve the age-old problem of chasing pussy by breeding the feral prarie lions of their age into the lazy and obese housecats we know today. While the advantages of keeping the company of an evil, judgmental pet are obvious, it was entirely unobvious that in addition to furballs, housecats also cough up SoX, a furry compound which, like your grandmother's sweaters, make the atmosphere uncomfortably warm. Eventually, this warmth will be more than uncomfortable, with many reputable scientists claiming that by the year 2012, our faces will melt off. Thus, in an attempt to make pussies more enjoyable, our progress-oriented forebears unknowingly caused the end of the world.
While many proponents of progress are willing to accept costs to the tune of thousands of horny housewives, even the most hard-nosed proponents would be hard-pressed to take the end of the world as an acceptable cost. (Re-merged the dichotomy). But even if we are all doomed to die in a ball of flames, further progress is still something we dare not risk. To die by face-melting is terrible, but to live forever without conscience, which will be the inevitable consequence of any advances in medical technology, would be unimaginable. (Establish stakes.) Thus, given the overwhelming body of evidence that the cost of progress is too great, we must take a stand, today, in valiant defense of sitting down and doing nothing. (call to [in]action).
Things to keep in mind for the essay: 1.) Vary your sentence structure. 2.) Throw in a few vocab words. Nothing TOOO fancy or esoteric (see what I did there?), but just enough to show you don't consider reading graffiti in bathroom stalls heavy reading. 3.) Maintain cohesion by repition of word roots or by using parallelism. 4.) Try to use facts if you can. When out of facts, use plausible lies. 5.) Fill up the whole page. There is almost a 1:1 correlation between essay length and score. 6.) OH YAH YOU HAVE LAIK 25 MINUTES! Just like in beta... you've got to end it before Zerg gets broodlords. TEST DAY!By this point in time, you probably think you've mastered everything there is to master regarding the SAT, but be not too hasty, young grasshopper! There is one final secret you have yet to learn. It is a secret so powerful, that, you basically could have skipped the entire guide before this and you probably would've been fine... It is.... + Show Spoiler +Dun dun dun!!!!!! + Show Spoiler +![[image loading]](http://www.mms.com/us/images/product_peanutmms.png) Peanut M&Ms. The SAT equivalent of being Lee Young Ho... But seriously. Bring food that is packed full of sugar, protein, and lipids and sneak bites whenever your proctor doesn't mind or won't catch you. Otherwise the next 5 hours are gonna destroy you. Congratulations, if you can successfully adhere to the program delineated in this guide, you are well on your way to getting a 2400. I'll see you at the finish line. ![[image loading]](http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-07/08/xin_1007020607590422858812.jpg)
If you have any questions about the guide feel free to post here. But to try to make things as easy to read and comprehend as possible, ask for help about any particular problems you can't seem to find a quick and efficient solution for in this thread (not this one, but the linked one).
|
|
Crazy kids and your 2400 maximum score... 1600 when I took it. Anyways a lot of solid advice here
|
|
Spoilers within spoilers within spoilers are so confusing O_O.
I already completed my SATs with flying colors. Make a thread about college applications, perhaps? :D
|
The metagame is evolving.
|
|
SAT is for noobs.. :p I'm studding to Pwn the MCATs next cycle.
|
Why is this in the SC2 section? Awesome guide though, which I read this before taking the SAT's I guess.. although I don't think I would have taken the time to follow it anyway.
|
Shouldn't this be in General? Scattered SC2 terms do not an SC2 thread make :\
|
i got a 1700 with a 300 on the math section....
i cheated in math through ALL of highschool... we had the same FAIL math teacher for 4 years who was a 400 pound ITT tech dropout who said "my degree was in computer hardware" in which case i replied "then wtf are u doing trying to teach me math?"...
i spent about 1/2 of every math class walking around the campus after being asked to leave the class.
im happy with the results =/... shoulda taken em another time... i missed the first 5 mins of the essay portion cause i fell asleep in the desk.. and woke up to every1 writing.
|
ah man... i regret not studying for my SAT's. i knew i'd get a good enough score but i'm sure if anyone studied any guide for the SAT for an hour a day for weeks prior to the exam, a 2400 is guaranteed . i should show this to my friends who are still in HS.
|
On September 05 2010 15:36 mnofstl007 wrote: i got a 1700 with a 300 on the math section....
i cheated in math through ALL of highschool... we had the same FAIL math teacher for 4 years who was a 400 pound ITT tech dropout who said "my degree was in computer hardware" in which case i replied "then wtf are u doing trying to teach me math?"...
i spent about 1/2 of every math class walking around the campus after being asked to leave the class.
im happy with the results =/... shoulda taken em another time... i missed the first 5 mins of the essay portion cause i fell asleep in the desk.. and woke up to every1 writing.
holy crap lol 300 is so bad, the math on the SAT is like incredibly basic hahaha
|
On September 05 2010 15:36 mnofstl007 wrote: i got a 1700 with a 300 on the math section....
i cheated in math through ALL of highschool... we had the same FAIL math teacher for 4 years who was a 400 pound ITT tech dropout who said "my degree was in computer hardware" in which case i replied "then wtf are u doing trying to teach me math?"...
i spent about 1/2 of every math class walking around the campus after being asked to leave the class.
im happy with the results =/... shoulda taken em another time... i missed the first 5 mins of the essay portion cause i fell asleep in the desk.. and woke up to every1 writing. wow a 300? i don't think fail math teacher is a valid excuse since kids in 7th and 8th grade are scoring higher than a 300
|
Haha, I remember taking the SAT back in the day. Now I have to deal with the FE exam instead...
|
Pretty sure basic arithmetic can do better than a 300 on the math section. Why are you proud of yourself?
Young whippersnappers, I took the SAT before it had the writing part too 
Just wait til you have to take the GREs and beyond!
Oh and dunno if it's still as important, but probably is, but the subject-based SAT tests are really good if you really want to show off where you can shine, as are AP tests.
Grats to OP, you really know what you're talking about, and these skills will prove valuable on any placement or certification test you'll ever take in life.
|
i dont like math...
i liked math until jr high... i got 1st place in math olympics 4th 5th and 6th grade (bitches... =p) rofl......
300 on math SAT....
it is not basic math... maybe i got impatient and guessed too much... idk.
Since it has been proven your brain is not at its full capacity until after 9am... its ridiculous u have to be there so early..
to clarify it was a 300 something... somewhere between 300 and 400... but with that low on the math. and sleeping during the beginning of the written.. im happy with my result.
Our valedictorian scored a 1400... to which i replied "Ya the concept of highschool isnt broken at all..."
|
On September 05 2010 16:11 mnofstl007 wrote: i dont like math...
i liked math until jr high... i got 1st place in math olympics 4th 5th and 6th grade (bitches... =p) rofl......
300 on math SAT....
it is not basic math... maybe i got impatient and guessed too much... idk.
Since it has been proven your brain is not at its full capacity until after 9am... its ridiculous u have to be there so early..
to clarify it was a 300 something... somewhere between 300 and 400... but with that low on the math. and sleeping during the beginning of the written.. im happy with my result.
Our valedictorian scored a 1400... to which i replied "Ya the concept of highschool isnt broken at all..." Your valedictorian scored a 1400. What?
|
Taiwan619 Posts
On September 05 2010 15:38 mardi wrote: ah man... i regret not studying for my SAT's. i knew i'd get a good enough score but i'm sure if anyone studied any guide for the SAT for an hour a day for weeks prior to the exam, a 2400 is guaranteed . i should show this to my friends who are still in HS.
it's not that easy man -.-
|
On September 05 2010 16:26 pathy wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2010 15:38 mardi wrote: ah man... i regret not studying for my SAT's. i knew i'd get a good enough score but i'm sure if anyone studied any guide for the SAT for an hour a day for weeks prior to the exam, a 2400 is guaranteed . i should show this to my friends who are still in HS. it's not that easy man -.- Oh.... but it is. Maybe a 2400 is sort of hard, because it's all about that consistency. But getting a 2200, if you have been able to keep up in your high school courses, is totally doable without much extra effort.
|
On September 05 2010 16:19 love1another wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2010 16:11 mnofstl007 wrote: i dont like math...
i liked math until jr high... i got 1st place in math olympics 4th 5th and 6th grade (bitches... =p) rofl......
300 on math SAT....
it is not basic math... maybe i got impatient and guessed too much... idk.
Since it has been proven your brain is not at its full capacity until after 9am... its ridiculous u have to be there so early..
to clarify it was a 300 something... somewhere between 300 and 400... but with that low on the math. and sleeping during the beginning of the written.. im happy with my result.
Our valedictorian scored a 1400... to which i replied "Ya the concept of highschool isnt broken at all..." Your valedictorian scored a 1400. What?
yes. He was one of those people who had NO social life. Wasn't intelligent, worked extra extra hard for his grades.
|
Yeah don't be too disappointed if you don't get a 2400.
Unless of course you actually need it, in which you should be.q
|
Taiwan619 Posts
On September 05 2010 16:30 love1another wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2010 16:26 pathy wrote:On September 05 2010 15:38 mardi wrote: ah man... i regret not studying for my SAT's. i knew i'd get a good enough score but i'm sure if anyone studied any guide for the SAT for an hour a day for weeks prior to the exam, a 2400 is guaranteed . i should show this to my friends who are still in HS. it's not that easy man -.- Oh.... but it is. Maybe a 2400 is sort of hard, because it's all about that consistency. But getting a 2200, if you have been able to keep up in your high school courses, is totally doable without much extra effort.
haha yeah, i was responding specifically to the 2400 part. i agree, a 2200 is not hard
|
On September 05 2010 16:31 mnofstl007 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2010 16:19 love1another wrote:On September 05 2010 16:11 mnofstl007 wrote: i dont like math...
i liked math until jr high... i got 1st place in math olympics 4th 5th and 6th grade (bitches... =p) rofl......
300 on math SAT....
it is not basic math... maybe i got impatient and guessed too much... idk.
Since it has been proven your brain is not at its full capacity until after 9am... its ridiculous u have to be there so early..
to clarify it was a 300 something... somewhere between 300 and 400... but with that low on the math. and sleeping during the beginning of the written.. im happy with my result.
Our valedictorian scored a 1400... to which i replied "Ya the concept of highschool isnt broken at all..." Your valedictorian scored a 1400. What? yes. He was one of those people who had NO social life. Wasn't intelligent, worked extra extra hard for his grades.
Uhh what? Even on the old SAT's, a 1400 is not fucking hard. I know people who never studied for the SAT's that scored 1400+. What type of school did you come from that had such a retarded valedictorian?
|
|
On September 05 2010 16:34 holy_war wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2010 16:31 mnofstl007 wrote:On September 05 2010 16:19 love1another wrote:On September 05 2010 16:11 mnofstl007 wrote: i dont like math...
i liked math until jr high... i got 1st place in math olympics 4th 5th and 6th grade (bitches... =p) rofl......
300 on math SAT....
it is not basic math... maybe i got impatient and guessed too much... idk.
Since it has been proven your brain is not at its full capacity until after 9am... its ridiculous u have to be there so early..
to clarify it was a 300 something... somewhere between 300 and 400... but with that low on the math. and sleeping during the beginning of the written.. im happy with my result.
Our valedictorian scored a 1400... to which i replied "Ya the concept of highschool isnt broken at all..." Your valedictorian scored a 1400. What? yes. He was one of those people who had NO social life. Wasn't intelligent, worked extra extra hard for his grades. Uhh what? Even on the old SAT's, a 1400 is not fucking hard. I know people who never studied for the SAT's that scored 1400+. What type of school did you come from that had such a retarded valedictorian?
But if he worked extra hard for his grades, I find it hard to believe that he wasn't willing to work a little hard by following my guide and getting a good SAT score as well. 1400 is like worse than a joke.
|
On September 05 2010 16:36 love1another wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2010 16:34 holy_war wrote:On September 05 2010 16:31 mnofstl007 wrote:On September 05 2010 16:19 love1another wrote:On September 05 2010 16:11 mnofstl007 wrote: i dont like math...
i liked math until jr high... i got 1st place in math olympics 4th 5th and 6th grade (bitches... =p) rofl......
300 on math SAT....
it is not basic math... maybe i got impatient and guessed too much... idk.
Since it has been proven your brain is not at its full capacity until after 9am... its ridiculous u have to be there so early..
to clarify it was a 300 something... somewhere between 300 and 400... but with that low on the math. and sleeping during the beginning of the written.. im happy with my result.
Our valedictorian scored a 1400... to which i replied "Ya the concept of highschool isnt broken at all..." Your valedictorian scored a 1400. What? yes. He was one of those people who had NO social life. Wasn't intelligent, worked extra extra hard for his grades. Uhh what? Even on the old SAT's, a 1400 is not fucking hard. I know people who never studied for the SAT's that scored 1400+. What type of school did you come from that had such a retarded valedictorian? But if he worked extra hard for his grades, I find it hard to believe that he wasn't willing to work a little hard by following my guide and getting a good SAT score as well. 1400 is like worse than a joke.
Right. If you refer to the new SAT. 1400 on the old SAT was pretty good. Don't you like get 600 automatically for filling out your name?
|
On September 05 2010 16:38 holy_war wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2010 16:36 love1another wrote:On September 05 2010 16:34 holy_war wrote:On September 05 2010 16:31 mnofstl007 wrote:On September 05 2010 16:19 love1another wrote:On September 05 2010 16:11 mnofstl007 wrote: i dont like math...
i liked math until jr high... i got 1st place in math olympics 4th 5th and 6th grade (bitches... =p) rofl......
300 on math SAT....
it is not basic math... maybe i got impatient and guessed too much... idk.
Since it has been proven your brain is not at its full capacity until after 9am... its ridiculous u have to be there so early..
to clarify it was a 300 something... somewhere between 300 and 400... but with that low on the math. and sleeping during the beginning of the written.. im happy with my result.
Our valedictorian scored a 1400... to which i replied "Ya the concept of highschool isnt broken at all..." Your valedictorian scored a 1400. What? yes. He was one of those people who had NO social life. Wasn't intelligent, worked extra extra hard for his grades. Uhh what? Even on the old SAT's, a 1400 is not fucking hard. I know people who never studied for the SAT's that scored 1400+. What type of school did you come from that had such a retarded valedictorian? But if he worked extra hard for his grades, I find it hard to believe that he wasn't willing to work a little hard by following my guide and getting a good SAT score as well. 1400 is like worse than a joke. Right. If you refer to the new SAT. 1400 on the old SAT was pretty good. Don't you like get 600 automatically for filling out your name? Yeah. It had the writing section, so it was definitely out of 2400.
|
Hmm the OP makes my SAT studying seem silly and shameful.
|
It is a shame that our culture makes sex studying for the SAT feel so shameful.
|
On September 05 2010 16:31 mnofstl007 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2010 16:19 love1another wrote:On September 05 2010 16:11 mnofstl007 wrote: i dont like math...
i liked math until jr high... i got 1st place in math olympics 4th 5th and 6th grade (bitches... =p) rofl......
300 on math SAT....
it is not basic math... maybe i got impatient and guessed too much... idk.
Since it has been proven your brain is not at its full capacity until after 9am... its ridiculous u have to be there so early..
to clarify it was a 300 something... somewhere between 300 and 400... but with that low on the math. and sleeping during the beginning of the written.. im happy with my result.
Our valedictorian scored a 1400... to which i replied "Ya the concept of highschool isnt broken at all..." Your valedictorian scored a 1400. What? yes. He was one of those people who had NO social life. Wasn't intelligent, worked extra extra hard for his grades. Actually, that makes him better than you in that respect.
You say "Ya the concept of highschool isnt broken at all..." but really couldn't it be "ya the concept of an SAT isn't broken at all..."
I mean, the successful, hard-working guy scored lower than the guy who didn't get higher than a 300 on the math portion... there's definitely something wrong there.
|
Also shame on you for defaming someone to make yourself look better.
|
On September 05 2010 16:41 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2010 16:31 mnofstl007 wrote:On September 05 2010 16:19 love1another wrote:On September 05 2010 16:11 mnofstl007 wrote: i dont like math...
i liked math until jr high... i got 1st place in math olympics 4th 5th and 6th grade (bitches... =p) rofl......
300 on math SAT....
it is not basic math... maybe i got impatient and guessed too much... idk.
Since it has been proven your brain is not at its full capacity until after 9am... its ridiculous u have to be there so early..
to clarify it was a 300 something... somewhere between 300 and 400... but with that low on the math. and sleeping during the beginning of the written.. im happy with my result.
Our valedictorian scored a 1400... to which i replied "Ya the concept of highschool isnt broken at all..." Your valedictorian scored a 1400. What? yes. He was one of those people who had NO social life. Wasn't intelligent, worked extra extra hard for his grades. Actually, that makes him better than you in that respect. You say "Ya the concept of highschool isnt broken at all..." but really couldn't it be "ya the concept of an SAT isn't broken at all..." I mean, the successful, hard-working guy scored lower than the guy who didn't get higher than a 300 on the math portion... there's definitely something wrong there. I never said the SAT was fair. I just said it was the funnest thing I've ever done in my life.
On September 05 2010 16:42 ZERG_RUSSIAN wrote: Also shame on you for defaming someone to make yourself look better.
Welcome to the internet :3
|
he got a 4.5 i think? idk he was in honors/ap classes every one of em that we offered..
lol at u people saying 2200 is cake... whats the avg score of the SAT? i guarentee its below 1800...
lol i guess the internet is the one place you can brag about ur SAT score and think it makes you cool
|
On September 05 2010 16:43 mnofstl007 wrote: lol i guess the internet is the one place you can brag about ur SAT score and think it makes you cool Ofc. Why else would I be doing this? In it for the rep, man!
|
This should be in regular general. Has nothing to do with SC2. But a good post nonetheless.
|
On September 05 2010 16:43 mnofstl007 wrote: he got a 4.5 i think? idk he was in honors/ap classes every one of em that we offered..
lol at u people saying 2200 is cake... whats the avg score of the SAT? i guarentee its below 1800...
lol i guess the internet is the one place you can brag about ur SAT score and think it makes you cool
This is the average for UC Berkeley for fall of 2009 (great school, but public school): http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/admissions/undergrad_adm/selecting/camp_profiles/camp_profiles_ucb.html
If you're too lazy to sum it up, the average is 2033.
|
I didn't study once before the SAT and I got 1700 Lool, Average = 1500 so I don't feel so bad. I might follow this guide for my second time taking it though!
|
Taiwan619 Posts
On September 05 2010 16:43 mnofstl007 wrote: he got a 4.5 i think? idk he was in honors/ap classes every one of em that we offered..
lol at u people saying 2200 is cake... whats the avg score of the SAT? i guarentee its below 1800...
lol i guess the internet is the one place you can brag about ur SAT score and think it makes you cool
you know it :B
|
Guide for taking the SAT is a little unnecessary if you've read the guide to getting a job first.
Guide for getting a job: Say you graduated from college on your resume Be not retarded at the interview Get the job because they don't fucking fact check anything because they're lazy corporate bastards ??? PROFIT!
|
Why is this in the sc2 forum?
|
SATs don't matter. I did very well on mine first try, never took them again. It's actually a fairly good test for intelligence, but if anything is worth studying for it's grammar. No school actually cares though. I scored about 500 points more than the average person at my university. It's just not worth worrying about.
|
2400's a bitch, I always ranged from 2200-2350.. Fucking a I'm a sophomore in college and I'm still pissed about this shit.
|
On September 05 2010 16:52 Felka wrote: Why is this in the sc2 forum?
It shouldn't. But people will instantly see the word 'Diamond' and '2400' and their eyes will light up.
|
The SAT is pretty easy, not sure how people have any issue doing well. I took mine early to get it out of the way, got four hours of sleep the night before and slept during the downtime/breaks, and got a 1420 (out of 1600). The hardest math on it is like alg2/geometry, which we learned in like 8th/9th grade... and the english portion was mostly common sense. I didn't realize people actually studied for it, its a test on stuff you've already learned...
|
I am taking the Sat one final time october 9th. I took it march of this year and got a 1750 no studying attached. I will start following this guide starting either tomorrow or the next day. Maybe ill update to let u guys know how difficult/effective it is. Thanks for the awesome write up!
|
On September 05 2010 16:52 comis wrote: Guide for taking the SAT is a little unnecessary if you've read the guide to getting a job first.
Guide for getting a job: Say you graduated from college on your resume Be not retarded at the interview Get the job because they don't fucking fact check anything because they're lazy corporate bastards ??? PROFIT! You severely limit your options, though, because if you ever have ambitions of getting into the public spotlight, you'll be exposed immediately.
|
On September 05 2010 16:58 Laerties wrote: I am taking the Sat one final time october 9th. I took it march of this year and got a 1750 no studying attached. I will start following this guide starting either tomorrow or the next day. Maybe ill update to let u guys know how difficult/effective it is. Thanks for the awesome write up! Please do. Success stories will keep others motivated! And remember to use this thread if you run into any problems that give you trouble!
|
I always wondered what kind of level the math in SAT was on. Is it stuff like Binomial Coefficents and trigonometric functions and all that good jazz, or is it higher/lower level stuff?
|
It's lower level stuff. It goes up to geometry and a little bit of Algebra 2.
|
funny, but this should be a blog. moving
|
On September 05 2010 17:34 Tadzio wrote: funny, but this should be a blog. moving
Well this is unfortunate. I better get to sleep before the pain of being pluto'd causes me to cut myself.
|
On September 05 2010 17:27 love1another wrote: It's lower level stuff. It goes up to geometry and a little bit of Algebra 2. At least that's when maths is still fun. But say would a question like:
Calculate the derivate for the function: f(x) = 3.0 cos z + 0.3 z^3 be an Algebra 2 question?
|
I partied the night before the SAT, got 3 hours of sleep and still pulled a 1440 old/2060 new. If you get anything above like a 1200 you're fine for state schools really. All the test does is measure how easily you will get A's in college.
|
If I took it once, and I didn't do as well as I wanted (2090), where could I start instead? I did some practice beforehand, but I'm primarily trying to get my Reading -> 700+. If I can do that, then I'll be happy (getting my 2200, as long as I don't screw up my math again [760] -_-.)
|
Thank you so much, I 've been preparing for the SAT for a while now, the highest I got was a 1980. I'm trying to get a 2400. Feel free to pm me if you want to give me more tips
|
On September 05 2010 17:41 Hynda wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2010 17:27 love1another wrote: It's lower level stuff. It goes up to geometry and a little bit of Algebra 2. At least that's when maths is still fun. But say would a question like: Calculate the derivate for the function: f(x) = 3.0 cos z + 0.3 z^3 be an Algebra 2 question?
Derivatives are calculus questions. There's only BASIC algebra on the SAT, so you'll see linear and quadratic equations. Only a few even use function notation. f '(x) = - 3 sin (z) + 0.9 z^2 btw.
On September 05 2010 22:17 Archaic wrote: If I took it once, and I didn't do as well as I wanted (2090), where could I start instead? I did some practice beforehand, but I'm primarily trying to get my Reading -> 700+. If I can do that, then I'll be happy (getting my 2200, as long as I don't screw up my math again [760] -_-.)
Damn it. I'm in the same boat as you. I took October test last month, but I slept at 4 playing Starcraft/reading TL and got 650 on Reading and 2150 overall. Damn you Teamliquid. And math, I blanked out on the first question of the last math section... (supposed to be really easy) -.-
|
1870 was my highest score so far. i'm taking it for a third time now.
|
I think grinding the full tests is all you really need to do. Maybe 2-3 a month for your entire sophomore/part of junior year.
|
I have never studied for SAT because I'm lazy, and I got a 1780. I'm gonna take it again in November
|
Thank you, love1another, for your not so subtle attempts to turn TL into CC -.-;
The hardest part in getting a 2400 is maintaining the motivation in your test prep, not the test itself.
|
I took it for the first time this Jan and got a 2250. Really wanna break ~2330. Do you have any specific strategies for those last 80 or so points? My biggest trouble is CR.
Thanks dude
|
Just gunna give a little update. Ive done 6 mathematics sections the way you recommended so far. I've gone from 570 to 610. Slight improvement I suppose, and that's only after maybe 3-4 days. The damn collegeboard's website does a shitty job explaining problems I don't understand. I just look at the solutions asking why that would be intuitive to do. So I feel like I am not learning too much but I am becoming better at applying what I do know. I now realize I have a time management problem. I only answered problems 16 out of 20 on the first section 16 out of 18 on the second and 14 out of 16 on the third section of my latest test. The best I could have done if I answered every problem correct was 700 which i'm looking to be my minimum come test time. (want to major in engineering)...So that's all i've done so far. It's not as bad as I predicted it to be...kinda enjoying it. I Love the competitive aspect hehe.
|
|
|
|