|
Quoting Chill
Also, just to be clear, if your story turns out to be false later you will be banned, because this kind of deception is unacceptable in a close community. I hope it is real and I wish you the best. If it's not, please just admit it now and don't drag it out for the people following your story.
Chill sent the PM sometime around 6 yesterday. At 6:22 Xero says "Thanks for the warning." blah blah. The last line in Chills warning is key. If it's fake, admit it. Xero makes many posts after 6:22 on July 03 leading us on some more. Whether the permaban is harsh or not, he was warned about it.
If someone says "Dont do this, or permaban" it doesn't matter how ridiculous the permaban is. You got the warning, don't do it.
|
On July 04 2010 02:11 anderoo wrote: good for those who spotted this as fake right away, i was just willing to accept stupid little details because the whole premise of the plot was totally believable
guy meets girl -> they go on date
makes me wonder how this actually evolved past a normal girl blog to the point where people cared enough to check if it was fake or not. maybe the starcraft aspect of it
It was the fact that she played Starcraft and was supposedly much better than a TL reg that made people care.
|
On July 04 2010 02:30 Torenhire wrote:
Whether the permaban is harsh or not
he posted a picture of himself with a sex doll, i think it wouldn't even be harsh without the warning
|
I think what's funnier than this prank is that anyone thinks the girl is a mannequin... makeup, eyeliner, plus the blurring effect from the shaky camera is what makes her face "smooth", and her eyes "big". lol wow
|
|
On July 04 2010 03:41 eddoo wrote: I think what's funnier than this prank is that anyone thinks the girl is a mannequin... makeup, eyeliner, plus the blurring effect from the shaky camera is what makes her face "smooth", and her eyes "big". lol wow Exactly. My most poignant thought in this whole blog series was thinking, "Do these people seriously believe the girl in that picture is a mannequin? How do they go from 'She looks weird/creepy/like a doll' to 'She most definitely is a doll'?" This whole event demonstrated healthy skepticism on one side, and then wild, incomprehensible gullibility on the other.
|
On July 04 2010 02:26 Mingeek wrote: IMO, I don't think he should've been banned at all. It was a sweet troll, and it's not like he was a random person like me with like 5 posts :p. 4k+ posts, that's pretty harsh for a perma ban. He was a random person with 4k+ posts. :p
I just know him as the guy who had to be warned and temp banned several times for spamming contentless posts.
|
Should have just bought a sex doll and took a picture with it, and made sure you used different IPs.
|
United States10774 Posts
On July 04 2010 03:59 SonuvBob wrote:Show nested quote +On July 04 2010 02:26 Mingeek wrote: IMO, I don't think he should've been banned at all. It was a sweet troll, and it's not like he was a random person like me with like 5 posts :p. 4k+ posts, that's pretty harsh for a perma ban. He was a random person with 4k+ posts. :p I just know him as the guy who had to be warned and temp banned several times for spamming contentless posts. yeah, this. he was a horrible poster lol
|
On July 04 2010 03:54 EchOne wrote:Show nested quote +On July 04 2010 03:41 eddoo wrote: I think what's funnier than this prank is that anyone thinks the girl is a mannequin... makeup, eyeliner, plus the blurring effect from the shaky camera is what makes her face "smooth", and her eyes "big". lol wow Exactly. My most poignant thought in this whole blog series was thinking, "Do these people seriously believe the girl in that picture is a mannequin? How do they go from 'She looks weird/creepy/like a doll' to 'She most definitely is a doll'?" This whole event demonstrated healthy skepticism on one side, and then wild, incomprehensible gullibility on the other.
I think the reason people are on the "definitely a doll" train is because there was a few people (myself included) that said it might have been. I still think she looks like a doll...maybe makeup insanity, or bad camera...but she still looks like a doll to me. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
Combine that with the lack of (at the time) Xero's post explaining himself or whatever...it's an easy bandwagon to jump on.
|
lol Torenhire <3 Happy Early Birthday btw ^^
|
|
On July 04 2010 04:37 MorningMusume11 wrote: lol Torenhire <3 Happy Early Birthday btw ^^
Thanks! Happy early birthday to you too. Haha.
|
Who cares about Xero.
We care about Torenhire :D!
HAPPY BIRTHDAY
|
HAPPY BIRTHDAY TRAVIS!>!!<!<!!!>!!><!<>!<!>!<>!<!>
|
Can someone make a short resume about what happened here? Or why was that teenage guy banned? 30 pages are way too much for me.
|
9070 Posts
On July 04 2010 04:14 OneOther wrote:Show nested quote +On July 04 2010 03:59 SonuvBob wrote:On July 04 2010 02:26 Mingeek wrote: IMO, I don't think he should've been banned at all. It was a sweet troll, and it's not like he was a random person like me with like 5 posts :p. 4k+ posts, that's pretty harsh for a perma ban. He was a random person with 4k+ posts. :p I just know him as the guy who had to be warned and temp banned several times for spamming contentless posts. yeah, this. he was a horrible poster lol He seemed like a big bisu fanboy as well... dont know what to make of it tbh
|
On July 04 2010 07:27 Pika Chu wrote: Can someone make a short resume about what happened here? Or why was that teenage guy banned? 30 pages are way too much for me.
Page 28. I wrote one already.
And thx for the birthday stuffs everyone.
|
That was a really entertaining story tbh. Fair enough that he got banned since he was warned, but I did enjoy reading it.
|
Calgary25963 Posts
On July 04 2010 07:27 Pika Chu wrote: Can someone make a short resume about what happened here? Or why was that teenage guy banned? 30 pages are way too much for me. If you read you can find several summaries.
|
|
|
|