• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:28
CEST 02:28
KST 09:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting2[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent6Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO65.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)67Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up3PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition325.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version)119
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition 5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8) IP For new Brazil servers for NA Players TL.net Map Contest #21 - Finalists
Tourneys
WardiTV Mondays SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales! SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers Mutation # 492 Get Out More
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Any rep analyzer that shows resources situation? BW General Discussion [ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent I'm making videos again
Tourneys
[ASL20] Semifinal A [ASL20] Semifinal B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
Current Meta BW - ajfirecracker Strategy & Training Siegecraft - a new perspective TvZ Theorycraft - Improving on State of the Art
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread ZeroSpace Megathread Dawn of War IV Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640} TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Sex and weight loss Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Inbreeding: Why Do We Do It…
Peanutsc
From Tilt to Ragequit:The Ps…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 920 users

math help?

Blogs > Oxygen
Post a Reply
Normal
Oxygen
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
Canada3581 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 22:26:46
May 21 2010 22:18 GMT
#1
trying to remember some math and I don't know why this isn't working

given

[image loading]


show that

[image loading]



we differentiate G with respect to x

[image loading]


now I would think the previous step is correct, but then when I differentiate Gx (first derivative of G with respect to x) a second time I get a pretty big expression and I can't reduce it all. I think I'm already making a mistake somewhere... if someone could just tell me if the following expression is correct, I can do the rest

[image loading]



thoughts?


*
Dont drink and derive. TSL: Made with Balls.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 22:28 GMT
#2
In your original line, G(x, y) = F(\frac{x}{x^{2} + y^{2}}, \frac{y}{x^{2} + y^{2}}),
is it implied that
u = \frac{x}{x^{2} + y^{2}}
and
v = \frac{y}{x^{2} + y^{2}}

or is it that x and y are functions of u and v? I'll work on this but I don't want to put any effort in until this is clarified.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
Oxygen
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
Canada3581 Posts
May 21 2010 22:33 GMT
#3
that's the thing, I'm uncertain, that's how the question is worded. before you get to work on it let me do it with u = \frac{x} ...
sec
Dont drink and derive. TSL: Made with Balls.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 22:41 GMT
#4
Well, I went ahead and worked it out.
If G(x, y) = F(u, v) the way that you have it defined above, then when you go to calculate,
\frac{\partial^{2} G}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} G}{\partial y^{2}}
the mixed partials will cancel and then you'll have
\frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial y^{2}} multiplied by a common multiple that can be factored out... which will result in 0.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
Rkie
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States1278 Posts
May 21 2010 22:48 GMT
#5
what does the backwards 6 mean?
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 22:52 GMT
#6
It means "a partial derivative with respect to"
so in the above case,
it says that G is a function of both x and y and to take two derivatives of G with respect to only x while keeping y constant and summing that with the second partial derivative of G with respect to only y while keeping x constant. This sum is supposed to be equal to 0 which it turns out is true.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
DeathByMonkeys
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States742 Posts
May 21 2010 22:52 GMT
#7
On May 22 2010 07:48 Rkie wrote:
what does the backwards 6 mean?


Haha, it's the partial derivative.
Rotation
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States118 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 22:53:10
May 21 2010 22:52 GMT
#8
On May 22 2010 07:48 Rkie wrote:
what does the backwards 6 mean?


It's a partial derivative

EDIT: beaten to it.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 22:56 GMT
#9
Also, it's not a backwards 6... hehe.
It's actually the scripted form of the lower case Greek letter delta. It's similar to the use of the upper case Greek delta to mean "change in".
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
DeathByMonkeys
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States742 Posts
May 21 2010 22:59 GMT
#10
On May 22 2010 07:18 Oxygen wrote:
trying to remember some math and I don't know why this isn't working

given

[image loading]


show that

[image loading]



we differentiate G with respect to x

[image loading]


now I would think the previous step is correct, but then when I differentiate Gx (first derivative of G with respect to x) a second time I get a pretty big expression and I can't reduce it all. I think I'm already making a mistake somewhere... if someone could just tell me if the following expression is correct, I can do the rest

[image loading]



thoughts?


Seems to me like it might be some kind of Green's/Stokes' Thm kind of problem. Where when you take y/(x^2 + y^2) with respect to y and you take x/(x^2 + y^2) with respect to x you get the same thing and they cancel. I can't remember what thats called... shit now that's going to bug me.
Oxygen
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
Canada3581 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 23:09:31
May 21 2010 23:06 GMT
#11
On May 22 2010 07:41 kingjames01 wrote:
Well, I went ahead and worked it out.
If G(x, y) = F(u, v) the way that you have it defined above, then when you go to calculate,
\frac{\partial^{2} G}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} G}{\partial y^{2}}
the mixed partials will cancel and then you'll have
\frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial y^{2}} multiplied by a common multiple that can be factored out... which will result in 0.


That's the part I'm not understanding. Given

[image loading]


[image loading]


right?

so
[image loading]
. specifically, how do you differentiate
[image loading]
? Fu is a function of u and v, which are in turn functions of x and y, so do you have to apply the product rule? in which case, what does
[image loading]
yield?


Dont drink and derive. TSL: Made with Balls.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 23:08 GMT
#12
What you're probably remembering is that for any function is at least twice differentiable and continuous, then the mixed partials will always equal.

So, if f is a C^{2} function, ie. f, fx, fy, fxx, fxy, fyx, fyy, then fxy = fyx.
In general this can be extended to higher orders and is not restricted to C^{2}. You would have seen this in courses in Complex Analysis, Differential Equations, Undergrad Mechanics, Undergrad Calc...

Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 23:14 GMT
#13
On May 22 2010 08:06 Oxygen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2010 07:41 kingjames01 wrote:
Well, I went ahead and worked it out.
If G(x, y) = F(u, v) the way that you have it defined above, then when you go to calculate,
\frac{\partial^{2} G}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} G}{\partial y^{2}}
the mixed partials will cancel and then you'll have
\frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial y^{2}} multiplied by a common multiple that can be factored out... which will result in 0.


That's the part I'm not understanding. Given

[image loading]


[image loading]


right?

so
[image loading]





Yes, that's right so far.

Continuing,
\frac{\partial^{2} G}{\partial x^{2}} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)
= \frac{\partial}{\partial u} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}
= \left(\frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial u^{2}} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial u \partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}
= \frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial u^{2}} \left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\right)^{2} + \frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial u \partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}

Do the same thing for the second partial of G wrt y and sum them. Evaluate the partial of u wrt x, u wrt y, v wrt x, v wrt y and when you substitute you'll see some very big simplifications.

Finally, if you are going to continue this you should pm me. Homework threads aren't allowed here. I can latex the solution if you are stuck but this should get you going. Good luck!
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
Oxygen
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
Canada3581 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 23:19:59
May 21 2010 23:15 GMT
#14
took the liberty ... http://www.homeschoolmath.net/worksheets/equation_editor.php

[image loading]


[image loading]


[image loading]


[image loading]


seems like I should be fine from here. thanks a lot for your help.

btw homework threads are generally not allowed when posted in general forum; they're fine in blogs, as long it's not "do my work for me". the huge movement against "homework" threads started a few years back when lots of people used to do that.
Dont drink and derive. TSL: Made with Balls.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 23:18 GMT
#15
Nice! I didn't know that you could convert it online! =)
I'm on my Windows side waiting for the beta to come back online, so I was just typing it freehand. haha.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 23:29 GMT
#16
Not a problem! Glad I could help.
Ah, okay, I didn't know that blogging it would be fine. =)
Yeah, I remember when the crackdowns started happening. Those were still back in my lurker days.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 23:34 GMT
#17
By the way, I forgot to put in the second term in this line:

\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)
= \frac{\partial}{\partial u} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial}{\partial v} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}

My mistake. If you want to see why, just pretend that expression inside of the bracket is a function called H. Well, it depends on x and y or u and v. So if you want to split the derivative of H wrt x into a partial wrt u then you'll have to do it wrt v as well since x depends on both u and v.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
Nytefish
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United Kingdom4282 Posts
May 21 2010 23:38 GMT
#18
lol I was so confused and thought I had forgotten how to do the chain rule until that post^
No I'm never serious.
Oxygen
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
Canada3581 Posts
May 21 2010 23:39 GMT
#19
ah that makes way more sense. also I imagine the last partial is dv/dx not du/dx?
Dont drink and derive. TSL: Made with Balls.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 23:44:08
May 21 2010 23:42 GMT
#20
Yes, you're right, my mistake again, I copied and pasted it. =)
It's hard to read latex code if you're not being careful.

EDIT:
For anyone who is following this discussion, the correct latex code is:

\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)
= \frac{\partial}{\partial u} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial}{\partial v} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right) \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
Oxygen
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
Canada3581 Posts
May 22 2010 00:09 GMT
#21
so I assume a full solution would be fairly long and messy? I'm still boggling my way through the algebra, trying to use Maple but not having much success
Dont drink and derive. TSL: Made with Balls.
Nytefish
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United Kingdom4282 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-22 00:24:31
May 22 2010 00:23 GMT
#22
It's not that bad as long as you don't substitute stuff in until the very last possible moment. And by the time you are substituting stuff you only need to look at the numerators - make sure all your stuff is over (x^2+y^2)^2.

When cancelling the mixed partials, make sure you take all of them from both d^2G/dx^2 and d^2G/dy^2 and write your expressions like dv/dy=-du/dx
No I'm never serious.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
Patches' TLMC21 Bash #2
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft446
Nathanias 103
Ketroc 15
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 14542
Artosis 582
Backho 127
NaDa 16
Light 0
Counter-Strike
fl0m416
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox162
Other Games
summit1g6326
Grubby2592
shahzam704
C9.Mang0358
Skadoodle174
Maynarde139
fpsfer 1
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick920
BasetradeTV31
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta77
• Hupsaiya 67
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV118
Other Games
• Scarra138
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
9h 32m
Soma vs Bisu
OSC
13h 32m
OSC
17h 32m
MaxPax vs Gerald
Solar vs Krystianer
PAPI vs Lemon
Ryung vs Moja
Nice vs NightPhoenix
Cham vs TBD
MaNa vs TriGGeR
PiGosaur Monday
23h 32m
OSC
1d 22h
The PondCast
2 days
OSC
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
Safe House 2
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Safe House 2
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.