• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 06:26
CET 12:26
KST 20:26
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT28Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Feb 16-22): MaxPax doubles0Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0247LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)46Weekly Cups (Feb 2-8): Classic, Solar, MaxPax win2
StarCraft 2
General
How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book
Tourneys
PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) SEL Doubles (SC Evo Bimonthly) WardiTV Team League Season 10 RSL Season 4 announced for March-April The Dave Testa Open #11
Strategy
Custom Maps
Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026] Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare Mutation # 512 Overclocked
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion TvZ is the most complete match up Soma Explains: JD's Unrelenting Aggro vs FlaSh CasterMuse Youtube ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/02
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 [LIVE] [S:21] ASL Season Open Day 1
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Path of Exile Beyond All Reason New broswer game : STG-World
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread Mexico's Drug War Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
YOUTUBE VIDEO
XenOsky
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Inside the Communication of …
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2032 users

math help?

Blogs > Oxygen
Post a Reply
Normal
Oxygen
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
Canada3581 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 22:26:46
May 21 2010 22:18 GMT
#1
trying to remember some math and I don't know why this isn't working

given

[image loading]


show that

[image loading]



we differentiate G with respect to x

[image loading]


now I would think the previous step is correct, but then when I differentiate Gx (first derivative of G with respect to x) a second time I get a pretty big expression and I can't reduce it all. I think I'm already making a mistake somewhere... if someone could just tell me if the following expression is correct, I can do the rest

[image loading]



thoughts?


*
Dont drink and derive. TSL: Made with Balls.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 22:28 GMT
#2
In your original line, G(x, y) = F(\frac{x}{x^{2} + y^{2}}, \frac{y}{x^{2} + y^{2}}),
is it implied that
u = \frac{x}{x^{2} + y^{2}}
and
v = \frac{y}{x^{2} + y^{2}}

or is it that x and y are functions of u and v? I'll work on this but I don't want to put any effort in until this is clarified.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
Oxygen
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
Canada3581 Posts
May 21 2010 22:33 GMT
#3
that's the thing, I'm uncertain, that's how the question is worded. before you get to work on it let me do it with u = \frac{x} ...
sec
Dont drink and derive. TSL: Made with Balls.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 22:41 GMT
#4
Well, I went ahead and worked it out.
If G(x, y) = F(u, v) the way that you have it defined above, then when you go to calculate,
\frac{\partial^{2} G}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} G}{\partial y^{2}}
the mixed partials will cancel and then you'll have
\frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial y^{2}} multiplied by a common multiple that can be factored out... which will result in 0.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
Rkie
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States1278 Posts
May 21 2010 22:48 GMT
#5
what does the backwards 6 mean?
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 22:52 GMT
#6
It means "a partial derivative with respect to"
so in the above case,
it says that G is a function of both x and y and to take two derivatives of G with respect to only x while keeping y constant and summing that with the second partial derivative of G with respect to only y while keeping x constant. This sum is supposed to be equal to 0 which it turns out is true.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
DeathByMonkeys
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States742 Posts
May 21 2010 22:52 GMT
#7
On May 22 2010 07:48 Rkie wrote:
what does the backwards 6 mean?


Haha, it's the partial derivative.
Rotation
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States118 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 22:53:10
May 21 2010 22:52 GMT
#8
On May 22 2010 07:48 Rkie wrote:
what does the backwards 6 mean?


It's a partial derivative

EDIT: beaten to it.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 22:56 GMT
#9
Also, it's not a backwards 6... hehe.
It's actually the scripted form of the lower case Greek letter delta. It's similar to the use of the upper case Greek delta to mean "change in".
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
DeathByMonkeys
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States742 Posts
May 21 2010 22:59 GMT
#10
On May 22 2010 07:18 Oxygen wrote:
trying to remember some math and I don't know why this isn't working

given

[image loading]


show that

[image loading]



we differentiate G with respect to x

[image loading]


now I would think the previous step is correct, but then when I differentiate Gx (first derivative of G with respect to x) a second time I get a pretty big expression and I can't reduce it all. I think I'm already making a mistake somewhere... if someone could just tell me if the following expression is correct, I can do the rest

[image loading]



thoughts?


Seems to me like it might be some kind of Green's/Stokes' Thm kind of problem. Where when you take y/(x^2 + y^2) with respect to y and you take x/(x^2 + y^2) with respect to x you get the same thing and they cancel. I can't remember what thats called... shit now that's going to bug me.
Oxygen
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
Canada3581 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 23:09:31
May 21 2010 23:06 GMT
#11
On May 22 2010 07:41 kingjames01 wrote:
Well, I went ahead and worked it out.
If G(x, y) = F(u, v) the way that you have it defined above, then when you go to calculate,
\frac{\partial^{2} G}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} G}{\partial y^{2}}
the mixed partials will cancel and then you'll have
\frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial y^{2}} multiplied by a common multiple that can be factored out... which will result in 0.


That's the part I'm not understanding. Given

[image loading]


[image loading]


right?

so
[image loading]
. specifically, how do you differentiate
[image loading]
? Fu is a function of u and v, which are in turn functions of x and y, so do you have to apply the product rule? in which case, what does
[image loading]
yield?


Dont drink and derive. TSL: Made with Balls.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 23:08 GMT
#12
What you're probably remembering is that for any function is at least twice differentiable and continuous, then the mixed partials will always equal.

So, if f is a C^{2} function, ie. f, fx, fy, fxx, fxy, fyx, fyy, then fxy = fyx.
In general this can be extended to higher orders and is not restricted to C^{2}. You would have seen this in courses in Complex Analysis, Differential Equations, Undergrad Mechanics, Undergrad Calc...

Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 23:14 GMT
#13
On May 22 2010 08:06 Oxygen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2010 07:41 kingjames01 wrote:
Well, I went ahead and worked it out.
If G(x, y) = F(u, v) the way that you have it defined above, then when you go to calculate,
\frac{\partial^{2} G}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} G}{\partial y^{2}}
the mixed partials will cancel and then you'll have
\frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial y^{2}} multiplied by a common multiple that can be factored out... which will result in 0.


That's the part I'm not understanding. Given

[image loading]


[image loading]


right?

so
[image loading]





Yes, that's right so far.

Continuing,
\frac{\partial^{2} G}{\partial x^{2}} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)
= \frac{\partial}{\partial u} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}
= \left(\frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial u^{2}} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial u \partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}
= \frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial u^{2}} \left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\right)^{2} + \frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial u \partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}

Do the same thing for the second partial of G wrt y and sum them. Evaluate the partial of u wrt x, u wrt y, v wrt x, v wrt y and when you substitute you'll see some very big simplifications.

Finally, if you are going to continue this you should pm me. Homework threads aren't allowed here. I can latex the solution if you are stuck but this should get you going. Good luck!
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
Oxygen
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
Canada3581 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 23:19:59
May 21 2010 23:15 GMT
#14
took the liberty ... http://www.homeschoolmath.net/worksheets/equation_editor.php

[image loading]


[image loading]


[image loading]


[image loading]


seems like I should be fine from here. thanks a lot for your help.

btw homework threads are generally not allowed when posted in general forum; they're fine in blogs, as long it's not "do my work for me". the huge movement against "homework" threads started a few years back when lots of people used to do that.
Dont drink and derive. TSL: Made with Balls.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 23:18 GMT
#15
Nice! I didn't know that you could convert it online! =)
I'm on my Windows side waiting for the beta to come back online, so I was just typing it freehand. haha.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 23:29 GMT
#16
Not a problem! Glad I could help.
Ah, okay, I didn't know that blogging it would be fine. =)
Yeah, I remember when the crackdowns started happening. Those were still back in my lurker days.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
May 21 2010 23:34 GMT
#17
By the way, I forgot to put in the second term in this line:

\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)
= \frac{\partial}{\partial u} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial}{\partial v} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}

My mistake. If you want to see why, just pretend that expression inside of the bracket is a function called H. Well, it depends on x and y or u and v. So if you want to split the derivative of H wrt x into a partial wrt u then you'll have to do it wrt v as well since x depends on both u and v.
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
Nytefish
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United Kingdom4282 Posts
May 21 2010 23:38 GMT
#18
lol I was so confused and thought I had forgotten how to do the chain rule until that post^
No I'm never serious.
Oxygen
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
Canada3581 Posts
May 21 2010 23:39 GMT
#19
ah that makes way more sense. also I imagine the last partial is dv/dx not du/dx?
Dont drink and derive. TSL: Made with Balls.
kingjames01
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Canada1603 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-21 23:44:08
May 21 2010 23:42 GMT
#20
Yes, you're right, my mistake again, I copied and pasted it. =)
It's hard to read latex code if you're not being careful.

EDIT:
For anyone who is following this discussion, the correct latex code is:

\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)
= \frac{\partial}{\partial u} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right) \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial}{\partial v} \left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right) \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}
Who would sup with the mighty, must walk the path of daggers.
Oxygen
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
Canada3581 Posts
May 22 2010 00:09 GMT
#21
so I assume a full solution would be fairly long and messy? I'm still boggling my way through the algebra, trying to use Maple but not having much success
Dont drink and derive. TSL: Made with Balls.
Nytefish
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United Kingdom4282 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-22 00:24:31
May 22 2010 00:23 GMT
#22
It's not that bad as long as you don't substitute stuff in until the very last possible moment. And by the time you are substituting stuff you only need to look at the numerators - make sure all your stuff is over (x^2+y^2)^2.

When cancelling the mixed partials, make sure you take all of them from both d^2G/dx^2 and d^2G/dy^2 and write your expressions like dv/dy=-du/dx
No I'm never serious.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiG Sty Festival
09:00
PiGFest 7 Playoffs Day 1
Serral vs MaruLIVE!
herO vs Solar
PiGStarcraft1694
ComeBackTV 900
IndyStarCraft 206
BRAT_OK 196
Rex187
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft1694
IndyStarCraft 206
BRAT_OK 196
Rex 187
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 36107
Calm 6347
Sea 4163
Rain 2025
Horang2 1409
GuemChi 1207
Jaedong 846
Stork 457
Light 143
Snow 143
[ Show more ]
Rush 132
ZerO 122
Dewaltoss 98
Larva 93
Pusan 77
ToSsGirL 58
hero 57
Soma 53
Shinee 49
Shine 42
Killer 38
Sharp 33
ZergMaN 30
Barracks 25
Mind 23
Backho 23
yabsab 22
Icarus 18
sorry 17
Hm[arnc] 16
Bale 16
JulyZerg 15
IntoTheRainbow 14
Movie 12
ivOry 5
Dota 2
Gorgc2569
XcaliburYe61
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1788
kRYSTAL_65
Other Games
singsing2629
crisheroes347
B2W.Neo285
Happy130
Fuzer 96
NeuroSwarm48
Mew2King46
QueenE36
ZerO(Twitch)11
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL304
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• iHatsuTV 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt730
Upcoming Events
Big Brain Bouts
5h 34m
Shino vs DnS
SpeCial vs Mixu
TriGGeR vs Cure
Korean StarCraft League
15h 34m
PiG Sty Festival
21h 34m
Reynor vs Clem
ShowTime vs SHIN
CranKy Ducklings
22h 34m
OSC
23h 34m
SC Evo Complete
1d 2h
DaveTesta Events
1d 6h
AI Arena Tournament
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 12h
PiG Sty Festival
1d 21h
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 22h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
KCM Race Survival
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-02-26
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Acropolis #4 - TS5
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026
WardiTV Winter 2026
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025

Upcoming

[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round Qualifier
ASL Season 21: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 21: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.