|
On April 22 2010 13:56 Spazer wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2010 13:46 minus_human wrote:
Just too fucking good.
yeah figures, the moment I decide to go to website, is moment it decides that every1 found it too. I only went there for skilled sc2 player replays. big mistake. just a bunch of noobs in the finals doing play it safe strategies.
Id beat them, but whenever I visualize a great strategy, i end up getting trashed at 4 minutes because his immortal shot my immortal better, or his mutalisks drove faster than my stalkers. Or sometimes, he sends marauders to my base earlier, and nothing i sent at them lasts longer than 3 seconds.
MIGHTY PROTOSS WARRIOR GANG, all blown away like little wimpy idiots. talk about a bunch of losers. I played sc1 today and was shocked when my zealots survived fighting hydralisks. 2 zealots vs 6 hydralisks and they actually killed one. Good luck getting in melee range in time in sc2 before your zealots just clal it quits and leave the battlefield.
I laughed so hard when I read this part. Play it safe strategies? His own great strategies? I don't know why, but "his immortal shot my immortal better" just brings up hilarious imagery. If I didn't know better, I'd say he was trolling. I didn't know mutalisks drove either. 
I didn't know stalkers drove.
|
Jesus, this brings me back to the day when I posted in the bnet d2 trading forums. oh my god i forgot how much i loved the nonsense
|
Oakhill is a pretty obvious troll, but since people fell for it i would give him 5/10, just because its b.net forums and they provide extra lolz
|
Canada8029 Posts
On April 22 2010 15:46 Monoxide wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2010 13:56 Spazer wrote:On April 22 2010 13:46 minus_human wrote:
Just too fucking good.
yeah figures, the moment I decide to go to website, is moment it decides that every1 found it too. I only went there for skilled sc2 player replays. big mistake. just a bunch of noobs in the finals doing play it safe strategies.
Id beat them, but whenever I visualize a great strategy, i end up getting trashed at 4 minutes because his immortal shot my immortal better, or his mutalisks drove faster than my stalkers. Or sometimes, he sends marauders to my base earlier, and nothing i sent at them lasts longer than 3 seconds.
MIGHTY PROTOSS WARRIOR GANG, all blown away like little wimpy idiots. talk about a bunch of losers. I played sc1 today and was shocked when my zealots survived fighting hydralisks. 2 zealots vs 6 hydralisks and they actually killed one. Good luck getting in melee range in time in sc2 before your zealots just clal it quits and leave the battlefield.
I laughed so hard when I read this part. Play it safe strategies? His own great strategies? I don't know why, but "his immortal shot my immortal better" just brings up hilarious imagery. If I didn't know better, I'd say he was trolling. I didn't know mutalisks drove either. I didn't know stalkers drove.
Of course stalkers drive. Cities are too big to stalk people on foot these days.
|
On April 22 2010 17:01 Spazer wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2010 15:46 Monoxide wrote:On April 22 2010 13:56 Spazer wrote:On April 22 2010 13:46 minus_human wrote:
Just too fucking good.
yeah figures, the moment I decide to go to website, is moment it decides that every1 found it too. I only went there for skilled sc2 player replays. big mistake. just a bunch of noobs in the finals doing play it safe strategies.
Id beat them, but whenever I visualize a great strategy, i end up getting trashed at 4 minutes because his immortal shot my immortal better, or his mutalisks drove faster than my stalkers. Or sometimes, he sends marauders to my base earlier, and nothing i sent at them lasts longer than 3 seconds.
MIGHTY PROTOSS WARRIOR GANG, all blown away like little wimpy idiots. talk about a bunch of losers. I played sc1 today and was shocked when my zealots survived fighting hydralisks. 2 zealots vs 6 hydralisks and they actually killed one. Good luck getting in melee range in time in sc2 before your zealots just clal it quits and leave the battlefield.
I laughed so hard when I read this part. Play it safe strategies? His own great strategies? I don't know why, but "his immortal shot my immortal better" just brings up hilarious imagery. If I didn't know better, I'd say he was trolling. I didn't know mutalisks drove either. I didn't know stalkers drove. Of course stalkers drive. Cities are too big to stalk people on foot these days.
How would you know? There can't be any Canadian stalkers on TL. Stalkers have to wake up really early, and we need to stay up late to watch our Pro games -.-
|
United States10328 Posts
HAHAHA OAKHILL
tied for most epic troll with tdot
|
On April 22 2010 13:03 kNyTTyM wrote:
lol Oakhill
:D
|
On April 22 2010 13:23 ramen247 wrote:
w00t Oakhill.
You know, Oakhill is kind of right. All I see now is single digit posters posting random irrelevant stuff in Strategy forums and the vitality of TL.net has just been sapped. The wave of new members is just too sudden and large.
So many noobs here now... which wouldn't be a bad thing except they have a tendency to post retarded one line 4chan jokes. There is just too much horrible posting to wade through in order to get to the good stuff anymore.
|
On April 22 2010 14:52 paper wrote:Show nested quote +Meatwagondriver
yeah figures, the moment I decide to go to website, is moment it decides that every1 found it too. I only went there for skilled sc2 player replays. big mistake. just a bunch of noobs in the finals doing play it safe strategies.
Id beat them, but whenever I visualize a great strategy, i end up getting trashed at 4 minutes because his immortal shot my immortal better, or his mutalisks drove faster than my stalkers. Or sometimes, he sends marauders to my base earlier, and nothing i sent at them lasts longer than 3 seconds.
MIGHTY PROTOSS WARRIOR GANG, all blown away like little wimpy idiots. talk about a bunch of losers. I played sc1 today and was shocked when my zealots survived fighting hydralisks. 2 zealots vs 6 hydralisks and they actually killed one. Good luck getting in melee range in time in sc2 before your zealots just clal it quits and leave the battlefield. lol i love it when people have a "great strategy" but it's the game's fault when they can't win with it
To sum up Meatwagondriver's point.
"I come up with great strategies that would win me tournaments but my units always die because of bad luck or something like that." This guy sounds like he's a bitter copper player.
|
fuckin oakhill bra rock on
|
I just find it ironic it was posted on the Bnet forums, of all places.
|
I love your icon on the bnet forum.
|
FuDDx
United States5008 Posts
On April 22 2010 18:56 GunSlinger wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2010 13:23 ramen247 wrote:
w00t Oakhill.
You know, Oakhill is kind of right. All I see now is single digit posters posting random irrelevant stuff in Strategy forums and the vitality of TL.net has just been sapped. The wave of new members is just too sudden and large. So many noobs here now... which wouldn't be a bad thing except they have a tendency to post retarded one line 4chan jokes. There is just too much horrible posting to wade through in order to get to the good stuff anymore.
so help some posters? show them the way? make this the site you want it to be maybe make a contribution or offer help?
I am not a great poster but I feel welcome and at home here for the past 8+ years or so.Its the people who make the site (and theyr willingness to help/grow said site) One day that 18 post noob will learn how to post better learn some sort of real worold or interwebz skill you will want or could use help with....ramble ramlbe lets help these new guys at least untill we HAVE to kick them out.
Sorry the Point is that when I started here My posting was not great I used tons of kekekeke and kakaka and "sounded" worse for no spell check and talking to people about what I thought they wanted to talk about. there is no way I could get to number one blogger(woot) without "growing up" here and learning about this site these people and more important myself.
I real;ly hope I make some sense?
|
Calgary25977 Posts
LOL you guys are succumbing to nostalgia. Seriously. Read the old threads before "all the newbs came in" and they were 100x shittier than the content now. And read the threads a generation before that when people were claiming "the good old days" and they are basically unreadable. TL is better than ever.
|
On April 23 2010 00:18 Chill wrote:
LOL you guys are succumbing to nostalgia. Seriously. Read the old threads before "all the newbs came in" and they were 100x shittier than the content now. And read the threads a generation before that when people were claiming "the good old days" and they are basically unreadable. TL is better than ever.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=13355
Bcs from two bases are great you just need a couple of valks if he switchs to wraiths. Ask GTR.
Seriously i love to read the old threads.
|
|
|
I think TL:s forum design is a bit so-so as well but the content is better than any other SC site out there.
|
I browse a couple of different forums ( mostly hardware / sports / games ) and i think that the design of TL is the best.
It is clean, clear, simple but with a ton of infos at the same time and with only a small ad banner.
Just make a comparison with gosugamers ( mass flashy ads, messy etc ... )
|
On April 23 2010 00:18 Chill wrote:
LOL you guys are succumbing to nostalgia. Seriously. Read the old threads before "all the newbs came in" and they were 100x shittier than the content now. And read the threads a generation before that when people were claiming "the good old days" and they are basically unreadable. TL is better than ever.
This is exactly what was being discussed before. Chill is basically daring you suckers to question him so he can ban you
|
I don't see how they can say the layout is terrible, it's so unbelievably convenient and easy on the eyes.
Word on the street is that CVG has best site layout amirite?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
