EPTEverything we can see is made of atoms. Everything we can see run under the rule of gravity. We figured everything out, we even used our knowledge about matters and rule of gravity to put people on moon for no purpose other than "ya we can do that". That was almost a century ago.
Then 2 smart asses from Princeton came along trying to figure out how much matter there is in the entire universe by using computer modeling of the universe. (Let's just say for the sake of argument that the data they use as input mainly velocity and mass for their modeling is verified by 300 other smart asses) After they input the data, their computer model kept telling them that the speed at which the stars are moving, will lead to orbit escape velocities from the center of their galaxies. And the galaxies should have never formed in the first place. (but in reality we have galaxies all over the universe) So that suggests 2 possible errors 1) the data they input is wrong. 2) their understand of gravity is wrong. How can Newton be wrong about Gravity? We put people on the bloody moon for crying out loud because of his understand of gravity. over 300 other smart asses out there all agree on the data they have inputed in the computer model saying it is correct. Well then, what can be done? They decided to run their program backward, they input what they see in a galaxy (the stars velocities and their orbit) and let the program calculate the mass. What they found was the mass required for the velocities they see the stars orbiting the center of the galaxies is vastly larger than what they can measure (how do they measure what they can measure? I don't know someone tell me plz
) in fact what they can measure (aka what we can see also aka matters, also aka stuffs made of atoms) only consist of 4% of that total mass calculated by the computer program. They call the 96% missing mass dark matter. ( I hope they check the code for their program at least 100times before they made this decision ) There was another asshole back in 1930s (no not Einstin) who likes to look at stars and galaxies, and he observed that the galaxies should not be moving in the patterns they are with the observable mass that they have. And because this asshole's arrogance knew no bounds everybody hated him a little more than the rest of the assholes so what he found was completely ignored. Especially when an arrogant asshole says "you are wrong and i'm right, and i got the evidence to prove it!" the rest of his colleagues told him to go fuck himself with his evidence.
The 2 assholes from Princeton want to tell everybody their findings, but they need to have someone who agree with them, well they can't find anyone alive at the time. so they start looking for the dead guys, and they happened to came upon that arrogant asshole's work. (Well could all 3 of these assholes be wrong? possibly but the 2 assholes that are still live can always blame it on the asshole that's been dead for a while if they are proven wrong later
)When they published their findings of this matter (matter get it? haha) the rest of the smart asses said to them "roflmao, we can't disprove it because of your evidence, but we still roflmao at your asses for comming up with something so ridiculous" No one was taking them seriously.
Then came along this sexy mom with 4 kids. She said the rule of gravity dictates that orbital velocity decreases as the distance increases from the center of the orbit. Take our solar system for example
![[image loading]](http://img36.imageshack.us/i/voverd.jpg/)
If you put the data of each planets' orbital velocity and distance from the sun on a graph it will look something like the above graph. It makes sense, the further you travel from the sun, the weaker you feel its gravity, and the slower you will move. Well galaxies have to work the same way if rule of gravity applies everywhere in the entire universe. When She look outside of our solar system, in the the scale of stars orbiting around a blackhole to form galaxies. to her surprise the graph looked something like this.
![[image loading]](http://img515.imageshack.us/i/starandbhg.jpg/)
Velocity is constant as distance increase!(increment in terms of 10s of light years) The stars are moving way too fast, the stars near the center blackhole and the stars near the edge of the galaxies are moving in about the same speed, yet they are light years apart. If the law of gravity is correct the outer stars should have escaped the orbits long ago. So if we want to savior Sir Newton's legacy then the observed mass has to be assumed wrong. (Question: Why couldn't the extra mass be inside the blackhole???? instead of in form of dark matter. since they can't see the blackhole how do they figure out how much mass is in the blackhole? ) When this hot mama publish her work, everybody took her seriously. (why her but not the other 2 assholes before her? isn't it obvious? she's 10/10 ? ) In the words of one of her colleague "Her image is stunning"
So finally everybody agree that there is missing mass, and they would call it dark matter, and everybody and their mother would rush to find this dark matter, since it is consist of 96% of our universe's mass it shouldn't be that hard to find them now would it? Well how do you find it? hm... let's see, first we can't see it because it is dark, hence the name dark matter (rofl) 2nd it has mass, since it attracts stars to keep a galaxy together while its stars moving at high speed (oh wait a minute, if our solar system doesn't feel the same effect as the larger scale galaxies feel, and our pulto moves a lot slower than mercury doesn't that mean there is no fucking dark matter anywhere near our solar system??????? could it be that all the extra 96% mass is inside the fucking blackhole? and there is no such thing as dark matter after all?) 3) the dark matters are not compose of atoms. They look and look, for many years, they found nothing, no evidence. The next best thing they can do is use their imagination to project what the dark matter would look like, and estimate how much of them could be around. Even their imagination fell short by around 80% of the total missing mass ( really? we call imagination without evidence in science now? Can someone show me some logical details on these imaginations???) But anyways with their best shot, they logically deduced 20% of the total missing mass is dark matter, together with the 4% normal matter they are still missing about 75% (someone on this field please tell me how they deduce that 20% dark matter? how did they come up with the 20%?)
And then the smart asses from UCB try to measure how fast the universe was expanding,they expected the result is "expansion of the universe is slowing down". But what they found was that the expanding universe is speeding up! They can't explain this shit with the current theories of physics, why the fuck would the expansion speed up instead of slow down? what can defy gravity? Well at least they can measure the acceleration and from that estimate the amount of energy required for this acceleration. E=mc^2 they convert this E to mass it matches the 75% of the missing mass!!!!!!! So they call it the dark energy. ( let me get this straight, they imagined that 20% dark matter, and then the new finding on the expanding universe proved their logic right by coming up with the exact match for the rest of the missing mass of the universe???? (EXACT MATCH?????????, I thought it was a fucking estimate????? Someone give me some numbers plz!!! Am i just going to have to take the words of all these assholes who stare on the telescope all day???)
4% atoms, 21% dark matters and 75% dark energy. Tell me how we get that, someone give me some data!!
4% regular matter
How do you figure out how much light matter there is in a galaxy? how do you measure mass by just staring on them with a telescope?
21% dark matter
can someone please tell me how they deduce this number from no evidence???? and then just happened to get an exact match from something totally unrelated and wasn't even looking for dark matter to begin with?
75% dark energy
ok, Doppler effect of wave lengths is evidences that proves galaxies are speeding up, the acceleration can be measured by the red shift in wavelength. Which suppose to lead to the energy it required to cause the expansion. Can someone tell me which formula they use to derive energy from acceleration? And once they find the energy they use E=MC^2 to figure out the mass. Which is exactly 75% of the total mass of the universe.
Ok operation answer my questions ppl
This is not a homework thread, this is a discussion of theoretical physics. Let's have fun, and show me some formulaZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
