|
Dude what's the deal with bunkers they so imba rapin' everything that gets near them and shit and medics make marines invincible with infinite stim so imba guys so imba bunker rush imba 2rax imba deep six imba ayumi build imba spark rush imba mech imba factory first imba vult drop imba cliff tanks imba valks imba bachanic imba imba imba imba imba.
|
On September 18 2009 04:43 koreasilver wrote:
Dude what's the deal with bunkers they so imba rapin' everything that gets near them and shit and medics make marines invincible with infinite stim so imba guys so imba bunker rush imba 2rax imba deep six imba ayumi build imba spark rush imba mech imba factory first imba vult drop imba cliff tanks imba valks imba bachanic imba imba imba imba imba.
You forgot to make a huge rant about how mech TvZ is imba. And how Zerg is the weakest race in Starcraft because OSL and MSL finals were both ZvZ, and how Battle Royal is the only fair map except it's not because Protoss is ez race even on Battle Royal.
|
Man, Tears of the Moon was so balanced, Protoss be bitchin'; Bisu is a noob.
|
whats with all the hate? Lovely op, I like it fresh!
|
Looked up imba in a dictionary and this is what I saw:
|
On September 18 2009 04:31 Caller wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2009 04:23 AzureEye wrote:On September 18 2009 04:13 koreasilver wrote:
Someone should make a thread that chronicles every single dogmatic, anti-Terran post that AzureEye makes because some of the things he says are just hilariously absurd, and because he often brings up the same arguments all the time although they have continuously been disproved by numerous members over the past 10 months of his existence on this forum. Yes they are same arguments, if you haven't read my post up there, I clearly stated myself that I was bringing it up again, thank you Captain Obvious? Btw, which member disproved what I just said now about Stork's remark? And btw, you label my content as dogmatic, and indeed they are, but what I posted on this thread were objective facts combined with my subjective views (Am I wrong for saying SCV's health = 60? Because last time I checked it really was.) And my post was a response to his thread that started the race flame and was frustrated someone was Toss-bashing again (which is extremely popular), thus, is it not justified to defend my race? Lets discuss about how you have a vendetta against me and track me down, grow the fuck up please, just because I called you out on your bashful attitude against helpless strategy newbies and your unjustified bitchy attitude for people just seeking help hey dickwad get your protossphilic nonsense out of my thread im an equal opportunity discriminator. i dont want to hear your crap about vultures being cheap and scvs having 60hp, because you know just as well as i do that protoss have cloaked 40 damage units, zealots that are unkillable, carriers, arbiters, templars, and reavers, and the best static defense in the game (cannons). Terrans are imba with long range tanks, vulture mines, and irradiate vessels. Zergs are imba with defilers, cows, and mutalisk harass is ridiculous. every single race is imba one way or the other. if you actually bothered to read the other thread where i made fun of terrans for turreting like whores and the like, then you would understand. instead you put all this crap out here in a thread thats supposed to be light-hearted and fun. this isn't the strategy section, this is my blog, and zergs will get discriminated next. so stfu and go back to 1a2a3aing your way to victory. edit: oh i banned you from the blog until this particular game ends edit2: oh and from now on this protoss player (you) will be Azureeye. This is my blog, i do what I want. edit3: im unbanning you cuz koreasilver is just as bad and itd be a double standard
If you're an equal opportunity discriminator, isn't it fair for someone to counter-bash on Terrans when you obviously bash on Toss? Hypocrite
@Koreasilver, good job on the sarcasm, I loved it. It doesn't change your ass attitude on the forums though. I may be an idiot for expressing my opinions so relentlessly but at least I don't target my insults to users and call them names, I just get frustrated over the situation. FYI, SCV life wasn't raised because they had to sit around to make buildings; they have repair for that. It was actually raised cuz of cheap cost of pool allowed Z to get early lings and they wanted some form of protection against that.
Hmm Protoss is imba because they have massive life zealot and their goons are so strong they can 1 shot kill everything. Wow cannons are so good they attack ground and air lols. Lets not forget the fact that Storm kills everything and Arbiter is like hack. DTs? Fuck that what a cheap unit
|
On September 18 2009 04:23 AzureEye wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2009 04:13 koreasilver wrote:
Someone should make a thread that chronicles every single dogmatic, anti-Terran post that AzureEye makes because some of the things he says are just hilariously absurd, and because he often brings up the same arguments all the time although they have continuously been disproved by numerous members over the past 10 months of his existence on this forum. Yes they are same arguments, if you haven't read my post up there, I clearly stated myself that I was bringing it up again, thank you Captain Obvious? Btw, which member disproved what I just said now about Stork's remark? And btw, you label my content as dogmatic, and indeed they are, but what I posted on this thread were objective facts combined with my subjective views (Am I wrong for saying SCV's health = 60? Because last time I checked it really was.) And my post was a response to his thread that started the race flame and was frustrated someone was Toss-bashing again (which is extremely popular), thus, is it not justified to defend my race? Lets discuss about how you have a vendetta against me and track me down, grow the fuck up please, just because I called you out on your bashful attitude against helpless strategy newbies and your unjustified bitchy attitude for people just seeking help
there's a reason scvs have 60 health they don't regenerate and they have the shortest range and they can't build a building then go back and mine they have to sit there and watch as the probe pounds away on it.
|
On September 18 2009 05:47 AzureEye wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2009 04:31 Caller wrote:On September 18 2009 04:23 AzureEye wrote:On September 18 2009 04:13 koreasilver wrote:
Someone should make a thread that chronicles every single dogmatic, anti-Terran post that AzureEye makes because some of the things he says are just hilariously absurd, and because he often brings up the same arguments all the time although they have continuously been disproved by numerous members over the past 10 months of his existence on this forum. Yes they are same arguments, if you haven't read my post up there, I clearly stated myself that I was bringing it up again, thank you Captain Obvious? Btw, which member disproved what I just said now about Stork's remark? And btw, you label my content as dogmatic, and indeed they are, but what I posted on this thread were objective facts combined with my subjective views (Am I wrong for saying SCV's health = 60? Because last time I checked it really was.) And my post was a response to his thread that started the race flame and was frustrated someone was Toss-bashing again (which is extremely popular), thus, is it not justified to defend my race? Lets discuss about how you have a vendetta against me and track me down, grow the fuck up please, just because I called you out on your bashful attitude against helpless strategy newbies and your unjustified bitchy attitude for people just seeking help hey dickwad get your protossphilic nonsense out of my thread im an equal opportunity discriminator. i dont want to hear your crap about vultures being cheap and scvs having 60hp, because you know just as well as i do that protoss have cloaked 40 damage units, zealots that are unkillable, carriers, arbiters, templars, and reavers, and the best static defense in the game (cannons). Terrans are imba with long range tanks, vulture mines, and irradiate vessels. Zergs are imba with defilers, cows, and mutalisk harass is ridiculous. every single race is imba one way or the other. if you actually bothered to read the other thread where i made fun of terrans for turreting like whores and the like, then you would understand. instead you put all this crap out here in a thread thats supposed to be light-hearted and fun. this isn't the strategy section, this is my blog, and zergs will get discriminated next. so stfu and go back to 1a2a3aing your way to victory. edit: oh i banned you from the blog until this particular game ends edit2: oh and from now on this protoss player (you) will be Azureeye. This is my blog, i do what I want. edit3: im unbanning you cuz koreasilver is just as bad and itd be a double standard If you're an equal opportunity discriminator, isn't it fair for someone to counter-bash on Terrans when you obviously bash on Toss? Hypocrite @Koreasilver, good job on the sarcasm, I loved it. It doesn't change your ass attitude on the forums though. I may be an idiot for expressing my opinions so relentlessly but at least I don't target my insults to users and call them names, I just get frustrated over the situation. FYI, SCV life wasn't raised because they had to sit around to make buildings; they have repair for that. It was actually raised cuz of cheap cost of pool allowed Z to get early lings and they wanted some form of protection against that. Hmm Protoss is imba because they have massive life zealot and their goons are so strong they can 1 shot kill everything. Wow cannons are so good they attack ground and air lols. Lets not forget the fact that Storm kills everything and Arbiter is like hack. DTs? Fuck that what a cheap unit
no, it's not, because i already bashed on terrans and about to bash on zerg, whereas you only bashed on terrans and claim protoss is fine. you're exhibiting bias. i'm discriminating against everything.
also, it's time for the next post.
|
United States10774 Posts
On September 18 2009 04:06 AzureEye wrote:
Whats wrong with OP and calling Toss low dignity and race flaming? Do you REALLY want to start another race war? Should I start again with how much health SCV has? How cost efficient Vultures are? Lets talk about the fact that mines cost nothing
A progamer called Stork said in a public broadcasted show that Vultures are too cheap for its cost and should only come with 1 mine. This is coming from arguably best PvT'er.
just don't worry about it. it's usually D/D- rank zerg/terran users finding excuses for why they are so terrible at the game lol
they don't wanna admit they are just plain bad
|
cyber so i can dt him with my below the floor dignity
|
On September 18 2009 06:05 OneOther wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2009 04:06 AzureEye wrote:
Whats wrong with OP and calling Toss low dignity and race flaming? Do you REALLY want to start another race war? Should I start again with how much health SCV has? How cost efficient Vultures are? Lets talk about the fact that mines cost nothing
A progamer called Stork said in a public broadcasted show that Vultures are too cheap for its cost and should only come with 1 mine. This is coming from arguably best PvT'er. just don't worry about it. it's usually D/D- rank zerg/terran users finding excuses for why they are so terrible at the game lol they don't wanna admit they are just plain bad
shh
|
On September 18 2009 06:05 OneOther wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2009 04:06 AzureEye wrote:
Whats wrong with OP and calling Toss low dignity and race flaming? Do you REALLY want to start another race war? Should I start again with how much health SCV has? How cost efficient Vultures are? Lets talk about the fact that mines cost nothing
A progamer called Stork said in a public broadcasted show that Vultures are too cheap for its cost and should only come with 1 mine. This is coming from arguably best PvT'er. just don't worry about it. it's usually D/D- rank zerg/terran users finding excuses for why they are so terrible at the game lol they don't wanna admit they are just plain bad
He's claiming terran imba.
|
United States10774 Posts
On September 18 2009 06:09 d(O.o)a wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2009 06:05 OneOther wrote:On September 18 2009 04:06 AzureEye wrote:
Whats wrong with OP and calling Toss low dignity and race flaming? Do you REALLY want to start another race war? Should I start again with how much health SCV has? How cost efficient Vultures are? Lets talk about the fact that mines cost nothing
A progamer called Stork said in a public broadcasted show that Vultures are too cheap for its cost and should only come with 1 mine. This is coming from arguably best PvT'er. just don't worry about it. it's usually D/D- rank zerg/terran users finding excuses for why they are so terrible at the game lol they don't wanna admit they are just plain bad He's claiming terran imba.
in that case he's a D rank protoss complaining about terran ;D
|
On September 18 2009 05:47 AzureEye wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2009 04:31 Caller wrote:On September 18 2009 04:23 AzureEye wrote:On September 18 2009 04:13 koreasilver wrote:
Someone should make a thread that chronicles every single dogmatic, anti-Terran post that AzureEye makes because some of the things he says are just hilariously absurd, and because he often brings up the same arguments all the time although they have continuously been disproved by numerous members over the past 10 months of his existence on this forum. Yes they are same arguments, if you haven't read my post up there, I clearly stated myself that I was bringing it up again, thank you Captain Obvious? Btw, which member disproved what I just said now about Stork's remark? And btw, you label my content as dogmatic, and indeed they are, but what I posted on this thread were objective facts combined with my subjective views (Am I wrong for saying SCV's health = 60? Because last time I checked it really was.) And my post was a response to his thread that started the race flame and was frustrated someone was Toss-bashing again (which is extremely popular), thus, is it not justified to defend my race? Lets discuss about how you have a vendetta against me and track me down, grow the fuck up please, just because I called you out on your bashful attitude against helpless strategy newbies and your unjustified bitchy attitude for people just seeking help hey dickwad get your protossphilic nonsense out of my thread im an equal opportunity discriminator. i dont want to hear your crap about vultures being cheap and scvs having 60hp, because you know just as well as i do that protoss have cloaked 40 damage units, zealots that are unkillable, carriers, arbiters, templars, and reavers, and the best static defense in the game (cannons). Terrans are imba with long range tanks, vulture mines, and irradiate vessels. Zergs are imba with defilers, cows, and mutalisk harass is ridiculous. every single race is imba one way or the other. if you actually bothered to read the other thread where i made fun of terrans for turreting like whores and the like, then you would understand. instead you put all this crap out here in a thread thats supposed to be light-hearted and fun. this isn't the strategy section, this is my blog, and zergs will get discriminated next. so stfu and go back to 1a2a3aing your way to victory. edit: oh i banned you from the blog until this particular game ends edit2: oh and from now on this protoss player (you) will be Azureeye. This is my blog, i do what I want. edit3: im unbanning you cuz koreasilver is just as bad and itd be a double standard If you're an equal opportunity discriminator, isn't it fair for someone to counter-bash on Terrans when you obviously bash on Toss? Hypocrite @Koreasilver, good job on the sarcasm, I loved it. It doesn't change your ass attitude on the forums though. I may be an idiot for expressing my opinions so relentlessly but at least I don't target my insults to users and call them names, I just get frustrated over the situation.
Aren't you the guy that pm'ed me telling me to commit suicide and went off about you're disappointed about a Korean brother etc. etc.?
I mean lol okay bro.
edit: Also, I have no idea where you got the idea that SCVs only had 60hp due to 150min spawning pools. Good job on completely disregarding that SCVs don't heal like probes and drones, and that repair costs resources to use.
|
On September 18 2009 06:18 koreasilver wrote:Show nested quote +On September 18 2009 05:47 AzureEye wrote:On September 18 2009 04:31 Caller wrote:On September 18 2009 04:23 AzureEye wrote:On September 18 2009 04:13 koreasilver wrote:
Someone should make a thread that chronicles every single dogmatic, anti-Terran post that AzureEye makes because some of the things he says are just hilariously absurd, and because he often brings up the same arguments all the time although they have continuously been disproved by numerous members over the past 10 months of his existence on this forum. Yes they are same arguments, if you haven't read my post up there, I clearly stated myself that I was bringing it up again, thank you Captain Obvious? Btw, which member disproved what I just said now about Stork's remark? And btw, you label my content as dogmatic, and indeed they are, but what I posted on this thread were objective facts combined with my subjective views (Am I wrong for saying SCV's health = 60? Because last time I checked it really was.) And my post was a response to his thread that started the race flame and was frustrated someone was Toss-bashing again (which is extremely popular), thus, is it not justified to defend my race? Lets discuss about how you have a vendetta against me and track me down, grow the fuck up please, just because I called you out on your bashful attitude against helpless strategy newbies and your unjustified bitchy attitude for people just seeking help hey dickwad get your protossphilic nonsense out of my thread im an equal opportunity discriminator. i dont want to hear your crap about vultures being cheap and scvs having 60hp, because you know just as well as i do that protoss have cloaked 40 damage units, zealots that are unkillable, carriers, arbiters, templars, and reavers, and the best static defense in the game (cannons). Terrans are imba with long range tanks, vulture mines, and irradiate vessels. Zergs are imba with defilers, cows, and mutalisk harass is ridiculous. every single race is imba one way or the other. if you actually bothered to read the other thread where i made fun of terrans for turreting like whores and the like, then you would understand. instead you put all this crap out here in a thread thats supposed to be light-hearted and fun. this isn't the strategy section, this is my blog, and zergs will get discriminated next. so stfu and go back to 1a2a3aing your way to victory. edit: oh i banned you from the blog until this particular game ends edit2: oh and from now on this protoss player (you) will be Azureeye. This is my blog, i do what I want. edit3: im unbanning you cuz koreasilver is just as bad and itd be a double standard If you're an equal opportunity discriminator, isn't it fair for someone to counter-bash on Terrans when you obviously bash on Toss? Hypocrite @Koreasilver, good job on the sarcasm, I loved it. It doesn't change your ass attitude on the forums though. I may be an idiot for expressing my opinions so relentlessly but at least I don't target my insults to users and call them names, I just get frustrated over the situation. Aren't you the guy that pm'ed me telling me to commit suicide and went off about you're disappointed about a Korean brother etc. etc.? I mean lol okay bro. edit: Also, I have no idea where you got the idea that SCVs only had 60hp due to 150min spawning pools. Good job on completely disregarding that SCVs don't heal like probes and drones, and that repair costs resources to use.
and scvs have to sit around while they build something.
also if it was because of 150 mineral spawning pool wouldn't probes have 60 health too?
|
ITT: fuckwads like caller making Terran look bad.
|
|
|
wtf why are we not making a forge? we need to cannon this bitch
|
United States11393 Posts
On September 18 2009 06:44 Sentenal wrote:
wtf why are we not making a forge? we need to cannon this bitch
That's what the manner pylon is for imo.
|
Lolblog!
Also, I am missing the "Create a shitty blog" option in your poll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://classic.battle.net/images/battle/scc/terran/pix/Tank2.jpg)
