WCSI'm so important
TLnet Poll - What do you think about the return of Extende…
What do you think about the return of Extended Series at MLG? :
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
Antylamon
United States1980 Posts
I'm so important | ||
|
Verator
United States220 Posts
| ||
|
Nuclease
United States1044 Posts
This is why I will not really be watching MLG anymore. Thanks for making my decision easy, Sundance and crew. | ||
|
Deckard.666
147 Posts
I really don't know how can people hate that rule so much when the only thing it does is bring fairness for the players. | ||
banjoetheredskin
United States743 Posts
| ||
|
MajuGarzett
Canada612 Posts
On June 24 2013 12:00 banjoetheredskin wrote: Would someone be kind enough to explain how this extended series works? If two players face each other in the tournament any future encounters between those two players is a best of five starting with the result of the first best of three instead of a regular best of three. | ||
|
Buddy168
United States156 Posts
But not extended series. | ||
|
QCD
Suriname81 Posts
On June 24 2013 11:13 Nuclease wrote: It's like the best of one in OSL. Extended series have been proven time and time again to degrade the quality, integrity, and excitement of tournaments, yet MLG brings them back. This is why I will not really be watching MLG anymore. Thanks for making my decision easy, Sundance and crew. So you're going to completely miss out on MLG because of a bracket style you disagree with? Doubtful, nice bluff however. I think if they're going to do this it should be bo7. | ||
|
Azelja
Japan622 Posts
On June 24 2013 11:20 Deckard.666 wrote: Everyone is going to disapprove w/o knowing it doesn't affect the finals. I really don't know how can people hate that rule so much when the only thing it does is bring fairness for the players. That's highly debated and I don't see the "fairness" in the rule at all, but that's for a different thread. Yes, I know it doesn't affect the finals, still voted for disapprove because the system's bullshit, imo. | ||
|
Tyrran
France652 Posts
 Seriously. | ||
|
Headnoob
Australia1964 Posts
| ||
|
Psychonian
United States2221 Posts
| ||
|
figq
11844 Posts
| ||
|
Greendotz
United Kingdom2041 Posts
| ||
|
LoKi-
United States120 Posts
| ||
|
Ichabod
United States1657 Posts
On June 25 2013 00:50 LoKi- wrote: It's interesting that this is so polarized. I personally don't mind it (I like it, really, but I don't feel too strongly either way). Could somebody please provide me with an argument against it, other than "it's unfair?" Because it seems to me that it's completely fair to retain the previous Bo3's standings when the same players meet again - it encourages solid play throughout the entire Bo3 because even losing 2-1 is better than losing 2-0. It also seems to add some excitement/story to the games when you can tell so clearly that these two players have met before in this tournament, and it actually matters fairly significantly. The argument I frequently hear is that it reduces the level of excitement if it happens in the finals. The finals all of a sudden become slightly less decisive just because the players met in round 1 or something. It is my understanding that the MLG Anaheim bracket will be two 64-man brackets, so an extended series cannot occur in the finals. I am not that opposed to it, but it seems slightly odd for MLG to be so ardently stubborn about it, even though they phased it out of their other games (It hasn't been in their MOBA titles, and I don't think it is in CoD, but I could be wrong on that count.) It is a little bit irritating that MLG doesn't simply state its rationale for extended series, some explanation would undoubtedly be preferable to "blame John Nelson." I think there was a thread a while ago where someone analyzed the statistical effect that extended series has on a bracket. I believe his simulations resulted in the agent with the greatest chance to win, winning more often than without extended series. + Show Spoiler + Something like this: 60-40 players A and B. 36% chance that A wins 2-0, 28.8% that A wins 2-1, 19.2% chance that B wins 2-1, 16% chance that B wins 2-0 | ||
|
DavoS
United States1909 Posts
| ||
|
a9arnn
United States1532 Posts
| ||
|
ValhallaDude
United States23 Posts
If a player beats another player earlier on in the tournament and goes on to win all matches and he faces that player again in the finals, why would it not be an extended series? Why does the player who wins get a double jeopardy and the player who loses get a second chance? We don't try people for the same crime twice. This should be no different. | ||
|
Boucot
France15974 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
