|
On October 11 2016 18:19 Ghostcom wrote:
I think adding a picture of Mr Rogers looking disappointed (GL finding one) to the "reply" screen to that thread would resolve quite a lot of the issues. Hopefully it would remind people that they should be the person Mr Rogers knew they could be and then rethink their posting.
What about putting this in the mod note instead:
+ Show Spoiler +
|
United States43934 Posts
I banned a troll. Judge me if you wish.
|
Looks suspiciously like a Cowboy clone.
|
On October 12 2016 15:40 KwarK wrote:
I banned a troll. Judge me if you wish.
I find your mod note insufficiently entertaining.
|
just when a person starts to ask the tough questions kwark brushes off his gavel
|
So, does the new mod note mean that I can't be as much of a dick to people who start shit with me as I would like? What a buzzkill. And I was looking forward to calling people out on their BS in full asshat mode.
|
I'm not sure i've seen any real difference despite the mod note.
|
On October 13 2016 12:31 zlefin wrote:
I'm not sure i've seen any real difference despite the mod note.
Yeah, I'm unsure why you would update the mod note and not actually enforce it. On any given page since it's update there have been at least 2 personal insults and very little substance overall.
|
Some red text scary person should make a post describing how it will work from now on. The mod note is kind of wishy washy.
|
On October 13 2016 22:10 Ghostcom wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2016 12:31 zlefin wrote:
I'm not sure i've seen any real difference despite the mod note. Yeah, I'm unsure why you would update the mod note and not actually enforce it. On any given page since it's update there have been at least 2 personal insults and very little substance overall.
On August 20 2016 09:58 xDaunt wrote:
Let's just face the facts: TL doesn't moderate liberal shitposts like it moderates conservative shitposts.
|
I guess you'll have to start posting like RealityisKing.
|
If there are any specific posts from liberals you think deserved mod action this would be a good place to discuss them : )
|
On October 13 2016 22:46 Mercy13 wrote:
If there are any specific posts from liberals you think deserved mod action this would be a good place to discuss them : )
The hardest part would simply be to know where to start.
|
On October 13 2016 22:54 LegalLord wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2016 22:46 Mercy13 wrote:
If there are any specific posts from liberals you think deserved mod action this would be a good place to discuss them : ) The hardest part would simply be to know where to start.
As per the mod note, page 5519.
|
On October 13 2016 22:46 Mercy13 wrote:
If there are any specific posts from liberals you think deserved mod action this would be a good place to discuss them : )
On March 13 2016 22:46 GaryJohnson wrote:
Trump's a pussy!
No wait, that was a presidential candidate.
For all the hemming and hawing in the US politics thread, it's still not as bad as our actual politics. As much as some people complain about it, would be funny to imagine them actually having to endure a world where the "moderation" of citizens was as unfair for them as it has always been for so many other groups and individuals.
|
On October 13 2016 22:58 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2016 22:54 LegalLord wrote:On October 13 2016 22:46 Mercy13 wrote:
If there are any specific posts from liberals you think deserved mod action this would be a good place to discuss them : ) The hardest part would simply be to know where to start. As per the mod note, page 5519.
Touche.
I suppose I'll keep an eye out and post anything that seems egregious here.
|
On October 13 2016 22:46 Mercy13 wrote:
If there are any specific posts from liberals you think deserved mod action this would be a good place to discuss them : )
I don't like to bitch, nor do I want to call out specific posters when I know that the mods aren't going to do anything anyway.
|
On October 13 2016 22:46 Mercy13 wrote:
If there are any specific posts from liberals you think deserved mod action this would be a good place to discuss them : )
sometimes it's more certain posters; and a whole lot of low quality posts in general; rather than a single egregious post that sticks out.
|
On October 13 2016 23:00 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2016 22:46 Mercy13 wrote:
If there are any specific posts from liberals you think deserved mod action this would be a good place to discuss them : ) No wait, that was a presidential candidate. For all the hemming and hawing in the US politics thread, it's still not as bad as our actual politics. As much as some people complain about it, would be funny to imagine them actually having to endure a world where the "moderation" of citizens was as unfair for them as it has always been for so many other groups and individuals.
Always a fun day when I can agree with GH for once
|
the problem is that sometimes it just moves way too fast and there are pages of trash to sift through. if i see 300 new posts and i run into a whole page where the only posters are plansix opining and nettles posting trump videos then i get the urge to just skip all 300 and assume i didnt miss anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
