| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
Piste
6183 Posts
On April 27 2010 16:57 Kentor wrote: i noticed that after clicking the # link, the page has to refresh before going to the anchor well that is how the link is provided to the address field  Other way could be a pop up window for the link but I like this better. edit: oh forget what i said. | ||
|
paper
13196 Posts
| ||
|
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
|
konadora
Singapore66364 Posts
 | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10342 Posts
| ||
|
Kentor
United States5784 Posts
On April 27 2010 23:16 R1CH wrote: I did what? it used to refresh the page and then wait a while before go down to the anchor, but now it doesn't do that even though the link in the source didn't change. weird :p edit: actually the page still refreshes if you are on page 1 of any thread and you click on the # link. if you are on page 2 and up there's no refreshing | ||
|
Jonoman92
United States9110 Posts
Maybe it let's the user input 2 page numbers a maximum of 10 pages apart and then shows that block? | ||
|
Kentor
United States5784 Posts
| ||
|
sword_siege
United States624 Posts
On April 28 2010 02:48 Kentor wrote: you guys really dislike pressing next? First let me state I'm a huge fan of Teamliquid.net and all the wonderful work it does for the community. If you want feedback then it would be great if all or view x pages could be implemented as it's awesome for scanning large posts for good posts. Personally, I looked at the micro post (http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=121769¤tpage=last) in the SC2 forum and I didn't want to step through 39 pages (and counting) of replies. I simply wanted to scan the article for the MIR posts as, to me, they have much higher value than a normal user's post and I simply don't want to read 580 normal user posts page by page. In either case, I love TL.net and thank you for all the hard work! | ||
|
Jonoman92
United States9110 Posts
On April 28 2010 02:48 Kentor wrote: you guys really dislike pressing next? Well when a thread has 20+ pages I'm not too fond of constantly having to hit next, I'd rather just have, fewer, longer pages. Especially since I tend to skim through posts and not read every word when I encounter a long thread for the first time. | ||
|
Dreadwave
Netherlands254 Posts
On April 28 2010 06:40 Jonoman92 wrote: Well when a thread has 20+ pages I'm not too fond of constantly having to hit next, I'd rather just have, fewer, longer pages. Especially since I tend to skim through posts and not read every word when I encounter a long thread for the first time. I despise it, if forums give me the option to view more posts per page I always set it to the maximum. I always hit 'all' on threads except for that images one. Having the option to view more than the 20(?) posts per page would be good enough if 'all' takes too much resources. | ||
|
Vasoline73
United States8082 Posts
 . Give the option to true forum veterans with more than 4448 posts obviously.  | ||
|
cyronc
218 Posts
| ||
|
[X]Ken_D
United States4653 Posts
. I wouldn't mind less graphics or whatever just to view all in 1 long page for smaller thread. I find a lot of posts in a thread to be of insignificance (random babble). | ||
|
[X]Ken_D
United States4653 Posts
On April 28 2010 00:39 Jonoman92 wrote: I don't know if it'd be possible but one feature I'd love to have is something so you can view 10 pages at a time or something in larger threads. Since the all button is gone now. Maybe it let's the user input 2 page numbers a maximum of 10 pages apart and then shows that block? This please. | ||
|
Badjas
Netherlands2038 Posts
Other options for dealing with the performance of viewing all messages in a thread, is dynamically loading content. Somewhat like slashdot's approach. Though this would take quite some time to implement, I imagine. A third idea, for live report threads, it would be great if the OP maintainer would include post links to various points in the thread for each match played. A community provided solution. | ||
|
Zona
40426 Posts
I still hold the opinion that an option for 100 posts per page would be tremendously helpful, since that would cut the pages needed to traverse by 5 times. Plus since "all" is available on threads with 20 or fewer pages (400 or fewer posts) wouldn't 100 posts be fine? | ||
|
citi.zen
2509 Posts
| ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10342 Posts
| ||
|
sword_siege
United States624 Posts
On May 10 2010 02:41 R1CH wrote: The "All" limit has been increased to 50 pages. You da man R1CH. Thank you :-) We owe you a | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
Kung Fu Cup
RotterdaM Event
Replay Cast
The PondCast
IntoTheTV X SOOP
CranKy Ducklings
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
Mixu vs TBD
Spirit vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
Afreeca Starleague
Soma vs Shuttle
BeSt vs Rush
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
